Defining frontier areas in the United States

Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of maps 2013-06, Vol.9 (2), p.149-153
Hauptverfasser: Cromartie, John, Nulph, David, Hart, Gary, Dobis, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Journal of maps
container_volume 9
creator Cromartie, John
Nulph, David
Hart, Gary
Dobis, Elizabeth
description Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17445647.2013.773569
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3125381895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125381895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_wIuCt3YmTdKmVyJzfsDAC911OE1PNGNLZ5Ih-_e2VMErr87h5f2Ah5BLRmeMKnrDKiFkKapZQRmfVRWXZX1EJoOcD_rxn_-UnMW4plQqquSEXN-jdd7598yGzieHIYOAEDPns_SB2cq7hG32miBhPCcnFjYRL37ulKweFm_zp3z58vg8v1vmhnOZcgMSjAGUbcONbEpeKCo40rpuoOaiqVUhGluCqZhBVsiqtBzBomlbFFxZPiVXY-8udJ97jEmvu33w_aTmvZ8rpmrZu8ToMqGLMaDVu-C2EA6aUT1w0b9c9MBFj1z62O0Yc952YQtfXdi0OsFh0wUbwBs3rPzX8A2gpmjn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125381895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining frontier areas in the United States</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cromartie, John ; Nulph, David ; Hart, Gary ; Dobis, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Cromartie, John ; Nulph, David ; Hart, Gary ; Dobis, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-5647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5647</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2013.773569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Classification ; Geography ; Population (statistical) ; Population density ; Population number ; Rural populations ; Time measurement ; Travel ; Travel time ; Urban areas ; Urban populations</subject><ispartof>Journal of maps, 2013-06, Vol.9 (2), p.149-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright Andrew Tice 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Andrew Tice. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cromartie, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nulph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobis, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Defining frontier areas in the United States</title><title>Journal of maps</title><description>Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel time</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><issn>1744-5647</issn><issn>1744-5647</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_wIuCt3YmTdKmVyJzfsDAC911OE1PNGNLZ5Ih-_e2VMErr87h5f2Ah5BLRmeMKnrDKiFkKapZQRmfVRWXZX1EJoOcD_rxn_-UnMW4plQqquSEXN-jdd7598yGzieHIYOAEDPns_SB2cq7hG32miBhPCcnFjYRL37ulKweFm_zp3z58vg8v1vmhnOZcgMSjAGUbcONbEpeKCo40rpuoOaiqVUhGluCqZhBVsiqtBzBomlbFFxZPiVXY-8udJ97jEmvu33w_aTmvZ8rpmrZu8ToMqGLMaDVu-C2EA6aUT1w0b9c9MBFj1z62O0Yc952YQtfXdi0OsFh0wUbwBs3rPzX8A2gpmjn</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Cromartie, John</creator><creator>Nulph, David</creator><creator>Hart, Gary</creator><creator>Dobis, Elizabeth</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Defining frontier areas in the United States</title><author>Cromartie, John ; Nulph, David ; Hart, Gary ; Dobis, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel time</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cromartie, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nulph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobis, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of maps</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cromartie, John</au><au>Nulph, David</au><au>Hart, Gary</au><au>Dobis, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining frontier areas in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of maps</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>149-153</pages><issn>1744-5647</issn><eissn>1744-5647</eissn><abstract>Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/17445647.2013.773569</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-5647
ispartof Journal of maps, 2013-06, Vol.9 (2), p.149-153
issn 1744-5647
1744-5647
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3125381895
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Classification
Geography
Population (statistical)
Population density
Population number
Rural populations
Time measurement
Travel
Travel time
Urban areas
Urban populations
title Defining frontier areas in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20frontier%20areas%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20maps&rft.au=Cromartie,%20John&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=149-153&rft.issn=1744-5647&rft.eissn=1744-5647&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17445647.2013.773569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125381895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125381895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true