Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA

Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vege...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2024-10, Vol.129 (10), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Miriam C., Willard, Debra A., Wurster, Frederic C., Huber, Molly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences
container_volume 129
creator Jones, Miriam C.
Willard, Debra A.
Wurster, Frederic C.
Huber, Molly
description Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps. Plain Language Summary Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last >200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the G
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2024JG008137
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3121373063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121373063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2327-b2b09090867f2f06bd1c666ee9f4f8b01d8f5a7036e1545ed82bae33979d60c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EElXpjgNYYtuCfxonXlYpDVQVPy0Vy8hJ7MpVEhc7UdUVHIEzchIcFSFWaBYzI31v9OYBcInRNUaE3xBExvMEoQjT8AT0CGZ8FHGGT3_ngJ6DgXNbhDqKcYx74P25FXWj1UHXG_hkXPP18Rmb0tRalPBJigbGwmamhgvjHJxZU0EBp1boWhZwZqx0jR86sBR1MYSJ7TRT7SqvX-1FtYMPotGm9uurLotSKwmXUrUbOYTr1eQCnClROjn46X2wnt2-xHejxWNyH08Wo5xQEo4ykiHuK2KhIgqxrMA5Y0xKrsYqyhAuIhWIEFEmcTAOZBGRTEhKecgLhvKQ9sHV8e7OmrfWu063prXelUspJj4yihj11PBI5da_a6VKd1ZXwh5SjNIu5fRvyh6nR3yvS3n4l03nyTIhJCIh_QYp2X2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121373063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jones, Miriam C. ; Willard, Debra A. ; Wurster, Frederic C. ; Huber, Molly</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Miriam C. ; Willard, Debra A. ; Wurster, Frederic C. ; Huber, Molly</creatorcontrib><description>Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps. Plain Language Summary Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last &gt;200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the Great Dismal Swamp to a carbon sink, an important consideration as the United States aims to reach carbon neutrality in the coming decades. Key Points Excess ash mass is used to quantify a loss of ∼50 Tg of carbon in a temperate peat swamp since drainage began in the late 1700s More than 1 Tg of carbon and 50–75 cm of peat were consumed in two recent fires in Great Dismal Swamp Carbon loss in the peat swamp is continuing, despite management efforts to reduce water loss from ∼240 km of drainage ditches</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2024JG008137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ash ; Ash content ; Ashes ; carbon ; Carbon capture and storage ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate variability ; Construction ; Ditches ; Drainage ; Drainage ditches ; Earth surface ; fire ; Fires ; Greenhouse gases ; Groundwater table ; Land use ; land‐use change ; Oxidation ; Peat ; peatland ; Peatlands ; Refuges ; Smoldering ; Surface drainage ; Swamps ; temperate peat swamp ; Trenching ; Vegetation ; vegetation history ; Water loss ; Water table ; Wetlands ; Wildlife ; Wildlife refuges ; Wildlife sanctuaries</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2024-10, Vol.129 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2327-b2b09090867f2f06bd1c666ee9f4f8b01d8f5a7036e1545ed82bae33979d60c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6650-7619 ; 0000-0001-6407-6627 ; 0000-0003-4878-0942</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2024JG008137$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2024JG008137$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Miriam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willard, Debra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurster, Frederic C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Molly</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps. Plain Language Summary Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last &gt;200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the Great Dismal Swamp to a carbon sink, an important consideration as the United States aims to reach carbon neutrality in the coming decades. Key Points Excess ash mass is used to quantify a loss of ∼50 Tg of carbon in a temperate peat swamp since drainage began in the late 1700s More than 1 Tg of carbon and 50–75 cm of peat were consumed in two recent fires in Great Dismal Swamp Carbon loss in the peat swamp is continuing, despite management efforts to reduce water loss from ∼240 km of drainage ditches</description><subject>Ash</subject><subject>Ash content</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate variability</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage ditches</subject><subject>Earth surface</subject><subject>fire</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Groundwater table</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land‐use change</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>peatland</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Refuges</subject><subject>Smoldering</subject><subject>Surface