Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T

PurposeTo evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of QSM of the liver via single breath‐hold chemical shift–encoded MRI at both 1.5 T and 3 T in a multicenter, multivendor study in subjects with iron overload.MethodsThis prospective study included four academic medical centers with three diff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2025-01, Vol.93 (1), p.330-340
Hauptverfasser: Buelo, Collin J, Velikina, Julia, Mao, Lu, Zhao, Ruiyang, Yuan, Qing, Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari, Ruschke, Stefan, Karampinos, Dimitrios C, Harris, David T, Mattison, Ryan J, Jeng, Michael R, Pedrosa, Ivan, Kamel, Ihab R, Vasanawala, Shreyas, Yokoo, Takeshi, Reeder, Scott B, Hernando, Diego
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue 1
container_start_page 330
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 93
creator Buelo, Collin J
Velikina, Julia
Mao, Lu
Zhao, Ruiyang
Yuan, Qing
Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari
Ruschke, Stefan
Karampinos, Dimitrios C
Harris, David T
Mattison, Ryan J
Jeng, Michael R
Pedrosa, Ivan
Kamel, Ihab R
Vasanawala, Shreyas
Yokoo, Takeshi
Reeder, Scott B
Hernando, Diego
description PurposeTo evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of QSM of the liver via single breath‐hold chemical shift–encoded MRI at both 1.5 T and 3 T in a multicenter, multivendor study in subjects with iron overload.MethodsThis prospective study included four academic medical centers with three different MRI vendors at 1.5 T and 3 T. Subjects with known or suspected liver iron overload underwent multi‐echo spoiled gradient‐recalled‐echo scans at each field strength. A subset received repeatability testing at either 1.5 T or 3 T. Susceptibility and R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps were reconstructed from the multi‐echo images and analyzed at a single center. QSM‐measured susceptibility was compared with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and a commercial R2‐based liver iron concentration method across centers and field strengths using linear regression and F‐tests on the intercept and slope. Field‐strength reproducibility and test/retest repeatability were evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsA total of 155/80 data sets (test/retest) were available at 1.5 T, and 159/70 data sets (test/retest) were available at 3 T. Calibrations across sites were reproducible, with some variability (e.g., susceptibility slope with liver iron concentration ranged from 0.102 to 0.123 g/[mg·$$ \cdotp $$ppm] across centers at 1.5 T). Field strength reproducibility was good (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.862), and test/retest repeatability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.951).ConclusionQSM as an imaging biomarker of liver iron overload is feasible and repeatable across centers and MR vendors. It may be complementary with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ as they are obtained from the same acquisition. Although good reproducibility was observed, liver QSM may benefit from standardization of acquisition parameters. Overall, QSM is a promising method for liver iron quantification.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.30251
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3121287238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121287238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_31212872383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhK0KJAL0wBusxJUE_yRKc0YgLtxyr0zj0q0c27XXrbjw7DgSD8BpNDPfDGMPgjeCc_k8x7lRXHZixSrRSVnLbmivWMX7ltdKDO0Nu03pyDkfhr6t2M9HtoQ748jEJ5gXczZu8hHO2uKkCb0Dvwdb4ginrB0h6QWClNPOBMJPtEjfMOsQ0H0BOggFKI8JLkgHwLhclLn1egJNIJpuBO0mUOM9u95rm8z6T-_Y49vr-PJeh-hP2STaHn2OrlRbJaSQm16qjfof9QugblW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121287238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Buelo, Collin J ; Velikina, Julia ; Mao, Lu ; Zhao, Ruiyang ; Yuan, Qing ; Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari ; Ruschke, Stefan ; Karampinos, Dimitrios C ; Harris, David T ; Mattison, Ryan J ; Jeng, Michael R ; Pedrosa, Ivan ; Kamel, Ihab R ; Vasanawala, Shreyas ; Yokoo, Takeshi ; Reeder, Scott B ; Hernando, Diego</creator><creatorcontrib>Buelo, Collin J ; Velikina, Julia ; Mao, Lu ; Zhao, Ruiyang ; Yuan, Qing ; Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari ; Ruschke, Stefan ; Karampinos, Dimitrios C ; Harris, David T ; Mattison, Ryan J ; Jeng, Michael R ; Pedrosa, Ivan ; Kamel, Ihab R ; Vasanawala, Shreyas ; Yokoo, Takeshi ; Reeder, Scott B ; Hernando, Diego</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeTo evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of QSM of the liver via single breath‐hold chemical shift–encoded MRI at both 1.5 T and 3 T in a multicenter, multivendor study in subjects with iron overload.MethodsThis prospective study included four academic medical centers with three different MRI vendors at 1.5 T and 3 T. Subjects with known or suspected liver iron overload underwent multi‐echo spoiled gradient‐recalled‐echo scans at each field strength. A subset received repeatability testing at either 1.5 T or 3 T. Susceptibility and R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps were reconstructed from the multi‐echo images and analyzed at a single center. QSM‐measured susceptibility was compared with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and a commercial R2‐based liver iron concentration method across centers and field strengths using linear regression and F‐tests on the intercept and slope. Field‐strength reproducibility and test/retest repeatability were evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsA total of 155/80 data sets (test/retest) were available at 1.5 T, and 159/70 data sets (test/retest) were available at 3 T. Calibrations across sites were reproducible, with some variability (e.g., susceptibility slope with liver iron concentration ranged from 0.102 to 0.123 g/[mg·$$ \cdotp $$ppm] across centers at 1.5 T). Field strength reproducibility was good (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.862), and test/retest repeatability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.951).ConclusionQSM as an imaging biomarker of liver iron overload is feasible and repeatable across centers and MR vendors. It may be complementary with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ as they are obtained from the same acquisition. Although good reproducibility was observed, liver QSM may benefit from standardization of acquisition parameters. Overall, QSM is a promising method for liver iron quantification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Chemical equilibrium ; Correlation coefficients ; Datasets ; Field strength ; Health care facilities ; Image reconstruction ; Iron ; Liver ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Overloading ; Reproducibility ; Susceptibility</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025-01, Vol.93 (1), p.330-340</ispartof><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buelo, Collin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velikina, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ruiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruschke, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karampinos, Dimitrios C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattison, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedrosa, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamel, Ihab R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasanawala, Shreyas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernando, Diego</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><description>PurposeTo evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of QSM of the liver via single breath‐hold chemical shift–encoded MRI at both 1.5 T and 3 T in a multicenter, multivendor study in subjects with iron overload.MethodsThis prospective study included four academic medical centers with three different MRI vendors at 1.5 T and 3 T. Subjects with known or suspected liver iron overload underwent multi‐echo spoiled gradient‐recalled‐echo scans at each field strength. A subset received repeatability testing at either 1.5 T or 3 T. Susceptibility and R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps were reconstructed from the multi‐echo images and analyzed at a single center. QSM‐measured susceptibility was compared with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and a commercial R2‐based liver iron concentration method across centers and field strengths using linear regression and F‐tests on the intercept and slope. Field‐strength reproducibility and test/retest repeatability were evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsA total of 155/80 data sets (test/retest) were available at 1.5 T, and 159/70 data sets (test/retest) were available at 3 T. Calibrations across sites were reproducible, with some variability (e.g., susceptibility slope with liver iron concentration ranged from 0.102 to 0.123 g/[mg·$$ \cdotp $$ppm] across centers at 1.5 T). Field strength reproducibility was good (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.862), and test/retest repeatability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.951).ConclusionQSM as an imaging biomarker of liver iron overload is feasible and repeatable across centers and MR vendors. It may be complementary with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ as they are obtained from the same acquisition. Although good reproducibility was observed, liver QSM may benefit from standardization of acquisition parameters. Overall, QSM is a promising method for liver iron quantification.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Chemical equilibrium</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Field strength</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Overloading</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Susceptibility</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhK0KJAL0wBusxJUE_yRKc0YgLtxyr0zj0q0c27XXrbjw7DgSD8BpNDPfDGMPgjeCc_k8x7lRXHZixSrRSVnLbmivWMX7ltdKDO0Nu03pyDkfhr6t2M9HtoQ748jEJ5gXczZu8hHO2uKkCb0Dvwdb4ginrB0h6QWClNPOBMJPtEjfMOsQ0H0BOggFKI8JLkgHwLhclLn1egJNIJpuBO0mUOM9u95rm8z6T-_Y49vr-PJeh-hP2STaHn2OrlRbJaSQm16qjfof9QugblW8</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Buelo, Collin J</creator><creator>Velikina, Julia</creator><creator>Mao, Lu</creator><creator>Zhao, Ruiyang</creator><creator>Yuan, Qing</creator><creator>Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari</creator><creator>Ruschke, Stefan</creator><creator>Karampinos, Dimitrios C</creator><creator>Harris, David T</creator><creator>Mattison, Ryan J</creator><creator>Jeng, Michael R</creator><creator>Pedrosa, Ivan</creator><creator>Kamel, Ihab R</creator><creator>Vasanawala, Shreyas</creator><creator>Yokoo, Takeshi</creator><creator>Reeder, Scott B</creator><creator>Hernando, Diego</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T</title><author>Buelo, Collin J ; Velikina, Julia ; Mao, Lu ; Zhao, Ruiyang ; Yuan, Qing ; Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari ; Ruschke, Stefan ; Karampinos, Dimitrios C ; Harris, David T ; Mattison, Ryan J ; Jeng, Michael R ; Pedrosa, Ivan ; Kamel, Ihab R ; Vasanawala, Shreyas ; Yokoo, Takeshi ; Reeder, Scott B ; Hernando, Diego</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31212872383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Chemical equilibrium</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Field strength</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Overloading</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Susceptibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buelo, Collin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velikina, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ruiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruschke, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karampinos, Dimitrios C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattison, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedrosa, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamel, Ihab R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasanawala, Shreyas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernando, Diego</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buelo, Collin J</au><au>Velikina, Julia</au><au>Mao, Lu</au><au>Zhao, Ruiyang</au><au>Yuan, Qing</au><au>Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari</au><au>Ruschke, Stefan</au><au>Karampinos, Dimitrios C</au><au>Harris, David T</au><au>Mattison, Ryan J</au><au>Jeng, Michael R</au><au>Pedrosa, Ivan</au><au>Kamel, Ihab R</au><au>Vasanawala, Shreyas</au><au>Yokoo, Takeshi</au><au>Reeder, Scott B</au><au>Hernando, Diego</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>330-340</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>PurposeTo evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of QSM of the liver via single breath‐hold chemical shift–encoded MRI at both 1.5 T and 3 T in a multicenter, multivendor study in subjects with iron overload.MethodsThis prospective study included four academic medical centers with three different MRI vendors at 1.5 T and 3 T. Subjects with known or suspected liver iron overload underwent multi‐echo spoiled gradient‐recalled‐echo scans at each field strength. A subset received repeatability testing at either 1.5 T or 3 T. Susceptibility and R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps were reconstructed from the multi‐echo images and analyzed at a single center. QSM‐measured susceptibility was compared with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and a commercial R2‐based liver iron concentration method across centers and field strengths using linear regression and F‐tests on the intercept and slope. Field‐strength reproducibility and test/retest repeatability were evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsA total of 155/80 data sets (test/retest) were available at 1.5 T, and 159/70 data sets (test/retest) were available at 3 T. Calibrations across sites were reproducible, with some variability (e.g., susceptibility slope with liver iron concentration ranged from 0.102 to 0.123 g/[mg·$$ \cdotp $$ppm] across centers at 1.5 T). Field strength reproducibility was good (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.862), and test/retest repeatability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.951).ConclusionQSM as an imaging biomarker of liver iron overload is feasible and repeatable across centers and MR vendors. It may be complementary with R2*$$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ as they are obtained from the same acquisition. Although good reproducibility was observed, liver QSM may benefit from standardization of acquisition parameters. Overall, QSM is a promising method for liver iron quantification.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/mrm.30251</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025-01, Vol.93 (1), p.330-340
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3121287238
source Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection
subjects Biomarkers
Chemical equilibrium
Correlation coefficients
Datasets
Field strength
Health care facilities
Image reconstruction
Iron
Liver
Magnetic resonance imaging
Overloading
Reproducibility
Susceptibility
title Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A26%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter,%20multivendor%20validation%20of%20liver%20quantitative%20susceptibility%20mapping%20in%20patients%20with%20iron%20overload%20at%201.5T%20and%203T&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Buelo,%20Collin%20J&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=330-340&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.30251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3121287238%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121287238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true