The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India
ABSTRACT India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to mater...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Development and change 2024-07, Vol.55 (4), p.533-559 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 559 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 533 |
container_title | Development and change |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Breman, Jan |
description | ABSTRACT
India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/dech.12845 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3120897962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3120897962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-7db5623ad3d5970140a7e0a7cc0a41a7dc06e897e6962f334feaf368c7f336ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MoWKsXnyDgTdiaj91k9yhrawsFPVTwFtIka1PWpCYp0puP4DP6JEbXswPDMMNvvv4AXGI0wdlutFGbCSZ1WR2BES4ZLzhj6BiMEMKkwFX1fArOYtwihAiq6QjMVxsDW-9SkDFZ9wJn3qddsC5B38GlXPt9gNJp2MqdTbKH1sFHH9PXx6fyvXc2lxZOW3kOTjrZR3PxF8fgaTZdtfNi-XC_aG-XhSKEVQXX64oRKjXVVcMRLpHkJrtSSJZYcq0QM3XDDWsY6SgtOyM7ymrFc8KUpGNwNczdBf-2NzGJbT7R5ZWC4vxTw3Njpq4HSgUfYzCdyD-9ynAQGIkfpcSPUuJXqQzjAX63vTn8Q4q7aTsfer4BimZrNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3120897962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Breman, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Breman, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-155X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dech.12845</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>20th century ; Autocracy ; Brokerage ; Capitalism ; Civil rights ; Collective action ; Democracy ; Deregulation ; Economic depression ; Employment ; Equality ; Global economy ; Governance ; Income inequality ; Independence ; Inequality ; Labor ; Nation states ; Neoliberalism ; Poverty ; Proletarianization ; Redemption ; Stakeholders ; Statism ; Wages & salaries ; Welfare ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Development and change, 2024-07, Vol.55 (4), p.533-559</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Institute of Social Studies.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-7db5623ad3d5970140a7e0a7cc0a41a7dc06e897e6962f334feaf368c7f336ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdech.12845$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdech.12845$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breman, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</title><title>Development and change</title><description>ABSTRACT
India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Brokerage</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Economic depression</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Independence</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Proletarianization</subject><subject>Redemption</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Statism</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0012-155X</issn><issn>1467-7660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MoWKsXnyDgTdiaj91k9yhrawsFPVTwFtIka1PWpCYp0puP4DP6JEbXswPDMMNvvv4AXGI0wdlutFGbCSZ1WR2BES4ZLzhj6BiMEMKkwFX1fArOYtwihAiq6QjMVxsDW-9SkDFZ9wJn3qddsC5B38GlXPt9gNJp2MqdTbKH1sFHH9PXx6fyvXc2lxZOW3kOTjrZR3PxF8fgaTZdtfNi-XC_aG-XhSKEVQXX64oRKjXVVcMRLpHkJrtSSJZYcq0QM3XDDWsY6SgtOyM7ymrFc8KUpGNwNczdBf-2NzGJbT7R5ZWC4vxTw3Njpq4HSgUfYzCdyD-9ynAQGIkfpcSPUuJXqQzjAX63vTn8Q4q7aTsfer4BimZrNA</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Breman, Jan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</title><author>Breman, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-7db5623ad3d5970140a7e0a7cc0a41a7dc06e897e6962f334feaf368c7f336ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Brokerage</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Economic depression</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Independence</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Proletarianization</topic><topic>Redemption</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Statism</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breman, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breman, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</atitle><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>559</epage><pages>533-559</pages><issn>0012-155X</issn><eissn>1467-7660</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dech.12845</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-155X |
ispartof | Development and change, 2024-07, Vol.55 (4), p.533-559 |
issn | 0012-155X 1467-7660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3120897962 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | 20th century Autocracy Brokerage Capitalism Civil rights Collective action Democracy Deregulation Economic depression Employment Equality Global economy Governance Income inequality Independence Inequality Labor Nation states Neoliberalism Poverty Proletarianization Redemption Stakeholders Statism Wages & salaries Welfare Workforce |
title | The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A47%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Contrasting%20Footprint%20of%20Labour%20and%20Capital%20in%20Post%E2%80%90colonial%20India&rft.jtitle=Development%20and%20change&rft.au=Breman,%20Jan&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=559&rft.pages=533-559&rft.issn=0012-155X&rft.eissn=1467-7660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dech.12845&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3120897962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3120897962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |