Quantifying spatially explicit uncertainty in empirically downscaled climate data
Ecological simulations including forest and vegetation growth models require climate inputs that match the resolution and extent of the process being modelled. Climate inputs are often derived at resolutions coarser than the scale of many ecosystem processes. Machine learning models can be trained t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of climatology 2024-11, Vol.44 (13), p.4548-4570 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4570 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 4548 |
container_title | International journal of climatology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Inglis, Nicole C. Brown, Taylor R. Cale, Ashley B. Hartsook, Theodore Matos, Adriano Onyegbula, Johanson Greenberg, Jonathan A. |
description | Ecological simulations including forest and vegetation growth models require climate inputs that match the resolution and extent of the process being modelled. Climate inputs are often derived at resolutions coarser than the scale of many ecosystem processes. Machine learning models can be trained to spatially downscale climate data to fine (30 m) resolution using topographic variables such as elevation, aspect and other site‐specific factors. Statistically downscaled climate models will have spatially varying uncertainty that is not usually incorporated into downscaling techniques for error propagation into later models, are often applied on smaller areas, are not fine enough resolutions for many modelling techniques, or are not always scalable to large spatial extents. There remains opportunity to leverage machine learning advancements to downscale climate to very fine (30 m) resolutions with associated spatially explicit uncertainty to represent microclimatic variation in ecological models. In this study, we used quantile machine learning to produce 30 m downscaled temperature and precipitation data and associated model prediction uncertainty for the state of California. Temperature models were accurate at downscaling 4 km climate data to 30 m, performing better than the 4 km data at high and low slope positions and at high elevations, especially where there were fewer weather observations. Precipitation model predictions did not show global improvement over the 4 km scale, but were more accurate at high elevations, slopes with higher solar radiation and in valleys. For all climate variables, the added detail of spatial explicit uncertainty via 90% prediction intervals provides critical insight into the utility of empirically downscaled climate. The resulting 30 m spatially contiguous outputs can be used as ecological model inputs with uncertainty propagation, to illuminate climate trends over time as a function of fine‐scale spatial factors, and to highlight areas of spatially explicit uncertainty.
High‐resolution climate variables are critical inputs to ecological models. We used quantile machine learning to downscale 4 km gridded climate data to 30 m with spatially explicit model uncertainty. Temperature variables were highly accurate when downscaled to 30 m, and spatial prediction intervals added insight for propagation into ecological models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/joc.8596 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3124170488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3124170488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1846-feb097761d95b973ea16442b8b6ffed34d1e57867774cc8aa92c0fd3844e84c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLAzEQB_AgCtYq-BECXrxsTXazeRyl-KRQCnoO2TwkZbu7JlnqfnvT1qunmcNvZv4MALcYLTBC5cO21wteC3oGZhgJViDE-TmYIS5EwQnml-Aqxi1CSAhMZ2CzGVWXvJt89wXjoJJXbTtB-zO0XvsEx07bkJTv0gR9B-1u8MHrozH9vou5tQbq1u9UstCopK7BhVNttDd_dQ4-n58-lq_Fav3ytnxcFRpzQgtnmxyPUWxE3QhWWYUpIWXDG-qcNRUx2NaMU8YY0ZorJUqNnKk4IZYTXVdzcHfaO4T-e7QxyW0_hi6flBUuCWaIcJ7V_Unp0McYrJNDyFnDJDGSh4flKS0PD8u0ONG9b-30r5Pv6-XR_wLNT21o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3124170488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying spatially explicit uncertainty in empirically downscaled climate data</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Inglis, Nicole C. ; Brown, Taylor R. ; Cale, Ashley B. ; Hartsook, Theodore ; Matos, Adriano ; Onyegbula, Johanson ; Greenberg, Jonathan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Inglis, Nicole C. ; Brown, Taylor R. ; Cale, Ashley B. ; Hartsook, Theodore ; Matos, Adriano ; Onyegbula, Johanson ; Greenberg, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological simulations including forest and vegetation growth models require climate inputs that match the resolution and extent of the process being modelled. Climate inputs are often derived at resolutions coarser than the scale of many ecosystem processes. Machine learning models can be trained to spatially downscale climate data to fine (30 m) resolution using topographic variables such as elevation, aspect and other site‐specific factors. Statistically downscaled climate models will have spatially varying uncertainty that is not usually incorporated into downscaling techniques for error propagation into later models, are often applied on smaller areas, are not fine enough resolutions for many modelling techniques, or are not always scalable to large spatial extents. There remains opportunity to leverage machine learning advancements to downscale climate to very fine (30 m) resolutions with associated spatially explicit uncertainty to represent microclimatic variation in ecological models. In this study, we used quantile machine learning to produce 30 m downscaled temperature and precipitation data and associated model prediction uncertainty for the state of California. Temperature models were accurate at downscaling 4 km climate data to 30 m, performing better than the 4 km data at high and low slope positions and at high elevations, especially where there were fewer weather observations. Precipitation model predictions did not show global improvement over the 4 km scale, but were more accurate at high elevations, slopes with higher solar radiation and in valleys. For all climate variables, the added detail of spatial explicit uncertainty via 90% prediction intervals provides critical insight into the utility of empirically downscaled climate. The resulting 30 m spatially contiguous outputs can be used as ecological model inputs with uncertainty propagation, to illuminate climate trends over time as a function of fine‐scale spatial factors, and to highlight areas of spatially explicit uncertainty.
