Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments

Social stimuli are some of the most commonly used reinforcers. Previous research shows that preference for social stimuli can be identified using paired‐stimulus preference assessments (PSPA) employing various stimulus modes (e.g., pictures of the actual social stimuli). To date, no study has evalua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral interventions 2024-11, Vol.39 (4), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Shannon, Cividini‐Motta, Catia, MacNaul, Hannah, Salinas, Rebecca, Ferrer, Geninna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Behavioral interventions
container_volume 39
creator Wilson, Shannon
Cividini‐Motta, Catia
MacNaul, Hannah
Salinas, Rebecca
Ferrer, Geninna
description Social stimuli are some of the most commonly used reinforcers. Previous research shows that preference for social stimuli can be identified using paired‐stimulus preference assessments (PSPA) employing various stimulus modes (e.g., pictures of the actual social stimuli). To date, no study has evaluated the correspondence in preference for social stimuli identified via PSPAs completed using three differing stimulus modes. Therefore, this study compared the correspondence in preference hierarchy identified via PSPAs completed using video of the social stimuli (VSM), pictures of the actual social stimuli (PSM‐A), and drawings of the social stimuli (PSM‐D) and whether preference hierarchy remained stable over repeated administration of the PSPAs (i.e., 1 month). Moreover, we assessed participants' preference for the three types of stimulus modes. Results demonstrated that during the initial PSPAs, preference hierarchies were most similar across the PSPAs completed using VSM and PSM‐A, that preference was most stable across repeated administration of the PSPAs completed using the VSM, and that participants' preference for differing stimulus modes was idiosyncratic. Moreover, the PSPAs completed using the VSM required the longest amount of time to create materials and administer the assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bin.2034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3126611507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3126611507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2544-7fb7820eb76f8bf72a764699d12dbf7ad17315fd66fe9b14d5fc34b3381563503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgTwh48bI1X5vseqvFj0JRDwoehJDdJJCyu1kzXaT_3q0tePI0M8zDO8OD0CUlM0oIu6lCN2OEiyM0oaQsM6KKj-Ndr1hGCqFO0RnAmhBSSsYn6PM1Oe-S62qHfUwYYh1Mg2ET2qEJt3iO69j2JgWIHY7-sBgAt9E6wAM4i0OH-78UA-AAWtdt4BydeNOAuzjUKXp_uH9bPGWrl8flYr7KapYLkSlfqYIRVynpi8orZpQUsiwtZXYcjaWK09xbKb0rKyps7msuKs4LmkueEz5FV_vcPsWvwcFGr-OQuvGk5pRJSWlO1Ehd76k6RYDxYd2n0Jq01ZTonTs9utM7dyOa7dHv0Ljtv5y-Wz7_8j9GjHAu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3126611507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wilson, Shannon ; Cividini‐Motta, Catia ; MacNaul, Hannah ; Salinas, Rebecca ; Ferrer, Geninna</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Shannon ; Cividini‐Motta, Catia ; MacNaul, Hannah ; Salinas, Rebecca ; Ferrer, Geninna</creatorcontrib><description>Social stimuli are some of the most commonly used reinforcers. Previous research shows that preference for social stimuli can be identified using paired‐stimulus preference assessments (PSPA) employing various stimulus modes (e.g., pictures of the actual social stimuli). To date, no study has evaluated the correspondence in preference for social stimuli identified via PSPAs completed using three differing stimulus modes. Therefore, this study compared the correspondence in preference hierarchy identified via PSPAs completed using video of the social stimuli (VSM), pictures of the actual social stimuli (PSM‐A), and drawings of the social stimuli (PSM‐D) and whether preference hierarchy remained stable over repeated administration of the PSPAs (i.e., 1 month). Moreover, we assessed participants' preference for the three types of stimulus modes. Results demonstrated that during the initial PSPAs, preference hierarchies were most similar across the PSPAs completed using VSM and PSM‐A, that preference was most stable across repeated administration of the PSPAs completed using the VSM, and that participants' preference for differing stimulus modes was idiosyncratic. Moreover, the PSPAs completed using the VSM required the longest amount of time to create materials and administer the assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-0847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-078X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bin.2034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>autism ; preference assessment ; PspA protein ; Social hierarchy ; social interaction ; social stimuli ; stability</subject><ispartof>Behavioral interventions, 2024-11, Vol.39 (4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2544-7fb7820eb76f8bf72a764699d12dbf7ad17315fd66fe9b14d5fc34b3381563503</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5679-9294</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbin.2034$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbin.2034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cividini‐Motta, Catia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacNaul, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, Geninna</creatorcontrib><title>Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments</title><title>Behavioral interventions</title><description>Social stimuli are some of the most commonly used reinforcers. Previous research shows that preference for social stimuli can