The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India

ABSTRACT India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to mater...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Development and change 2024-07, Vol.55 (4), p.533-559
1. Verfasser: Breman, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 559
container_issue 4
container_start_page 533
container_title Development and change
container_volume 55
creator Breman, Jan
description ABSTRACT India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dech.12845
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3120897962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3120897962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-7db5623ad3d5970140a7e0a7cc0a41a7dc06e897e6962f334feaf368c7f336ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MoWKsXnyDgTdiaj91k9yhrawsFPVTwFtIka1PWpCYp0puP4DP6JEbXswPDMMNvvv4AXGI0wdlutFGbCSZ1WR2BES4ZLzhj6BiMEMKkwFX1fArOYtwihAiq6QjMVxsDW-9SkDFZ9wJn3qddsC5B38GlXPt9gNJp2MqdTbKH1sFHH9PXx6fyvXc2lxZOW3kOTjrZR3PxF8fgaTZdtfNi-XC_aG-XhSKEVQXX64oRKjXVVcMRLpHkJrtSSJZYcq0QM3XDDWsY6SgtOyM7ymrFc8KUpGNwNczdBf-2NzGJbT7R5ZWC4vxTw3Njpq4HSgUfYzCdyD-9ynAQGIkfpcSPUuJXqQzjAX63vTn8Q4q7aTsfer4BimZrNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3120897962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Breman, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Breman, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-155X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dech.12845</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>20th century ; Autocracy ; Brokerage ; Capitalism ; Civil rights ; Collective action ; Democracy ; Deregulation ; Economic depression ; Employment ; Equality ; Global economy ; Governance ; Income inequality ; Independence ; Inequality ; Labor ; Nation states ; Neoliberalism ; Poverty ; Proletarianization ; Redemption ; Stakeholders ; Statism ; Wages &amp; salaries ; Welfare ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Development and change, 2024-07, Vol.55 (4), p.533-559</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Institute of Social Studies.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-7db5623ad3d5970140a7e0a7cc0a41a7dc06e897e6962f334feaf368c7f336ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdech.12845$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdech.12845$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breman, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</title><title>Development and change</title><description>ABSTRACT India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Brokerage</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Economic depression</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Independence</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Proletarianization</subject><subject>Redemption</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Statism</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0012-155X</issn><issn>1467-7660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MoWKsXnyDgTdiaj91k9yhrawsFPVTwFtIka1PWpCYp0puP4DP6JEbXswPDMMNvvv4AXGI0wdlutFGbCSZ1WR2BES4ZLzhj6BiMEMKkwFX1fArOYtwihAiq6QjMVxsDW-9SkDFZ9wJn3qddsC5B38GlXPt9gNJp2MqdTbKH1sFHH9PXx6fyvXc2lxZOW3kOTjrZR3PxF8fgaTZdtfNi-XC_aG-XhSKEVQXX64oRKjXVVcMRLpHkJrtSSJZYcq0QM3XDDWsY6SgtOyM7ymrFc8KUpGNwNczdBf-2NzGJbT7R5ZWC4vxTw3Njpq4HSgUfYzCdyD-9ynAQGIkfpcSPUuJXqQzjAX63vTn8Q4q7aTsfer4BimZrNA</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Breman, Jan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</title><author>Breman, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2265-7db5623ad3d5970140a7e0a7cc0a41a7dc06e897e6962f334feaf368c7f336ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Brokerage</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Economic depression</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Independence</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Proletarianization</topic><topic>Redemption</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Statism</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breman, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breman, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India</atitle><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>559</epage><pages>533-559</pages><issn>0012-155X</issn><eissn>1467-7660</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT India's struggle for independence held the promise of an end to poverty and redemption from the communal‐cum‐class‐based inequality which had kept the peasant economy backward. But the planned substitution of the agrarian‐rural fabric for an industrial‐urban way of life failed to materialize. Casualization and contractualization of waged work indicated that labour had become thoroughly commodified in a state of ongoing footlooseness. It was a proletarianization which did not allow for the collective action precondition to raise and settle the social question. The onslaught of neoliberal capitalism in the last quarter of the 20th century ended the brokerage of the nation state to secure the interests of labour next to those of capital. Less than 10 per cent of the workforce has continued to enjoy formalized occupational engagement, mainly in the downgraded public economy. Corporate capital in collusion with statist autocracy has not only effectuated the deregulation of employment but also abandoned the legal code of formality. The outcome is a state of lawlessness for the people at the bottom of the pile. Besides big business, politics and governance are identified in this reconfiguration as stakeholders in a brutal regime of informality, erosive of equality, democracy, welfare and civil rights.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dech.12845</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-155X
ispartof Development and change, 2024-07, Vol.55 (4), p.533-559
issn 0012-155X
1467-7660
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3120897962
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects 20th century
Autocracy
Brokerage
Capitalism
Civil rights
Collective action
Democracy
Deregulation
Economic depression
Employment
Equality
Global economy
Governance
Income inequality
Independence
Inequality
Labor
Nation states
Neoliberalism
Poverty
Proletarianization
Redemption
Stakeholders
Statism
Wages & salaries
Welfare
Workforce
title The Contrasting Footprint of Labour and Capital in Post‐colonial India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A47%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Contrasting%20Footprint%20of%20Labour%20and%20Capital%20in%20Post%E2%80%90colonial%20India&rft.jtitle=Development%20and%20change&rft.au=Breman,%20Jan&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=559&rft.pages=533-559&rft.issn=0012-155X&rft.eissn=1467-7660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dech.12845&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3120897962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3120897962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true