Dear England: A critical discourse analysis of how sports stars and politicians battle for legitimacy in debates around athlete activism

This article looks at how high-profile individual and collective actors within the worlds of sport and politics seek to advance their views on significant social issues. It focuses on the public debate around the anti-racist actions taken by the England men's football team at Euro 2020 and uses...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International review for the sociology of sport 2024-12, Vol.59 (8), p.1266-1286
Hauptverfasser: McGlynn, Kathryn, Tacon, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1286
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1266
container_title International review for the sociology of sport
container_volume 59
creator McGlynn, Kathryn
Tacon, Richard
description This article looks at how high-profile individual and collective actors within the worlds of sport and politics seek to advance their views on significant social issues. It focuses on the public debate around the anti-racist actions taken by the England men's football team at Euro 2020 and uses a form of critical discourse analysis to look at how the England manager and players, on one side, and members of the UK Government, on the other, sought to gain and maintain legitimacy for their opposing positions. It also seeks to understand legitimacy as a relational process, by looking at how members of the public and national newspapers responded. Drawing on Strittmatter et al.'s framework of legitimacy, the article examines the subjects, sources, strategies, bases and scenarios of each side's efforts. The article seeks to contribute to a more detailed understanding of political discourse and legitimacy in the context of sport, as well as offering some critical reflections on the nexus of sport and politics.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10126902241259097
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3138952431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10126902241259097</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3138952431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-8dcf2629f99166ba1ef47667823651e1f7cfb2e65831ca75be9e23f8c39058fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUMtKAzEUDaJgrX6Au4Dr0dxkJpm4K7U-oOBG10Mmk7Qp6WScpEr_wM82pYILV-dyzwPOQegayC2AEHdAgHJJKC2BVpJIcYImUHIoBIX6NN-ZLw6Cc3QR44YQQnkJE_T9YNSIF_3Kq767xzOsR5ecVh53LuqwG6PBqld-H13EweJ1-MJxCGOKOCY1xkx2eAj-YHKqj7hVKXmDbRixN6v83iq9x67HncmUyYYx7LJHpbU3KYfr5D5d3F6iM6t8NFe_OEXvj4u3-XOxfH16mc-WxQCySkXdaUs5lVZK4LxVYGwpOBc1ZbwCA1Zo21LDq5qBVqJqjTSU2VozSaraajZFN8fcYQwfOxNTs8ktc8PYMGC1rGiZcYpuj6qoVuZPAaQ5rN38W5v9ALFPc18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3138952431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dear England: A critical discourse analysis of how sports stars and politicians battle for legitimacy in debates around athlete activism</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>McGlynn, Kathryn ; Tacon, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Kathryn ; Tacon, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>This article looks at how high-profile individual and collective actors within the worlds of sport and politics seek to advance their views on significant social issues. It focuses on the public debate around the anti-racist actions taken by the England men's football team at Euro 2020 and uses a form of critical discourse analysis to look at how the England manager and players, on one side, and members of the UK Government, on the other, sought to gain and maintain legitimacy for their opposing positions. It also seeks to understand legitimacy as a relational process, by looking at how members of the public and national newspapers responded. Drawing on Strittmatter et al.'s framework of legitimacy, the article examines the subjects, sources, strategies, bases and scenarios of each side's efforts. The article seeks to contribute to a more detailed understanding of political discourse and legitimacy in the context of sport, as well as offering some critical reflections on the nexus of sport and politics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1012-6902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10126902241259097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Activism ; Critical theory ; Debates ; Discourse analysis ; Legitimacy ; Politics ; Racism ; Sports</subject><ispartof>International review for the sociology of sport, 2024-12, Vol.59 (8), p.1266-1286</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3680-8944</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10126902241259097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10126902241259097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tacon, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Dear England: A critical discourse analysis of how sports stars and politicians battle for legitimacy in debates around athlete activism</title><title>International review for the sociology of sport</title><description>This article looks at how high-profile individual and collective actors within the worlds of sport and politics seek to advance their views on significant social issues. It focuses on the public debate around the anti-racist actions taken by the England men's football team at Euro 2020 and uses a form of critical discourse analysis to look at how the England manager and players, on one side, and members of the UK Government, on the other, sought to gain and maintain legitimacy for their opposing positions. It also seeks to understand legitimacy as a relational process, by looking at how members of the public and national newspapers responded. Drawing on Strittmatter et al.'s framework of legitimacy, the article examines the subjects, sources, strategies, bases and scenarios of each side's efforts. The article seeks to contribute to a more detailed understanding of political discourse and legitimacy in the context of sport, as well as offering some critical reflections on the nexus of sport and politics.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Sports</subject><issn>1012-6902</issn><issn>1461-7218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNplUMtKAzEUDaJgrX6Au4Dr0dxkJpm4K7U-oOBG10Mmk7Qp6WScpEr_wM82pYILV-dyzwPOQegayC2AEHdAgHJJKC2BVpJIcYImUHIoBIX6NN-ZLw6Cc3QR44YQQnkJE_T9YNSIF_3Kq767xzOsR5ecVh53LuqwG6PBqld-H13EweJ1-MJxCGOKOCY1xkx2eAj-YHKqj7hVKXmDbRixN6v83iq9x67HncmUyYYx7LJHpbU3KYfr5D5d3F6iM6t8NFe_OEXvj4u3-XOxfH16mc-WxQCySkXdaUs5lVZK4LxVYGwpOBc1ZbwCA1Zo21LDq5qBVqJqjTSU2VozSaraajZFN8fcYQwfOxNTs8ktc8PYMGC1rGiZcYpuj6qoVuZPAaQ5rN38W5v9ALFPc18</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>McGlynn, Kathryn</creator><creator>Tacon, Richard</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-8944</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Dear England: A critical discourse analysis of how sports stars and politicians battle for legitimacy in debates around athlete activism</title><author>McGlynn, Kathryn ; Tacon, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-8dcf2629f99166ba1ef47667823651e1f7cfb2e65831ca75be9e23f8c39058fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tacon, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International review for the sociology of sport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGlynn, Kathryn</au><au>Tacon, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dear England: A critical discourse analysis of how sports stars and politicians battle for legitimacy in debates around athlete activism</atitle><jtitle>International review for the sociology of sport</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1266</spage><epage>1286</epage><pages>1266-1286</pages><issn>1012-6902</issn><eissn>1461-7218</eissn><abstract>This article looks at how high-profile individual and collective actors within the worlds of sport and politics seek to advance their views on significant social issues. It focuses on the public debate around the anti-racist actions taken by the England men's football team at Euro 2020 and uses a form of critical discourse analysis to look at how the England manager and players, on one side, and members of the UK Government, on the other, sought to gain and maintain legitimacy for their opposing positions. It also seeks to understand legitimacy as a relational process, by looking at how members of the public and national newspapers responded. Drawing on Strittmatter et al.'s framework of legitimacy, the article examines the subjects, sources, strategies, bases and scenarios of each side's efforts. The article seeks to contribute to a more detailed understanding of political discourse and legitimacy in the context of sport, as well as offering some critical reflections on the nexus of sport and politics.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10126902241259097</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-8944</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1012-6902
ispartof International review for the sociology of sport, 2024-12, Vol.59 (8), p.1266-1286
issn 1012-6902
1461-7218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3138952431
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Activism
Critical theory
Debates
Discourse analysis
Legitimacy
Politics
Racism
Sports
title Dear England: A critical discourse analysis of how sports stars and politicians battle for legitimacy in debates around athlete activism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dear%20England:%20A%20critical%20discourse%20analysis%20of%20how%20sports%20stars%20and%20politicians%20battle%20for%20legitimacy%20in%20debates%20around%20athlete%20activism&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20for%20the%20sociology%20of%20sport&rft.au=McGlynn,%20Kathryn&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1266&rft.epage=1286&rft.pages=1266-1286&rft.issn=1012-6902&rft.eissn=1461-7218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10126902241259097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E3138952431%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3138952431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10126902241259097&rfr_iscdi=true