Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian early childhood education and care staff: Views about source, content and format
Issue Addressed: Effective dissemination of public health research and evidence-based guidelines to Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) staff is critical for promoting research transfer and uptake and achieving positive outcomes for children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted duri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health promotion journal of Australia 2024-10, Vol.35 (4), p.1397-1404 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1404 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1397 |
| container_title | Health promotion journal of Australia |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Finch, Meghan Lum, Melanie Yoong, Sze Lin Hodder, Rebecca K. Grady, Alice Wolfenden, Luke |
| description | Issue Addressed: Effective dissemination of public health research and evidence-based guidelines to Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) staff is critical for promoting research transfer and uptake and achieving positive outcomes for children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during August 2021 to March 2022, with a sub-sample of Australian ECEC services participating in a larger survey completed online and via Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview. Survey items assessed: influential source for receiving research, type of content that would influence decisions to adopt research and preferred formats for receiving research.
Results: Overall, 993 service managers or staff from 1984 (50.0%) invited and eligible services completed the larger survey. Of these, 463 randomly allocated services (46.7%) had staff complete the dissemination items. The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority, ECEC agencies and Government Departments were most frequently selected as influential sources of research evidence. Staff were most interested in content providing evidence-based recommendations for future actions and descriptions of health issues addressed. Workshops or conferences and webinars were the preferred format for receiving research.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of tailoring dissemination strategies to meet ECEC staff needs and engaging influential sources to disseminate research evidence.
So What? Understanding dissemination preferences of ECEC staff is crucial for supporting uptake of evidence-based health promotion in this setting. By developing tailored strategies based on ECEC preferences, research transfer and evidence-based decision making can be supported more effectively. These findings contribute to bridging the evidence-practice gap and improving the quality of care and health outcomes for children in ECEC settings |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hpja.820 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3120154538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.T2024112700010201398560813</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2877392597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5980-c58e795399a9a13c393b05da243bd6ccbcb18c4a983b698b333c75ab4c7ef7163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtkk1vFCEYxydGY9dq4icwJF48uJWXnQG8bepLNU300HolDPNMhw0DKzA2-2X8rDJOtcZET71ACD9-zwN_quopwScEY_pq2O_0iaD4XrWiFJM1aQi_X60IZs2aYM6Oqkcp7TAmssbiYXXEuKBcynpVfX9jU4LRep1t8Cj0aD-1zho0gHZ5QBES6GgGBN9sB94A0r5DV1NZOOshoRzQdko5ame1R4V1B2QG67ohhA5BN5nFPB8zOgJKWff9a_TFwnVCug1TRilM0cBLZILP4PNPtg9x1Plx9aDXLsGTm_m4unz39uL0bH3-6f2H0-352tRS4DIK4LJmUmqpCTNMshbXnaYb1naNMa1piTAbLQVrGylaxpjhtW43hkPPScOOqxeLdx_D1wlSVqNNBpzTHsKUFBWcM0lryQv6_C90V9r3pTvFSHn8elMzcSs0MaQUoVf7aEcdD4pgNWem5sxUyaygz26EUztC9xv8FVIB1gtwbR0c_ilSZ58_bhehWvg42qxMcA7MnEHa6ZzUkqeyfn7hsh_ileqCnXWMkeZ2I1NMN4RQjsvHweVmTIq6wYKwu6pw8b8Kl39U0Hvd5zvx_gCtS_41</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3120154538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian early childhood education and care staff: Views about source, content and format</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Finch, Meghan ; Lum, Melanie ; Yoong, Sze Lin ; Hodder, Rebecca K. ; Grady, Alice ; Wolfenden, Luke</creator><creatorcontrib>Finch, Meghan ; Lum, Melanie ; Yoong, Sze Lin ; Hodder, Rebecca K. ; Grady, Alice ; Wolfenden, Luke</creatorcontrib><description>Issue Addressed: Effective dissemination of public health research and evidence-based guidelines to Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) staff is critical for promoting research transfer and uptake and achieving positive outcomes for children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during August 2021 to March 2022, with a sub-sample of Australian ECEC services participating in a larger survey completed online and via Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview. Survey items assessed: influential source for receiving research, type of content that would influence decisions to adopt research and preferred formats for receiving research.
Results: Overall, 993 service managers or staff from 1984 (50.0%) invited and eligible services completed the larger survey. Of these, 463 randomly allocated services (46.7%) had staff complete the dissemination items. The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority, ECEC agencies and Government Departments were most frequently selected as influential sources of research evidence. Staff were most interested in content providing evidence-based recommendations for future actions and descriptions of health issues addressed. Workshops or conferences and webinars were the preferred format for receiving research.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of tailoring dissemination strategies to meet ECEC staff needs and engaging influential sources to disseminate research evidence.
So What? Understanding dissemination preferences of ECEC staff is crucial for supporting uptake of evidence-based health promotion in this setting. By developing tailored strategies based on ECEC preferences, research transfer and evidence-based decision making can be supported more effectively. These findings contribute to bridging the evidence-practice gap and improving the quality of care and health outcomes for children in ECEC settings</description><identifier>ISSN: 1036-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2201-1617</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hpja.820</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37827995</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Perth, WA: Australian Health Promotion Association</publisher><subject>Australia ; child day care centres ; Child, Preschool ; childcare services ; Childhood ; Children ; Childrens health ; Clinical decision making ; Clinical outcomes ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; cross‐sectional survey ; Decision making ; Departments ; Dissemination ; Early childhood education ; Early Childhood Education and Care ; Education ; Evaluation ; Evidence-Based Practice ; evidence‐based decision making ; Female ; Format ; Government agencies ; Guidelines ; Health promotion ; Health research ; Health status ; Humans ; Information Dissemination - methods ; Information services ; International cooperation ; Male ; Medical research ; Moral and ethical aspects ; Polls & surveys ; Preferences ; Public Health ; Public health education ; Quality of care ; Research transfer ; research transfer and uptake ; Services ; Statistical methods ; Supervisor-Subordinate interactions ; Surveys ; Telephone surveys ; Uptake ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Health promotion journal of Australia, 2024-10, Vol.35 (4), p.1397-1404</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Health Promotion Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5980-c58e795399a9a13c393b05da243bd6ccbcb18c4a983b698b333c75ab4c7ef7163</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3730-0907 ; 0000-0003-3379-5340 ; 0000-0002-0836-017X ; 0000-0002-3192-1705 ; 0000-0003-2371-6549 ; 0000-0002-6178-3868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhpja.820$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhpja.820$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37827995$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finch, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lum, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoong, Sze Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Rebecca K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grady, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfenden, Luke</creatorcontrib><title>Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian early childhood education and care staff: Views about source, content and format</title><title>Health promotion journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Health Promot J Austr</addtitle><description>Issue Addressed: Effective dissemination of public health research and evidence-based guidelines to Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) staff is critical for promoting research transfer and uptake and achieving positive outcomes for children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during August 2021 to March 2022, with a sub-sample of Australian ECEC services participating in a larger survey completed online and via Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview. Survey items assessed: influential source for receiving research, type of content that would influence decisions to adopt research and preferred formats for receiving research.
Results: Overall, 993 service managers or staff from 1984 (50.0%) invited and eligible services completed the larger survey. Of these, 463 randomly allocated services (46.7%) had staff complete the dissemination items. The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority, ECEC agencies and Government Departments were most frequently selected as influential sources of research evidence. Staff were most interested in content providing evidence-based recommendations for future actions and descriptions of health issues addressed. Workshops or conferences and webinars were the preferred format for receiving research.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of tailoring dissemination strategies to meet ECEC staff needs and engaging influential sources to disseminate research evidence.
So What? Understanding dissemination preferences of ECEC staff is crucial for supporting uptake of evidence-based health promotion in this setting. By developing tailored strategies based on ECEC preferences, research transfer and evidence-based decision making can be supported more effectively. These findings contribute to bridging the evidence-practice gap and improving the quality of care and health outcomes for children in ECEC settings</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>child day care centres</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>childcare services</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>cross‐sectional survey</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Dissemination</subject><subject>Early childhood education</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education and Care</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>evidence‐based decision making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health research</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination - methods</subject><subject>Information services</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Moral and ethical aspects</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public health education</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Research transfer</subject><subject>research transfer and uptake</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Supervisor-Subordinate interactions</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Telephone surveys</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>1036-1073</issn><issn>2201-1617</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqtkk1vFCEYxydGY9dq4icwJF48uJWXnQG8bepLNU300HolDPNMhw0DKzA2-2X8rDJOtcZET71ACD9-zwN_quopwScEY_pq2O_0iaD4XrWiFJM1aQi_X60IZs2aYM6Oqkcp7TAmssbiYXXEuKBcynpVfX9jU4LRep1t8Cj0aD-1zho0gHZ5QBES6GgGBN9sB94A0r5DV1NZOOshoRzQdko5ame1R4V1B2QG67ohhA5BN5nFPB8zOgJKWff9a_TFwnVCug1TRilM0cBLZILP4PNPtg9x1Plx9aDXLsGTm_m4unz39uL0bH3-6f2H0-352tRS4DIK4LJmUmqpCTNMshbXnaYb1naNMa1piTAbLQVrGylaxpjhtW43hkPPScOOqxeLdx_D1wlSVqNNBpzTHsKUFBWcM0lryQv6_C90V9r3pTvFSHn8elMzcSs0MaQUoVf7aEcdD4pgNWem5sxUyaygz26EUztC9xv8FVIB1gtwbR0c_ilSZ58_bhehWvg42qxMcA7MnEHa6ZzUkqeyfn7hsh_ileqCnXWMkeZ2I1NMN4RQjsvHweVmTIq6wYKwu6pw8b8Kl39U0Hvd5zvx_gCtS_41</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Finch, Meghan</creator><creator>Lum, Melanie</creator><creator>Yoong, Sze Lin</creator><creator>Hodder, Rebecca K.</creator><creator>Grady, Alice</creator><creator>Wolfenden, Luke</creator><general>Australian Health Promotion Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3730-0907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3379-5340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-017X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-1705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-6549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-3868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian early childhood education and care staff: Views about source, content and format</title><author>Finch, Meghan ; Lum, Melanie ; Yoong, Sze Lin ; Hodder, Rebecca K. ; Grady, Alice ; Wolfenden, Luke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5980-c58e795399a9a13c393b05da243bd6ccbcb18c4a983b698b333c75ab4c7ef7163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>child day care centres</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>childcare services</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>cross‐sectional survey</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Dissemination</topic><topic>Early childhood education</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education and Care</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>evidence‐based decision making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health research</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination - methods</topic><topic>Information services</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Moral and ethical aspects</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public health education</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Research transfer</topic><topic>research transfer and uptake</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Supervisor-Subordinate interactions</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Telephone surveys</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finch, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lum, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoong, Sze Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Rebecca K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grady, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfenden, Luke</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health promotion journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finch, Meghan</au><au>Lum, Melanie</au><au>Yoong, Sze Lin</au><au>Hodder, Rebecca K.</au><au>Grady, Alice</au><au>Wolfenden, Luke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian early childhood education and care staff: Views about source, content and format</atitle><jtitle>Health promotion journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Health Promot J Austr</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1397</spage><epage>1404</epage><pages>1397-1404</pages><issn>1036-1073</issn><eissn>2201-1617</eissn><abstract>Issue Addressed: Effective dissemination of public health research and evidence-based guidelines to Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) staff is critical for promoting research transfer and uptake and achieving positive outcomes for children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during August 2021 to March 2022, with a sub-sample of Australian ECEC services participating in a larger survey completed online and via Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview. Survey items assessed: influential source for receiving research, type of content that would influence decisions to adopt research and preferred formats for receiving research.
Results: Overall, 993 service managers or staff from 1984 (50.0%) invited and eligible services completed the larger survey. Of these, 463 randomly allocated services (46.7%) had staff complete the dissemination items. The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority, ECEC agencies and Government Departments were most frequently selected as influential sources of research evidence. Staff were most interested in content providing evidence-based recommendations for future actions and descriptions of health issues addressed. Workshops or conferences and webinars were the preferred format for receiving research.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of tailoring dissemination strategies to meet ECEC staff needs and engaging influential sources to disseminate research evidence.
So What? Understanding dissemination preferences of ECEC staff is crucial for supporting uptake of evidence-based health promotion in this setting. By developing tailored strategies based on ECEC preferences, research transfer and evidence-based decision making can be supported more effectively. These findings contribute to bridging the evidence-practice gap and improving the quality of care and health outcomes for children in ECEC settings</abstract><cop>West Perth, WA</cop><pub>Australian Health Promotion Association</pub><pmid>37827995</pmid><doi>10.1002/hpja.820</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3730-0907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3379-5340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-017X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-1705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-6549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-3868</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1036-1073 |
| ispartof | Health promotion journal of Australia, 2024-10, Vol.35 (4), p.1397-1404 |
| issn | 1036-1073 2201-1617 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3120154538 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index |
| subjects | Australia child day care centres Child, Preschool childcare services Childhood Children Childrens health Clinical decision making Clinical outcomes Cross-Sectional Studies cross‐sectional survey Decision making Departments Dissemination Early childhood education Early Childhood Education and Care Education Evaluation Evidence-Based Practice evidence‐based decision making Female Format Government agencies Guidelines Health promotion Health research Health status Humans Information Dissemination - methods Information services International cooperation Male Medical research Moral and ethical aspects Polls & surveys Preferences Public Health Public health education Quality of care Research transfer research transfer and uptake Services Statistical methods Supervisor-Subordinate interactions Surveys Telephone surveys Uptake Workshops |
| title | Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian early childhood education and care staff: Views about source, content and format |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A34%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dissemination%20of%20public%20health%20research%20evidence%20and%20guidelines%20to%20Australian%20early%20childhood%20education%20and%20care%20staff:%20Views%20about%20source,%20content%20and%20format&rft.jtitle=Health%20promotion%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Finch,%20Meghan&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1397&rft.epage=1404&rft.pages=1397-1404&rft.issn=1036-1073&rft.eissn=2201-1617&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hpja.820&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2877392597%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3120154538&rft_id=info:pmid/37827995&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.T2024112700010201398560813&rfr_iscdi=true |