High‐resolution climate variables are critical inputs to ecological models. We used quantile machine learning to downscale 4 km gridded climate data to 30 m with spatially explicit model uncertainty. Temperature variables were highly accurate when downscaled to 30 m, and spatial prediction intervals added insight for propagation into ecological models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.8596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate ; Climate and vegetation ; Climate change ; climate data ; climate extremes ; Climate models ; Climate prediction ; Climate trends ; Climatic data ; Ecological models ; empirical downscaling ; Growth models ; Hydrologic data ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; model uncertainty ; Precipitation ; Precipitation data ; Solar radiation ; Statistical analysis ; Uncertainty ; Vegetation growth</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2024-11, Vol.44 (13), p.4548-4570</ispartof><rights>2024 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1846-feb097761d95b973ea16442b8b6ffed34d1e57867774cc8aa92c0fd3844e84c53</cites><orcidid>0009-0003-3539-5209 ; 0000-0003-1149-7641</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.8596$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.8596$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inglis, Nicole C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Taylor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cale, Ashley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartsook, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onyegbula, Johanson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying spatially explicit uncertainty in empirically downscaled climate data</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>Ecological simulations including forest and vegetation growth models require climate inputs that match the resolution and extent of the process being modelled. Climate inputs are often derived at resolutions coarser than the scale of many ecosystem processes. Machine learning models can be trained to spatially downscale climate data to fine (30 m) resolution using topographic variables such as elevation, aspect and other site‐specific factors. Statistically downscaled climate models will have spatially varying uncertainty that is not usually incorporated into downscaling techniques for error propagation into later models, are often applied on smaller areas, are not fine enough resolutions for many modelling techniques, or are not always scalable to large spatial extents. There remains opportunity to leverage machine learning advancements to downscale climate to very fine (30 m) resolutions with associated spatially explicit uncertainty to represent microclimatic variation in ecological models. In this study, we used quantile machine learning to produce 30 m downscaled temperature and precipitation data and associated model prediction uncertainty for the state of California. Temperature models were accurate at downscaling 4 km climate data to 30 m, performing better than the 4 km data at high and low slope positions and at high elevations, especially where there were fewer weather observations. Precipitation model predictions did not show global improvement over the 4 km scale, but were more accurate at high elevations, slopes with higher solar radiation and in valleys. For all climate variables, the added detail of spatial explicit uncertainty via 90% prediction intervals provides critical insight into the utility of empirically downscaled climate. The resulting 30 m spatially contiguous outputs can be used as ecological model inputs with uncertainty propagation, to illuminate climate trends over time as a function of fine‐scale spatial factors, and to highlight areas of spatially explicit uncertainty.
