Effects of coworker's idiosyncratic deals on witness's creative process engagement: roles of responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership
Emerging research in the idiosyncratic deals literature is to examine its negative effects. Thus far, much remains unknown about how and when idiosyncratic deals are associated with employee creative process engagement. Invoking fairness heuristic theory and trait activation theory, we propose and t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management & organization 2024-07, Vol.30 (4), p.1001-1021 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1021 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1001 |
| container_title | Journal of management & organization |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Huang, Jie Tang, Chunyong |
| description | Emerging research in the idiosyncratic deals literature is to examine its negative effects. Thus far, much remains unknown about how and when idiosyncratic deals are associated with employee creative process engagement. Invoking fairness heuristic theory and trait activation theory, we propose and test a model that coworker's idiosyncratic deals have a negative association with witness's creative process engagement through psychological contract violation. Furthermore, we theorize and test the combination of the responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership as important boundary conditions, associate interact with coworker's idiosyncratic deals to strengthen the positive impact on psychological contract violation, thereby reducing witness's creative process engagement. We use two time-lagged studies to provide support for these mediation and moderation effects, and also discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/jmo.2021.21 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3142760441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_jmo_2021_21</cupid><sourcerecordid>3142760441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-cbeadff9a5eb105e321dfe0fe79ea32754dba797875f7bec47ab7c3ad876882e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkLtOwzAUhiMEEqUw8QKWGBhQii9JnLAhVC5SJRaYI8c-Tl1SO9gppe_Cw-JeJBamYx1__n75T5JLgicEE367WLoJxZRMKDlKRqRkVcpyyo93Z5aygtPT5CyEBcYF5QUdJT9TrUEOATmNpFs7_wH-OiCjjAsbK70YjEQKRBcJi9ZmsBBCBKSHePUFqPdOxhUC24oWlmCHO-RdBzujh9A7G0xjOjNskHYeybmwLSBhFerBS4gOheC775wZ9sYOhAIf5qY_T050TIaLwxwn74_Tt4fndPb69PJwP0slraohlU18oXUlcmgIzoFRojRgDbwCwSjPM9UIXvGS55o3IDMuGi6ZUCUvypICGydXe2_8zOcKwlAv3MrbGFkzksWicJaRSN3sKeldCB503XuzFH5TE1xv669j_fW2_ppu6fRAi2XjjWrhT_of_wtIl4zD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142760441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of coworker's idiosyncratic deals on witness's creative process engagement: roles of responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Huang, Jie ; Tang, Chunyong</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jie ; Tang, Chunyong</creatorcontrib><description>Emerging research in the idiosyncratic deals literature is to examine its negative effects. Thus far, much remains unknown about how and when idiosyncratic deals are associated with employee creative process engagement. Invoking fairness heuristic theory and trait activation theory, we propose and test a model that coworker's idiosyncratic deals have a negative association with witness's creative process engagement through psychological contract violation. Furthermore, we theorize and test the combination of the responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership as important boundary conditions, associate interact with coworker's idiosyncratic deals to strengthen the positive impact on psychological contract violation, thereby reducing witness's creative process engagement. We use two time-lagged studies to provide support for these mediation and moderation effects, and also discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1833-3672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-3527</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2021.21</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Coronaviruses ; Creative process ; Creativity ; Employees ; Heuristic ; Job performance ; Leadership</subject><ispartof>Journal of management & organization, 2024-07, Vol.30 (4), p.1001-1021</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-cbeadff9a5eb105e321dfe0fe79ea32754dba797875f7bec47ab7c3ad876882e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-cbeadff9a5eb105e321dfe0fe79ea32754dba797875f7bec47ab7c3ad876882e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1908-6129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000213/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chunyong</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of coworker's idiosyncratic deals on witness's creative process engagement: roles of responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership</title><title>Journal of management & organization</title><addtitle>Journal of Management & Organization</addtitle><description>Emerging research in the idiosyncratic deals literature is to examine its negative effects. Thus far, much remains unknown