drainage</subject><subject>Swamps</subject><subject>temperate peat swamp</subject><subject>Trenching</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation history</subject><subject>Water loss</subject><subject>Water table</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife refuges</subject><subject>Wildlife sanctuaries</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EElXpjgNYYtuCfxonXlYpDVQVPy0Vy8hJ7MpVEhc7UdUVHIEzchIcFSFWaBYzI31v9OYBcInRNUaE3xBExvMEoQjT8AT0CGZ8FHGGT3_ngJ6DgXNbhDqKcYx74P25FXWj1UHXG_hkXPP18Rmb0tRalPBJigbGwmamhgvjHJxZU0EBp1boWhZwZqx0jR86sBR1MYSJ7TRT7SqvX-1FtYMPotGm9uurLotSKwmXUrUbOYTr1eQCnClROjn46X2wnt2-xHejxWNyH08Wo5xQEo4ykiHuK2KhIgqxrMA5Y0xKrsYqyhAuIhWIEFEmcTAOZBGRTEhKecgLhvKQ9sHV8e7OmrfWu063prXelUspJj4yihj11PBI5da_a6VKd1ZXwh5SjNIu5fRvyh6nR3yvS3n4l03nyTIhJCIh_QYp2X2o</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Jones, Miriam C.</creator><creator>Willard, Debra A.</creator><creator>Wurster, Frederic C.</creator><creator>Huber, Molly</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-7619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6407-6627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-0942</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</title><author>Jones, Miriam C. ; Willard, Debra A. ; Wurster, Frederic C. ; Huber, Molly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2327-b2b09090867f2f06bd1c666ee9f4f8b01d8f5a7036e1545ed82bae33979d60c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ash</topic><topic>Ash content</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate variability</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage ditches</topic><topic>Earth surface</topic><topic>fire</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Groundwater table</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land‐use change</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>peatland</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Refuges</topic><topic>Smoldering</topic><topic>Surface drainage</topic><topic>Swamps</topic><topic>temperate peat swamp</topic><topic>Trenching</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation history</topic><topic>Water loss</topic><topic>Water table</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife refuges</topic><topic>Wildlife sanctuaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Miriam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willard, Debra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurster, Frederic C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Molly</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Miriam C.</au><au>Willard, Debra A.</au><au>Wurster, Frederic C.</au><au>Huber, Molly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps. Plain Language Summary Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last &gt;200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the Great Dismal Swamp to a carbon sink, an important consideration as the United States aims to reach carbon neutrality in the coming decades. Key Points Excess ash mass is used to quantify a loss of ∼50 Tg of carbon in a temperate peat swamp since drainage began in the late 1700s More than 1 Tg of carbon and 50–75 cm of peat were consumed in two recent fires in Great Dismal Swamp Carbon loss in the peat swamp is continuing, despite management efforts to reduce water loss from ∼240 km of drainage ditches</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2024JG008137</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-7619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6407-6627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-0942</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-8953
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2024-10, Vol.129 (10), p.n/a
issn 2169-8953
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3121373063
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Ash
Ash content
Ashes
carbon
Carbon capture and storage
Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
Carbon sinks
Climate
Climate change
Climate variability
Construction
Ditches
Drainage
Drainage ditches
Earth surface
fire
Fires
Greenhouse gases
Groundwater table
Land use
land‐use change
Oxidation
Peat
peatland
Peatlands
Refuges
Smoldering
Surface drainage
Swamps
temperate peat swamp
Trenching
Vegetation
vegetation history
Water loss
Water table
Wetlands
Wildlife
Wildlife refuges
Wildlife sanctuaries
title Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A07%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20Post%E2%80%90Colonial%20Peat%20Carbon%20Loss%20From%20a%20Drained%20Forested%20Peatland,%20Great%20Dismal%20Swamp%20National%20Wildlife%20Refuge,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Jones,%20Miriam%20C.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2024JG008137&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3121373063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121373063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true