Comparative Study of Hydrogen and Carbothermal Reduction for Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries

Recovery of critical metals such as Li and Co from the spent lithium-ion batteries is necessary to alleviate resource scarcity and mitigate supply risk. The present study emphasizes the carbothermal and hydrogen reduction of lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and the recovery of Li and Co from spent LCO-bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals 2024, Vol.77 (12), p.4355-4365
Hauptverfasser: Velpoor, Rakesh, Dhawan, Nikhil, Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4365
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4355
container_title Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals
container_volume 77
creator Velpoor, Rakesh
Dhawan, Nikhil
Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker
description Recovery of critical metals such as Li and Co from the spent lithium-ion batteries is necessary to alleviate resource scarcity and mitigate supply risk. The present study emphasizes the carbothermal and hydrogen reduction of lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and the recovery of Li and Co from spent LCO-based batteries. Carbothermal reduction (CR) and hydrogen reduction (HR) at 500–900 °C followed by water leaching was carried out for Li recovery. Complete reduction with hydrogen was achieved at 500 °C, whereas a significant reduction for CR was achieved at 700 ℃. Characterization analysis of the reduced products affirms the decomposition of the layered LCO structure with the evolution of new phases. CR favored the Li 2 CO 3 formation, while the LiOH phase was observed in the HR products. Both reductive treatments yielded metallic Co, but CoO was also found in the CR products. The hydrogen reduction was found better compared to carbothermal reduction for both Li and Co recovery. CR process at 900 °C resulted in 61% Li dissolution and 76.5% Co recovery, while HR at 500 °C yielded much higher Li dissolution (93%) and Co recovery (86.5%).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12666-023-03164-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3133718396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3133718396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-6f519ec597bd315e0f5eb3643270e02b9da7521cf14af81e998bf6642cf933023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIrE2eBH4sRHqIBWqoRE4Rw5zrpN1cTBdpDy97gNEjcuuzvamVntIHRLyT0lJH_wlAkhMGEcE05FiskZmhGZZziC7Pw0M8wKml2iK-_3hHDJOJ8hWNi2V06F5huSTRjqMbEmWY61s1voEtXVyUK5yoYduFYdkneoBx0a2yXGuoj0qA9Ntz2KNj10IVk3YdcMLV5FypMKAVwD_hpdGHXwcPPb5-jz5fljscTrt9fV4nGNNctJwMJkVILOZF7VnGZATAYVFymPWyCskrXKM0a1oakyBQUpi8oIkTJtJOfx-Tm6m3x7Z78G8KHc28F18WTJKec5LbgUkcUmlnbWewem7F3TKjeWlJTHOMspzjI6lqc4Y50jPol8JHdbcH_W_6h-APwMeBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133718396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Hydrogen and Carbothermal Reduction for Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Velpoor, Rakesh ; Dhawan, Nikhil ; Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker</creator><creatorcontrib>Velpoor, Rakesh ; Dhawan, Nikhil ; Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker</creatorcontrib><description>Recovery of critical metals such as Li and Co from the spent lithium-ion batteries is necessary to alleviate resource scarcity and mitigate supply risk. The present study emphasizes the carbothermal and hydrogen reduction of lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and the recovery of Li and Co from spent LCO-based batteries. Carbothermal reduction (CR) and hydrogen reduction (HR) at 500–900 °C followed by water leaching was carried out for Li recovery. Complete reduction with hydrogen was achieved at 500 °C, whereas a significant reduction for CR was achieved at 700 ℃. Characterization analysis of the reduced products affirms the decomposition of the layered LCO structure with the evolution of new phases. CR favored the Li 2 CO 3 formation, while the LiOH phase was observed in the HR products. Both reductive treatments yielded metallic Co, but CoO was also found in the CR products. The hydrogen reduction was found better compared to carbothermal reduction for both Li and Co recovery. CR process at 900 °C resulted in 61% Li dissolution and 76.5% Co recovery, while HR at 500 °C yielded much higher Li dissolution (93%) and Co recovery (86.5%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-2815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-1645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12666-023-03164-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science ; Cobalt oxides ; Comparative studies ; Corrosion and Coatings ; Dissolution ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen reduction ; Leaching ; Lithium ; Lithium carbonate ; Lithium-ion batteries ; Materials recovery ; Materials Science ; Metallic Materials ; Original Article ; Structural analysis ; Tribology</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2024, Vol.77 (12), p.4355-4365</ispartof><rights>The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-6f519ec597bd315e0f5eb3643270e02b9da7521cf14af81e998bf6642cf933023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0404-4575</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12666-023-03164-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12666-023-03164-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Velpoor, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhawan, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Hydrogen and Carbothermal Reduction for Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries</title><title>Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals</title><addtitle>Trans Indian Inst Met</addtitle><description>Recovery of critical metals such as Li and Co from the spent lithium-ion batteries is necessary to alleviate resource scarcity and mitigate supply risk. The present study emphasizes the carbothermal and hydrogen reduction of lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and the recovery of Li and Co from spent LCO-based batteries. Carbothermal reduction (CR) and hydrogen reduction (HR) at 500–900 °C followed by water leaching was carried out for Li recovery. Complete reduction with hydrogen was achieved at 500 °C, whereas a significant reduction for CR was achieved at 700 ℃. Characterization analysis of the reduced products affirms the decomposition of the layered LCO structure with the evolution of new phases. CR favored the Li 2 CO 3 formation, while the LiOH phase was observed in the HR products. Both reductive treatments yielded metallic Co, but CoO was also found in the CR products. The hydrogen reduction was found better compared to carbothermal reduction for both Li and Co recovery. CR process at 900 °C resulted in 61% Li dissolution and 76.5% Co recovery, while HR at 500 °C yielded much higher Li dissolution (93%) and Co recovery (86.5%).</description><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Cobalt oxides</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Corrosion and Coatings</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen reduction</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Lithium carbonate</subject><subject>Lithium-ion batteries</subject><subject>Materials recovery</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Metallic Materials</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Structural analysis</subject><subject>Tribology</subject><issn>0972-2815</issn><issn>0975-1645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIrE2eBH4sRHqIBWqoRE4Rw5zrpN1cTBdpDy97gNEjcuuzvamVntIHRLyT0lJH_wlAkhMGEcE05FiskZmhGZZziC7Pw0M8wKml2iK-_3hHDJOJ8hWNi2V06F5huSTRjqMbEmWY61s1voEtXVyUK5yoYduFYdkneoBx0a2yXGuoj0qA9Ntz2KNj10IVk3YdcMLV5FypMKAVwD_hpdGHXwcPPb5-jz5fljscTrt9fV4nGNNctJwMJkVILOZF7VnGZATAYVFymPWyCskrXKM0a1oakyBQUpi8oIkTJtJOfx-Tm6m3x7Z78G8KHc28F18WTJKec5LbgUkcUmlnbWewem7F3TKjeWlJTHOMspzjI6lqc4Y50jPol8JHdbcH_W_6h-APwMeBo</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Velpoor, Rakesh</creator><creator>Dhawan, Nikhil</creator><creator>Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-4575</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Hydrogen and Carbothermal Reduction for Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries</title><author>Velpoor, Rakesh ; Dhawan, Nikhil ; Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-6f519ec597bd315e0f5eb3643270e02b9da7521cf14af81e998bf6642cf933023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Cobalt oxides</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Corrosion and Coatings</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen reduction</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Lithium carbonate</topic><topic>Lithium-ion batteries</topic><topic>Materials recovery</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Metallic Materials</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Structural analysis</topic><topic>Tribology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Velpoor, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhawan, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Velpoor, Rakesh</au><au>Dhawan, Nikhil</au><au>Bhandari, Ganesh Shanker</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Hydrogen and Carbothermal Reduction for Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals</jtitle><stitle>Trans Indian Inst Met</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4355</spage><epage>4365</epage><pages>4355-4365</pages><issn>0972-2815</issn><eissn>0975-1645</eissn><abstract>Recovery of critical metals such as Li and Co from the spent lithium-ion batteries is necessary to alleviate resource scarcity and mitigate supply risk. The present study emphasizes the carbothermal and hydrogen reduction of lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and the recovery of Li and Co from spent LCO-based batteries. Carbothermal reduction (CR) and hydrogen reduction (HR) at 500–900 °C followed by water leaching was carried out for Li recovery. Complete reduction with hydrogen was achieved at 500 °C, whereas a significant reduction for CR was achieved at 700 ℃. Characterization analysis of the reduced products affirms the decomposition of the layered LCO structure with the evolution of new phases. CR favored the Li 2 CO 3 formation, while the LiOH phase was observed in the HR products. Both reductive treatments yielded metallic Co, but CoO was also found in the CR products. The hydrogen reduction was found better compared to carbothermal reduction for both Li and Co recovery. CR process at 900 °C resulted in 61% Li dissolution and 76.5% Co recovery, while HR at 500 °C yielded much higher Li dissolution (93%) and Co recovery (86.5%).</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><doi>10.1007/s12666-023-03164-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-4575</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-2815
ispartof Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2024, Vol.77 (12), p.4355-4365
issn 0972-2815
0975-1645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3133718396
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Chemistry and Materials Science
Cobalt oxides
Comparative studies
Corrosion and Coatings
Dissolution
Hydrogen
Hydrogen reduction
Leaching
Lithium
Lithium carbonate
Lithium-ion batteries
Materials recovery
Materials Science
Metallic Materials
Original Article
Structural analysis
Tribology
title Comparative Study of Hydrogen and Carbothermal Reduction for Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T18%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Hydrogen%20and%20Carbothermal%20Reduction%20for%20Recycling%20of%20Spent%20Lithium-Ion%20Batteries&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20Indian%20Institute%20of%20Metals&rft.au=Velpoor,%20Rakesh&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4355&rft.epage=4365&rft.pages=4355-4365&rft.issn=0972-2815&rft.eissn=0975-1645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12666-023-03164-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3133718396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133718396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true