Validating Disaster Medicine Experts’ Feedback Outcome Using Artificial Intelligence Computing Techniques

ObjectivesThis study aimed to use artificial intelligence (AI) computing techniques to determine if they can validate the findings of a previously published thematic analysis article focusing on disaster medicine experts’ open-ended feedback about Middle East and North African countries (MENA) for c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Disaster medicine and public health preparedness 2024-10, Vol.18, Article e160
Hauptverfasser: Farhat, Hassan, Helou, Mariana, Bajow, Nidaa, Abougalala, Walid, AL-Shaikh, Loua, Laughton, James, Dhiab, Mohamed Ben, Alinier, Guillaume
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesThis study aimed to use artificial intelligence (AI) computing techniques to determine if they can validate the findings of a previously published thematic analysis article focusing on disaster medicine experts’ open-ended feedback about Middle East and North African countries (MENA) for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats.MethodsAutomated text analytics techniques were employed to explore and visualize the semantic essence of the experts’ feedback through word vector transformation and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction. The t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) is another more advanced dimensionality reduction technique that enhanced the capturing of the determined components.ResultsTwo prominent clusters emerged from the full textual data set representing word similarities groups in the original data set, denoting a thematic group of ideas that experts have emphasized in their responses. Upon deep reading the text feedback, the themes linked preparedness with different training types, such as tabletop exercises and policies/legislation. The findings are in line with currently adopted practices.ConclusionsWhile AI methods demonstrated their valuable application in disaster medicine and helped validate the experts’ recommendations objectively, they should be approached cautiously, as they can be complex and challenging to comprehend fully.
ISSN:1935-7893
1938-744X
DOI:10.1017/dmp.2024.205