Innovative Business Models in Ocean-Bound Plastic Recycling

Problem definition : About 30 million tons of plastic waste reaches the oceans each year, mostly from low- and middle-income coastal countries. We study novel business models of firms aiming to reduce ocean plastic pollution with a triple-bottom-line (TBL) objective—a weighted sum of profit, environ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Manufacturing & service operations management 2024-11, Vol.26 (6), p.2160-2178
Hauptverfasser: Baron, Opher, Romero, Gonzalo, Zhang, Zhuoluo, Zhou, Sean X.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2178
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2160
container_title Manufacturing & service operations management
container_volume 26
creator Baron, Opher
Romero, Gonzalo
Zhang, Zhuoluo
Zhou, Sean X.
description Problem definition : About 30 million tons of plastic waste reaches the oceans each year, mostly from low- and middle-income coastal countries. We study novel business models of firms aiming to reduce ocean plastic pollution with a triple-bottom-line (TBL) objective—a weighted sum of profit, environmental impact, and social impact. These firms sell (a) plastic offsets and (b) segregated plastic. Methodology/results : We develop and analyze models where a firm partners with a local plastic recycling supply chain to sell (a), (b), or both via collecting and recycling ocean-bound plastic. Considering additionality (i.e., that the firm can only sell plastic offsets based on recycled plastic that is additional to the plastic recycled without the firm’s presence), we solve the equilibrium outcomes by maximizing the firm’s TBL objective. For the special case of a for-profit firm, we show that additionality can decrease the firm’s social and environmental impacts when selling (a) only or when selling both (a) and (b). Additionality may also alter the effect of the local recycled plastic market (i.e., the number of collectors and the recycled plastic price) on the firm. We find similar insights under the TBL objective via a numerical study calibrated with real data. Managerial implications : When firms decide whether to integrate and promote additionality, they must be careful because it may not only reduce their profit but also, reduce their social and environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that selling both (a) and (b) can generate a much higher TBL objective value than selling either one alone. We also find that firms employing a TBL objective can generate much larger environmental and social impacts with a slight reduction in profits than profit-maximizing firms. Our model and results provide insights into new initiatives for tackling ocean plastic pollution. Funding: O. Baron and G. Romero are both supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Z. Zhang is partially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Xiamen University [Grant 20720241012]. S. X. Zhou is partially supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund [Grant CUHK-14500921], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72394395], and the Asian Institute of Supply Chains and Logistics. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0643 .
doi_str_mv 10.1287/msom.2022.0643
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3132641223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3132641223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-27fb0761927728428c20ece93e3b8f785e06cc100658ede4a587e0babd70ffa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAYhoMoOKdXzwXPqV-Stknx5IY_BpOJ6Dmk6VfJaJPZtML-e1fn3dP3Hp73_eAh5JpByriSt10MXcqB8xSKTJyQGct5QfOsVKe_WdCsYNk5uYhxCwBMAZ-Ru5X34dsM7huTxRidxxiTl1BjGxPnk41F4-kijL5OXlsTB2eTN7R72zr_eUnOGtNGvPq7c_Lx-PC-fKbrzdNqeb-mlpUwUC6bCmTBSi4lVxlXlgNaLAWKSjVS5QiFtQygyBXWmJlcSYTKVLWEpjGlmJOb4-6uD18jxkFvw9j7w0stmOBFxjgXByo9UrYPMfbY6F3vOtPvNQM9CdKTID0J0pOgQ4EeC843oe_if_wPyntnMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132641223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Innovative Business Models in Ocean-Bound Plastic Recycling</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><creator>Baron, Opher ; Romero, Gonzalo ; Zhang, Zhuoluo ; Zhou, Sean X.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baron, Opher ; Romero, Gonzalo ; Zhang, Zhuoluo ; Zhou, Sean X.</creatorcontrib><description>Problem definition : About 30 million tons of plastic waste reaches the oceans each year, mostly from low- and middle-income coastal countries. We study novel business models of firms aiming to reduce ocean plastic pollution with a triple-bottom-line (TBL) objective—a weighted sum of profit, environmental impact, and social impact. These firms sell (a) plastic offsets and (b) segregated plastic. Methodology/results : We develop and analyze models where a firm partners with a local plastic recycling supply chain to sell (a), (b), or both via collecting and recycling ocean-bound plastic. Considering additionality (i.e., that the firm can only sell plastic offsets based on recycled plastic that is additional to the plastic recycled without the firm’s presence), we solve the equilibrium outcomes by maximizing the firm’s TBL objective. For the special case of a for-profit firm, we show that additionality can decrease the firm’s social and environmental impacts when selling (a) only or when selling both (a) and (b). Additionality may also alter the effect of the local recycled plastic market (i.e., the number of collectors and the recycled plastic price) on the firm. We find similar insights under the TBL objective via a numerical study calibrated with real data. Managerial implications : When firms decide whether to integrate and promote additionality, they must be careful because it may not only reduce their profit but also, reduce their social and environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that selling both (a) and (b) can generate a much higher TBL objective value than selling either one alone. We also find that firms employing a TBL objective can generate much larger environmental and social impacts with a slight reduction in profits than profit-maximizing firms. Our model and results provide insights into new initiatives for tackling ocean plastic pollution. Funding: O. Baron and G. Romero are both supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Z. Zhang is partially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Xiamen University [Grant 20720241012]. S. X. Zhou is partially supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund [Grant CUHK-14500921], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72394395], and the Asian Institute of Supply Chains and Logistics. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0643 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>additionality ; Business models ; Environmental impact ; Equilibrium ; Numerical analysis ; ocean-bound plastic (OBP) recycling ; Plastics ; Profit maximization ; Recycling ; Supply chains ; sustainable operations ; triple bottom line (TBL)</subject><ispartof>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management, 2024-11, Vol.26 (6), p.2160-2178</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Nov/Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-27fb0761927728428c20ece93e3b8f785e06cc100658ede4a587e0babd70ffa93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5529-3117 ; 0000-0001-6851-4858 ; 0009-0008-0062-8339 ; 0000-0001-5314-2676</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/msom.2022.0643$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3692,27924,27925,62616</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baron, Opher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhuoluo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Sean X.</creatorcontrib><title>Innovative Business Models in Ocean-Bound Plastic Recycling</title><title>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</title><description>Problem definition : About 30 million tons of plastic waste reaches the oceans each year, mostly from low- and middle-income coastal countries. We study novel business models of firms aiming to reduce ocean plastic pollution with a triple-bottom-line (TBL) objective—a weighted sum of profit, environmental impact, and social impact. These firms sell (a) plastic offsets and (b) segregated plastic. Methodology/results : We develop and analyze models where a firm partners with a local plastic recycling supply chain to sell (a), (b), or both via collecting and recycling ocean-bound plastic. Considering additionality (i.e., that the firm can only sell plastic offsets based on recycled plastic that is additional to the plastic recycled without the firm’s presence), we solve the equilibrium outcomes by maximizing the firm’s TBL objective. For the special case of a for-profit firm, we show that additionality can decrease the firm’s social and environmental impacts when selling (a) only or when selling both (a) and (b). Additionality may also alter the effect of the local recycled plastic market (i.e., the number of collectors and the recycled plastic price) on the firm. We find similar insights under the TBL objective via a numerical study calibrated with real data. Managerial implications : When firms decide whether to integrate and promote additionality, they must be careful because it may not only reduce their profit but also, reduce their social and environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that selling both (a) and (b) can generate a much higher TBL objective value than selling either one alone. We also find that firms employing a TBL objective can generate much larger environmental and social impacts with a slight reduction in profits than profit-maximizing firms. Our model and results provide insights into new initiatives for tackling ocean plastic pollution. Funding: O. Baron and G. Romero are both supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Z. Zhang is partially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Xiamen University [Grant 20720241012]. S. X. Zhou is partially supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund [Grant CUHK-14500921], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72394395], and the Asian Institute of Supply Chains and Logistics. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0643 .</description><subject>additionality</subject><subject>Business models</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>ocean-bound plastic (OBP) recycling</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Profit maximization</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>sustainable operations</subject><subject>triple bottom line (TBL)</subject><issn>1523-4614</issn><issn>1526-5498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAYhoMoOKdXzwXPqV-Stknx5IY_BpOJ6Dmk6VfJaJPZtML-e1fn3dP3Hp73_eAh5JpByriSt10MXcqB8xSKTJyQGct5QfOsVKe_WdCsYNk5uYhxCwBMAZ-Ru5X34dsM7huTxRidxxiTl1BjGxPnk41F4-kijL5OXlsTB2eTN7R72zr_eUnOGtNGvPq7c_Lx-PC-fKbrzdNqeb-mlpUwUC6bCmTBSi4lVxlXlgNaLAWKSjVS5QiFtQygyBXWmJlcSYTKVLWEpjGlmJOb4-6uD18jxkFvw9j7w0stmOBFxjgXByo9UrYPMfbY6F3vOtPvNQM9CdKTID0J0pOgQ4EeC843oe_if_wPyntnMg</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Baron, Opher</creator><creator>Romero, Gonzalo</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhuoluo</creator><creator>Zhou, Sean X.</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-3117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6851-4858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0062-8339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-2676</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Innovative Business Models in Ocean-Bound Plastic Recycling</title><author>Baron, Opher ; Romero, Gonzalo ; Zhang, Zhuoluo ; Zhou, Sean X.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c190t-27fb0761927728428c20ece93e3b8f785e06cc100658ede4a587e0babd70ffa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>additionality</topic><topic>Business models</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>ocean-bound plastic (OBP) recycling</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Profit maximization</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>sustainable operations</topic><topic>triple bottom line (TBL)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baron, Opher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhuoluo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Sean X.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baron, Opher</au><au>Romero, Gonzalo</au><au>Zhang, Zhuoluo</au><au>Zhou, Sean X.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Innovative Business Models in Ocean-Bound Plastic Recycling</atitle><jtitle>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2160</spage><epage>2178</epage><pages>2160-2178</pages><issn>1523-4614</issn><eissn>1526-5498</eissn><abstract>Problem definition : About 30 million tons of plastic waste reaches the oceans each year, mostly from low- and middle-income coastal countries. We study novel business models of firms aiming to reduce ocean plastic pollution with a triple-bottom-line (TBL) objective—a weighted sum of profit, environmental impact, and social impact. These firms sell (a) plastic offsets and (b) segregated plastic. Methodology/results : We develop and analyze models where a firm partners with a local plastic recycling supply chain to sell (a), (b), or both via collecting and recycling ocean-bound plastic. Considering additionality (i.e., that the firm can only sell plastic offsets based on recycled plastic that is additional to the plastic recycled without the firm’s presence), we solve the equilibrium outcomes by maximizing the firm’s TBL objective. For the special case of a for-profit firm, we show that additionality can decrease the firm’s social and environmental impacts when selling (a) only or when selling both (a) and (b). Additionality may also alter the effect of the local recycled plastic market (i.e., the number of collectors and the recycled plastic price) on the firm. We find similar insights under the TBL objective via a numerical study calibrated with real data. Managerial implications : When firms decide whether to integrate and promote additionality, they must be careful because it may not only reduce their profit but also, reduce their social and environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that selling both (a) and (b) can generate a much higher TBL objective value than selling either one alone. We also find that firms employing a TBL objective can generate much larger environmental and social impacts with a slight reduction in profits than profit-maximizing firms. Our model and results provide insights into new initiatives for tackling ocean plastic pollution. Funding: O. Baron and G. Romero are both supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Z. Zhang is partially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Xiamen University [Grant 20720241012]. S. X. Zhou is partially supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund [Grant CUHK-14500921], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72394395], and the Asian Institute of Supply Chains and Logistics. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0643 .</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/msom.2022.0643</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-3117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6851-4858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0062-8339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-2676</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-4614
ispartof Manufacturing & service operations management, 2024-11, Vol.26 (6), p.2160-2178
issn 1523-4614
1526-5498
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3132641223
source INFORMS PubsOnLine
subjects additionality
Business models
Environmental impact
Equilibrium
Numerical analysis
ocean-bound plastic (OBP) recycling
Plastics
Profit maximization
Recycling
Supply chains
sustainable operations
triple bottom line (TBL)
title Innovative Business Models in Ocean-Bound Plastic Recycling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A51%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Innovative%20Business%20Models%20in%20Ocean-Bound%20Plastic%20Recycling&rft.jtitle=Manufacturing%20&%20service%20operations%20management&rft.au=Baron,%20Opher&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2160&rft.epage=2178&rft.pages=2160-2178&rft.issn=1523-4614&rft.eissn=1526-5498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/msom.2022.0643&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3132641223%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132641223&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true