Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography

Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta zoologica (Stockholm) 2025-01, Vol.106 (1), p.55-64
Hauptverfasser: Perkas, Olga, Pomraenke, Marta, Greiser, Julia, Porwoll, Veronika, Wiegand, Steffen, Kuehnel, Christian, Winkens, Thomas, Freesmeyer, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Acta zoologica (Stockholm)
container_volume 106
creator Perkas, Olga
Pomraenke, Marta
Greiser, Julia
Porwoll, Veronika
Wiegand, Steffen
Kuehnel, Christian
Winkens, Thomas
Freesmeyer, Martin
description Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/azo.12495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3143853963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3143853963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2925-38af8ae1bfc79dc6c205708052176297af06fedc692a7163b93c4e5156e5f7c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhBILC0H3sASF3pIG9ubZMOtaikgVeqhcOESzTqTrCvHE-wkEE59hD4jD9BnYLbbK77Y1vczn-ZLkncyO5V8zuAPnUq1rvIXyUquC50WuspfJqssy2RaqlK9Tt7EeMffTabVKnm8newIW-vsuAhqBfaT-HAZqAc7ReFpBtyRc-AbC3gisOuiaCkI6wXNJGwPnfWdCBgRgtkJiAK8ADdi8DDaGcVIwpCf0Y-WPDiGWeRETw26j-LKhjgK_D1gsOgNMtzwWP_3_sH6GeLegR8YR9vB3mEfctgt0ZKjzhp2wn4blifrBmd0NPQ8SzDTUD9MIzYcoacuAMuOk1ctuIhvn--j5PvVp28XX9Lrm89fL86vU6Mqlad6A-0GUG5bU1aNKYzK8pI3litZFqoqoc2KFhmoFJSy0NtKmzXmMi8wb0tT6KPk_cF3CPRz4vT1HU28ERdrLdd6k-uq0Mw6ObBMoBgDtvUQeDlhqWVW7-usuc76qU7mnh24v6zD5f_E-vzHzUHxD2n-qgk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3143853963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Perkas, Olga ; Pomraenke, Marta ; Greiser, Julia ; Porwoll, Veronika ; Wiegand, Steffen ; Kuehnel, Christian ; Winkens, Thomas ; Freesmeyer, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Perkas, Olga ; Pomraenke, Marta ; Greiser, Julia ; Porwoll, Veronika ; Wiegand, Steffen ; Kuehnel, Christian ; Winkens, Thomas ; Freesmeyer, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-7272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-6395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/azo.12495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>alternative animal testing ; Animal embryos ; Animal models ; artificial incubation ; Bird eggs ; Computed tomography ; Eggs ; embryonal development ; Embryos ; emu eggs ; in ovo imaging ; Incubation ; Medical imaging ; Physiology ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research facilities ; Tomography ; Weight ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2025-01, Vol.106 (1), p.55-64</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2925-38af8ae1bfc79dc6c205708052176297af06fedc692a7163b93c4e5156e5f7c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6462-3851 ; 0009-0002-1496-740X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fazo.12495$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fazo.12495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perkas, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomraenke, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porwoll, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehnel, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freesmeyer, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</title><title>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</title><description>Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs.</description><subject>alternative animal testing</subject><subject>Animal embryos</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>artificial incubation</subject><subject>Bird eggs</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>embryonal development</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>emu eggs</subject><subject>in ovo imaging</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>0001-7272</issn><issn>1463-6395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhBILC0H3sASF3pIG9ubZMOtaikgVeqhcOESzTqTrCvHE-wkEE59hD4jD9BnYLbbK77Y1vczn-ZLkncyO5V8zuAPnUq1rvIXyUquC50WuspfJqssy2RaqlK9Tt7EeMffTabVKnm8newIW-vsuAhqBfaT-HAZqAc7ReFpBtyRc-AbC3gisOuiaCkI6wXNJGwPnfWdCBgRgtkJiAK8ADdi8DDaGcVIwpCf0Y-WPDiGWeRETw26j-LKhjgK_D1gsOgNMtzwWP_3_sH6GeLegR8YR9vB3mEfctgt0ZKjzhp2wn4blifrBmd0NPQ8SzDTUD9MIzYcoacuAMuOk1ctuIhvn--j5PvVp28XX9Lrm89fL86vU6Mqlad6A-0GUG5bU1aNKYzK8pI3litZFqoqoc2KFhmoFJSy0NtKmzXmMi8wb0tT6KPk_cF3CPRz4vT1HU28ERdrLdd6k-uq0Mw6ObBMoBgDtvUQeDlhqWVW7-usuc76qU7mnh24v6zD5f_E-vzHzUHxD2n-qgk</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Perkas, Olga</creator><creator>Pomraenke, Marta</creator><creator>Greiser, Julia</creator><creator>Porwoll, Veronika</creator><creator>Wiegand, Steffen</creator><creator>Kuehnel, Christian</creator><creator>Winkens, Thomas</creator><creator>Freesmeyer, Martin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1496-740X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</title><author>Perkas, Olga ; Pomraenke, Marta ; Greiser, Julia ; Porwoll, Veronika ; Wiegand, Steffen ; Kuehnel, Christian ; Winkens, Thomas ; Freesmeyer, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2925-38af8ae1bfc79dc6c205708052176297af06fedc692a7163b93c4e5156e5f7c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>alternative animal testing</topic><topic>Animal embryos</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>artificial incubation</topic><topic>Bird eggs</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>embryonal development</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>emu eggs</topic><topic>in ovo imaging</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perkas, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomraenke, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porwoll, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehnel, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freesmeyer, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perkas, Olga</au><au>Pomraenke, Marta</au><au>Greiser, Julia</au><au>Porwoll, Veronika</au><au>Wiegand, Steffen</au><au>Kuehnel, Christian</au><au>Winkens, Thomas</au><au>Freesmeyer, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Acta zoologica (Stockholm)</jtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>55-64</pages><issn>0001-7272</issn><eissn>1463-6395</eissn><abstract>Fertilized bird eggs are an alternative model to conventional animal testing. In recent studies, a preclinical imaging model based on large ostrich eggs was introduced in a clinical research centre using imaging systems designed for humans, thus bypassing the need for dedicated small animal imaging systems. Ostrich eggs are only laid during the season with increased daylength, which limits its year‐round availability. The current study focuses on large emu eggs instead of ostrich eggs and aims at investigating its suitability for preclinical imaging research. Physiological development of emu embryos was observed by serial weightings and serial CT scans until developmental day (DD) 46. Differences between fertilized a non‐fertilized eggs were analysed. In fertilized eggs, the embryo was identified on CT scans as early as DD 13. As expected, CT scans showed continuous embryonal development and growth over time, comparable to ostriches. Neither the eggs' volume and weight nor the weight loss nor the radiodensity provided significant differences between fertilized and non‐fertilized eggs. Despite inferior incubation success in emus compared to ostriches, suitability of emu eggs for artificial incubation and subsequent research was confirmed. Hence, emu eggs represent an alternative model for preclinical imaging and allow a year‐round use for research purposes if combined with ostrich eggs.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/azo.12495</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-3851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1496-740X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-7272
ispartof Acta zoologica (Stockholm), 2025-01, Vol.106 (1), p.55-64
issn 0001-7272
1463-6395
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3143853963
source Wiley Journals
subjects alternative animal testing
Animal embryos
Animal models
artificial incubation
Bird eggs
Computed tomography
Eggs
embryonal development
Embryos
emu eggs
in ovo imaging
Incubation
Medical imaging
Physiology
R&D
Research & development
Research facilities
Tomography
Weight
Weight loss
title Suitability of emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) eggs for in ovo imaging research as an alternative to conventional animal model: First experience and non‐invasive investigation of physiological embryonal development on computed tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suitability%20of%20emu%20(Dromaius%20novaehollandiae)%20eggs%20for%20in%20ovo%20imaging%20research%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20conventional%20animal%20model:%20First%20experience%20and%20non%E2%80%90invasive%20investigation%20of%20physiological%20embryonal%20development%20on%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Acta%20zoologica%20(Stockholm)&rft.au=Perkas,%20Olga&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=55-64&rft.issn=0001-7272&rft.eissn=1463-6395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/azo.12495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3143853963%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3143853963&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true