Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography
Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta zoologica (Stockholm) 2025-01, Vol.106 (1), p.55-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Acta zoologica (Stockholm) |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Perkas, Olga Pomraenke, Marta Greiser, Julia Porwoll, Veronika Wiegand, Steffen Kuehnel, Christian Winkens, Thomas Freesmeyer, Martin |
description | Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/azo.12495 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3143853963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3143853963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2925-38af8ae1bfc79dc6c205708052176297af06fedc692a7163b93c4e5156e5f7c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhBILC0H3sASF3pIG9ubZMOtaikgVeqhcOESzTqTrCvHE-wkEE59hD4jD9BnYLbbK77Y1vczn-ZLkncyO5V8zuAPnUq1rvIXyUquC50WuspfJqssy2RaqlK9Tt7EeMffTabVKnm8newIW-vsuAhqBfaT-HAZqAc7ReFpBtyRc-AbC3gisOuiaCkI6wXNJGwPnfWdCBgRgtkJiAK8ADdi8DDaGcVIwpCf0Y-WPDiGWeRETw26j-LKhjgK_D1gsOgNMtzwWP_3_sH6GeLegR8YR9vB3mEfctgt0ZKjzhp2wn4blifrBmd0NPQ8SzDTUD9MIzYcoacuAMuOk1ctuIhvn--j5PvVp28XX9Lrm89fL86vU6Mqlad6A-0GUG5bU1aNKYzK8pI3litZFqoqoc2KFhmoFJSy0NtKmzXmMi8wb0tT6KPk_cF3CPRz4vT1HU28ERdrLdd6k-uq0Mw6ObBMoBgDtvUQeDlhqWVW7-usuc76qU7mnh24v6zD5f_E-vzHzUHxD2n-qgk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3143853963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Perkas, Olga ; Pomraenke, Marta ; Greiser, Julia ; Porwoll, Veronika ; Wiegand, Steffen ; Kuehnel, Christian ; Winkens, Thomas ; Freesmeyer, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Perkas, Olga ; Pomraenke, Marta ; Greiser, Julia ; Porwoll, Veronika ; Wiegand, Steffen ; Kuehnel, Christian ; Winkens, Thomas ; Freesmeyer, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-7272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-6395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/azo.12495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>alternative animal testing ; Animal embryos ; Animal models ; artificial incubation ; Bird eggs ; Computed tomography ; Eggs ; embryonal development ; Embryos ; emu eggs ; in ovo imaging ; Incubation ; Medical imaging ; Physiology ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research facilities ; Tomography ; Weight ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2025-01, Vol.106 (1), p.55-64</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2925-38af8ae1bfc79dc6c205708052176297af06fedc692a7163b93c4e5156e5f7c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6462-3851 ; 0009-0002-1496-740X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fazo.12495$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fazo.12495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perkas, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomraenke, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porwoll, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehnel, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freesmeyer, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</title><title>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</title><description>Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs.</description><subject>alternative animal testing</subject><subject>Animal embryos</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>artificial incubation</subject><subject>Bird eggs</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>embryonal development</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>emu eggs</subject><subject>in ovo imaging</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>0001-7272</issn><issn>1463-6395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhBILC0H3sASF3pIG9ubZMOtaikgVeqhcOESzTqTrCvHE-wkEE59hD4jD9BnYLbbK77Y1vczn-ZLkncyO5V8zuAPnUq1rvIXyUquC50WuspfJqssy2RaqlK9Tt7EeMffTabVKnm8newIW-vsuAhqBfaT-HAZqAc7ReFpBtyRc-AbC3gisOuiaCkI6wXNJGwPnfWdCBgRgtkJiAK8ADdi8DDaGcVIwpCf0Y-WPDiGWeRETw26j-LKhjgK_D1gsOgNMtzwWP_3_sH6GeLegR8YR9vB3mEfctgt0ZKjzhp2wn4blifrBmd0NPQ8SzDTUD9MIzYcoacuAMuOk1ctuIhvn--j5PvVp28XX9Lrm89fL86vU6Mqlad6A-0GUG5bU1aNKYzK8pI3litZFqoqoc2KFhmoFJSy0NtKmzXmMi8wb0tT6KPk_cF3CPRz4vT1HU28ERdrLdd6k-uq0Mw6ObBMoBgDtvUQeDlhqWVW7-usuc76qU7mnh24v6zD5f_E-vzHzUHxD2n-qgk</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Perkas, Olga</creator><creator>Pomraenke, Marta</creator><creator>Greiser, Julia</creator><creator>Porwoll, Veronika</creator><creator>Wiegand, Steffen</creator><creator>Kuehnel, Christian</creator><creator>Winkens, Thomas</creator><creator>Freesmeyer, Martin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1496-740X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</title><author>Perkas, Olga ; Pomraenke, Marta ; Greiser, Julia ; Porwoll, Veronika ; Wiegand, Steffen ; Kuehnel, Christian ; Winkens, Thomas ; Freesmeyer, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2925-38af8ae1bfc79dc6c205708052176297af06fedc692a7163b93c4e5156e5f7c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>alternative animal testing</topic><topic>Animal embryos</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>artificial incubation</topic><topic>Bird eggs</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>embryonal development</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>emu eggs</topic><topic>in ovo imaging</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perkas, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomraenke, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porwoll, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehnel, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freesmeyer, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perkas, Olga</au><au>Pomraenke, Marta</au><au>Greiser, Julia</au><au>Porwoll, Veronika</au><au>Wiegand, Steffen</au><au>Kuehnel, Christian</au><au>Winkens, Thomas</au><au>Freesmeyer, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>55-64</pages><issn>0001-7272</issn><eissn>1463-6395</eissn><abstract>Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/azo.12495</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1496-740X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-7272 |
ispartof | Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2025-01, Vol.106 (1), p.55-64 |
issn | 0001-7272 1463-6395 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3143853963 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | alternative animal testing Animal embryos Animal models artificial incubation Bird eggs Computed tomography Eggs embryonal development Embryos emu eggs in ovo imaging Incubation Medical imaging Physiology R&D Research & development Research facilities Tomography Weight Weight loss |
title | Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suitability%20of%20emu%20(Dromaius%20novaehollandiae)%20eggs%20for%20in%20ovo%20imaging%20research%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20conventional%20animal%20model:%20First%20experience%20and%20non%E2%80%90invasive%20investigation%20of%20physiological%20embryonal%20development%20on%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Acta%20zoologica%20(Stockholm)&rft.au=Perkas,%20Olga&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=55-64&rft.issn=0001-7272&rft.eissn=1463-6395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/azo.12495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3143853963%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3143853963&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |