The impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic

I explore the impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic using real‐time location tracking data from Facebook users. I find that stocks categorized as “harder‐to‐value,” which are typically smaller, less transparent, less visible, and less profitable, experience dec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Financial management 2024-12, Vol.53 (4), p.833-865
1. Verfasser: Sabah, Nasim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 865
container_issue 4
container_start_page 833
container_title Financial management
container_volume 53
creator Sabah, Nasim
description I explore the impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic using real‐time location tracking data from Facebook users. I find that stocks categorized as “harder‐to‐value,” which are typically smaller, less transparent, less visible, and less profitable, experience decreased abnormal trading with more social distancing in their headquarters counties. In contrast, “easier‐to‐value” stocks show an increase in abnormal trading due to high social distancing in their headquarters counties. These findings indicate that greater firm‐specific information asymmetry arises from increased social distancing within the firm headquarters counties. Although “easier‐to‐value” stocks can use alternative information sources to mitigate the information asymmetry, “harder‐to‐value” stocks fail to do so and face negative impact on trading. Additional analyses using alternative information channels, market sidedness, and liquidity confirm this hypothesis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/fima.12456
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3125970799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125970799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3176-c286072b9a1aa9188f104ac9afa1365b496c6287fafeedf9e0ebc3d1b0a9cee13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXnyDgTdiaye5mN8dSrRYqBaniLWSziaa0u2uyrfTmI_iMPolZV_DmXGYGvvkGfoTOgYwg1JWxGzkCmqTsAA0gS9OIpPHzIRoQkrAozjk9RiferwgBSigboIflq8Z200jV4tpgXysr17i0vpWVstULrivcOll2Y2DszrZ7XG5dt7fhdLJ4ml1_fXwCx42sSr2x6hQdGbn2-uy3D9Hj9GY5uYvmi9vZZDyPVAwZixTNGclowSVIySHPDZBEKi6NhJilRcKZYjTPjDRal4ZrogsVl1AQyZXWEA_RRe9tXP221b4Vq3rrqvBSxEBTnpGM80Bd9pRytfdOG9G4EJLbCyCiy0x0mYmfzAKMe1irurL-D-UkqHiekYBAj7zbtd7_IxPT2f24134DmVN5vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125970799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sabah, Nasim</creator><creatorcontrib>Sabah, Nasim</creatorcontrib><description>I explore the impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic using real‐time location tracking data from Facebook users. I find that stocks categorized as “harder‐to‐value,” which are typically smaller, less transparent, less visible, and less profitable, experience decreased abnormal trading with more social distancing in their headquarters counties. In contrast, “easier‐to‐value” stocks show an increase in abnormal trading due to high social distancing in their headquarters counties. These findings indicate that greater firm‐specific information asymmetry arises from increased social distancing within the firm headquarters counties. Although “easier‐to‐value” stocks can use alternative information sources to mitigate the information asymmetry, “harder‐to‐value” stocks fail to do so and face negative impact on trading. Additional analyses using alternative information channels, market sidedness, and liquidity confirm this hypothesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-3892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-053X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fima.12456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tampa: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetric information ; COVID-19 ; Head offices ; information asymmetry ; Information sources ; Liquidity ; Online securities trading ; Pandemics ; physical interactions ; social distance ; Social distancing ; Tracking ; Trading ; trading activity</subject><ispartof>Financial management, 2024-12, Vol.53 (4), p.833-865</ispartof><rights>2024 Financial Management Association International.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3176-c286072b9a1aa9188f104ac9afa1365b496c6287fafeedf9e0ebc3d1b0a9cee13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffima.12456$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffima.12456$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sabah, Nasim</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic</title><title>Financial management</title><description>I explore the impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic using real‐time location tracking data from Facebook users. I find that stocks categorized as “harder‐to‐value,” which are typically smaller, less transparent, less visible, and less profitable, experience decreased abnormal trading with more social distancing in their headquarters counties. In contrast, “easier‐to‐value” stocks show an increase in abnormal trading due to high social distancing in their headquarters counties. These findings indicate that greater firm‐specific information asymmetry arises from increased social distancing within the firm headquarters counties. Although “easier‐to‐value” stocks can use alternative information sources to mitigate the information asymmetry, “harder‐to‐value” stocks fail to do so and face negative impact on trading. Additional analyses using alternative information channels, market sidedness, and liquidity confirm this hypothesis.</description><subject>Asymmetric information</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Head offices</subject><subject>information asymmetry</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Online securities trading</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>physical interactions</subject><subject>social distance</subject><subject>Social distancing</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Trading</subject><subject>trading activity</subject><issn>0046-3892</issn><issn>1755-053X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXnyDgTdiaye5mN8dSrRYqBaniLWSziaa0u2uyrfTmI_iMPolZV_DmXGYGvvkGfoTOgYwg1JWxGzkCmqTsAA0gS9OIpPHzIRoQkrAozjk9RiferwgBSigboIflq8Z200jV4tpgXysr17i0vpWVstULrivcOll2Y2DszrZ7XG5dt7fhdLJ4ml1_fXwCx42sSr2x6hQdGbn2-uy3D9Hj9GY5uYvmi9vZZDyPVAwZixTNGclowSVIySHPDZBEKi6NhJilRcKZYjTPjDRal4ZrogsVl1AQyZXWEA_RRe9tXP221b4Vq3rrqvBSxEBTnpGM80Bd9pRytfdOG9G4EJLbCyCiy0x0mYmfzAKMe1irurL-D-UkqHiekYBAj7zbtd7_IxPT2f24134DmVN5vg</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Sabah, Nasim</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>The impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic</title><author>Sabah, Nasim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3176-c286072b9a1aa9188f104ac9afa1365b496c6287fafeedf9e0ebc3d1b0a9cee13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Asymmetric information</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Head offices</topic><topic>information asymmetry</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Online securities trading</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>physical interactions</topic><topic>social distance</topic><topic>Social distancing</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Trading</topic><topic>trading activity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sabah, Nasim</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sabah, Nasim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Financial management</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>865</epage><pages>833-865</pages><issn>0046-3892</issn><eissn>1755-053X</eissn><abstract>I explore the impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic using real‐time location tracking data from Facebook users. I find that stocks categorized as “harder‐to‐value,” which are typically smaller, less transparent, less visible, and less profitable, experience decreased abnormal trading with more social distancing in their headquarters counties. In contrast, “easier‐to‐value” stocks show an increase in abnormal trading due to high social distancing in their headquarters counties. These findings indicate that greater firm‐specific information asymmetry arises from increased social distancing within the firm headquarters counties. Although “easier‐to‐value” stocks can use alternative information sources to mitigate the information asymmetry, “harder‐to‐value” stocks fail to do so and face negative impact on trading. Additional analyses using alternative information channels, market sidedness, and liquidity confirm this hypothesis.</abstract><cop>Tampa</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/fima.12456</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-3892
ispartof Financial management, 2024-12, Vol.53 (4), p.833-865
issn 0046-3892
1755-053X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3125970799
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Asymmetric information
COVID-19
Head offices
information asymmetry
Information sources
Liquidity
Online securities trading
Pandemics
physical interactions
social distance
Social distancing
Tracking
Trading
trading activity
title The impact of social distancing on trading activity during the COVID‐19 pandemic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A58%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20social%20distancing%20on%20trading%20activity%20during%20the%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20pandemic&rft.jtitle=Financial%20management&rft.au=Sabah,%20Nasim&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=865&rft.pages=833-865&rft.issn=0046-3892&rft.eissn=1755-053X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fima.12456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125970799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125970799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true