Sulfide stress corrosion (SSC) susceptibilities of duplex stainless steels 2205 produced by powder metallurgy (HIP) and hot rolling

Owing to their excellent properties, duplex stainless steels (DSSs) may be selected for the H2S environment. Operational limits are not defined and depend on fabrication processes. In this work, the susceptibilities of two DSSs 2205 to sulfide stress corrosion (SSC) in saline solutions with three pH...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials and corrosion 2024-11, Vol.75 (11), p.1528-1538
Hauptverfasser: Barros, T. S., Tavares, S. S. M., Pimenta, A. R., Batista, R. T., Velasco, J. A. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Owing to their excellent properties, duplex stainless steels (DSSs) may be selected for the H2S environment. Operational limits are not defined and depend on fabrication processes. In this work, the susceptibilities of two DSSs 2205 to sulfide stress corrosion (SSC) in saline solutions with three pH levels were investigated. The difference between materials is the fabrication route: hot rolled (HR) tubes and powder metallurgy with compacting and sintering final operations by hot isostatic pressing (PM‐HIP). The susceptibility parameters were evaluated by slow strain rate tensile tests (SSRT). Both materials suffered embrittlement in solutions with pH 3.5 and 4.5, but the susceptibility was slightly better in the HR. In the solution with pH 5.5, the HR fractured with ductile behavior, while the PM‐HIP was brittle. The better resistance of HR to SSC can be explained by microstructural features, such as the lower grain size and austenite island interspace. The hot‐rolled material is less susceptible to sulfide stress corrosion than the material produced by powder metallurgy. This behavior can be attributed to the the lower grain size and austenite island interspace.
ISSN:0947-5117
1521-4176
DOI:10.1002/maco.202414418