Improving Evidence-Based Practice in Forensic Medicine: Validation of INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements and Principles of Evidence-Based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version in Indonesia

Introduction: Expert opinions presented in legal proceedings should be scientifically accountable, which is known as evidence-based practice (EBP). Although forensic medical expert opinions are essential in legal proceedings, the methods used to formulate them are not always evidence based or based...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forensic science and medicine 2023-07, Vol.9 (3), p.236-249
Hauptverfasser: Meilia, Putri Ika, Herkutanto, Purwadianto, Agus, Sampurna, Budi, Abdullah, Murdani, Soemantri, Diantha, Kekalih, Aria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 3
container_start_page 236
container_title Journal of forensic science and medicine
container_volume 9
creator Meilia, Putri Ika
Herkutanto
Purwadianto, Agus
Sampurna, Budi
Abdullah, Murdani
Soemantri, Diantha
Kekalih, Aria
description Introduction: Expert opinions presented in legal proceedings should be scientifically accountable, which is known as evidence-based practice (EBP). Although forensic medical expert opinions are essential in legal proceedings, the methods used to formulate them are not always evidence based or based on standard methods. In forensic medicine, EBP has not been explicitly applied, including in Indonesia. One potential approach to formulate evidence-based expert opinions is called INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements (INFERENCE). In addition, there is also no universal guideline for making forensic pathological reports. One prospective guideline is named the Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version (PERFORM-P). Methods: This article describes the validation process of INFERENCE and PERFORM-P in Indonesia. This study uses a mixed method through three interrelated phases, i.e., (1) a cross-sectional survey to determine the characteristics of Indonesian forensic doctors and their current practice, (2) the adaptation and validation process of the two tools through a review by the Indonesian College of Forensic Medicine, and (3) a one-group pre–postintervention study to assess the validity and reliability of forensic medical expert opinions formulated using Indonesian-INFERENCE (i-INFERENCE) and reported using Indonesian-PERFORM-P (i-PERFORM-P). Results and Discussion: In general, both tools received a positive reception and can potentially be used in the Indonesian setting with some additions/clarifications in the user manuals. Participants envision that both tools will be most useful in complex cases. Conclusions: By obtaining the i-INFERENCE and the i-PERFORM-P, it is hoped that Indonesian forensic medical doctors are better equipped in analyzing and reporting complex cases, and the implementation of EBP can be improved.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_47_22
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3144086392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A768219120</galeid><sourcerecordid>A768219120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2662-689e9a3c5509b2862029d2a71079bf3f4f56a3af6dca3af3aa095f6d84f0edc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1rGzEQhpfSQkOac6-CnnpYR1_7od5S47SGNDFu6FUo2tFGZldyJdk0v72XauOS4FKCQKMRzzszzExRvCd4xglm5xsTx9l0Sd5ISl8VJ5RXVYmx4K_zm3FRVpjwt8VZjBuMMWlbLFhzUvxejtvg99b1aLG3HTgN5WcVoUOroHSyGpB16NIHcNFq9A06q62DT-iHGmynkvUOeYOW1wn68OQ-8YttjjlaP_j-ASnXoXQPaG17H_wu5oxq2E2i60k0V7t4iLAYYASX4qNiFazTdjtAnKB_ilzD1oc0VT9VebM-rrJcqXR_yL2HEKfQGVu6zjuIVr0r3hg1RDj7a0-L28vF7fxreXXzZTm_uCo1rWta1q0AoZiuKizuaFtTTEVHVUNwI-4MM9xUtWLK1J2eDFMKiyp7LTcYOs1Oiw-HsLnRP3cQk9z4XXA5o2SEc9zWTNCXKUI4a0X1IkXbhpOGiZY9U70aQFpnfMrDHG3U8qKpW0oEoThTs_9Q-UwT07lFxub_I8HHI0FmEvxKfZ5blMvv62P2_MDq4GMMYOQ22FGFB0mwnFZWPm7r88qyPyfu4vo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2874173983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Evidence-Based Practice in Forensic Medicine: Validation of INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements and Principles of Evidence-Based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version in Indonesia</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Meilia, Putri Ika ; Herkutanto ; Purwadianto, Agus ; Sampurna, Budi ; Abdullah, Murdani ; Soemantri, Diantha ; Kekalih, Aria</creator><creatorcontrib>Meilia, Putri Ika ; Herkutanto ; Purwadianto, Agus ; Sampurna, Budi ; Abdullah, Murdani ; Soemantri, Diantha ; Kekalih, Aria</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Expert opinions presented in legal proceedings should be scientifically accountable, which is known as evidence-based practice (EBP). Although forensic medical expert opinions are essential in legal proceedings, the methods used to formulate them are not always evidence based or based on standard methods. In forensic medicine, EBP has not been explicitly applied, including in Indonesia. One potential approach to formulate evidence-based expert opinions is called INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements (INFERENCE). In addition, there is also no universal guideline for making forensic pathological reports. One prospective guideline is named the Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version (PERFORM-P). Methods: This article describes the validation process of INFERENCE and PERFORM-P in Indonesia. This study uses a mixed method through three interrelated phases, i.e., (1) a cross-sectional survey to determine the characteristics of Indonesian forensic doctors and their current practice, (2) the adaptation and validation process of the two tools through a review by the Indonesian College of Forensic Medicine, and (3) a one-group pre–postintervention study to assess the validity and reliability of forensic medical expert opinions formulated using Indonesian-INFERENCE (i-INFERENCE) and reported using Indonesian-PERFORM-P (i-PERFORM-P). Results and Discussion: In general, both tools received a positive reception and can potentially be used in the Indonesian setting with some additions/clarifications in the user manuals. Participants envision that both tools will be most useful in complex cases. Conclusions: By obtaining the i-INFERENCE and the i-PERFORM-P, it is hoped that Indonesian forensic medical doctors are better equipped in analyzing and reporting complex cases, and the implementation of EBP can be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2349-5014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2455-0094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_47_22</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Epidemiology ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-based practice ; Forensic medicine ; Pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic science and medicine, 2023-07, Vol.9 (3), p.236-249</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2662-689e9a3c5509b2862029d2a71079bf3f4f56a3af6dca3af3aa095f6d84f0edc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meilia, Putri Ika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herkutanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purwadianto, Agus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampurna, Budi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Murdani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soemantri, Diantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kekalih, Aria</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Evidence-Based Practice in Forensic Medicine: Validation of INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements and Principles of Evidence-Based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version in Indonesia</title><title>Journal of forensic science and medicine</title><description>Introduction: Expert opinions presented in legal proceedings should be scientifically accountable, which is known as evidence-based practice (EBP). Although forensic medical expert opinions are essential in legal proceedings, the methods used to formulate them are not always evidence based or based on standard methods. In forensic medicine, EBP has not been explicitly applied, including in Indonesia. One potential approach to formulate evidence-based expert opinions is called INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements (INFERENCE). In addition, there is also no universal guideline for making forensic pathological reports. One prospective guideline is named the Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version (PERFORM-P). Methods: This article describes the validation process of INFERENCE and PERFORM-P in Indonesia. This study uses a mixed method through three interrelated phases, i.e., (1) a cross-sectional survey to determine the characteristics of Indonesian forensic doctors and their current practice, (2) the adaptation and validation process of the two tools through a review by the Indonesian College of Forensic Medicine, and (3) a one-group pre–postintervention study to assess the validity and reliability of forensic medical expert opinions formulated using Indonesian-INFERENCE (i-INFERENCE) and reported using Indonesian-PERFORM-P (i-PERFORM-P). Results and Discussion: In general, both tools received a positive reception and can potentially be used in the Indonesian setting with some additions/clarifications in the user manuals. Participants envision that both tools will be most useful in complex cases. Conclusions: By obtaining the i-INFERENCE and the i-PERFORM-P, it is hoped that Indonesian forensic medical doctors are better equipped in analyzing and reporting complex cases, and the implementation of EBP can be improved.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Forensic medicine</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><issn>2349-5014</issn><issn>2455-0094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1rGzEQhpfSQkOac6-CnnpYR1_7od5S47SGNDFu6FUo2tFGZldyJdk0v72XauOS4FKCQKMRzzszzExRvCd4xglm5xsTx9l0Sd5ISl8VJ5RXVYmx4K_zm3FRVpjwt8VZjBuMMWlbLFhzUvxejtvg99b1aLG3HTgN5WcVoUOroHSyGpB16NIHcNFq9A06q62DT-iHGmynkvUOeYOW1wn68OQ-8YttjjlaP_j-ASnXoXQPaG17H_wu5oxq2E2i60k0V7t4iLAYYASX4qNiFazTdjtAnKB_ilzD1oc0VT9VebM-rrJcqXR_yL2HEKfQGVu6zjuIVr0r3hg1RDj7a0-L28vF7fxreXXzZTm_uCo1rWta1q0AoZiuKizuaFtTTEVHVUNwI-4MM9xUtWLK1J2eDFMKiyp7LTcYOs1Oiw-HsLnRP3cQk9z4XXA5o2SEc9zWTNCXKUI4a0X1IkXbhpOGiZY9U70aQFpnfMrDHG3U8qKpW0oEoThTs_9Q-UwT07lFxub_I8HHI0FmEvxKfZ5blMvv62P2_MDq4GMMYOQ22FGFB0mwnFZWPm7r88qyPyfu4vo</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Meilia, Putri Ika</creator><creator>Herkutanto</creator><creator>Purwadianto, Agus</creator><creator>Sampurna, Budi</creator><creator>Abdullah, Murdani</creator><creator>Soemantri, Diantha</creator><creator>Kekalih, Aria</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Improving