Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining

This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal on interactive design and manufacturing 2024-12, Vol.18 (10), p.7381-7390
1. Verfasser: Gabsi, Abd El Hedi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7390
container_issue 10
container_start_page 7381
container_title International journal on interactive design and manufacturing
container_volume 18
creator Gabsi, Abd El Hedi
description This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R 2  = 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3125899718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125899718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgejSXyUyyLMUbFHShW0Mmc1JT0klNpohvb3REd67Ohf87Bz6Ezim5pIS0V5kyQmRFGK8IFURU_ADNqBKiYmU6_O0pP0YnOW8IaSSRZIZeHhP03o4-Djg6bJMZIeExxoDfwSS8z35YY5NG77z1JmA_jBCCX8NgAW9jDyGXHW5JK_AiYBNC_MBbY1_9UMhTdORMyHD2U-fo-eb6aXlXrR5u75eLVWU5VWOlOlXb2hpoa945UAa6nnWKC9tzYIoS0wAI60xbW0klq52TjWsVUdS4Rhk-RxfT3V2Kb3vIo97EfRrKS80pE1KplsqSYlPKpphzAqd3yW9N-tCU6C-PevKoi0f97VHzAvEJyiU8rCH9nf6H-gR003Y2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125899718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creator><creatorcontrib>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R 2  = 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1955-2513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1955-2505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Alloys ; Aluminum base alloys ; Artificial intelligence ; CAE) and Design ; Carbide tools ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Cutting parameters ; Cutting speed ; Cutting tools ; Cutting wear ; Deviation ; Electronics and Microelectronics ; Engineering ; Engineering Design ; Evolutionary algorithms ; Experiments ; Feed rate ; Industrial Design ; Instrumentation ; Machine learning ; Machining ; Manufacturing ; Mechanical Engineering ; Original Paper ; Performance indices ; Physical properties ; Predictions ; Process parameters ; Random variables ; Regression analysis ; Tool wear ; Tungsten carbide ; Wear rate</subject><ispartof>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing, 2024-12, Vol.18 (10), p.7381-7390</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4925-2367</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</title><title>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing</title><addtitle>Int J Interact Des Manuf</addtitle><description>This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R 2  = 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Alloys</subject><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Carbide tools</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Cutting parameters</subject><subject>Cutting speed</subject><subject>Cutting tools</subject><subject>Cutting wear</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Electronics and Microelectronics</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Design</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feed rate</subject><subject>Industrial Design</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Machining</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Tool wear</subject><subject>Tungsten carbide</subject><subject>Wear rate</subject><issn>1955-2513</issn><issn>1955-2505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgejSXyUyyLMUbFHShW0Mmc1JT0klNpohvb3REd67Ohf87Bz6Ezim5pIS0V5kyQmRFGK8IFURU_ADNqBKiYmU6_O0pP0YnOW8IaSSRZIZeHhP03o4-Djg6bJMZIeExxoDfwSS8z35YY5NG77z1JmA_jBCCX8NgAW9jDyGXHW5JK_AiYBNC_MBbY1_9UMhTdORMyHD2U-fo-eb6aXlXrR5u75eLVWU5VWOlOlXb2hpoa945UAa6nnWKC9tzYIoS0wAI60xbW0klq52TjWsVUdS4Rhk-RxfT3V2Kb3vIo97EfRrKS80pE1KplsqSYlPKpphzAqd3yW9N-tCU6C-PevKoi0f97VHzAvEJyiU8rCH9nf6H-gR003Y2</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-2367</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</title><author>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Alloys</topic><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Carbide tools</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Cutting parameters</topic><topic>Cutting speed</topic><topic>Cutting tools</topic><topic>Cutting wear</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Electronics and Microelectronics</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Design</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feed rate</topic><topic>Industrial Design</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Machining</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Tool wear</topic><topic>Tungsten carbide</topic><topic>Wear rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</atitle><jtitle>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing</jtitle><stitle>Int J Interact Des Manuf</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>7381</spage><epage>7390</epage><pages>7381-7390</pages><issn>1955-2513</issn><eissn>1955-2505</eissn><abstract>This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R 2  = 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-2367</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1955-2513
ispartof International journal on interactive design and manufacturing, 2024-12, Vol.18 (10), p.7381-7390
issn 1955-2513
1955-2505
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3125899718
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
Alloys
Aluminum base alloys
Artificial intelligence
CAE) and Design
Carbide tools
Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD
Cutting parameters
Cutting speed
Cutting tools
Cutting wear
Deviation
Electronics and Microelectronics
Engineering
Engineering Design
Evolutionary algorithms
Experiments
Feed rate
Industrial Design
Instrumentation
Machine learning
Machining
Manufacturing
Mechanical Engineering
Original Paper
Performance indices
Physical properties
Predictions
Process parameters
Random variables
Regression analysis
Tool wear
Tungsten carbide
Wear rate
title Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A17%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20crater%20tool%20wear%20using%20artificial%20intelligence%20models%20in%207075%20Al%20alloy%20machining&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20on%20interactive%20design%20and%20manufacturing&rft.au=Gabsi,%20Abd%20El%20Hedi&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=7381&rft.epage=7390&rft.pages=7381-7390&rft.issn=1955-2513&rft.eissn=1955-2505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125899718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125899718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true