Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining
This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the dat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal on interactive design and manufacturing 2024-12, Vol.18 (10), p.7381-7390 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 7381 |
container_title | International journal on interactive design and manufacturing |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Gabsi, Abd El Hedi |
description | This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R
2
= 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3125899718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125899718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgejSXyUyyLMUbFHShW0Mmc1JT0klNpohvb3REd67Ohf87Bz6Ezim5pIS0V5kyQmRFGK8IFURU_ADNqBKiYmU6_O0pP0YnOW8IaSSRZIZeHhP03o4-Djg6bJMZIeExxoDfwSS8z35YY5NG77z1JmA_jBCCX8NgAW9jDyGXHW5JK_AiYBNC_MBbY1_9UMhTdORMyHD2U-fo-eb6aXlXrR5u75eLVWU5VWOlOlXb2hpoa945UAa6nnWKC9tzYIoS0wAI60xbW0klq52TjWsVUdS4Rhk-RxfT3V2Kb3vIo97EfRrKS80pE1KplsqSYlPKpphzAqd3yW9N-tCU6C-PevKoi0f97VHzAvEJyiU8rCH9nf6H-gR003Y2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125899718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creator><creatorcontrib>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R
2
= 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1955-2513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1955-2505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Alloys ; Aluminum base alloys ; Artificial intelligence ; CAE) and Design ; Carbide tools ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Cutting parameters ; Cutting speed ; Cutting tools ; Cutting wear ; Deviation ; Electronics and Microelectronics ; Engineering ; Engineering Design ; Evolutionary algorithms ; Experiments ; Feed rate ; Industrial Design ; Instrumentation ; Machine learning ; Machining ; Manufacturing ; Mechanical Engineering ; Original Paper ; Performance indices ; Physical properties ; Predictions ; Process parameters ; Random variables ; Regression analysis ; Tool wear ; Tungsten carbide ; Wear rate</subject><ispartof>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing, 2024-12, Vol.18 (10), p.7381-7390</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4925-2367</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</title><title>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing</title><addtitle>Int J Interact Des Manuf</addtitle><description>This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R
2
= 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Alloys</subject><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Carbide tools</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Cutting parameters</subject><subject>Cutting speed</subject><subject>Cutting tools</subject><subject>Cutting wear</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Electronics and Microelectronics</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Design</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feed rate</subject><subject>Industrial Design</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Machining</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Tool wear</subject><subject>Tungsten carbide</subject><subject>Wear rate</subject><issn>1955-2513</issn><issn>1955-2505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgejSXyUyyLMUbFHShW0Mmc1JT0klNpohvb3REd67Ohf87Bz6Ezim5pIS0V5kyQmRFGK8IFURU_ADNqBKiYmU6_O0pP0YnOW8IaSSRZIZeHhP03o4-Djg6bJMZIeExxoDfwSS8z35YY5NG77z1JmA_jBCCX8NgAW9jDyGXHW5JK_AiYBNC_MBbY1_9UMhTdORMyHD2U-fo-eb6aXlXrR5u75eLVWU5VWOlOlXb2hpoa945UAa6nnWKC9tzYIoS0wAI60xbW0klq52TjWsVUdS4Rhk-RxfT3V2Kb3vIo97EfRrKS80pE1KplsqSYlPKpphzAqd3yW9N-tCU6C-PevKoi0f97VHzAvEJyiU8rCH9nf6H-gR003Y2</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-2367</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</title><author>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9b94c4cae743bfe9aebd2b935cd3e2910a6ee5cfa74c81824ff86f79091af69a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Alloys</topic><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Carbide tools</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Cutting parameters</topic><topic>Cutting speed</topic><topic>Cutting tools</topic><topic>Cutting wear</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Electronics and Microelectronics</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Design</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feed rate</topic><topic>Industrial Design</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Machining</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Tool wear</topic><topic>Tungsten carbide</topic><topic>Wear rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gabsi, Abd El Hedi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining</atitle><jtitle>International journal on interactive design and manufacturing</jtitle><stitle>Int J Interact Des Manuf</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>7381</spage><epage>7390</epage><pages>7381-7390</pages><issn>1955-2513</issn><eissn>1955-2505</eissn><abstract>This paper reports how artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used to predict the evolution of crater tool wear. The choice of using AI methods for predicting tool wear in this study is driven by the inherent capabilities of AI algorithms to handle complex and non-linear relationships within the data. Traditional methods may have limitations in capturing the intricate patterns and interactions between various machining parameters and tool wear. Tests were executed with tungsten carbide cutting tools to machining Aluminum 7075 Alloy and performed with a CNC lathe. Corner radius, feed rate, cutting speeds, and cut depth were studied in response to tools crater wear. Thirty experiments were performed: twenty-four were used in model training and six in tests, and another experiment was carried out with different cutting conditions to approve the chosen models. The novelty of this article lies in its effective prediction of tool wear. Additionally, this study is the first to explore 10 independent AI models in the context of tool wear prediction. Through hyperparameter search and careful tuning, the optimal learning rate for each model was determined to ensure effective convergence. The paper contends that the Gradient Boosting Model has been proven the best according to performance indices (R
2
= 0.9085, MAE = 0.05425, RMSE = 0.06635, RAE = 0.24265 and RSE = 0.09115) with deviations, among predicted and actual crater tool wear, has an average deviation of 8.27%.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-2367</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1955-2513 |
ispartof | International journal on interactive design and manufacturing, 2024-12, Vol.18 (10), p.7381-7390 |
issn | 1955-2513 1955-2505 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3125899718 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Alloys Aluminum base alloys Artificial intelligence CAE) and Design Carbide tools Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD Cutting parameters Cutting speed Cutting tools Cutting wear Deviation Electronics and Microelectronics Engineering Engineering Design Evolutionary algorithms Experiments Feed rate Industrial Design Instrumentation Machine learning Machining Manufacturing Mechanical Engineering Original Paper Performance indices Physical properties Predictions Process parameters Random variables Regression analysis Tool wear Tungsten carbide Wear rate |
title | Prediction of crater tool wear using artificial intelligence models in 7075 Al alloy machining |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A17%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20crater%20tool%20wear%20using%20artificial%20intelligence%20models%20in%207075%20Al%20alloy%20machining&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20on%20interactive%20design%20and%20manufacturing&rft.au=Gabsi,%20Abd%20El%20Hedi&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=7381&rft.epage=7390&rft.pages=7381-7390&rft.issn=1955-2513&rft.eissn=1955-2505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12008-023-01505-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125899718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125899718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |