Survival versus sustaining: A multidisciplinary inquiry of the environmental dilemma in rural Uganda

The livelihoods of the majority of Uganda's population depend on declining environmental resources. The sustainability of the natural environment requires that the people who are interdependent with it, as well as the structures of governance and leadership around them, understand the implicati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural resources forum 2024-11, Vol.48 (4), p.1226-1243
Hauptverfasser: Muwanika, Vincent B., Perry, Mia, Kayendeke, Ellen J., Pullanikkatil, Deepa, Okot, Alex, Thakadu, Olekae T., Mwesigwa, Gordon Y., Mfitumukiza, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1243
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1226
container_title Natural resources forum
container_volume 48
creator Muwanika, Vincent B.
Perry, Mia
Kayendeke, Ellen J.
Pullanikkatil, Deepa
Okot, Alex
Thakadu, Olekae T.
Mwesigwa, Gordon Y.
Mfitumukiza, David
description The livelihoods of the majority of Uganda's population depend on declining environmental resources. The sustainability of the natural environment requires that the people who are interdependent with it, as well as the structures of governance and leadership around them, understand the implications of resource degradation and take deliberate steps towards restoration. The interdependency of human and environment conditions in Uganda requires multidisciplinary attention and this paper reflects a contribution to this end. Socio‐cultural perceptions and relations with a vulnerable environment are put into dialogue with the physical status of environmental resources in Alebtong District, Uganda. Southern epistemological perspectives are considered in relation to Western scientific paradigms. Culturally responsive socio‐cultural research data are related to MODIS NDVI data, using time series analyses and NDVI as a proxy for productivity. The research confirms the declining availability and condition of natural resources and the acknowledgement of local influence on this condition. Despite this, deliberate community and governance efforts towards conservation and restoration varied from non‐existent to insufficient. The causes for this inconsistency revolve around conflicting priorities. This paper demonstrates and discusses the difficult trade‐offs in decision‐making about natural resources that rural communities face, and supports new partnership models as a route to improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1477-8947.12360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3126381391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3126381391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-86768d132bdf4070896676ebedde01fc9bad7c31a69f08461c5343a5ca15c2b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNFLwzAQxoMoOKfPvgZ87pZr2qT1bQynwlBQ9xzSJp0ZbbolbWX_vZkVXz04Dj5-3x33IXQLZAah5pBwHmV5wmcQU0bO0ORPOUcTAiyNSEzoJbryfkcIcIj5BKn33g1mkDUetPO9x6E7aayx23u8wE1fd0YZX5p9bax0R2zsoTdhthXuPjXWdjCutY22XdihTK2bRgYIu94FYbOVVslrdFHJ2uub3zlFm9XDx_IpWr8-Pi8X66ikACTKGGeZAhoXqkoIJ1nOgqILrZQmUJV5IRUPqGR5RbKEQZnShMq0lJCWcRHTKbob9-5de-i178Su7Z0NJwWFmNEMaA6Bmo9U6Vrvna7E3pkm_CaAiFOU4hScOAUnfqIMDjY6vsJ_x_9w8bJ4W43Gb218dxk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3126381391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival versus sustaining: A multidisciplinary inquiry of the environmental dilemma in rural Uganda</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Muwanika, Vincent B. ; Perry, Mia ; Kayendeke, Ellen J. ; Pullanikkatil, Deepa ; Okot, Alex ; Thakadu, Olekae T. ; Mwesigwa, Gordon Y. ; Mfitumukiza, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Muwanika, Vincent B. ; Perry, Mia ; Kayendeke, Ellen J. ; Pullanikkatil, Deepa ; Okot, Alex ; Thakadu, Olekae T. ; Mwesigwa, Gordon Y. ; Mfitumukiza, David</creatorcontrib><description>The livelihoods of the majority of Uganda's population depend on declining environmental resources. The sustainability of the natural environment requires that the people who are interdependent with it, as well as the structures of governance and leadership around them, understand the implications of resource degradation and take deliberate steps towards restoration. The interdependency of human and environment conditions in Uganda requires multidisciplinary attention and this paper reflects a contribution to this end. Socio‐cultural perceptions and relations with a vulnerable environment are put into dialogue with the physical status of environmental resources in Alebtong District, Uganda. Southern epistemological perspectives are considered in relation to Western scientific paradigms. Culturally responsive socio‐cultural research data are related to MODIS NDVI data, using time series analyses and NDVI as a proxy for productivity. The research confirms the declining availability and condition of natural resources and the acknowledgement of local influence on this condition. Despite this, deliberate community and governance efforts towards conservation and restoration varied from non‐existent to insufficient. The causes for this inconsistency revolve around conflicting priorities. This paper demonstrates and discusses the difficult trade‐offs in decision‐making about natural resources that rural communities face, and supports new partnership models as a route to improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-8947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>community based ; Conservation ; Cultural factors ; Cultural sensitivity ; Decision making ; Degradation ; Environmental degradation ; environmental resources ; Environmental restoration ; Epistemology ; Governance ; Inconsistency ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Leadership ; multi‐disciplinarity ; Natural environment ; Natural resources ; Perceptions ; Population decline ; Restoration ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural environments ; rural livelihoods ; sustainability ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Natural resources forum, 2024-11, Vol.48 (4), p.1226-1243</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of United Nations.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-86768d132bdf4070896676ebedde01fc9bad7c31a69f08461c5343a5ca15c2b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0886-7093 ; 0000-0003-1685-4548 ; 0000-0003-3903-4198 ; 0000-0002-9955-4956 ; 0000-0001-7399-004X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1477-8947.12360$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1477-8947.12360$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muwanika, Vincent B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Mia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayendeke, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullanikkatil, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okot, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakadu, Olekae T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwesigwa, Gordon Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mfitumukiza, David</creatorcontrib><title>Survival versus sustaining: A multidisciplinary inquiry of the environmental dilemma in rural Uganda</title><title>Natural resources forum</title><description>The livelihoods of the majority of Uganda's population depend on declining environmental resources. The sustainability of the natural environment requires that the people who are interdependent with it, as well as the structures of governance and leadership around them, understand the implications of resource degradation and take deliberate steps towards restoration. The interdependency of human and environment conditions in Uganda requires multidisciplinary attention and this paper reflects a contribution to this end. Socio‐cultural perceptions and relations with a vulnerable environment are put into dialogue with the physical status of environmental resources in Alebtong District, Uganda. Southern epistemological perspectives are considered in relation to Western scientific paradigms. Culturally responsive socio‐cultural research data are related to MODIS NDVI data, using time series analyses and NDVI as a proxy for productivity. The research confirms the declining availability and condition of natural resources and the acknowledgement of local influence on this condition. Despite this, deliberate community and governance efforts towards conservation and restoration varied from non‐existent to insufficient. The causes for this inconsistency revolve around conflicting priorities. This paper demonstrates and discusses the difficult trade‐offs in decision‐making about natural resources that rural communities face, and supports new partnership models as a route to improvement.</description><subject>community based</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Cultural sensitivity</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>environmental resources</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Inconsistency</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>multi‐disciplinarity</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural environments</subject><subject>rural livelihoods</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0165-0203</issn><issn>1477-8947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNFLwzAQxoMoOKfPvgZ87pZr2qT1bQynwlBQ9xzSJp0ZbbolbWX_vZkVXz04Dj5-3x33IXQLZAah5pBwHmV5wmcQU0bO0ORPOUcTAiyNSEzoJbryfkcIcIj5BKn33g1mkDUetPO9x6E7aayx23u8wE1fd0YZX5p9bax0R2zsoTdhthXuPjXWdjCutY22XdihTK2bRgYIu94FYbOVVslrdFHJ2uub3zlFm9XDx_IpWr8-Pi8X66ikACTKGGeZAhoXqkoIJ1nOgqILrZQmUJV5IRUPqGR5RbKEQZnShMq0lJCWcRHTKbob9-5de-i178Su7Z0NJwWFmNEMaA6Bmo9U6Vrvna7E3pkm_CaAiFOU4hScOAUnfqIMDjY6vsJ_x_9w8bJ4W43Gb218dxk</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Muwanika, Vincent B.</creator><creator>Perry, Mia</creator><creator>Kayendeke, Ellen J.</creator><creator>Pullanikkatil, Deepa</creator><creator>Okot, Alex</creator><creator>Thakadu, Olekae T.</creator><creator>Mwesigwa, Gordon Y.</creator><creator>Mfitumukiza, David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-7093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-4548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-4198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-4956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-004X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Survival versus sustaining: A multidisciplinary inquiry of the environmental dilemma in rural Uganda</title><author>Muwanika, Vincent B. ; Perry, Mia ; Kayendeke, Ellen J. ; Pullanikkatil, Deepa ; Okot, Alex ; Thakadu, Olekae T. ; Mwesigwa, Gordon Y. ; Mfitumukiza, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3110-86768d132bdf4070896676ebedde01fc9bad7c31a69f08461c5343a5ca15c2b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>community based</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Cultural sensitivity</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>environmental resources</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Inconsistency</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>multi‐disciplinarity</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural environments</topic><topic>rural livelihoods</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muwanika, Vincent B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Mia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayendeke, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullanikkatil, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okot, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakadu, Olekae T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwesigwa, Gordon Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mfitumukiza, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library website</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural resources forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muwanika, Vincent B.</au><au>Perry, Mia</au><au>Kayendeke, Ellen J.</au><au>Pullanikkatil, Deepa</au><au>Okot, Alex</au><au>Thakadu, Olekae T.</au><au>Mwesigwa, Gordon Y.</au><au>Mfitumukiza, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival versus sustaining: A multidisciplinary inquiry of the environmental dilemma in rural Uganda</atitle><jtitle>Natural resources forum</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1226</spage><epage>1243</epage><pages>1226-1243</pages><issn>0165-0203</issn><eissn>1477-8947</eissn><abstract>The livelihoods of the majority of Uganda's population depend on declining environmental resources. The sustainability of the natural environment requires that the people who are interdependent with it, as well as the structures of governance and leadership around them, understand the implications of resource degradation and take deliberate steps towards restoration. The interdependency of human and environment conditions in Uganda requires multidisciplinary attention and this paper reflects a contribution to this end. Socio‐cultural perceptions and relations with a vulnerable environment are put into dialogue with the physical status of environmental resources in Alebtong District, Uganda. Southern epistemological perspectives are considered in relation to Western scientific paradigms. Culturally responsive socio‐cultural research data are related to MODIS NDVI data, using time series analyses and NDVI as a proxy for productivity. The research confirms the declining availability and condition of natural resources and the acknowledgement of local influence on this condition. Despite this, deliberate community and governance efforts towards conservation and restoration varied from non‐existent to insufficient. The causes for this inconsistency revolve around conflicting priorities. This paper demonstrates and discusses the difficult trade‐offs in decision‐making about natural resources that rural communities face, and supports new partnership models as a route to improvement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1477-8947.12360</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-7093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-4548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-4198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-4956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-004X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0203
ispartof Natural resources forum, 2024-11, Vol.48 (4), p.1226-1243
issn 0165-0203
1477-8947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3126381391
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects community based
Conservation
Cultural factors
Cultural sensitivity
Decision making
Degradation
Environmental degradation
environmental resources
Environmental restoration
Epistemology
Governance
Inconsistency
Interdisciplinary aspects
Leadership
multi‐disciplinarity
Natural environment
Natural resources
Perceptions
Population decline
Restoration
Rural areas
Rural communities
Rural environments
rural livelihoods
sustainability
Time series
title Survival versus sustaining: A multidisciplinary inquiry of the environmental dilemma in rural Uganda
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T14%3A58%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20versus%20sustaining:%20A%20multidisciplinary%20inquiry%20of%20the%20environmental%20dilemma%20in%20rural%20Uganda&rft.jtitle=Natural%20resources%20forum&rft.au=Muwanika,%20Vincent%20B.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1226&rft.epage=1243&rft.pages=1226-1243&rft.issn=0165-0203&rft.eissn=1477-8947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1477-8947.12360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3126381391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126381391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true