about how and when idiosyncratic deals are associated with employee creative process engagement. Invoking fairness heuristic theory and trait activation theory, we propose and test a model that coworker's idiosyncratic deals have a negative association with witness's creative process engagement through psychological contract violation. Furthermore, we theorize and test the combination of the responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership as important boundary conditions, associate interact with coworker's idiosyncratic deals to strengthen the positive impact on psychological contract violation, thereby reducing witness's creative process engagement. We use two time-lagged studies to provide support for these mediation and moderation effects, and also discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</description><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Creative process</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><issn>1833-3672</issn><issn>1839-3527</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkLtOwzAUhiMEEqUw8QKWGBhQii9JnLAhVC5SJRaYI8c-Tl1SO9gppe_Cw-JeJBamYx1__n75T5JLgicEE367WLoJxZRMKDlKRqRkVcpyyo93Z5aygtPT5CyEBcYF5QUdJT9TrUEOATmNpFs7_wH-OiCjjAsbK70YjEQKRBcJi9ZmsBBCBKSHePUFqPdOxhUC24oWlmCHO-RdBzujh9A7G0xjOjNskHYeybmwLSBhFerBS4gOheC775wZ9sYOhAIf5qY_T050TIaLwxwn74_Tt4fndPb69PJwP0slraohlU18oXUlcmgIzoFRojRgDbwCwSjPM9UIXvGS55o3IDMuGi6ZUCUvypICGydXe2_8zOcKwlAv3MrbGFkzksWicJaRSN3sKeldCB503XuzFH5TE1xv669j_fW2_ppu6fRAi2XjjWrhT_of_wtIl4zD</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Huang, Jie</creator><creator>Tang, Chunyong</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-6129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Effects of coworker's idiosyncratic deals on witness's creative process engagement: roles of responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership</title><author>Huang, Jie ; Tang, Chunyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-cbeadff9a5eb105e321dfe0fe79ea32754dba797875f7bec47ab7c3ad876882e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Creative process</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chunyong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of management & organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Jie</au><au>Tang, Chunyong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of coworker's idiosyncratic deals on witness's creative process engagement: roles of responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management & organization</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Management & Organization</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1001</spage><epage>1021</epage><pages>1001-1021</pages><issn>1833-3672</issn><eissn>1839-3527</eissn><abstract>Emerging research in the idiosyncratic deals literature is to examine its negative effects. Thus far, much remains unknown about how and when idiosyncratic deals are associated with employee creative process engagement. Invoking fairness heuristic theory and trait activation theory, we propose and test a model that coworker's idiosyncratic deals have a negative association with witness's creative process engagement through psychological contract violation. Furthermore, we theorize and test the combination of the responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership as important boundary conditions, associate interact with coworker's idiosyncratic deals to strengthen the positive impact on psychological contract violation, thereby reducing witness's creative process engagement. We use two time-lagged studies to provide support for these mediation and moderation effects, and also discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/jmo.2021.21</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-6129</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1833-3672 |
| ispartof | Journal of management & organization, 2024-07, Vol.30 (4), p.1001-1021 |
| issn | 1833-3672 1839-3527 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3142760441 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Online |
| subjects | Coronaviruses Creative process Creativity Employees Heuristic Job performance Leadership |
| title | Effects of coworker's idiosyncratic deals on witness's creative process engagement: roles of responsibility for change and perceived exploitative leadership |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A33%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20coworker's%20idiosyncratic%20deals%20on%20witness's%20creative%20process%20engagement:%20roles%20of%20responsibility%20for%20change%20and%20perceived%20exploitative%20leadership&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20&%20organization&rft.au=Huang,%20Jie&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1001&rft.epage=1021&rft.pages=1001-1021&rft.issn=1833-3672&rft.eissn=1839-3527&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jmo.2021.21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3142760441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142760441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_jmo_2021_21&rfr_iscdi=true |