Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand
The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological invasions 2024-12, Vol.26 (12), p.4215-4228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4228 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4215 |
container_title | Biological invasions |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Pearson, Benjamin M. Minor, Maria A. Robertson, Alastair W. Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L. |
description | The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species (
Leptospermum scoparium
—mānuka and
Chionochloa rubra
—red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing
Calluna vulgaris
—European heather and N-fixing
Cytisus scoparius
—Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3130536148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3130536148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8c75a209e04cc87b04814f23cd67d9361d1958cb66cfe53e83a8bd90283941973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRSPESDxmfoCVJdZm7NiJHXaoxUtqAYuZzWwsx6mAUdoOttMNfNN8JE43EjtWflTdc0t1i-KEkjNKiPgdKakYwaTkmDDOKX7fKw5pJRimvOb7-c6kwKzi4qA4ivGZENIIUh0W_x8G7RKybq2j9Q51fuPQ5DoI5whex8EH6x5RegLUwuA3-DH4XEV2NWqTkO8_lWtA4xYURzAWIsqo6O2AxuBHCGn-0rPOrfML2qATIONXq8nZbdG6rckCXAp6QHmqBHqaDe5gg_6BzvTuZ_Gj10OEX5_ncfH36vLP4gYv769vFxdLbErOE5ZGVLokDRBujBQt4ZLyvmSmq0XXsJp2tKmkaeva9FAxkEzLtmtIKVnDaSPYcXG64-bpXyaIST37KbhsqRhledM15TJ3lbsuE3yMAXo1BrvS4U1RouZU1C4VlVNR21TUexaxnSiO82YhfKG_UX0AsrGTqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130536148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Pearson, Benjamin M. ; Minor, Maria A. ; Robertson, Alastair W. ; Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Benjamin M. ; Minor, Maria A. ; Robertson, Alastair W. ; Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><description>The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species (
Leptospermum scoparium
—mānuka and
Chionochloa rubra
—red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing
Calluna vulgaris
—European heather and N-fixing
Cytisus scoparius
—Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon/nitrogen ratio ; Collembola ; Cytisus scoparius ; Decomposition ; Developmental Biology ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Fixing ; Flowers & plants ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasions ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Nitrogen ; Nonnative species ; Nutrient concentrations ; Oligochaeta ; Original Paper ; Plant layout ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Soil conditions ; Soil fauna ; Soil invertebrates ; Soil nutrients ; Soil properties</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2024-12, Vol.26 (12), p.4215-4228</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8c75a209e04cc87b04814f23cd67d9361d1958cb66cfe53e83a8bd90283941973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6894-2158 ; 0000-0003-2095-5456 ; 0000-0003-3949-2439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Alastair W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><title>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species (
Leptospermum scoparium
—mānuka and
Chionochloa rubra
—red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing
Calluna vulgaris
—European heather and N-fixing
Cytisus scoparius
—Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon/nitrogen ratio</subject><subject>Collembola</subject><subject>Cytisus scoparius</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fixing</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasions</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Oligochaeta</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant layout</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil fauna</subject><subject>Soil invertebrates</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctO5DAQRSPESDxmfoCVJdZm7NiJHXaoxUtqAYuZzWwsx6mAUdoOttMNfNN8JE43EjtWflTdc0t1i-KEkjNKiPgdKakYwaTkmDDOKX7fKw5pJRimvOb7-c6kwKzi4qA4ivGZENIIUh0W_x8G7RKybq2j9Q51fuPQ5DoI5whex8EH6x5RegLUwuA3-DH4XEV2NWqTkO8_lWtA4xYURzAWIsqo6O2AxuBHCGn-0rPOrfML2qATIONXq8nZbdG6rckCXAp6QHmqBHqaDe5gg_6BzvTuZ_Gj10OEX5_ncfH36vLP4gYv769vFxdLbErOE5ZGVLokDRBujBQt4ZLyvmSmq0XXsJp2tKmkaeva9FAxkEzLtmtIKVnDaSPYcXG64-bpXyaIST37KbhsqRhledM15TJ3lbsuE3yMAXo1BrvS4U1RouZU1C4VlVNR21TUexaxnSiO82YhfKG_UX0AsrGTqA</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Pearson, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Minor, Maria A.</creator><creator>Robertson, Alastair W.</creator><creator>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6894-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-5456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-2439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</title><author>Pearson, Benjamin M. ; Minor, Maria A. ; Robertson, Alastair W. ; Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8c75a209e04cc87b04814f23cd67d9361d1958cb66cfe53e83a8bd90283941973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon/nitrogen ratio</topic><topic>Collembola</topic><topic>Cytisus scoparius</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fixing</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasions</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Oligochaeta</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant layout</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil fauna</topic><topic>Soil invertebrates</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Alastair W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearson, Benjamin M.</au><au>Minor, Maria A.</au><au>Robertson, Alastair W.</au><au>Clavijo McCormick, Andrea L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4215</spage><epage>4228</epage><pages>4215-4228</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>The impacts of invasive plants on arthropod communities are often reported to be negative and have predominantly been explored aboveground, but there is a paucity of information regarding what happens belowground. To address this gap, we compared soil properties and soil fauna communities associated with two native plant species (
Leptospermum scoparium
—mānuka and
Chionochloa rubra
—red tussock) and two invasive species (non-N-fixing
Calluna vulgaris
—European heather and N-fixing
Cytisus scoparius
—Scotch broom) in the Central Plateau of New Zealand. We expected that (1) at individual plant level soil properties would be different under invasive and native plant species, with higher soil nutrient concentrations under invasive species, especially N-fixing broom; (2) total abundance of soil fauna would be higher under invasive plant species, as generally positive impact of invasive plants on soil invertebrates is indicated in the literature; (3) invasive plants, and especially N-fixing broom, will be associated with greater abundances of soil decomposer groups. We found that soil properties and soil fauna assemblages did not cluster by plant invasive status as initially predicted. At individual plant level, there was similarity in soil conditions between mānuka and broom, and between red tussock and heather. The invasive N-fixer (broom) had positive effects on soil N availability, with higher N pool and lower C/N ratio in soil under this species. There were no consistent differences in total soil fauna abundance between invasive and native plants. Broom and mānuka were associated with higher abundances of Collembola, Oligochaeta and Diplopoda; heather and red tussock had higher abundances of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera. Significantly more Oligochaeta and Collembola under broom matched the prediction of invasive plants (and especially N-fixing invasives) being associated with greater abundances of decomposers. However, another important decomposer group—oribatid mites—did not show the same tendency. These results evidence that simplified generalizations regarding the impacts of invasive plants are unlikely to be justified, since the ecological effects of plant invasions are complex and do not always follow the same pattern. Therefore, we need to take into consideration the ecological context and the traits of individual plant species and target organisms in an unbiased manner to fully understand the impacts of plant invasions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6894-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-5456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-2439</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-3547 |
ispartof | Biological invasions, 2024-12, Vol.26 (12), p.4215-4228 |
issn | 1387-3547 1573-1464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3130536148 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abundance Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbon/nitrogen ratio Collembola Cytisus scoparius Decomposition Developmental Biology Ecological effects Ecology Fixing Flowers & plants Freshwater & Marine Ecology Indigenous plants Indigenous species Introduced species Invasions Invasive plants Invasive species Invertebrates Life Sciences Nitrogen Nonnative species Nutrient concentrations Oligochaeta Original Paper Plant layout Plant Sciences Plant species Soil conditions Soil fauna Soil invertebrates Soil nutrients Soil properties |
title | Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T03%3A48%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20invasion%20down%20under:%20exploring%20the%20below-ground%20impact%20of%20invasive%20plant%20species%20on%20soil%20properties%20and%20invertebrate%20communities%20in%20the%20Central%20Plateau%20of%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Pearson,%20Benjamin%20M.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4215&rft.epage=4228&rft.pages=4215-4228&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-024-03441-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3130536148%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130536148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |