A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry
Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural resources research (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2024-12, Vol.33 (6), p.2609-2626 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2626 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2609 |
container_title | Natural resources research (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Zhao, Hongtao Zhang, Yu Shao, Yongjun Liao, Jia Song, Shuling Cao, Genshen Tan, Ruichang |
description | Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperature-dependent, making it an ideal candidate for geothermometry. Here, we first compiled a global sphalerite trace element composition dataset (n = 1416, T = 75–430 °C), encompassing different Pb–Zn deposit types (Mississippi Valley-type, epithermal, sedimentary-exhalative, skarn-type, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits). After data processing following statistical norms, the different machine learning algorithms (random forest (RF), gradient boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and linear regression) were employed to train different models to explore the potential link between the sphalerite-forming temperature and trace element geochemistry. Each of the model’s performance was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation approach, which revealed the RF (R
2
= 0.88, RMSE = 26 °C) as the best-performing algorithm. Meanwhile, five-fold cross-validation results indicated that the RF model (R
2
= 0.87, RMSE = 25 °C) outperformed the GGIMFis thermometer (R
2
= 0.53, RMSE = 50 °C). Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis revealed that Ge and Mn displayed significant impacts on temperature prediction as the high temperature generally favors Mn, but not Ge, incorporation into the sphalerite structure. Finally, a model was trained with the entire dataset, generating a reliable sphalerite thermometer (SPRFT software, freely provided here) suitable for low to moderate temperature (75–430 °C) hydrothermal environments. This SPRFT thermometer was applied to evaluate the temperature of Pb–Zn mineralization in the Sichuan–Yunnan–Guizhou Pb–Zn metallogenic belt (SW China) and it provides an innovative perspective into the ore-fluid evolution. This study demonstrated a robust approach for calculating mineralization temperatures using machine learning. This novel methodology opens new avenues for investigating and recalculating more mineral geothermometers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3127415183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3127415183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-319eb393d7f5bc9dfa4aec22801e8650b6bcef939705cd7a2e54f9397eeb95dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAkyWmA1nO27isVSlIAUYKKyW41yaVE1S7FRV3560QWJjujvp__6TPkJuOdxzgPghcA5KMhAR4xBBwuQZGXEVS5bohJ8fdwEsjqS-JFchrKGHZKJG5GtK33BPP7al3aCvOqTLEn3d1tihp482YE7bhr5aV1YN0hStb6pmRfdVV9Kltw7pfIM1Nh1dYOtKrKvQ-cM1uSjsJuDN7xyTz6f5cvbM0vfFy2yaMicAOia5xkxqmceFypzOCxtZdEIkwDGZKMgmmcNCSx2DcnlsBarodCJmWuVOjsnd0Lv17fcOQ2fW7c43_UsjuYgjrngi-5QYUs63IXgszNZXtfUHw8Ec_ZnBn-n9mZM_c4TkAIU-3KzQ_1X_Q_0AzmVzFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3127415183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zhao, Hongtao ; Zhang, Yu ; Shao, Yongjun ; Liao, Jia ; Song, Shuling ; Cao, Genshen ; Tan, Ruichang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Hongtao ; Zhang, Yu ; Shao, Yongjun ; Liao, Jia ; Song, Shuling ; Cao, Genshen ; Tan, Ruichang</creatorcontrib><description>Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperature-dependent, making it an ideal candidate for geothermometry. Here, we first compiled a global sphalerite trace element composition dataset (n = 1416, T = 75–430 °C), encompassing different Pb–Zn deposit types (Mississippi Valley-type, epithermal, sedimentary-exhalative, skarn-type, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits). After data processing following statistical norms, the different machine learning algorithms (random forest (RF), gradient boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and linear regression) were employed to train different models to explore the potential link between the sphalerite-forming temperature and trace element geochemistry. Each of the model’s performance was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation approach, which revealed the RF (R
2
= 0.88, RMSE = 26 °C) as the best-performing algorithm. Meanwhile, five-fold cross-validation results indicated that the RF model (R
2
= 0.87, RMSE = 25 °C) outperformed the GGIMFis thermometer (R
2
= 0.53, RMSE = 50 °C). Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis revealed that Ge and Mn displayed significant impacts on temperature prediction as the high temperature generally favors Mn, but not Ge, incorporation into the sphalerite structure. Finally, a model was trained with the entire dataset, generating a reliable sphalerite thermometer (SPRFT software, freely provided here) suitable for low to moderate temperature (75–430 °C) hydrothermal environments. This SPRFT thermometer was applied to evaluate the temperature of Pb–Zn mineralization in the Sichuan–Yunnan–Guizhou Pb–Zn metallogenic belt (SW China) and it provides an innovative perspective into the ore-fluid evolution. This study demonstrated a robust approach for calculating mineralization temperatures using machine learning. This novel methodology opens new avenues for investigating and recalculating more mineral geothermometers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-7439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Composition ; Computer Science ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Decision trees ; Deposits ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Fossil Fuels (incl. Carbon Capture) ; Geochemistry ; Geography ; Geology ; High temperature ; Lead ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics ; Mineral deposits ; Mineral Resources ; Mineralization ; Neural networks ; Original Paper ; Performance evaluation ; Physics ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Sphalerite ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics for Engineering ; Support vector machines ; Sustainable Development ; Temperature ; Temperature dependence ; Thermometers ; Thermometry ; Trace elements ; Zinc ; Zincblende</subject><ispartof>Natural resources research (New York, N.Y.), 2024-12, Vol.33 (6), p.2609-2626</ispartof><rights>International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-319eb393d7f5bc9dfa4aec22801e8650b6bcef939705cd7a2e54f9397eeb95dc3</cites><orcidid>0009-0002-7793-0794</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yongjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Shuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Genshen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ruichang</creatorcontrib><title>A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry</title><title>Natural resources research (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Nat Resour Res</addtitle><description>Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperature-dependent, making it an ideal candidate for geothermometry. Here, we first compiled a global sphalerite trace element composition dataset (n = 1416, T = 75–430 °C), encompassing different Pb–Zn deposit types (Mississippi Valley-type, epithermal, sedimentary-exhalative, skarn-type, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits). After data processing following statistical norms, the different machine learning algorithms (random forest (RF), gradient boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and linear regression) were employed to train different models to explore the potential link between the sphalerite-forming temperature and trace element geochemistry. Each of the model’s performance was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation approach, which revealed the RF (R
2
= 0.88, RMSE = 26 °C) as the best-performing algorithm. Meanwhile, five-fold cross-validation results indicated that the RF model (R
2
= 0.87, RMSE = 25 °C) outperformed the GGIMFis thermometer (R
2
= 0.53, RMSE = 50 °C). Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis revealed that Ge and Mn displayed significant impacts on temperature prediction as the high temperature generally favors Mn, but not Ge, incorporation into the sphalerite structure. Finally, a model was trained with the entire dataset, generating a reliable sphalerite thermometer (SPRFT software, freely provided here) suitable for low to moderate temperature (75–430 °C) hydrothermal environments. This SPRFT thermometer was applied to evaluate the temperature of Pb–Zn mineralization in the Sichuan–Yunnan–Guizhou Pb–Zn metallogenic belt (SW China) and it provides an innovative perspective into the ore-fluid evolution. This study demonstrated a robust approach for calculating mineralization temperatures using machine learning. This novel methodology opens new avenues for investigating and recalculating more mineral geothermometers.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Deposits</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Fossil Fuels (incl. Carbon Capture)</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics</subject><subject>Mineral deposits</subject><subject>Mineral Resources</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Sphalerite</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature dependence</subject><subject>Thermometers</subject><subject>Thermometry</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><subject>Zincblende</subject><issn>1520-7439</issn><issn>1573-8981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAkyWmA1nO27isVSlIAUYKKyW41yaVE1S7FRV3560QWJjujvp__6TPkJuOdxzgPghcA5KMhAR4xBBwuQZGXEVS5bohJ8fdwEsjqS-JFchrKGHZKJG5GtK33BPP7al3aCvOqTLEn3d1tihp482YE7bhr5aV1YN0hStb6pmRfdVV9Kltw7pfIM1Nh1dYOtKrKvQ-cM1uSjsJuDN7xyTz6f5cvbM0vfFy2yaMicAOia5xkxqmceFypzOCxtZdEIkwDGZKMgmmcNCSx2DcnlsBarodCJmWuVOjsnd0Lv17fcOQ2fW7c43_UsjuYgjrngi-5QYUs63IXgszNZXtfUHw8Ec_ZnBn-n9mZM_c4TkAIU-3KzQ_1X_Q_0AzmVzFQ</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Zhao, Hongtao</creator><creator>Zhang, Yu</creator><creator>Shao, Yongjun</creator><creator>Liao, Jia</creator><creator>Song, Shuling</creator><creator>Cao, Genshen</creator><creator>Tan, Ruichang</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7793-0794</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry</title><author>Zhao, Hongtao ; Zhang, Yu ; Shao, Yongjun ; Liao, Jia ; Song, Shuling ; Cao, Genshen ; Tan, Ruichang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-319eb393d7f5bc9dfa4aec22801e8650b6bcef939705cd7a2e54f9397eeb95dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Deposits</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Fossil