High‐resolution climate variables are critical inputs to ecological models. We used quantile machine learning to downscale 4 km gridded climate data to 30 m with spatially explicit model uncertainty. Temperature variables were highly accurate when downscaled to 30 m, and spatial prediction intervals added insight for propagation into ecological models.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate and vegetation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate data</subject><subject>climate extremes</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climate prediction</subject><subject>Climate trends</subject><subject>Climatic data</subject><subject>Ecological models</subject><subject>empirical downscaling</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>model uncertainty</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation data</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Vegetation growth</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtLAzEQB_AgCtYq-BECXrxsTXazeRyl-KRQCnoO2TwkZbu7JlnqfnvT1qunmcNvZv4MALcYLTBC5cO21wteC3oGZhgJViDE-TmYIS5EwQnml-Aqxi1CSAhMZ2CzGVWXvJt89wXjoJJXbTtB-zO0XvsEx07bkJTv0gR9B-1u8MHrozH9vou5tQbq1u9UstCopK7BhVNttDd_dQ4-n58-lq_Fav3ytnxcFRpzQgtnmxyPUWxE3QhWWYUpIWXDG-qcNRUx2NaMU8YY0ZorJUqNnKk4IZYTXVdzcHfaO4T-e7QxyW0_hi6flBUuCWaIcJ7V_Unp0McYrJNDyFnDJDGSh4flKS0PD8u0ONG9b-30r5Pv6-XR_wLNT21o</recordid><startdate>20241115</startdate><enddate>20241115</enddate><creator>Inglis, Nicole C.</creator><creator>Brown, Taylor R.</creator><creator>Cale, Ashley B.</creator><creator>Hartsook, Theodore</creator><creator>Matos, Adriano</creator><creator>Onyegbula, Johanson</creator><creator>Greenberg, Jonathan A.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3539-5209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-7641</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241115</creationdate><title>Quantifying spatially explicit uncertainty in empirically downscaled climate data</title><author>Inglis, Nicole C. ; Brown, Taylor R. ; Cale, Ashley B. ; Hartsook, Theodore ; Matos, Adriano ; Onyegbula, Johanson ; Greenberg, Jonathan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1846-feb097761d95b973ea16442b8b6ffed34d1e57867774cc8aa92c0fd3844e84c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate and vegetation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate data</topic><topic>climate extremes</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climate prediction</topic><topic>Climate trends</topic><topic>Climatic data</topic><topic>Ecological models</topic><topic>empirical downscaling</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>model uncertainty</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation data</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Vegetation growth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inglis, Nicole C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Taylor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cale, Ashley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartsook, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onyegbula, Johanson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inglis, Nicole C.</au><au>Brown, Taylor R.</au><au>Cale, Ashley B.</au><au>Hartsook, Theodore</au><au>Matos, Adriano</au><au>Onyegbula, Johanson</au><au>Greenberg, Jonathan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying spatially explicit uncertainty in empirically downscaled climate data</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2024-11-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>4548</spage><epage>4570</epage><pages>4548-4570</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>Ecological simulations including forest and vegetation growth models require climate inputs that match the resolution and extent of the process being modelled. Climate inputs are often derived at resolutions coarser than the scale of many ecosystem processes. Machine learning models can be trained to spatially downscale climate data to fine (30 m) resolution using topographic variables such as elevation, aspect and other site‐specific factors. Statistically downscaled climate models will have spatially varying uncertainty that is not usually incorporated into downscaling techniques for error propagation into later models, are often applied on smaller areas, are not fine enough resolutions for many modelling techniques, or are not always scalable to large spatial extents. There remains opportunity to leverage machine learning advancements to downscale climate to very fine (30 m) resolutions with associated spatially explicit uncertainty to represent microclimatic variation in ecological models. In this study, we used quantile machine learning to produce 30 m downscaled temperature and precipitation data and associated model prediction uncertainty for the state of California. Temperature models were accurate at downscaling 4 km climate data to 30 m, performing better than the 4 km data at high and low slope positions and at high elevations, especially where there were fewer weather observations. Precipitation model predictions did not show global improvement over the 4 km scale, but were more accurate at high elevations, slopes with higher solar radiation and in valleys. For all climate variables, the added detail of spatial explicit uncertainty via 90% prediction intervals provides critical insight into the utility of empirically downscaled climate. The resulting 30 m spatially contiguous outputs can be used as ecological model inputs with uncertainty propagation, to illuminate climate trends over time as a function of fine‐scale spatial factors, and to highlight areas of spatially explicit uncertainty.
High‐resolution climate variables are critical inputs to ecological models. We used quantile machine learning to downscale 4 km gridded climate data to 30 m with spatially explicit model uncertainty. Temperature variables were highly accurate when downscaled to 30 m, and spatial prediction intervals added insight for propagation into ecological models.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.8596</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3539-5209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-7641</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-8418 |
ispartof | International journal of climatology, 2024-11, Vol.44 (13), p.4548-4570 |
issn | 0899-8418 1097-0088 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3124170488 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Climate Climate and vegetation Climate change climate data climate extremes Climate models Climate prediction Climate trends Climatic data Ecological models empirical downscaling Growth models Hydrologic data Learning algorithms Machine learning model uncertainty Precipitation Precipitation data Solar radiation Statistical analysis Uncertainty Vegetation growth |
title | Quantifying spatially explicit uncertainty in empirically downscaled climate data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20spatially%20explicit%20uncertainty%20in%20empirically%20downscaled%20climate%20data&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Inglis,%20Nicole%20C.&rft.date=2024-11-15&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=4548&rft.epage=4570&rft.pages=4548-4570&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.8596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3124170488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3124170488&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |