Co-rumination and psychological well-being of Chinese and Australian college students: a comparative study
The present research examined cultural differences of co-rumination in predicting psychological well-being between 331 Chinese and 166 Australian college students. Results of comparative analyses indicated three higher positive co-rumination factors (i.e., affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2024-10, Vol.43 (39), p.31141-31148 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 31148 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 39 |
| container_start_page | 31141 |
| container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Yang, Hongfei Maccann, Carolyn |
| description | The present research examined cultural differences of co-rumination in predicting psychological well-being between 331 Chinese and 166 Australian college students. Results of comparative analyses indicated three higher positive co-rumination factors (i.e., affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship), one higher negative co-rumination factor (i.e., inhibiting happiness), but one lower negative co-rumination factor (i.e., worry about evaluation) in Chinese participants, than in Australian participants. The neutral factors of co-rumination (i.e., frequency P and N) did not show group differences. Regression analyses indicated that affirmation and problem-solving were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, and slack were negative predictors for Chinese participants. Affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, inhibiting happiness, and slack were negative predictors for Australian participants. Overall, these findings indicate that different strategies of co-rumination have different relationships with psychological well-being while highlighting important differences between East and West cultures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-024-06690-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3121424370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121424370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-2e438b7c0672c3e204b4fd4cb02359f77f25ba50ad6f4a7bfea2cd0d5939521f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYsoOI7-AVcB19GbRxvrbii-YMCNrkOaJp0OnaQmrTL_3sxUcOfici-Hc86FL8uuCdwSAHEXCSWcY6BpiqIETE-yBSlZgblg7DTdwAtMGIHz7CLGLQARRVkusm3lcZh2nVNj5x1SrkFD3OuN733badWjb9P3uDada5G3qNp0zkRz9K2mOAbVd8oh7fvetAbFcWqMG-MDUknbDSqk2q9Z319mZ1b10Vz97mX28fT4Xr3g9dvza7VaY00BRkwNZ_e10FAIqpmhwGtuG65roCwvrRCW5rXKQTWF5UrU1iiqG2jykpU5JZYts5u5dwj-czJxlFs_BZdeSnbARDkTkFx0dungYwzGyiF0OxX2koA8MJUzU5mYyiNTSVOIzaGYzK414a_6n9QPpQV7BQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121424370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Co-rumination and psychological well-being of Chinese and Australian college students: a comparative study</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yang, Hongfei ; Maccann, Carolyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongfei ; Maccann, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><description>The present research examined cultural differences of co-rumination in predicting psychological well-being between 331 Chinese and 166 Australian college students. Results of comparative analyses indicated three higher positive co-rumination factors (i.e., affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship), one higher negative co-rumination factor (i.e., inhibiting happiness), but one lower negative co-rumination factor (i.e., worry about evaluation) in Chinese participants, than in Australian participants. The neutral factors of co-rumination (i.e., frequency P and N) did not show group differences. Regression analyses indicated that affirmation and problem-solving were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, and slack were negative predictors for Chinese participants. Affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, inhibiting happiness, and slack were negative predictors for Australian participants. Overall, these findings indicate that different strategies of co-rumination have different relationships with psychological well-being while highlighting important differences between East and West cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-024-06690-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; College students ; Cultural differences ; Culture ; Friendship ; Happiness ; Problem solving ; Psychology ; Questionnaires ; Social interaction ; Social Sciences ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2024-10, Vol.43 (39), p.31141-31148</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-2e438b7c0672c3e204b4fd4cb02359f77f25ba50ad6f4a7bfea2cd0d5939521f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5451-6887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-024-06690-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-024-06690-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccann, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><title>Co-rumination and psychological well-being of Chinese and Australian college students: a comparative study</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>The present research examined cultural differences of co-rumination in predicting psychological well-being between 331 Chinese and 166 Australian college students. Results of comparative analyses indicated three higher positive co-rumination factors (i.e., affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship), one higher negative co-rumination factor (i.e., inhibiting happiness), but one lower negative co-rumination factor (i.e., worry about evaluation) in Chinese participants, than in Australian participants. The neutral factors of co-rumination (i.e., frequency P and N) did not show group differences. Regression analyses indicated that affirmation and problem-solving were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, and slack were negative predictors for Chinese participants. Affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, inhibiting happiness, and slack were negative predictors for Australian participants. Overall, these findings indicate that different strategies of co-rumination have different relationships with psychological well-being while highlighting important differences between East and West cultures.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYsoOI7-AVcB19GbRxvrbii-YMCNrkOaJp0OnaQmrTL_3sxUcOfici-Hc86FL8uuCdwSAHEXCSWcY6BpiqIETE-yBSlZgblg7DTdwAtMGIHz7CLGLQARRVkusm3lcZh2nVNj5x1SrkFD3OuN733badWjb9P3uDada5G3qNp0zkRz9K2mOAbVd8oh7fvetAbFcWqMG-MDUknbDSqk2q9Z319mZ1b10Vz97mX28fT4Xr3g9dvza7VaY00BRkwNZ_e10FAIqpmhwGtuG65roCwvrRCW5rXKQTWF5UrU1iiqG2jykpU5JZYts5u5dwj-czJxlFs_BZdeSnbARDkTkFx0dungYwzGyiF0OxX2koA8MJUzU5mYyiNTSVOIzaGYzK414a_6n9QPpQV7BQ</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Yang, Hongfei</creator><creator>Maccann, Carolyn</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5451-6887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Co-rumination and psychological well-being of Chinese and Australian college students: a comparative study</title><author>Yang, Hongfei ; Maccann, Carolyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-2e438b7c0672c3e204b4fd4cb02359f77f25ba50ad6f4a7bfea2cd0d5939521f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccann, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Hongfei</au><au>Maccann, Carolyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Co-rumination and psychological well-being of Chinese and Australian college students: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>31141</spage><epage>31148</epage><pages>31141-31148</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>The present research examined cultural differences of co-rumination in predicting psychological well-being between 331 Chinese and 166 Australian college students. Results of comparative analyses indicated three higher positive co-rumination factors (i.e., affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship), one higher negative co-rumination factor (i.e., inhibiting happiness), but one lower negative co-rumination factor (i.e., worry about evaluation) in Chinese participants, than in Australian participants. The neutral factors of co-rumination (i.e., frequency P and N) did not show group differences. Regression analyses indicated that affirmation and problem-solving were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, and slack were negative predictors for Chinese participants. Affirmation, problem-solving, and enhancing friendship were positive predictors whereas worry about evaluation, inhibiting happiness, and slack were negative predictors for Australian participants. Overall, these findings indicate that different strategies of co-rumination have different relationships with psychological well-being while highlighting important differences between East and West cultures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-024-06690-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5451-6887</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
| ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2024-10, Vol.43 (39), p.31141-31148 |
| issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3121424370 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Adjustment Behavioral Science and Psychology College students Cultural differences Culture Friendship Happiness Problem solving Psychology Questionnaires Social interaction Social Sciences Well being |
| title | Co-rumination and psychological well-being of Chinese and Australian college students: a comparative study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A52%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Co-rumination%20and%20psychological%20well-being%20of%20Chinese%20and%20Australian%20college%20students:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Yang,%20Hongfei&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=31141&rft.epage=31148&rft.pages=31141-31148&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-024-06690-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3121424370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121424370&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |