Hyperautomation on fuzzy data dredging on four advanced industrial forecasting models to support sustainable business management

Recently, traditional manufacturing industries have faced two serious gaps and problems in line with effective product-line sales forecasting methods to balance the negative impacts on the performance of the subjective experience, including (1) arbitrary judgment, such as growth rate of expectancy,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of operations research 2024-11, Vol.342 (1), p.215-264
Hauptverfasser: Chen, You-Shyang, Sangaiah, Arun Kumar, Lin, Yu-Pei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 264
container_issue 1
container_start_page 215
container_title Annals of operations research
container_volume 342
creator Chen, You-Shyang
Sangaiah, Arun Kumar
Lin, Yu-Pei
description Recently, traditional manufacturing industries have faced two serious gaps and problems in line with effective product-line sales forecasting methods to balance the negative impacts on the performance of the subjective experience, including (1) arbitrary judgment, such as growth rate of expectancy, manager’s experiences, and historical sales data, may cause inaccurately predictive results and severe negative effects, and (2) sales forecasting is a key priority and challenge in the context of considerable product lines that have different properties and need specific models for supporting decision analytics. This study is motivated to propose an advanced hybrid model to utilize the advantages of variation for methods of fuzzy time series (FTS), exponential smoothing (ES), moving average (MA), and regression analysis (RA). To analyze the four product lines—stably growing product (SGP), declining product (DP), irregularly growing product (IGP), and special sales product (SSP)—this study is based on empirical sales data from a leading traditional manufacturer to accurately identify the high potentials of decisive key factors and objectively evaluate the model. Two evaluation standards—the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE), a parameter sensitivity analysis, and comparative analysis—are measured. After implementing the data from the case study, four key reports were conclusively identified. (1) Purely for the RMSE, the best one (10.32) is the ES method in the SGP line. (2) In the DP line, the better one is the RA(2) method, with a relatively low MAPE of 17.78% and RMSE of 26.46. (3) The FTS method is the best choice (MAPE 12.41% and RMSE 18.98) for the IGP line. (4) For the SSP line, the better one (MAPE 24.05 and RMSE 29.34) is the MA method. According to the above reports, although the proposed hybrid model has a general performance for the SSP line, it still has a superior predictor when compared to manager subjective prediction. Interestingly, the proposed model is rarely used, has a new trial with an innovative solution for the traditional manufacturer, and thus realizes applicable values. The study concludes with acceptable and satisfactory results and yields seven important findings and three managerial implications that significantly contribute to decision-making reference for complete sales-production planning for interested parties. Thus, this study benefits and values a conventional industry upgrade from novel app
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-024-05882-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3124280655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3124280655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-16e4bbf4721049413946cce1d2918f4f4a7fa437a36f54ee94bca8681f4c36ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AUXETBWv0DnhY8R_crX0cpaoWCFz0vL8nbkJJs4u5GaE_-dLet4E14MPDezDxmCLnl7J4zlj94zlReJkyohKVFIRJ2RhY8zUVSSlmckwUTqUpSKdklufJ-yxjjvEgX5Hu9m9DBHMYBQjdaGsfM-_2ONhCANg6btrPtcT3OjkLzBbbGhna2mX1wHfTx4LAGHw68YWyw9zSM1M_TNLoQ0QfoLFQ90mr2nUXv6QAWWhzQhmtyYaD3ePOLS_Lx_PS-Wiebt5fX1eMmqUXOQsIzVFVlVC5i0lJxWaqsrpE3ouSFUUZBbkDJHGRmUoVYqqqGIiu4UbXMKpBLcnfyndz4OaMPehvz2PhSSy6UKFiWppElTqzajd47NHpy3QBupznTh6b1qWkdm9bHpjWLInkS-Ui2Lbo_639UPyxWhJo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3124280655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hyperautomation on fuzzy data dredging on four advanced industrial forecasting models to support sustainable business management</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chen, You-Shyang ; Sangaiah, Arun Kumar ; Lin, Yu-Pei</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, You-Shyang ; Sangaiah, Arun Kumar ; Lin, Yu-Pei</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, traditional manufacturing industries have faced two serious gaps and problems in line with effective product-line sales forecasting methods to balance the negative impacts on the performance of the subjective experience, including (1) arbitrary judgment, such as growth rate of expectancy, manager’s experiences, and historical sales data, may cause inaccurately predictive results and severe negative effects, and (2) sales forecasting is a key priority and challenge in the context of considerable product lines that have different properties and need specific models for supporting decision analytics. This study is motivated to propose an advanced hybrid model to utilize the advantages of variation for methods of fuzzy time series (FTS), exponential smoothing (ES), moving average (MA), and regression analysis (RA). To analyze the four product lines—stably growing product (SGP), declining product (DP), irregularly growing product (IGP), and special sales product (SSP)—this study is based on empirical sales data from a leading traditional manufacturer to accurately identify the high potentials of decisive key factors and objectively evaluate the model. Two evaluation standards—the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE), a parameter sensitivity analysis, and comparative analysis—are measured. After implementing the data from the case study, four key reports were conclusively identified. (1) Purely for the RMSE, the best one (10.32) is the ES method in the SGP line. (2) In the DP line, the better one is the RA(2) method, with a relatively low MAPE of 17.78% and RMSE of 26.46. (3) The FTS method is the best choice (MAPE 12.41% and RMSE 18.98) for the IGP line. (4) For the SSP line, the better one (MAPE 24.05 and RMSE 29.34) is the MA method. According to the above reports, although the proposed hybrid model has a general performance for the SSP line, it still has a superior predictor when compared to manager subjective prediction. Interestingly, the proposed model is rarely used, has a new trial with an innovative solution for the traditional manufacturer, and thus realizes applicable values. The study concludes with acceptable and satisfactory results and yields seven important findings and three managerial implications that significantly contribute to decision-making reference for complete sales-production planning for interested parties. Thus, this study benefits and values a conventional industry upgrade from novel application techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-05882-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business administration ; Business and Management ; Circular economy ; Combinatorics ; Data analysis ; Decision making ; Error analysis ; Forecasting ; Inventory ; Inventory management ; Knowledge management ; Machine learning ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Research ; Parameter identification ; Parameter sensitivity ; Plant layout ; Product lines ; Production planning ; Regression analysis ; Root-mean-square errors ; Sales forecasting ; Sensitivity analysis ; Theory of Computation ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2024-11, Vol.342 (1), p.215-264</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-16e4bbf4721049413946cce1d2918f4f4a7fa437a36f54ee94bca8681f4c36ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0229-2460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-024-05882-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-05882-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, You-Shyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangaiah, Arun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yu-Pei</creatorcontrib><title>Hyperautomation on fuzzy data dredging on four advanced industrial forecasting models to support sustainable business management</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>Recently, traditional manufacturing industries have faced two serious gaps and problems in line with effective product-line sales forecasting methods to balance the negative impacts on the performance of the subjective experience, including (1) arbitrary judgment, such as growth rate of expectancy, manager’s experiences, and historical sales data, may cause inaccurately predictive results and severe negative effects, and (2) sales forecasting is a key priority and challenge in the context of considerable product lines that have different properties and need specific models for supporting decision analytics. This study is motivated to propose an advanced hybrid model to utilize the advantages of variation for methods of fuzzy time series (FTS), exponential smoothing (ES), moving average (MA), and regression analysis (RA). To analyze the four product lines—stably growing product (SGP), declining product (DP), irregularly growing product (IGP), and special sales product (SSP)—this study is based on empirical sales data from a leading traditional manufacturer to accurately identify the high potentials of decisive key factors and objectively evaluate the model. Two evaluation standards—the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE), a parameter sensitivity analysis, and comparative analysis—are measured. After implementing the data from the case study, four key reports were conclusively identified. (1) Purely for the RMSE, the best one (10.32) is the ES method in the SGP line. (2) In the DP line, the better one is the RA(2) method, with a relatively low MAPE of 17.78% and RMSE of 26.46. (3) The FTS method is the best choice (MAPE 12.41% and RMSE 18.98) for the IGP line. (4) For the SSP line, the better one (MAPE 24.05 and RMSE 29.34) is the MA method. According to the above reports, although the proposed hybrid model has a general performance for the SSP line, it still has a superior predictor when compared to manager subjective prediction. Interestingly, the proposed model is rarely used, has a new trial with an innovative solution for the traditional manufacturer, and thus realizes applicable values. The study concludes with acceptable and satisfactory results and yields seven important findings and three managerial implications that significantly contribute to decision-making reference for complete sales-production planning for interested parties. Thus, this study benefits and values a conventional industry upgrade from novel application techniques.</description><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Inventory management</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Plant layout</subject><subject>Product lines</subject><subject>Production planning</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Sales forecasting</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AUXETBWv0DnhY8R_crX0cpaoWCFz0vL8nbkJJs4u5GaE_-dLet4E14MPDezDxmCLnl7J4zlj94zlReJkyohKVFIRJ2RhY8zUVSSlmckwUTqUpSKdklufJ-yxjjvEgX5Hu9m9DBHMYBQjdaGsfM-_2ONhCANg6btrPtcT3OjkLzBbbGhna2mX1wHfTx4LAGHw68YWyw9zSM1M_TNLoQ0QfoLFQ90mr2nUXv6QAWWhzQhmtyYaD3ePOLS_Lx_PS-Wiebt5fX1eMmqUXOQsIzVFVlVC5i0lJxWaqsrpE3ouSFUUZBbkDJHGRmUoVYqqqGIiu4UbXMKpBLcnfyndz4OaMPehvz2PhSSy6UKFiWppElTqzajd47NHpy3QBupznTh6b1qWkdm9bHpjWLInkS-Ui2Lbo_639UPyxWhJo</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Chen, You-Shyang</creator><creator>Sangaiah, Arun Kumar</creator><creator>Lin, Yu-Pei</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-2460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Hyperautomation on fuzzy data dredging on four advanced industrial forecasting models to support sustainable business management</title><author>Chen, You-Shyang ; Sangaiah, Arun Kumar ; Lin, Yu-Pei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-16e4bbf4721049413946cce1d2918f4f4a7fa437a36f54ee94bca8681f4c36ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Inventory management</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Plant layout</topic><topic>Product lines</topic><topic>Production planning</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Sales forecasting</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, You-Shyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangaiah, Arun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yu-Pei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, You-Shyang</au><au>Sangaiah, Arun Kumar</au><au>Lin, Yu-Pei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hyperautomation on fuzzy data dredging on four advanced industrial forecasting models to support sustainable business management</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>342</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>215-264</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>Recently, traditional manufacturing industries have faced two serious gaps and problems in line with effective product-line sales forecasting methods to balance the negative impacts on the performance of the subjective experience, including (1) arbitrary judgment, such as growth rate of expectancy, manager’s experiences, and historical sales data, may cause inaccurately predictive results and severe negative effects, and (2) sales forecasting is a key priority and challenge in the context of considerable product lines that have different properties and need specific models for supporting decision analytics. This study is motivated to propose an advanced hybrid model to utilize the advantages of variation for methods of fuzzy time series (FTS), exponential smoothing (ES), moving average (MA), and regression analysis (RA). To analyze the four product lines—stably growing product (SGP), declining product (DP), irregularly growing product (IGP), and special sales product (SSP)—this study is based on empirical sales data from a leading traditional manufacturer to accurately identify the high potentials of decisive key factors and objectively evaluate the model. Two evaluation standards—the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE), a parameter sensitivity analysis, and comparative analysis—are measured. After implementing the data from the case study, four key reports were conclusively identified. (1) Purely for the RMSE, the best one (10.32) is the ES method in the SGP line. (2) In the DP line, the better one is the RA(2) method, with a relatively low MAPE of 17.78% and RMSE of 26.46. (3) The FTS method is the best choice (MAPE 12.41% and RMSE 18.98) for the IGP line. (4) For the SSP line, the better one (MAPE 24.05 and RMSE 29.34) is the MA method. According to the above reports, although the proposed hybrid model has a general performance for the SSP line, it still has a superior predictor when compared to manager subjective prediction. Interestingly, the proposed model is rarely used, has a new trial with an innovative solution for the traditional manufacturer, and thus realizes applicable values. The study concludes with acceptable and satisfactory results and yields seven important findings and three managerial implications that significantly contribute to decision-making reference for complete sales-production planning for interested parties. Thus, this study benefits and values a conventional industry upgrade from novel application techniques.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-024-05882-0</doi><tpages>50</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-2460</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-5330
ispartof Annals of operations research, 2024-11, Vol.342 (1), p.215-264
issn 0254-5330
1572-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3124280655
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Business administration
Business and Management
Circular economy
Combinatorics
Data analysis
Decision making
Error analysis
Forecasting
Inventory
Inventory management
Knowledge management
Machine learning
Manufacturers
Manufacturing
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Original Research
Parameter identification
Parameter sensitivity
Plant layout
Product lines
Production planning
Regression analysis
Root-mean-square errors
Sales forecasting
Sensitivity analysis
Theory of Computation
Time series
title Hyperautomation on fuzzy data dredging on four advanced industrial forecasting models to support sustainable business management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T23%3A41%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hyperautomation%20on%20fuzzy%20data%20dredging%20on%20four%20advanced%20industrial%20forecasting%20models%20to%20support%20sustainable%20business%20management&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Chen,%20You-Shyang&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=342&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=215-264&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-024-05882-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3124280655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3124280655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true