Experimental and analytical study on the reinforcement mechanism of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction in loose sandy soil

Considering that conventional dynamic compaction (CDC) method has limitation in the effectiveness of improvement depth because the improved shallow soil layers prevent the impact energy further transmitted to the deep ground, a new technique of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction (IDDC) is proposed in w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta geotechnica 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.7989-8006
Hauptverfasser: Li, Ping, Sun, Xinfei, Yu, Jun, Kong, Gangqiang, Chen, Junjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8006
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7989
container_title Acta geotechnica
container_volume 19
creator Li, Ping
Sun, Xinfei
Yu, Jun
Kong, Gangqiang
Chen, Junjun
description Considering that conventional dynamic compaction (CDC) method has limitation in the effectiveness of improvement depth because the improved shallow soil layers prevent the impact energy further transmitted to the deep ground, a new technique of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction (IDDC) is proposed in which the tamper can compact soil from the deep to the shallow soil layers. In this paper, the main objective is to illustrate the work mechanism of IDDC. Firstly, main components of equipment and construction process of IDDC are introduced. Then, model tests of CDC and IDDC were conducted on loose sand to obtain the influence depth using the acceleration of soil particles during impact and the distribution of cone resistance and side friction through static cone penetration tests (CPTs) after impact. Finally, the analytical formulae of superimposed stress and settlement due to IDDC was derived based on the Mindlin’s solution and equation of motion, and verified with model test results and a practical case. The results indicate that with the falling height of 1 m in model tests, the further impacts after the 6th impact of CDC could hardly improve ground, resulting in the improvement depth of around 45 cm, whereas the improvement depth of IDDC was over 80 cm. Moreover, at the falling height of 1 m, the average increment in cone resistance after IDDC is 82% greater than that after CDC. Finally, compared with experimental results, the errors of the predicted settlement and the superimposed stress are less than 26 and 14%, respectively, and the proposed formulae succeed to predict the improvement depth of IDDC applied in a coastal area of China.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11440-024-02340-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3134182224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3134182224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-68299ea6acacbd3d14ab2b732835f4d04c19206d49f4327b044270f8b6da7fe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA82q-uh9HKfUDCl70HLLJxKbsJmuype6_N7WiNw_DzMD7TMiD0DUlt5SQ6i5RKgQpCBO5eJ72J2hG65IWlHJ--juzxTm6SGlLSMmZKGdov_ocILoe_Kg6rLzJpbppdDqvadyZCQePxw3gCM7bEDUcsrgHvVHepR4Hi50vBjcANgADNpNXvdNYh35QenQZdx53ISTAKT8w4RRcd4nOrOoSXP30OXp7WL0un4r1y-Pz8n5daFaRsShr1jSgSqWVbg03VKiWtRVnNV9YYYjQtGGkNKKxgrOqJUJkztZtaVRlYcHn6OZ4d4jhYwdplNuwi_mLSXLKBa0ZYyKn2DGlY0gpgpVDdqLiJCmRB8HyKFhmwfJbsNxniB-hlMP-HeLf6X-oL5nzgFI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3134182224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental and analytical study on the reinforcement mechanism of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction in loose sandy soil</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Li, Ping ; Sun, Xinfei ; Yu, Jun ; Kong, Gangqiang ; Chen, Junjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Ping ; Sun, Xinfei ; Yu, Jun ; Kong, Gangqiang ; Chen, Junjun</creatorcontrib><description>Considering that conventional dynamic compaction (CDC) method has limitation in the effectiveness of improvement depth because the improved shallow soil layers prevent the impact energy further transmitted to the deep ground, a new technique of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction (IDDC) is proposed in which the tamper can compact soil from the deep to the shallow soil layers. In this paper, the main objective is to illustrate the work mechanism of IDDC. Firstly, main components of equipment and construction process of IDDC are introduced. Then, model tests of CDC and IDDC were conducted on loose sand to obtain the influence depth using the acceleration of soil particles during impact and the distribution of cone resistance and side friction through static cone penetration tests (CPTs) after impact. Finally, the analytical formulae of superimposed stress and settlement due to IDDC was derived based on the Mindlin’s solution and equation of motion, and verified with model test results and a practical case. The results indicate that with the falling height of 1 m in model tests, the further impacts after the 6th impact of CDC could hardly improve ground, resulting in the improvement depth of around 45 cm, whereas the improvement depth of IDDC was over 80 cm. Moreover, at the falling height of 1 m, the average increment in cone resistance after IDDC is 82% greater than that after CDC. Finally, compared with experimental results, the errors of the predicted settlement and the superimposed stress are less than 26 and 14%, respectively, and the proposed formulae succeed to predict the improvement depth of IDDC applied in a coastal area of China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1861-1125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1861-1133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11440-024-02340-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Coastal zone ; Compaction ; Complex Fluids and Microfluidics ; Concrete ; Cone penetration tests ; Depth ; Energy ; Engineering ; Equations of motion ; Falling ; Formulae ; Foundations ; Friction resistance ; Geoengineering ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Height ; Hydraulics ; Impact resistance ; Medical laboratories ; Mindlin plates ; Penetration resistance ; Pipes ; Research Paper ; Sandy soils ; Soft and Granular Matter ; Soil ; Soil analysis ; Soil compaction ; Soil improvement ; Soil layers ; Soil resistance ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Solid Mechanics</subject><ispartof>Acta geotechnica, 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.7989-8006</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-68299ea6acacbd3d14ab2b732835f4d04c19206d49f4327b044270f8b6da7fe53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3953-2229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11440-024-02340-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11440-024-02340-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Xinfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Gangqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junjun</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental and analytical study on the reinforcement mechanism of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction in loose sandy soil</title><title>Acta geotechnica</title><addtitle>Acta Geotech</addtitle><description>Considering that conventional dynamic compaction (CDC) method has limitation in the effectiveness of improvement depth because the improved shallow soil layers prevent the impact energy further transmitted to the deep ground, a new technique of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction (IDDC) is proposed in which the tamper can compact soil from the deep to the shallow soil layers. In this paper, the main objective is to illustrate the work mechanism of IDDC. Firstly, main components of equipment and construction process of IDDC are introduced. Then, model tests of CDC and IDDC were conducted on loose sand to obtain the influence depth using the acceleration of soil particles during impact and the distribution of cone resistance and side friction through static cone penetration tests (CPTs) after impact. Finally, the analytical formulae of superimposed stress and settlement due to IDDC was derived based on the Mindlin’s solution and equation of motion, and verified with model test results and a practical case. The results indicate that with the falling height of 1 m in model tests, the further impacts after the 6th impact of CDC could hardly improve ground, resulting in the improvement depth of around 45 cm, whereas the improvement depth of IDDC was over 80 cm. Moreover, at the falling height of 1 m, the average increment in cone resistance after IDDC is 82% greater than that after CDC. Finally, compared with experimental results, the errors of the predicted settlement and the superimposed stress are less than 26 and 14%, respectively, and the proposed formulae succeed to predict the improvement depth of IDDC applied in a coastal area of China.</description><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Compaction</subject><subject>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Cone penetration tests</subject><subject>Depth</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Equations of motion</subject><subject>Falling</subject><subject>Formulae</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Friction resistance</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Impact resistance</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Mindlin plates</subject><subject>Penetration resistance</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>Soft and Granular Matter</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil resistance</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><issn>1861-1125</issn><issn>1861-1133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA82q-uh9HKfUDCl70HLLJxKbsJmuype6_N7WiNw_DzMD7TMiD0DUlt5SQ6i5RKgQpCBO5eJ72J2hG65IWlHJ--juzxTm6SGlLSMmZKGdov_ocILoe_Kg6rLzJpbppdDqvadyZCQePxw3gCM7bEDUcsrgHvVHepR4Hi50vBjcANgADNpNXvdNYh35QenQZdx53ISTAKT8w4RRcd4nOrOoSXP30OXp7WL0un4r1y-Pz8n5daFaRsShr1jSgSqWVbg03VKiWtRVnNV9YYYjQtGGkNKKxgrOqJUJkztZtaVRlYcHn6OZ4d4jhYwdplNuwi_mLSXLKBa0ZYyKn2DGlY0gpgpVDdqLiJCmRB8HyKFhmwfJbsNxniB-hlMP-HeLf6X-oL5nzgFI</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Li, Ping</creator><creator>Sun, Xinfei</creator><creator>Yu, Jun</creator><creator>Kong, Gangqiang</creator><creator>Chen, Junjun</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-2229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Experimental and analytical study on the reinforcement mechanism of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction in loose sandy soil</title><author>Li, Ping ; Sun, Xinfei ; Yu, Jun ; Kong, Gangqiang ; Chen, Junjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-68299ea6acacbd3d14ab2b732835f4d04c19206d49f4327b044270f8b6da7fe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Compaction</topic><topic>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Cone penetration tests</topic><topic>Depth</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Equations of motion</topic><topic>Falling</topic><topic>Formulae</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Friction resistance</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Impact resistance</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Mindlin plates</topic><topic>Penetration resistance</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>Soft and Granular Matter</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil resistance</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Xinfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Gangqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junjun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Acta geotechnica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Ping</au><au>Sun, Xinfei</au><au>Yu, Jun</au><au>Kong, Gangqiang</au><au>Chen, Junjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental and analytical study on the reinforcement mechanism of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction in loose sandy soil</atitle><jtitle>Acta geotechnica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Geotech</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7989</spage><epage>8006</epage><pages>7989-8006</pages><issn>1861-1125</issn><eissn>1861-1133</eissn><abstract>Considering that conventional dynamic compaction (CDC) method has limitation in the effectiveness of improvement depth because the improved shallow soil layers prevent the impact energy further transmitted to the deep ground, a new technique of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction (IDDC) is proposed in which the tamper can compact soil from the deep to the shallow soil layers. In this paper, the main objective is to illustrate the work mechanism of IDDC. Firstly, main components of equipment and construction process of IDDC are introduced. Then, model tests of CDC and IDDC were conducted on loose sand to obtain the influence depth using the acceleration of soil particles during impact and the distribution of cone resistance and side friction through static cone penetration tests (CPTs) after impact. Finally, the analytical formulae of superimposed stress and settlement due to IDDC was derived based on the Mindlin’s solution and equation of motion, and verified with model test results and a practical case. The results indicate that with the falling height of 1 m in model tests, the further impacts after the 6th impact of CDC could hardly improve ground, resulting in the improvement depth of around 45 cm, whereas the improvement depth of IDDC was over 80 cm. Moreover, at the falling height of 1 m, the average increment in cone resistance after IDDC is 82% greater than that after CDC. Finally, compared with experimental results, the errors of the predicted settlement and the superimposed stress are less than 26 and 14%, respectively, and the proposed formulae succeed to predict the improvement depth of IDDC applied in a coastal area of China.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11440-024-02340-w</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-2229</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1861-1125
ispartof Acta geotechnica, 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.7989-8006
issn 1861-1125
1861-1133
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3134182224
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Coastal zone
Compaction
Complex Fluids and Microfluidics
Concrete
Cone penetration tests
Depth
Energy
Engineering
Equations of motion
Falling
Formulae
Foundations
Friction resistance
Geoengineering
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Height
Hydraulics
Impact resistance
Medical laboratories
Mindlin plates
Penetration resistance
Pipes
Research Paper
Sandy soils
Soft and Granular Matter
Soil
Soil analysis
Soil compaction
Soil improvement
Soil layers
Soil resistance
Soil Science & Conservation
Solid Mechanics
title Experimental and analytical study on the reinforcement mechanism of in-pipe deep dynamic compaction in loose sandy soil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A29%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20and%20analytical%20study%20on%20the%20reinforcement%20mechanism%20of%20in-pipe%20deep%20dynamic%20compaction%20in%20loose%20sandy%20soil&rft.jtitle=Acta%20geotechnica&rft.au=Li,%20Ping&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7989&rft.epage=8006&rft.pages=7989-8006&rft.issn=1861-1125&rft.eissn=1861-1133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11440-024-02340-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3134182224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3134182224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true