Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand

The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2024-12, Vol.26 (12), p.4215-4228
Hauptverfasser: Pearson, Benjamin M., Minor, Maria A., Robertson, Alastair W., Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4228
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4215
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 26
creator Pearson, Benjamin M.
Minor, Maria A.
Robertson, Alastair W.
Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.
description The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species ( Leptospermum scoparium —mānuka and Chionochloa rubra —red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing Calluna vulgaris —European heather and N-fixing Cytisus scoparius —Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3130536148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3130536148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8c75a209e04cc87b04814f23cd67d9361d1958cb66cfe53e83a8bd90283941973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRSPESDxmfoCVJdZm7NiJHXaoxUtqAYuZzWwsx6mAUdoOttMNfNN8JE43EjtWflTdc0t1i-KEkjNKiPgdKakYwaTkmDDOKX7fKw5pJRimvOb7-c6kwKzi4qA4ivGZENIIUh0W_x8G7RKybq2j9Q51fuPQ5DoI5whex8EH6x5RegLUwuA3-DH4XEV2NWqTkO8_lWtA4xYURzAWIsqo6O2AxuBHCGn-0rPOrfML2qATIONXq8nZbdG6rckCXAp6QHmqBHqaDe5gg_6BzvTuZ_Gj10OEX5_ncfH36vLP4gYv769vFxdLbErOE5ZGVLokDRBujBQt4ZLyvmSmq0XXsJp2tKmkaeva9FAxkEzLtmtIKVnDaSPYcXG64-bpXyaIST37KbhsqRhledM15TJ3lbsuE3yMAXo1BrvS4U1RouZU1C4VlVNR21TUexaxnSiO82YhfKG_UX0AsrGTqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130536148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Pearson, Benjamin M. ; Minor, Maria A. ; Robertson, Alastair W. ; Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Benjamin M. ; Minor, Maria A. ; Robertson, Alastair W. ; Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><description>The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species ( Leptospermum scoparium —mānuka and Chionochloa rubra —red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing Calluna vulgaris —European heather and N-fixing Cytisus scoparius —Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon/nitrogen ratio ; Collembola ; Cytisus scoparius ; Decomposition ; Developmental Biology ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Fixing ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasions ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Nitrogen ; Nonnative species ; Nutrient concentrations ; Oligochaeta ; Original Paper ; Plant layout ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Soil conditions ; Soil fauna ; Soil invertebrates ; Soil nutrients ; Soil properties</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2024-12, Vol.26 (12), p.4215-4228</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8c75a209e04cc87b04814f23cd67d9361d1958cb66cfe53e83a8bd90283941973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6894-2158 ; 0000-0003-2095-5456 ; 0000-0003-3949-2439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Alastair W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><title>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species ( Leptospermum scoparium —mānuka and Chionochloa rubra —red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing Calluna vulgaris —European heather and N-fixing Cytisus scoparius —Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon/nitrogen ratio</subject><subject>Collembola</subject><subject>Cytisus scoparius</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fixing</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasions</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Oligochaeta</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant layout</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil fauna</subject><subject>Soil invertebrates</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRSPESDxmfoCVJdZm7NiJHXaoxUtqAYuZzWwsx6mAUdoOttMNfNN8JE43EjtWflTdc0t1i-KEkjNKiPgdKakYwaTkmDDOKX7fKw5pJRimvOb7-c6kwKzi4qA4ivGZENIIUh0W_x8G7RKybq2j9Q51fuPQ5DoI5whex8EH6x5RegLUwuA3-DH4XEV2NWqTkO8_lWtA4xYURzAWIsqo6O2AxuBHCGn-0rPOrfML2qATIONXq8nZbdG6rckCXAp6QHmqBHqaDe5gg_6BzvTuZ_Gj10OEX5_ncfH36vLP4gYv769vFxdLbErOE5ZGVLokDRBujBQt4ZLyvmSmq0XXsJp2tKmkaeva9FAxkEzLtmtIKVnDaSPYcXG64-bpXyaIST37KbhsqRhledM15TJ3lbsuE3yMAXo1BrvS4U1RouZU1C4VlVNR21TUexaxnSiO82YhfKG_UX0AsrGTqA</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Pearson, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Minor, Maria A.</creator><creator>Robertson, Alastair W.</creator><creator>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6894-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-5456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-2439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</title><author>Pearson, Benjamin M. ; Minor, Maria A. ; Robertson, Alastair W. ; Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8c75a209e04cc87b04814f23cd67d9361d1958cb66cfe53e83a8bd90283941973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon/nitrogen ratio</topic><topic>Collembola</topic><topic>Cytisus scoparius</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fixing</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasions</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Oligochaeta</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant layout</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil fauna</topic><topic>Soil invertebrates</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Alastair W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearson, Benjamin M.</au><au>Minor, Maria A.</au><au>Robertson, Alastair W.</au><au>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4215</spage><epage>4228</epage><pages>4215-4228</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species ( Leptospermum scoparium —mānuka and Chionochloa rubra —red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing Calluna vulgaris —European heather and N-fixing Cytisus scoparius —Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6894-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-5456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-2439</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2024-12, Vol.26 (12), p.4215-4228
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3130536148
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abundance
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carbon/nitrogen ratio
Collembola
Cytisus scoparius
Decomposition
Developmental Biology
Ecological effects
Ecology
Fixing
Flowers & plants
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Indigenous plants
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Invasions
Invasive plants
Invasive species
Invertebrates
Life Sciences
Nitrogen
Nonnative species
Nutrient concentrations
Oligochaeta
Original Paper
Plant layout
Plant Sciences
Plant species
Soil conditions
Soil fauna
Soil invertebrates
Soil nutrients
Soil properties
title Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T03%3A48%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20invasion%20down%20under:%20exploring%20the%20below-ground%20impact%20of%20invasive%20plant%20species%20on%20soil%20properties%20and%20invertebrate%20communities%20in%20the%20Central%20Plateau%20of%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Pearson,%20Benjamin%20M.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4215&rft.epage=4228&rft.pages=4215-4228&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3130536148%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130536148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true