Quality of undifferentiated chest pain evaluation and diagnosis guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal
Chest pain is a symptom that is potentially life-threatening and requires quick and accurate evaluations. This article describes the quality of guidelines related to the evaluation and diagnosis of acute, undifferentiated chest pain. After systematically evaluating existing guidelines, we found that...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | JRSM open 2024-11, Vol.15 (11) |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | JRSM open |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Palmer, Nicole Pasumarthi, Tejanth O’Connell, Joe Lee, Brandon Yu, Tiffany Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima Patel, Shama Morgan, Rebecca L. |
| description | Chest pain is a symptom that is potentially life-threatening and requires quick and accurate evaluations. This article describes the quality of guidelines related to the evaluation and diagnosis of acute, undifferentiated chest pain. After systematically evaluating existing guidelines, we found that there exists a wide variety of quality in these documents. Future documents that provide recommendations should utilize guideline evaluation tools during the creation process to ensure a high-quality product, regardless of document type. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/20542704241288955 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3133454839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20542704241288955</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3133454839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-64f5ed7b50823c125f697861bdff45e8592383cde69df49ce905d352bc80d5ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-AN8WfE7da7LxTYo3EETQ5zDdna1b0iTuJpX-e1MrKIhPMxy-M5dDyDlnc86L4lIwrUTBlFBcGFNqfUQmey3bi8e_-lMyS2nNGONcaGnEhGyfB6hDv6Otp0PjgvcYsekD9OiofcPU0w5CQ3EL9QB9aBsKjaMuwKppU0h0NQSHdWgwXVGgaZd63IycpRG3AT--aBvDqEBNoesihAT1GTnxUCecfdcpeb29eVncZ49Pdw-L68fMci10liuv0RVLzYyQdrzZ52Vhcr503iuNRpdCGmkd5qXzqrRYMu2kFktrmNNg5ZRcHOZ2sX0fxm-qdTvEZlxZSS6l0srIcqT4gbKxTSmir7oYNhB3FWfVPuHqT8KjZ37wJFjhz9T_DZ8-HHx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133454839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of undifferentiated chest pain evaluation and diagnosis guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Palmer, Nicole ; Pasumarthi, Tejanth ; O’Connell, Joe ; Lee, Brandon ; Yu, Tiffany ; Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima ; Patel, Shama ; Morgan, Rebecca L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Nicole ; Pasumarthi, Tejanth ; O’Connell, Joe ; Lee, Brandon ; Yu, Tiffany ; Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima ; Patel, Shama ; Morgan, Rebecca L.</creatorcontrib><description>Chest pain is a symptom that is potentially life-threatening and requires quick and accurate evaluations. This article describes the quality of guidelines related to the evaluation and diagnosis of acute, undifferentiated chest pain. After systematically evaluating existing guidelines, we found that there exists a wide variety of quality in these documents. Future documents that provide recommendations should utilize guideline evaluation tools during the creation process to ensure a high-quality product, regardless of document type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-2704</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-2704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20542704241288955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Angina pectoris ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Medical diagnosis ; Pain ; Quality of care</subject><ispartof>JRSM open, 2024-11, Vol.15 (11)</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-64f5ed7b50823c125f697861bdff45e8592383cde69df49ce905d352bc80d5ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1012-4897 ; 0000-0001-8288-6340 ; 0000-0002-0231-1158</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20542704241288955$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20542704241288955$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,864,21966,27853,27922,27924,27925,44945,45333</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasumarthi, Tejanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Shama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Rebecca L.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of undifferentiated chest pain evaluation and diagnosis guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal</title><title>JRSM open</title><description>Chest pain is a symptom that is potentially life-threatening and requires quick and accurate evaluations. This article describes the quality of guidelines related to the evaluation and diagnosis of acute, undifferentiated chest pain. After systematically evaluating existing guidelines, we found that there exists a wide variety of quality in these documents. Future documents that provide recommendations should utilize guideline evaluation tools during the creation process to ensure a high-quality product, regardless of document type.</description><subject>Angina pectoris</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><issn>2054-2704</issn><issn>2054-2704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-AN8WfE7da7LxTYo3EETQ5zDdna1b0iTuJpX-e1MrKIhPMxy-M5dDyDlnc86L4lIwrUTBlFBcGFNqfUQmey3bi8e_-lMyS2nNGONcaGnEhGyfB6hDv6Otp0PjgvcYsekD9OiofcPU0w5CQ3EL9QB9aBsKjaMuwKppU0h0NQSHdWgwXVGgaZd63IycpRG3AT--aBvDqEBNoesihAT1GTnxUCecfdcpeb29eVncZ49Pdw-L68fMci10liuv0RVLzYyQdrzZ52Vhcr503iuNRpdCGmkd5qXzqrRYMu2kFktrmNNg5ZRcHOZ2sX0fxm-qdTvEZlxZSS6l0srIcqT4gbKxTSmir7oYNhB3FWfVPuHqT8KjZ37wJFjhz9T_DZ8-HHx8</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Palmer, Nicole</creator><creator>Pasumarthi, Tejanth</creator><creator>O’Connell, Joe</creator><creator>Lee, Brandon</creator><creator>Yu, Tiffany</creator><creator>Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima</creator><creator>Patel, Shama</creator><creator>Morgan, Rebecca L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-4897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-6340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0231-1158</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Quality of undifferentiated chest pain evaluation and diagnosis guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal</title><author>Palmer, Nicole ; Pasumarthi, Tejanth ; O’Connell, Joe ; Lee, Brandon ; Yu, Tiffany ; Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima ; Patel, Shama ; Morgan, Rebecca L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-64f5ed7b50823c125f697861bdff45e8592383cde69df49ce905d352bc80d5ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Angina pectoris</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasumarthi, Tejanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Shama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Rebecca L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>JRSM open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palmer, Nicole</au><au>Pasumarthi, Tejanth</au><au>O’Connell, Joe</au><au>Lee, Brandon</au><au>Yu, Tiffany</au><au>Kothapudi, Venkata Neelima</au><au>Patel, Shama</au><au>Morgan, Rebecca L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of undifferentiated chest pain evaluation and diagnosis guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal</atitle><jtitle>JRSM open</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><issn>2054-2704</issn><eissn>2054-2704</eissn><abstract>Chest pain is a symptom that is potentially life-threatening and requires quick and accurate evaluations. This article describes the quality of guidelines related to the evaluation and diagnosis of acute, undifferentiated chest pain. After systematically evaluating existing guidelines, we found that there exists a wide variety of quality in these documents. Future documents that provide recommendations should utilize guideline evaluation tools during the creation process to ensure a high-quality product, regardless of document type.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20542704241288955</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-4897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-6340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0231-1158</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2054-2704 |
| ispartof | JRSM open, 2024-11, Vol.15 (11) |
| issn | 2054-2704 2054-2704 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3133454839 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Angina pectoris Clinical practice guidelines Medical diagnosis Pain Quality of care |
| title | Quality of undifferentiated chest pain evaluation and diagnosis guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A44%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20undifferentiated%20chest%20pain%20evaluation%20and%20diagnosis%20guidelines:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20critical%20appraisal&rft.jtitle=JRSM%20open&rft.au=Palmer,%20Nicole&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.issn=2054-2704&rft.eissn=2054-2704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20542704241288955&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3133454839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133454839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20542704241288955&rfr_iscdi=true |