be identified using paired‐stimulus preference assessments (PSPA) employing various stimulus modes (e.g., pictures of the actual social stimuli). To date, no study has evaluated the correspondence in preference for social stimuli identified via PSPAs completed using three differing stimulus modes. Therefore, this study compared the correspondence in preference hierarchy identified via PSPAs completed using video of the social stimuli (VSM), pictures of the actual social stimuli (PSM‐A), and drawings of the social stimuli (PSM‐D) and whether preference hierarchy remained stable over repeated administration of the PSPAs (i.e., 1 month). Moreover, we assessed participants' preference for the three types of stimulus modes. Results demonstrated that during the initial PSPAs, preference hierarchies were most similar across the PSPAs completed using VSM and PSM‐A, that preference was most stable across repeated administration of the PSPAs completed using the VSM, and that participants' preference for differing stimulus modes was idiosyncratic. Moreover, the PSPAs completed using the VSM required the longest amount of time to create materials and administer the assessment.</description><subject>autism</subject><subject>preference assessment</subject><subject>PspA protein</subject><subject>Social hierarchy</subject><subject>social interaction</subject><subject>social stimuli</subject><subject>stability</subject><issn>1072-0847</issn><issn>1099-078X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgTwh48bI1X5vseqvFj0JRDwoehJDdJJCyu1kzXaT_3q0tePI0M8zDO8OD0CUlM0oIu6lCN2OEiyM0oaQsM6KKj-Ndr1hGCqFO0RnAmhBSSsYn6PM1Oe-S62qHfUwYYh1Mg2ET2qEJt3iO69j2JgWIHY7-sBgAt9E6wAM4i0OH-78UA-AAWtdt4BydeNOAuzjUKXp_uH9bPGWrl8flYr7KapYLkSlfqYIRVynpi8orZpQUsiwtZXYcjaWK09xbKb0rKyps7msuKs4LmkueEz5FV_vcPsWvwcFGr-OQuvGk5pRJSWlO1Ehd76k6RYDxYd2n0Jq01ZTonTs9utM7dyOa7dHv0Ljtv5y-Wz7_8j9GjHAu</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Wilson, Shannon</creator><creator>Cividini‐Motta, Catia</creator><creator>MacNaul, Hannah</creator><creator>Salinas, Rebecca</creator><creator>Ferrer, Geninna</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-9294</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments</title><author>Wilson, Shannon ; Cividini‐Motta, Catia ; MacNaul, Hannah ; Salinas, Rebecca ; Ferrer, Geninna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2544-7fb7820eb76f8bf72a764699d12dbf7ad17315fd66fe9b14d5fc34b3381563503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>autism</topic><topic>preference assessment</topic><topic>PspA protein</topic><topic>Social hierarchy</topic><topic>social interaction</topic><topic>social stimuli</topic><topic>stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cividini‐Motta, Catia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacNaul, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, Geninna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Behavioral interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Shannon</au><au>Cividini‐Motta, Catia</au><au>MacNaul, Hannah</au><au>Salinas, Rebecca</au><au>Ferrer, Geninna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral interventions</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1072-0847</issn><eissn>1099-078X</eissn><abstract>Social stimuli are some of the most commonly used reinforcers. Previous research shows that preference for social stimuli can be identified using paired‐stimulus preference assessments (PSPA) employing various stimulus modes (e.g., pictures of the actual social stimuli). To date, no study has evaluated the correspondence in preference for social stimuli identified via PSPAs completed using three differing stimulus modes. Therefore, this study compared the correspondence in preference hierarchy identified via PSPAs completed using video of the social stimuli (VSM), pictures of the actual social stimuli (PSM‐A), and drawings of the social stimuli (PSM‐D) and whether preference hierarchy remained stable over repeated administration of the PSPAs (i.e., 1 month). Moreover, we assessed participants' preference for the three types of stimulus modes. Results demonstrated that during the initial PSPAs, preference hierarchies were most similar across the PSPAs completed using VSM and PSM‐A, that preference was most stable across repeated administration of the PSPAs completed using the VSM, and that participants' preference for differing stimulus modes was idiosyncratic. Moreover, the PSPAs completed using the VSM required the longest amount of time to create materials and administer the assessment.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/bin.2034</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-9294</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1072-0847
ispartof Behavioral interventions, 2024-11, Vol.39 (4), p.n/a
issn 1072-0847
1099-078X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3126611507
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects autism
preference assessment
PspA protein
Social hierarchy
social interaction
social stimuli
stability
title Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preference%20for%20social%20stimuli:%20A%20comparison%20of%20stimulus%20modes%20used%20in%20preference%20assessments&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20interventions&rft.au=Wilson,%20Shannon&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1072-0847&rft.eissn=1099-078X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bin.2034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3126611507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126611507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true