Fuels (incl. Carbon Capture)</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics</topic><topic>Mineral deposits</topic><topic>Mineral Resources</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Sphalerite</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature dependence</topic><topic>Thermometers</topic><topic>Thermometry</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><topic>Zincblende</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Hongtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yongjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Shuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Genshen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ruichang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Natural resources research (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Hongtao</au><au>Zhang, Yu</au><au>Shao, Yongjun</au><au>Liao, Jia</au><au>Song, Shuling</au><au>Cao, Genshen</au><au>Tan, Ruichang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry</atitle><jtitle>Natural resources research (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Resour Res</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2609</spage><epage>2626</epage><pages>2609-2626</pages><issn>1520-7439</issn><eissn>1573-8981</eissn><abstract>Mineralization temperature determination is fundamental to economic geology research, yet quantifying it across mineralization remains a challenge. Sphalerite is ubiquitous in various types of mineral deposits and particularly abundant in Pb–Zn deposits, and its trace element composition is temperature-dependent, making it an ideal candidate for geothermometry. Here, we first compiled a global sphalerite trace element composition dataset (n = 1416, T = 75–430 °C), encompassing different Pb–Zn deposit types (Mississippi Valley-type, epithermal, sedimentary-exhalative, skarn-type, and volcanic massive sulfide deposits). After data processing following statistical norms, the different machine learning algorithms (random forest (RF), gradient boosted decision trees, artificial neural networks, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and linear regression) were employed to train different models to explore the potential link between the sphalerite-forming temperature and trace element geochemistry. Each of the model’s performance was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation approach, which revealed the RF (R
2
= 0.88, RMSE = 26 °C) as the best-performing algorithm. Meanwhile, five-fold cross-validation results indicated that the RF model (R
2
= 0.87, RMSE = 25 °C) outperformed the GGIMFis thermometer (R
2
= 0.53, RMSE = 50 °C). Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis revealed that Ge and Mn displayed significant impacts on temperature prediction as the high temperature generally favors Mn, but not Ge, incorporation into the sphalerite structure. Finally, a model was trained with the entire dataset, generating a reliable sphalerite thermometer (SPRFT software, freely provided here) suitable for low to moderate temperature (75–430 °C) hydrothermal environments. This SPRFT thermometer was applied to evaluate the temperature of Pb–Zn mineralization in the Sichuan–Yunnan–Guizhou Pb–Zn metallogenic belt (SW China) and it provides an innovative perspective into the ore-fluid evolution. This study demonstrated a robust approach for calculating mineralization temperatures using machine learning. This novel methodology opens new avenues for investigating and recalculating more mineral geothermometers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7793-0794</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-7439 |
ispartof | Natural resources research (New York, N.Y.), 2024-12, Vol.33 (6), p.2609-2626 |
issn | 1520-7439 1573-8981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3127415183 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial neural networks Chemistry and Earth Sciences Composition Computer Science Data processing Datasets Decision trees Deposits Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Fossil Fuels (incl. Carbon Capture) Geochemistry Geography Geology High temperature Lead Learning algorithms Machine learning Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics Mineral deposits Mineral Resources Mineralization Neural networks Original Paper Performance evaluation Physics Regression analysis Regression models Sphalerite Statistical analysis Statistics for Engineering Support vector machines Sustainable Development Temperature Temperature dependence Thermometers Thermometry Trace elements Zinc Zincblende |
title | A New Sphalerite Thermometer Based on Machine Learning with Trace Element Geochemistry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20New%20Sphalerite%20Thermometer%20Based%20on%20Machine%20Learning%20with%20Trace%20Element%20Geochemistry&rft.jtitle=Natural%20resources%20research%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Zhao,%20Hongtao&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2609&rft.epage=2626&rft.pages=2609-2626&rft.issn=1520-7439&rft.eissn=1573-8981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11053-024-10408-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3127415183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3127415183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |