Statistical modeling and optimization of process parameters for additive manufacturing of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer parts using solvent cast 3D printing technique
Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic elastomers is challenging using fused deposition modeling due to their high melt viscosity, low column strength, and poor fusion among layers. Solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) is an efficient alternative to successfully 3D print such materials. However, selec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polymer engineering and science 2024-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5798-5814 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5814 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5798 |
container_title | Polymer engineering and science |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Kumar, Arun Pandey, Pulak Mohan Jha, Sunil Banerjee, Shib Shankar |
description | Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic elastomers is challenging using fused deposition modeling due to their high melt viscosity, low column strength, and poor fusion among layers. Solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) is an efficient alternative to successfully 3D print such materials. However, selection of suitable 3D printing parameters is crucial to realize parts with optimum physicomechanical properties. In this work, statistical modeling and SC‐3DP parameter optimization for styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) block copolymer were performed. The effect of 3D printing process parameters on shrinkage, relative density, and tensile strength was analyzed using response surface methodology. Experiments were planned as per central composite design and analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the significant parameters. SEBS content in the polymer solution significantly affected the shrinkage of SC‐3DP samples. Moreover, relative density and tensile strength were significantly affected by print speed and layer height. A significant interaction between print speed and layer height was also noticed for tensile strength and relative density of printed samples. Multi‐objective optimization using genetic algorithm was also performed to minimize shrinkage and maximize relative density and tensile strength. Finally, a case study was conducted comparing the physicomechanical properties of SC‐3DP samples printed at optimized process parameters and compression molded samples.
Highlights
Statistical models were developed using response surface methodology.
Genetic algorithm based multi‐objective optimization was performed.
Optimum solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) process parameters were determined.
Solvent‐cast 3D Printing of SEBS block copolymer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pen.26953 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3125304772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A822242157</galeid><sourcerecordid>A822242157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3633-c881302e4ae0a7826326371b294eb6c32553da053887de230019040ec6eee3703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhiMEEkvhwBtY4oREto6dbLLHqhRaqQJE4Ww5zmTXJbEXz6SQnngHXohn4UlwSBGstMiWPPJ8_4z1e5LkacaXGefieAduKVbrQt5LFlmRV6lYyfx-suBcilRWVfUweYR4zSMri_Ui-XFFmiySNbpjvW-gs27DtGuY35Ht7W3Mesd8y3bBG0BkOx10DwQBWesD001jyd4A67UbWm1oCFOFKEAaAzj4-e070Hbs5rAe6E94l2d1580nZvzOd2MPYWpAyAacyqDvbsARMxqJyZfxEdbRlCAwW2c_D_A4edDqDuHJ3XmUfHx19uH0PL18-_ri9OQyNXIlZWqqKpNcQK6B67KKrsRdZrVY51CvjBRFIRvNi2hR2YCQnGdrnnMwKwCQJZdHybO5bvQhtkVS134ILrZUMhOF5HlZir_URnegrGs9BW16i0adVEKIXGRFGan0ALWJZgTdeQetjdd7_PIAH1cDvTUHBc_3BJEh-EobPSCqi6v3--yLf9h68j1-s3VoN1vCWXKotAkeMUCr4p_0Oowq42oaQRVHUP0ewcgez-yX-L7x_6B6d_ZmVvwCosjiTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125304772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Statistical modeling and optimization of process parameters for additive manufacturing of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer parts using solvent cast 3D printing technique</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kumar, Arun ; Pandey, Pulak Mohan ; Jha, Sunil ; Banerjee, Shib Shankar</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Arun ; Pandey, Pulak Mohan ; Jha, Sunil ; Banerjee, Shib Shankar</creatorcontrib><description>Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic elastomers is challenging using fused deposition modeling due to their high melt viscosity, low column strength, and poor fusion among layers. Solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) is an efficient alternative to successfully 3D print such materials. However, selection of suitable 3D printing parameters is crucial to realize parts with optimum physicomechanical properties. In this work, statistical modeling and SC‐3DP parameter optimization for styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) block copolymer were performed. The effect of 3D printing process parameters on shrinkage, relative density, and tensile strength was analyzed using response surface methodology. Experiments were planned as per central composite design and analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the significant parameters. SEBS content in the polymer solution significantly affected the shrinkage of SC‐3DP samples. Moreover, relative density and tensile strength were significantly affected by print speed and layer height. A significant interaction between print speed and layer height was also noticed for tensile strength and relative density of printed samples. Multi‐objective optimization using genetic algorithm was also performed to minimize shrinkage and maximize relative density and tensile strength. Finally, a case study was conducted comparing the physicomechanical properties of SC‐3DP samples printed at optimized process parameters and compression molded samples.
Highlights
Statistical models were developed using response surface methodology.
Genetic algorithm based multi‐objective optimization was performed.
Optimum solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) process parameters were determined.
Solvent‐cast 3D Printing of SEBS block copolymer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pen.26953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>3-D printers ; 3D printing ; Additive manufacturing ; Block copolymers ; Butylene ; central composite design ; Column strength ; Compressive strength ; Density ; Ethylene ; Fused deposition modeling ; genetic algorithm ; Genetic algorithms ; International economic relations ; Manufacturing ; Mechanical properties ; Melting ; Methods ; Optimization ; Petroleum chemicals industry ; Polymers ; Process parameters ; Response surface methodology ; Samples ; Solvents ; Specific gravity ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Styrenes ; Tensile strength ; thermoplastic elastomer ; Thermoplastic elastomers ; Three dimensional composites ; Three dimensional printing</subject><ispartof>Polymer engineering and science, 2024-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5798-5814</ispartof><rights>2024 Society of Plastics Engineers.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc.</rights><rights>2024 Society of Plastics Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3633-c881302e4ae0a7826326371b294eb6c32553da053887de230019040ec6eee3703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5048-8388</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpen.26953$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpen.26953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Pulak Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Shib Shankar</creatorcontrib><title>Statistical modeling and optimization of process parameters for additive manufacturing of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer parts using solvent cast 3D printing technique</title><title>Polymer engineering and science</title><description>Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic elastomers is challenging using fused deposition modeling due to their high melt viscosity, low column strength, and poor fusion among layers. Solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) is an efficient alternative to successfully 3D print such materials. However, selection of suitable 3D printing parameters is crucial to realize parts with optimum physicomechanical properties. In this work, statistical modeling and SC‐3DP parameter optimization for styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) block copolymer were performed. The effect of 3D printing process parameters on shrinkage, relative density, and tensile strength was analyzed using response surface methodology. Experiments were planned as per central composite design and analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the significant parameters. SEBS content in the polymer solution significantly affected the shrinkage of SC‐3DP samples. Moreover, relative density and tensile strength were significantly affected by print speed and layer height. A significant interaction between print speed and layer height was also noticed for tensile strength and relative density of printed samples. Multi‐objective optimization using genetic algorithm was also performed to minimize shrinkage and maximize relative density and tensile strength. Finally, a case study was conducted comparing the physicomechanical properties of SC‐3DP samples printed at optimized process parameters and compression molded samples.
Highlights
Statistical models were developed using response surface methodology.
Genetic algorithm based multi‐objective optimization was performed.
Optimum solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) process parameters were determined.
Solvent‐cast 3D Printing of SEBS block copolymer.</description><subject>3-D printers</subject><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Block copolymers</subject><subject>Butylene</subject><subject>central composite design</subject><subject>Column strength</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ethylene</subject><subject>Fused deposition modeling</subject><subject>genetic algorithm</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>International economic relations</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Melting</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Petroleum chemicals industry</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Specific gravity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Styrenes</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>thermoplastic elastomer</subject><subject>Thermoplastic elastomers</subject><subject>Three dimensional composites</subject><subject>Three dimensional printing</subject><issn>0032-3888</issn><issn>1548-2634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhiMEEkvhwBtY4oREto6dbLLHqhRaqQJE4Ww5zmTXJbEXz6SQnngHXohn4UlwSBGstMiWPPJ8_4z1e5LkacaXGefieAduKVbrQt5LFlmRV6lYyfx-suBcilRWVfUweYR4zSMri_Ui-XFFmiySNbpjvW-gs27DtGuY35Ht7W3Mesd8y3bBG0BkOx10DwQBWesD001jyd4A67UbWm1oCFOFKEAaAzj4-e070Hbs5rAe6E94l2d1580nZvzOd2MPYWpAyAacyqDvbsARMxqJyZfxEdbRlCAwW2c_D_A4edDqDuHJ3XmUfHx19uH0PL18-_ri9OQyNXIlZWqqKpNcQK6B67KKrsRdZrVY51CvjBRFIRvNi2hR2YCQnGdrnnMwKwCQJZdHybO5bvQhtkVS134ILrZUMhOF5HlZir_URnegrGs9BW16i0adVEKIXGRFGan0ALWJZgTdeQetjdd7_PIAH1cDvTUHBc_3BJEh-EobPSCqi6v3--yLf9h68j1-s3VoN1vCWXKotAkeMUCr4p_0Oowq42oaQRVHUP0ewcgez-yX-L7x_6B6d_ZmVvwCosjiTQ</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Kumar, Arun</creator><creator>Pandey, Pulak Mohan</creator><creator>Jha, Sunil</creator><creator>Banerjee, Shib Shankar</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-8388</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Statistical modeling and optimization of process parameters for additive manufacturing of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer parts using solvent cast 3D printing technique</title><author>Kumar, Arun ; Pandey, Pulak Mohan ; Jha, Sunil ; Banerjee, Shib Shankar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3633-c881302e4ae0a7826326371b294eb6c32553da053887de230019040ec6eee3703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>3-D printers</topic><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Block copolymers</topic><topic>Butylene</topic><topic>central composite design</topic><topic>Column strength</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ethylene</topic><topic>Fused deposition modeling</topic><topic>genetic algorithm</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>International economic relations</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Melting</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Petroleum chemicals industry</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Specific gravity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Styrenes</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>thermoplastic elastomer</topic><topic>Thermoplastic elastomers</topic><topic>Three dimensional composites</topic><topic>Three dimensional printing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Pulak Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Shib Shankar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Arun</au><au>Pandey, Pulak Mohan</au><au>Jha, Sunil</au><au>Banerjee, Shib Shankar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Statistical modeling and optimization of process parameters for additive manufacturing of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer parts using solvent cast 3D printing technique</atitle><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5798</spage><epage>5814</epage><pages>5798-5814</pages><issn>0032-3888</issn><eissn>1548-2634</eissn><abstract>Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic elastomers is challenging using fused deposition modeling due to their high melt viscosity, low column strength, and poor fusion among layers. Solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) is an efficient alternative to successfully 3D print such materials. However, selection of suitable 3D printing parameters is crucial to realize parts with optimum physicomechanical properties. In this work, statistical modeling and SC‐3DP parameter optimization for styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) block copolymer were performed. The effect of 3D printing process parameters on shrinkage, relative density, and tensile strength was analyzed using response surface methodology. Experiments were planned as per central composite design and analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the significant parameters. SEBS content in the polymer solution significantly affected the shrinkage of SC‐3DP samples. Moreover, relative density and tensile strength were significantly affected by print speed and layer height. A significant interaction between print speed and layer height was also noticed for tensile strength and relative density of printed samples. Multi‐objective optimization using genetic algorithm was also performed to minimize shrinkage and maximize relative density and tensile strength. Finally, a case study was conducted comparing the physicomechanical properties of SC‐3DP samples printed at optimized process parameters and compression molded samples.
Highlights
Statistical models were developed using response surface methodology.
Genetic algorithm based multi‐objective optimization was performed.
Optimum solvent‐cast 3D printing (SC‐3DP) process parameters were determined.
Solvent‐cast 3D Printing of SEBS block copolymer.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pen.26953</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-8388</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3888 |
ispartof | Polymer engineering and science, 2024-11, Vol.64 (11), p.5798-5814 |
issn | 0032-3888 1548-2634 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3125304772 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 3-D printers 3D printing Additive manufacturing Block copolymers Butylene central composite design Column strength Compressive strength Density Ethylene Fused deposition modeling genetic algorithm Genetic algorithms International economic relations Manufacturing Mechanical properties Melting Methods Optimization Petroleum chemicals industry Polymers Process parameters Response surface methodology Samples Solvents Specific gravity Statistical analysis Statistical models Styrenes Tensile strength thermoplastic elastomer Thermoplastic elastomers Three dimensional composites Three dimensional printing |
title | Statistical modeling and optimization of process parameters for additive manufacturing of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer parts using solvent cast 3D printing technique |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A18%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical%20modeling%20and%20optimization%20of%20process%20parameters%20for%20additive%20manufacturing%20of%20styrene%E2%80%93ethylene%E2%80%93butylene%E2%80%93styrene%20block%20copolymer%20parts%20using%20solvent%20cast%203D%20printing%20technique&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20engineering%20and%20science&rft.au=Kumar,%20Arun&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5798&rft.epage=5814&rft.pages=5798-5814&rft.issn=0032-3888&rft.eissn=1548-2634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pen.26953&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA822242157%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125304772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A822242157&rfr_iscdi=true |