Evidence-Based Practice in Forensic Medicine: Validation of INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements and Principles of Evidence-Based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version in Indonesia</title><author>Meilia, Putri Ika ; Herkutanto ; Purwadianto, Agus ; Sampurna, Budi ; Abdullah, Murdani ; Soemantri, Diantha ; Kekalih, Aria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2662-689e9a3c5509b2862029d2a71079bf3f4f56a3af6dca3af3aa095f6d84f0edc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Forensic medicine</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meilia, Putri Ika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herkutanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purwadianto, Agus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampurna, Budi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Murdani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soemantri, Diantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kekalih, Aria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic science and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meilia, Putri Ika</au><au>Herkutanto</au><au>Purwadianto, Agus</au><au>Sampurna, Budi</au><au>Abdullah, Murdani</au><au>Soemantri, Diantha</au><au>Kekalih, Aria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Evidence-Based Practice in Forensic Medicine: Validation of INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements and Principles of Evidence-Based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version in Indonesia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic science and medicine</jtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>236-249</pages><issn>2349-5014</issn><eissn>2455-0094</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Expert opinions presented in legal proceedings should be scientifically accountable, which is known as evidence-based practice (EBP). Although forensic medical expert opinions are essential in legal proceedings, the methods used to formulate them are not always evidence based or based on standard methods. In forensic medicine, EBP has not been explicitly applied, including in Indonesia. One potential approach to formulate evidence-based expert opinions is called INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements (INFERENCE). In addition, there is also no universal guideline for making forensic pathological reports. One prospective guideline is named the Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version (PERFORM-P). Methods: This article describes the validation process of INFERENCE and PERFORM-P in Indonesia. This study uses a mixed method through three interrelated phases, i.e., (1) a cross-sectional survey to determine the characteristics of Indonesian forensic doctors and their current practice, (2) the adaptation and validation process of the two tools through a review by the Indonesian College of Forensic Medicine, and (3) a one-group pre–postintervention study to assess the validity and reliability of forensic medical expert opinions formulated using Indonesian-INFERENCE (i-INFERENCE) and reported using Indonesian-PERFORM-P (i-PERFORM-P). Results and Discussion: In general, both tools received a positive reception and can potentially be used in the Indonesian setting with some additions/clarifications in the user manuals. Participants envision that both tools will be most useful in complex cases. Conclusions: By obtaining the i-INFERENCE and the i-PERFORM-P, it is hoped that Indonesian forensic medical doctors are better equipped in analyzing and reporting complex cases, and the implementation of EBP can be improved.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_47_22</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2349-5014
ispartof Journal of forensic science and medicine, 2023-07, Vol.9 (3), p.236-249
issn 2349-5014
2455-0094
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3144086392
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Analysis
Epidemiology
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
Forensic medicine
Pathology
title Improving Evidence-Based Practice in Forensic Medicine: Validation of INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements and Principles of Evidence-Based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version in Indonesia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A36%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Evidence-Based%20Practice%20in%20Forensic%20Medicine:%20Validation%20of%20INtegration%20of%20Forensic%20Epidemiology%20and%20the%20Rigorous%20EvaluatioN%20of%20Causation%20Elements%20and%20Principles%20of%20Evidence-Based%20Reporting%20in%20FORensic%20Medicine-Pathology%20version%20in%20Indonesia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20science%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Meilia,%20Putri%20Ika&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=236-249&rft.issn=2349-5014&rft.eissn=2455-0094&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_47_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA768219120%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2874173983&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A768219120&rfr_iscdi=true