Classification of reflective writing: A comparative analysis with shallow machine learning and pre-trained language models
Reflective practice holds critical importance, for example, in higher education and teacher education, yet promoting students’ reflective skills has been a persistent challenge. The emergence of revolutionary artificial intelligence technologies, notably in machine learning and large language models...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Education and information technologies 2024-11, Vol.29 (16), p.21593-21619 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21619 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 21593 |
container_title | Education and information technologies |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Zhang, Chengming Hofmann, Florian Plößl, Lea Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela |
description | Reflective practice holds critical importance, for example, in higher education and teacher education, yet promoting students’ reflective skills has been a persistent challenge. The emergence of revolutionary artificial intelligence technologies, notably in machine learning and large language models, heralds potential breakthroughs in this domain. The current research on analyzing reflective writing hinges on sentence-level classification. Such an approach, however, may fall short of providing a holistic grasp of written reflection. Therefore, this study employs shallow machine learning algorithms and pre-trained language models, namely BERT, RoBERTa, BigBird, and Longformer, with the intention of enhancing the document-level classification accuracy of reflective writings. A dataset of 1,043 reflective writings was collected in a teacher education program at a German university (
M
= 251.38 words,
SD
= 143.08 words). Our findings indicated that BigBird and Longformer models significantly outperformed BERT and RoBERTa, achieving classification accuracies of 76.26% and 77.22%, respectively, with less than 60% accuracy observed in shallow machine learning models. The outcomes of this study contribute to refining document-level classification of reflective writings and have implications for augmenting automated feedback mechanisms in teacher education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10639-024-12720-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3133053676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3133053676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-88fb49527b6fa68f4ea7c5810778f7df3ecb908c0c1c3de99ecd7320cc6989ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhosouK7-AU8Bz9FJ0zatt2XxCxa86DlM06SbJf0w6bqsv964K3jzNMPwvC_MkyTXDG4ZgLgLDApeUUgzylKRAoWTZMZywakooDyNOy-ApjwX58lFCBsAqESWzpKvpcMQrLEKJzv0ZDDEa-O0muynJjtvJ9u392RB1NCN6PFwxh7dPthAdnZak7BG54Yd6VCtba-J0-j7mIpYQ0av6eQx3hvisG-32GrSDY124TI5M-iCvvqd8-T98eFt-UxXr08vy8WKKs6yiZalqbMqT0VdGCxKk2kUKi8ZCFEa0RiuVV1BqUAxxRtdVVo1gqegVFGVVY18ntwce0c_fGx1mORm2Pr4QpCccQ45L0QRqfRIKT-EEB3I0dsO_V4ykD-O5dGxjI7lwbGEGOLHUIhw32r_V_1P6hu_g4HL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133053676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification of reflective writing: A comparative analysis with shallow machine learning and pre-trained language models</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zhang, Chengming ; Hofmann, Florian ; Plößl, Lea ; Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chengming ; Hofmann, Florian ; Plößl, Lea ; Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela</creatorcontrib><description>Reflective practice holds critical importance, for example, in higher education and teacher education, yet promoting students’ reflective skills has been a persistent challenge. The emergence of revolutionary artificial intelligence technologies, notably in machine learning and large language models, heralds potential breakthroughs in this domain. The current research on analyzing reflective writing hinges on sentence-level classification. Such an approach, however, may fall short of providing a holistic grasp of written reflection. Therefore, this study employs shallow machine learning algorithms and pre-trained language models, namely BERT, RoBERTa, BigBird, and Longformer, with the intention of enhancing the document-level classification accuracy of reflective writings. A dataset of 1,043 reflective writings was collected in a teacher education program at a German university (
M
= 251.38 words,
SD
= 143.08 words). Our findings indicated that BigBird and Longformer models significantly outperformed BERT and RoBERTa, achieving classification accuracies of 76.26% and 77.22%, respectively, with less than 60% accuracy observed in shallow machine learning models. The outcomes of this study contribute to refining document-level classification of reflective writings and have implications for augmenting automated feedback mechanisms in teacher education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-2357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-12720-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Classification ; Comparative Analysis ; Comparative Education ; Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Computer Science ; Computers and Education ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Machine learning ; Reflective Teaching ; Teacher education ; Teacher Education Programs ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><ispartof>Education and information technologies, 2024-11, Vol.29 (16), p.21593-21619</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-88fb49527b6fa68f4ea7c5810778f7df3ecb908c0c1c3de99ecd7320cc6989ba3</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-8695-5455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10639-024-12720-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-024-12720-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chengming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plößl, Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela</creatorcontrib><title>Classification of reflective writing: A comparative analysis with shallow machine learning and pre-trained language models</title><title>Education and information technologies</title><addtitle>Educ Inf Technol</addtitle><description>Reflective practice holds critical importance, for example, in higher education and teacher education, yet promoting students’ reflective skills has been a persistent challenge. The emergence of revolutionary artificial intelligence technologies, notably in machine learning and large language models, heralds potential breakthroughs in this domain. The current research on analyzing reflective writing hinges on sentence-level classification. Such an approach, however, may fall short of providing a holistic grasp of written reflection. Therefore, this study employs shallow machine learning algorithms and pre-trained language models, namely BERT, RoBERTa, BigBird, and Longformer, with the intention of enhancing the document-level classification accuracy of reflective writings. A dataset of 1,043 reflective writings was collected in a teacher education program at a German university (
M
= 251.38 words,
SD
= 143.08 words). Our findings indicated that BigBird and Longformer models significantly outperformed BERT and RoBERTa, achieving classification accuracies of 76.26% and 77.22%, respectively, with less than 60% accuracy observed in shallow machine learning models. The outcomes of this study contribute to refining document-level classification of reflective writings and have implications for augmenting automated feedback mechanisms in teacher education.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative Education</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Education</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Reflective Teaching</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><issn>1360-2357</issn><issn>1573-7608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhosouK7-AU8Bz9FJ0zatt2XxCxa86DlM06SbJf0w6bqsv964K3jzNMPwvC_MkyTXDG4ZgLgLDApeUUgzylKRAoWTZMZywakooDyNOy-ApjwX58lFCBsAqESWzpKvpcMQrLEKJzv0ZDDEa-O0muynJjtvJ9u392RB1NCN6PFwxh7dPthAdnZak7BG54Yd6VCtba-J0-j7mIpYQ0av6eQx3hvisG-32GrSDY124TI5M-iCvvqd8-T98eFt-UxXr08vy8WKKs6yiZalqbMqT0VdGCxKk2kUKi8ZCFEa0RiuVV1BqUAxxRtdVVo1gqegVFGVVY18ntwce0c_fGx1mORm2Pr4QpCccQ45L0QRqfRIKT-EEB3I0dsO_V4ykD-O5dGxjI7lwbGEGOLHUIhw32r_V_1P6hu_g4HL</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Zhang, Chengming</creator><creator>Hofmann, Florian</creator><creator>Plößl, Lea</creator><creator>Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8695-5455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Classification of reflective writing: A comparative analysis with shallow machine learning and pre-trained language models</title><author>Zhang, Chengming ; Hofmann, Florian ; Plößl, Lea ; Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-88fb49527b6fa68f4ea7c5810778f7df3ecb908c0c1c3de99ecd7320cc6989ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative Education</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Education</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Reflective Teaching</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chengming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plößl, Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Education and information technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Chengming</au><au>Hofmann, Florian</au><au>Plößl, Lea</au><au>Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification of reflective writing: A comparative analysis with shallow machine learning and pre-trained language models</atitle><jtitle>Education and information technologies</jtitle><stitle>Educ Inf Technol</stitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>21593</spage><epage>21619</epage><pages>21593-21619</pages><issn>1360-2357</issn><eissn>1573-7608</eissn><abstract>Reflective practice holds critical importance, for example, in higher education and teacher education, yet promoting students’ reflective skills has been a persistent challenge. The emergence of revolutionary artificial intelligence technologies, notably in machine learning and large language models, heralds potential breakthroughs in this domain. The current research on analyzing reflective writing hinges on sentence-level classification. Such an approach, however, may fall short of providing a holistic grasp of written reflection. Therefore, this study employs shallow machine learning algorithms and pre-trained language models, namely BERT, RoBERTa, BigBird, and Longformer, with the intention of enhancing the document-level classification accuracy of reflective writings. A dataset of 1,043 reflective writings was collected in a teacher education program at a German university (
M
= 251.38 words,
SD
= 143.08 words). Our findings indicated that BigBird and Longformer models significantly outperformed BERT and RoBERTa, achieving classification accuracies of 76.26% and 77.22%, respectively, with less than 60% accuracy observed in shallow machine learning models. The outcomes of this study contribute to refining document-level classification of reflective writings and have implications for augmenting automated feedback mechanisms in teacher education.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10639-024-12720-0</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8695-5455</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1360-2357 |
ispartof | Education and information technologies, 2024-11, Vol.29 (16), p.21593-21619 |
issn | 1360-2357 1573-7608 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3133053676 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial intelligence Classification Comparative Analysis Comparative Education Computer Appl. in Social and Behavioral Sciences Computer Science Computers and Education Education Educational Technology Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Machine learning Reflective Teaching Teacher education Teacher Education Programs User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction |
title | Classification of reflective writing: A comparative analysis with shallow machine learning and pre-trained language models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A11%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20of%20reflective%20writing:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20with%20shallow%20machine%20learning%20and%20pre-trained%20language%20models&rft.jtitle=Education%20and%20information%20technologies&rft.au=Zhang,%20Chengming&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=21593&rft.epage=21619&rft.pages=21593-21619&rft.issn=1360-2357&rft.eissn=1573-7608&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10639-024-12720-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3133053676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133053676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |