Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities

Summary Though there are clear benefits of being included at work, important questions about employees' views and experiences of workplace inclusion remain unanswered. First, scholars have tended to adopt a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that assumes that inclusion is viewed and experienced similar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of organizational behavior 2024-11, Vol.45 (9), p.1413-1430
Hauptverfasser: Dhanani, Lindsay Y., Sultan, Mohsin, Pham, Carolyn T., Mikami, Keisuke, Charles, Daniel Ryan, Crandell, Hannah A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1430
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1413
container_title Journal of organizational behavior
container_volume 45
creator Dhanani, Lindsay Y.
Sultan, Mohsin
Pham, Carolyn T.
Mikami, Keisuke
Charles, Daniel Ryan
Crandell, Hannah A.
description Summary Though there are clear benefits of being included at work, important questions about employees' views and experiences of workplace inclusion remain unanswered. First, scholars have tended to adopt a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that assumes that inclusion is viewed and experienced similarly by all employees, regardless of their social identities. Moreover, there have been rapid shifts in work modalities over the last few years, and it is currently unclear how modality impacts inclusion and if that impact is similar across all employees. To address these questions, we leveraged qualitative data from a demographically diverse sample to examine how employees define workplace inclusion, what practices and behaviors employees associate with feeling included, how social identities shape definitions and experiences of inclusion, and the modalities in which employees feel the most included. Results indicated that employees primarily define workplace inclusion as being accepted and treated equally regardless of their identities, being integrated into decision‐making, and expressing themselves authentically. Though employees defined inclusion similarly regardless of their social identities, the importance of specific inclusion practices differed across subgroups. Finally, employees felt more included when working in person, though minoritized employees were more likely to prefer remote work. Theoretical and practical implications regarding inclusion are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/job.2779
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3133067165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3133067165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2889-1c0d461c35d3b752d3043e5a6e55d0e3673b8f9fb88ecbe2a9037e7c0b560e183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmMg8RMiceHS4TRN0nIbiI-hSbvAuUrSdGR0zZZ0m8ad_03WceUUx3782q8RuiYwIgDp3cKpUSpEcYIGBIoiIVQUp2gAeZElMeTn6CKEBQCwrOAD9DNpdbMJ1rW4NdJj2Va4lv4ej_F6Ixvbyc5uDbbt1oTOzuMvkq6Oib4tlpyfy9Z-9xXZYGU-5da6qKS9CwHvnP_CS1cdtKwJ_YDgtI2orUzb9dlLdFbLJpirv3eIPp6f3h9fk-nsZfI4niY6zfPoRUOVcaIpq6gSLK0oZNQwyQ1jFRjKBVV5XdQqz41WJpUFUGGEBsU4GJLTIbo56q68W2-io3LhNj6uHUpKKAUuCGeRuj1SvQNv6nLl7VL6fUmgPBw5dqnycOSIJkd0Zxuz_5cr32YPPf8LisOAgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133067165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dhanani, Lindsay Y. ; Sultan, Mohsin ; Pham, Carolyn T. ; Mikami, Keisuke ; Charles, Daniel Ryan ; Crandell, Hannah A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhanani, Lindsay Y. ; Sultan, Mohsin ; Pham, Carolyn T. ; Mikami, Keisuke ; Charles, Daniel Ryan ; Crandell, Hannah A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Though there are clear benefits of being included at work, important questions about employees' views and experiences of workplace inclusion remain unanswered. First, scholars have tended to adopt a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that assumes that inclusion is viewed and experienced similarly by all employees, regardless of their social identities. Moreover, there have been rapid shifts in work modalities over the last few years, and it is currently unclear how modality impacts inclusion and if that impact is similar across all employees. To address these questions, we leveraged qualitative data from a demographically diverse sample to examine how employees define workplace inclusion, what practices and behaviors employees associate with feeling included, how social identities shape definitions and experiences of inclusion, and the modalities in which employees feel the most included. Results indicated that employees primarily define workplace inclusion as being accepted and treated equally regardless of their identities, being integrated into decision‐making, and expressing themselves authentically. Though employees defined inclusion similarly regardless of their social identities, the importance of specific inclusion practices differed across subgroups. Finally, employees felt more included when working in person, though minoritized employees were more likely to prefer remote work. Theoretical and practical implications regarding inclusion are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.2779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Employees ; inclusive organizational behavior ; Job performance ; Organizational behavior ; Social identity ; Work ; work modality ; workplace inclusion ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2024-11, Vol.45 (9), p.1413-1430</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2889-1c0d461c35d3b752d3043e5a6e55d0e3673b8f9fb88ecbe2a9037e7c0b560e183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4701-4640</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjob.2779$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjob.2779$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhanani, Lindsay Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Mohsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, Carolyn T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Daniel Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crandell, Hannah A.</creatorcontrib><title>Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><description>Summary Though there are clear benefits of being included at work, important questions about employees' views and experiences of workplace inclusion remain unanswered. First, scholars have tended to adopt a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that assumes that inclusion is viewed and experienced similarly by all employees, regardless of their social identities. Moreover, there have been rapid shifts in work modalities over the last few years, and it is currently unclear how modality impacts inclusion and if that impact is similar across all employees. To address these questions, we leveraged qualitative data from a demographically diverse sample to examine how employees define workplace inclusion, what practices and behaviors employees associate with feeling included, how social identities shape definitions and experiences of inclusion, and the modalities in which employees feel the most included. Results indicated that employees primarily define workplace inclusion as being accepted and treated equally regardless of their identities, being integrated into decision‐making, and expressing themselves authentically. Though employees defined inclusion similarly regardless of their social identities, the importance of specific inclusion practices differed across subgroups. Finally, employees felt more included when working in person, though minoritized employees were more likely to prefer remote work. Theoretical and practical implications regarding inclusion are discussed.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>inclusive organizational behavior</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Social identity</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>work modality</subject><subject>workplace inclusion</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmMg8RMiceHS4TRN0nIbiI-hSbvAuUrSdGR0zZZ0m8ad_03WceUUx3782q8RuiYwIgDp3cKpUSpEcYIGBIoiIVQUp2gAeZElMeTn6CKEBQCwrOAD9DNpdbMJ1rW4NdJj2Va4lv4ej_F6Ixvbyc5uDbbt1oTOzuMvkq6Oib4tlpyfy9Z-9xXZYGU-5da6qKS9CwHvnP_CS1cdtKwJ_YDgtI2orUzb9dlLdFbLJpirv3eIPp6f3h9fk-nsZfI4niY6zfPoRUOVcaIpq6gSLK0oZNQwyQ1jFRjKBVV5XdQqz41WJpUFUGGEBsU4GJLTIbo56q68W2-io3LhNj6uHUpKKAUuCGeRuj1SvQNv6nLl7VL6fUmgPBw5dqnycOSIJkd0Zxuz_5cr32YPPf8LisOAgw</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Dhanani, Lindsay Y.</creator><creator>Sultan, Mohsin</creator><creator>Pham, Carolyn T.</creator><creator>Mikami, Keisuke</creator><creator>Charles, Daniel Ryan</creator><creator>Crandell, Hannah A.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4701-4640</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities</title><author>Dhanani, Lindsay Y. ; Sultan, Mohsin ; Pham, Carolyn T. ; Mikami, Keisuke ; Charles, Daniel Ryan ; Crandell, Hannah A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2889-1c0d461c35d3b752d3043e5a6e55d0e3673b8f9fb88ecbe2a9037e7c0b560e183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>inclusive organizational behavior</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Social identity</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>work modality</topic><topic>workplace inclusion</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhanani, Lindsay Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Mohsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, Carolyn T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Daniel Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crandell, Hannah A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library website</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhanani, Lindsay Y.</au><au>Sultan, Mohsin</au><au>Pham, Carolyn T.</au><au>Mikami, Keisuke</au><au>Charles, Daniel Ryan</au><au>Crandell, Hannah A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1413</spage><epage>1430</epage><pages>1413-1430</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><abstract>Summary Though there are clear benefits of being included at work, important questions about employees' views and experiences of workplace inclusion remain unanswered. First, scholars have tended to adopt a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that assumes that inclusion is viewed and experienced similarly by all employees, regardless of their social identities. Moreover, there have been rapid shifts in work modalities over the last few years, and it is currently unclear how modality impacts inclusion and if that impact is similar across all employees. To address these questions, we leveraged qualitative data from a demographically diverse sample to examine how employees define workplace inclusion, what practices and behaviors employees associate with feeling included, how social identities shape definitions and experiences of inclusion, and the modalities in which employees feel the most included. Results indicated that employees primarily define workplace inclusion as being accepted and treated equally regardless of their identities, being integrated into decision‐making, and expressing themselves authentically. Though employees defined inclusion similarly regardless of their social identities, the importance of specific inclusion practices differed across subgroups. Finally, employees felt more included when working in person, though minoritized employees were more likely to prefer remote work. Theoretical and practical implications regarding inclusion are discussed.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/job.2779</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4701-4640</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-3796
ispartof Journal of organizational behavior, 2024-11, Vol.45 (9), p.1413-1430
issn 0894-3796
1099-1379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3133067165
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Decision making
Employees
inclusive organizational behavior
Job performance
Organizational behavior
Social identity
Work
work modality
workplace inclusion
Workplaces
title Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A22%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inclusion%20near%20and%20far:%20A%20qualitative%20investigation%20of%20inclusive%20organizational%20behavior%20across%20work%20modalities%20and%20social%20identities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Dhanani,%20Lindsay%20Y.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1413&rft.epage=1430&rft.pages=1413-1430&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.2779&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3133067165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133067165&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true