Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA
Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vege...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2024-10, Vol.129 (10), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Jones, Miriam C. Willard, Debra A. Wurster, Frederic C. Huber, Molly |
description | Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps.
Plain Language Summary
Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last >200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the G |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2024JG008137 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3121373063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121373063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2327-b2b09090867f2f06bd1c666ee9f4f8b01d8f5a7036e1545ed82bae33979d60c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EElXpjgNYYtuCfxonXlYpDVQVPy0Vy8hJ7MpVEhc7UdUVHIEzchIcFSFWaBYzI31v9OYBcInRNUaE3xBExvMEoQjT8AT0CGZ8FHGGT3_ngJ6DgXNbhDqKcYx74P25FXWj1UHXG_hkXPP18Rmb0tRalPBJigbGwmamhgvjHJxZU0EBp1boWhZwZqx0jR86sBR1MYSJ7TRT7SqvX-1FtYMPotGm9uurLotSKwmXUrUbOYTr1eQCnClROjn46X2wnt2-xHejxWNyH08Wo5xQEo4ykiHuK2KhIgqxrMA5Y0xKrsYqyhAuIhWIEFEmcTAOZBGRTEhKecgLhvKQ9sHV8e7OmrfWu063prXelUspJj4yihj11PBI5da_a6VKd1ZXwh5SjNIu5fRvyh6nR3yvS3n4l03nyTIhJCIh_QYp2X2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121373063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jones, Miriam C. ; Willard, Debra A. ; Wurster, Frederic C. ; Huber, Molly</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Miriam C. ; Willard, Debra A. ; Wurster, Frederic C. ; Huber, Molly</creatorcontrib><description>Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps.
Plain Language Summary
Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last >200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the Great Dismal Swamp to a carbon sink, an important consideration as the United States aims to reach carbon neutrality in the coming decades.
Key Points
Excess ash mass is used to quantify a loss of ∼50 Tg of carbon in a temperate peat swamp since drainage began in the late 1700s
More than 1 Tg of carbon and 50–75 cm of peat were consumed in two recent fires in Great Dismal Swamp
Carbon loss in the peat swamp is continuing, despite management efforts to reduce water loss from ∼240 km of drainage ditches</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2024JG008137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ash ; Ash content ; Ashes ; carbon ; Carbon capture and storage ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate variability ; Construction ; Ditches ; Drainage ; Drainage ditches ; Earth surface ; fire ; Fires ; Greenhouse gases ; Groundwater table ; Land use ; land‐use change ; Oxidation ; Peat ; peatland ; Peatlands ; Refuges ; Smoldering ; Surface drainage ; Swamps ; temperate peat swamp ; Trenching ; Vegetation ; vegetation history ; Water loss ; Water table ; Wetlands ; Wildlife ; Wildlife refuges ; Wildlife sanctuaries</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2024-10, Vol.129 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2327-b2b09090867f2f06bd1c666ee9f4f8b01d8f5a7036e1545ed82bae33979d60c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6650-7619 ; 0000-0001-6407-6627 ; 0000-0003-4878-0942</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2024JG008137$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2024JG008137$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Miriam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willard, Debra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurster, Frederic C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Molly</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps.
Plain Language Summary
Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last >200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the Great Dismal Swamp to a carbon sink, an important consideration as the United States aims to reach carbon neutrality in the coming decades.
Key Points
Excess ash mass is used to quantify a loss of ∼50 Tg of carbon in a temperate peat swamp since drainage began in the late 1700s
More than 1 Tg of carbon and 50–75 cm of peat were consumed in two recent fires in Great Dismal Swamp
Carbon loss in the peat swamp is continuing, despite management efforts to reduce water loss from ∼240 km of drainage ditches</description><subject>Ash</subject><subject>Ash content</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate variability</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage ditches</subject><subject>Earth surface</subject><subject>fire</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Groundwater table</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land‐use change</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>peatland</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Refuges</subject><subject>Smoldering</subject><subject>Surface drainage</subject><subject>Swamps</subject><subject>temperate peat swamp</subject><subject>Trenching</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation history</subject><subject>Water loss</subject><subject>Water table</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife refuges</subject><subject>Wildlife sanctuaries</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EElXpjgNYYtuCfxonXlYpDVQVPy0Vy8hJ7MpVEhc7UdUVHIEzchIcFSFWaBYzI31v9OYBcInRNUaE3xBExvMEoQjT8AT0CGZ8FHGGT3_ngJ6DgXNbhDqKcYx74P25FXWj1UHXG_hkXPP18Rmb0tRalPBJigbGwmamhgvjHJxZU0EBp1boWhZwZqx0jR86sBR1MYSJ7TRT7SqvX-1FtYMPotGm9uurLotSKwmXUrUbOYTr1eQCnClROjn46X2wnt2-xHejxWNyH08Wo5xQEo4ykiHuK2KhIgqxrMA5Y0xKrsYqyhAuIhWIEFEmcTAOZBGRTEhKecgLhvKQ9sHV8e7OmrfWu063prXelUspJj4yihj11PBI5da_a6VKd1ZXwh5SjNIu5fRvyh6nR3yvS3n4l03nyTIhJCIh_QYp2X2o</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Jones, Miriam C.</creator><creator>Willard, Debra A.</creator><creator>Wurster, Frederic C.</creator><creator>Huber, Molly</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-7619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6407-6627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-0942</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</title><author>Jones, Miriam C. ; Willard, Debra A. ; Wurster, Frederic C. ; Huber, Molly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2327-b2b09090867f2f06bd1c666ee9f4f8b01d8f5a7036e1545ed82bae33979d60c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ash</topic><topic>Ash content</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate variability</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage ditches</topic><topic>Earth surface</topic><topic>fire</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Groundwater table</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land‐use change</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>peatland</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Refuges</topic><topic>Smoldering</topic><topic>Surface drainage</topic><topic>Swamps</topic><topic>temperate peat swamp</topic><topic>Trenching</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation history</topic><topic>Water loss</topic><topic>Water table</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife refuges</topic><topic>Wildlife sanctuaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Miriam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willard, Debra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurster, Frederic C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Molly</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Miriam C.</au><au>Willard, Debra A.</au><au>Wurster, Frederic C.</au><au>Huber, Molly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Peatland carbon storage is increasingly threatened by the combination of land‐use change and climate variability, though carbon losses from land‐use changes that span centuries are difficult to quantify, particularly in systems where little undisturbed area remains. Here we use a combination of vegetation change, fire history, and calculations of excess ash mass to quantify carbon loss in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (GDS NWR), USA, a highly impacted oligotrophic temperate peat swamp. Our results indicate that ditch construction that began in the Colonial Era in the late 1700s and continued into the mid‐20th century across the swamp resulted in shifts from cypress‐tupelo swamps to a combination of maple‐gum and pine pocosin forests, consistent with drying surface conditions. Two large smoldering fires (2008, 2011) that were exacerbated by surface drainage, shifted vegetation from swamp to marsh, consumed peat over 25 km2, and caused losses of 1.05–1.34 Tg C due to peat burning. Across the Refuge as a whole, up to 48.2 Tg C has been lost to peat oxidation since ditch construction. Both stocks and rates of carbon loss remain higher than post‐disturbance accumulation across most of GDS NWR, suggesting that existing efforts to block drainages to elevate water tables may not be enough to offset carbon losses. Rewetting heavily impacted surface peats may reduce peat oxidation and carbon loss, and shift vegetation toward hydrologic conditions preferred by pre‐disturbance cypress‐tupelo swamps.
Plain Language Summary
Peatlands sequester a globally significant pool of carbon despite covering only 3% of the terrestrial earth's surface. However, this carbon can be released to the atmosphere as the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane due to changes in climate and land use. In this study we quantify carbon loss from Great Dismal Swamp, a temperate peat swamp with a history of drainage that began with George Washington in the late 18th century. Using ash content as a proxy for peat loss, we found that Great Dismal Swamp has lost a substantial amount of carbon (∼50 million metric tons) since Colonial‐era ditching, with more than 1 million metric tons lost from two recent catastrophic smoldering peat fires. Our calculations suggest that the swamp continues to lose carbon, despite efforts to slow water loss from nearly 240 km of drainage ditches constructed over the last >200 years. More aggressive mitigation methods may be needed to return the Great Dismal Swamp to a carbon sink, an important consideration as the United States aims to reach carbon neutrality in the coming decades.
Key Points
Excess ash mass is used to quantify a loss of ∼50 Tg of carbon in a temperate peat swamp since drainage began in the late 1700s
More than 1 Tg of carbon and 50–75 cm of peat were consumed in two recent fires in Great Dismal Swamp
Carbon loss in the peat swamp is continuing, despite management efforts to reduce water loss from ∼240 km of drainage ditches</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2024JG008137</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-7619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6407-6627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-0942</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-8953 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2024-10, Vol.129 (10), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-8953 2169-8961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3121373063 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ash Ash content Ashes carbon Carbon capture and storage Carbon dioxide Carbon sequestration Carbon sinks Climate Climate change Climate variability Construction Ditches Drainage Drainage ditches Earth surface fire Fires Greenhouse gases Groundwater table Land use land‐use change Oxidation Peat peatland Peatlands Refuges Smoldering Surface drainage Swamps temperate peat swamp Trenching Vegetation vegetation history Water loss Water table Wetlands Wildlife Wildlife refuges Wildlife sanctuaries |
title | Quantifying Post‐Colonial Peat Carbon Loss From a Drained Forested Peatland, Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A07%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20Post%E2%80%90Colonial%20Peat%20Carbon%20Loss%20From%20a%20Drained%20Forested%20Peatland,%20Great%20Dismal%20Swamp%20National%20Wildlife%20Refuge,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Jones,%20Miriam%20C.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2024JG008137&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3121373063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121373063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |