Defining frontier areas in the United States
Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of maps 2013-06, Vol.9 (2), p.149-153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 153 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Journal of maps |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Cromartie, John Nulph, David Hart, Gary Dobis, Elizabeth |
description | Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17445647.2013.773569 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3125381895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125381895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_wIuCt3YmTdKmVyJzfsDAC911OE1PNGNLZ5Ih-_e2VMErr87h5f2Ah5BLRmeMKnrDKiFkKapZQRmfVRWXZX1EJoOcD_rxn_-UnMW4plQqquSEXN-jdd7598yGzieHIYOAEDPns_SB2cq7hG32miBhPCcnFjYRL37ulKweFm_zp3z58vg8v1vmhnOZcgMSjAGUbcONbEpeKCo40rpuoOaiqVUhGluCqZhBVsiqtBzBomlbFFxZPiVXY-8udJ97jEmvu33w_aTmvZ8rpmrZu8ToMqGLMaDVu-C2EA6aUT1w0b9c9MBFj1z62O0Yc952YQtfXdi0OsFh0wUbwBs3rPzX8A2gpmjn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125381895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining frontier areas in the United States</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cromartie, John ; Nulph, David ; Hart, Gary ; Dobis, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Cromartie, John ; Nulph, David ; Hart, Gary ; Dobis, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-5647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5647</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2013.773569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Classification ; Geography ; Population (statistical) ; Population density ; Population number ; Rural populations ; Time measurement ; Travel ; Travel time ; Urban areas ; Urban populations</subject><ispartof>Journal of maps, 2013-06, Vol.9 (2), p.149-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright Andrew Tice 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Andrew Tice. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cromartie, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nulph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobis, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Defining frontier areas in the United States</title><title>Journal of maps</title><description>Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel time</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><issn>1744-5647</issn><issn>1744-5647</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_wIuCt3YmTdKmVyJzfsDAC911OE1PNGNLZ5Ih-_e2VMErr87h5f2Ah5BLRmeMKnrDKiFkKapZQRmfVRWXZX1EJoOcD_rxn_-UnMW4plQqquSEXN-jdd7598yGzieHIYOAEDPns_SB2cq7hG32miBhPCcnFjYRL37ulKweFm_zp3z58vg8v1vmhnOZcgMSjAGUbcONbEpeKCo40rpuoOaiqVUhGluCqZhBVsiqtBzBomlbFFxZPiVXY-8udJ97jEmvu33w_aTmvZ8rpmrZu8ToMqGLMaDVu-C2EA6aUT1w0b9c9MBFj1z62O0Yc952YQtfXdi0OsFh0wUbwBs3rPzX8A2gpmjn</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Cromartie, John</creator><creator>Nulph, David</creator><creator>Hart, Gary</creator><creator>Dobis, Elizabeth</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Defining frontier areas in the United States</title><author>Cromartie, John ; Nulph, David ; Hart, Gary ; Dobis, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-ca5accae5db3c5b6328043e099ba934b9824bf6ac71ce12576f3eafecdde438f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel time</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cromartie, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nulph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobis, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of maps</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cromartie, John</au><au>Nulph, David</au><au>Hart, Gary</au><au>Dobis, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining frontier areas in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of maps</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>149-153</pages><issn>1744-5647</issn><eissn>1744-5647</eissn><abstract>Demand is growing for a statistically based, nationally consistent definition of frontier territory, one that is adjustable within a reasonable range and applicable in different research and policy contexts. The need arises from Congressional mandates affecting rural health programs and from limitations of previous classification schemes. As used here, the term frontier denotes territory characterized by some combination of relatively low-population density and high geographic remoteness. Two features distinguish the methodology described here from earlier classifications. First, the approach strives for the most accurate measures of distance possible for the smallest units of geography containing population data. Travel time by car to nearby urban areas is calculated for coterminous US territory at the 1 × 1 kilometer grid level. Once frontier territory is delimited at the grid level, frontier populations may be summed to ZIP code areas, as demonstrated on the Main Map, or to census tracts, counties, or other useful geographic entities. Second, travel-time thresholds around urban areas were allowed to vary by urban-area population size. This is desirable because the effect of urban population size on adjacent rural population density is discontinuous. At any given distance from an urban area, population density increases as the size of the nearby urban area increases.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/17445647.2013.773569</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-5647 |
ispartof | Journal of maps, 2013-06, Vol.9 (2), p.149-153 |
issn | 1744-5647 1744-5647 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3125381895 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Classification Geography Population (statistical) Population density Population number Rural populations Time measurement Travel Travel time Urban areas Urban populations |
title | Defining frontier areas in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20frontier%20areas%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20maps&rft.au=Cromartie,%20John&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=149-153&rft.issn=1744-5647&rft.eissn=1744-5647&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17445647.2013.773569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125381895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125381895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |