A new risk-based measure of link criticality for flood risk planning
The importance of a reliable transportation system is often taken for granted but its value becomes undeniable when the system is severely disrupted with little warning, the area of impact is extensive, and the amount of time required to restore system connectivity is prolonged. For many states, the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation (Dordrecht) 2024-12, Vol.51 (6), p.2051-2071 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2071 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2051 |
container_title | Transportation (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Sullivan, James L. Sentoff, Karen Segale, Joseph Marshall, Norman L. Fitzgerald, Evan Schiff, Roy |
description | The importance of a reliable transportation system is often taken for granted but its value becomes undeniable when the system is severely disrupted with little warning, the area of impact is extensive, and the amount of time required to restore system connectivity is prolonged. For many states, the largest single cost of flood damage comes from damage to transportation infrastructure and the ensuing disruption of personal, commercial, and emergency-response travel. The goal of transportation risk planning at the state or provincial level is to consider the risks imposed by the vulnerability of network elements to strengthen the system’s ability to withstand a disruptive impact. Although separate measures of vulnerability and criticality are useful, a true risk-based measure would use the vulnerability of links in the network to calculate criticality, so links that are unlikely to be disrupted by a given hazard are left intact in the calculations. This paper details the development and application of the Network Criticality Index (NCI), a new link-specific, risk-based performance measure that uses flood-risk vulnerability scores and a Monte Carlo simulation process for simulating disruptive impacts and measuring link criticality. The paper includes an application of the NCI for flood risk planning to the Deerfield River basin in Vermont. Highly critical segments can be identified as those with the highest NCI values, and mitigation projects can be designed to mitigate the risk. The application finds that relatively high traffic flows can make highly vulnerable links critical due to a lack of redundant routes with adequate capacity to handle flows when they are disrupted by floods. Reducing risk to the highway system from flooding means either (1) improving the segment or crossing and thereby reducing its vulnerability score, or (2) influencing regional traffic flows to prevent disruptive effects on travelers when a disruption occurs. Addressing the vulnerability of the segment or crossing can be done with an engineering design that is sensitive to the project context and the need to improve its ability to withstand higher stream flows in the future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11116-023-10396-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3119361437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3119361437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-278fc06d1ded4bc8802cd7e5396fde69aff67e4f2d60543be84554a1f24274313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxA6wssTaM38myKk-pEhtYW64flds0KXYqlL8nNEjsmM1s7rkzOgjdULijAPq-0HEUAcYJBV4rMpygGZWakVpweYpmAKImQlTVObooZQMAkko6Qw9z3IYvnFPZkpUtweNdsOWQA-4iblK7xS6nPjnbpH7Ascs4Nl3njwDeN7ZtU7u-QmfRNiVc_-5L9PH0-L54Icu359fFfEkc09ATpqvoQHnqgxcrV1XAnNdBjv9GH1RtY1Q6iMi8Ain4KlRCSmFpZIJpwSm_RLdT7z53n4dQerPpDrkdTxpOac0VFVyPKTalXO5KySGafU47mwdDwfzYMpMtM9oyR1tmGCE-QWUMt-uQ_6r_ob4B3rps2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3119361437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new risk-based measure of link criticality for flood risk planning</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Sullivan, James L. ; Sentoff, Karen ; Segale, Joseph ; Marshall, Norman L. ; Fitzgerald, Evan ; Schiff, Roy</creator><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, James L. ; Sentoff, Karen ; Segale, Joseph ; Marshall, Norman L. ; Fitzgerald, Evan ; Schiff, Roy</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of a reliable transportation system is often taken for granted but its value becomes undeniable when the system is severely disrupted with little warning, the area of impact is extensive, and the amount of time required to restore system connectivity is prolonged. For many states, the largest single cost of flood damage comes from damage to transportation infrastructure and the ensuing disruption of personal, commercial, and emergency-response travel. The goal of transportation risk planning at the state or provincial level is to consider the risks imposed by the vulnerability of network elements to strengthen the system’s ability to withstand a disruptive impact. Although separate measures of vulnerability and criticality are useful, a true risk-based measure would use the vulnerability of links in the network to calculate criticality, so links that are unlikely to be disrupted by a given hazard are left intact in the calculations. This paper details the development and application of the Network Criticality Index (NCI), a new link-specific, risk-based performance measure that uses flood-risk vulnerability scores and a Monte Carlo simulation process for simulating disruptive impacts and measuring link criticality. The paper includes an application of the NCI for flood risk planning to the Deerfield River basin in Vermont. Highly critical segments can be identified as those with the highest NCI values, and mitigation projects can be designed to mitigate the risk. The application finds that relatively high traffic flows can make highly vulnerable links critical due to a lack of redundant routes with adequate capacity to handle flows when they are disrupted by floods. Reducing risk to the highway system from flooding means either (1) improving the segment or crossing and thereby reducing its vulnerability score, or (2) influencing regional traffic flows to prevent disruptive effects on travelers when a disruption occurs. Addressing the vulnerability of the segment or crossing can be done with an engineering design that is sensitive to the project context and the need to improve its ability to withstand higher stream flows in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10396-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Application ; Criticality aspects ; Design engineering ; Disruption ; Economic Geography ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Emergency response ; Engineering Economics ; Environmental risk ; Flood damage ; Floods ; Infrastructure ; Innovation/Technology Management ; Links ; Logistics ; Marketing ; Mitigation ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Organization ; Regional planning ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; River basins ; Rivers ; Segments ; Simulation ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Traffic ; Traffic capacity ; Traffic flow ; Transportation ; Transportation networks ; Transportation systems ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Transportation (Dordrecht), 2024-12, Vol.51 (6), p.2051-2071</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-278fc06d1ded4bc8802cd7e5396fde69aff67e4f2d60543be84554a1f24274313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11116-023-10396-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-023-10396-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sentoff, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segale, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Norman L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiff, Roy</creatorcontrib><title>A new risk-based measure of link criticality for flood risk planning</title><title>Transportation (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Transportation</addtitle><description>The importance of a reliable transportation system is often taken for granted but its value becomes undeniable when the system is severely disrupted with little warning, the area of impact is extensive, and the amount of time required to restore system connectivity is prolonged. For many states, the largest single cost of flood damage comes from damage to transportation infrastructure and the ensuing disruption of personal, commercial, and emergency-response travel. The goal of transportation risk planning at the state or provincial level is to consider the risks imposed by the vulnerability of network elements to strengthen the system’s ability to withstand a disruptive impact. Although separate measures of vulnerability and criticality are useful, a true risk-based measure would use the vulnerability of links in the network to calculate criticality, so links that are unlikely to be disrupted by a given hazard are left intact in the calculations. This paper details the development and application of the Network Criticality Index (NCI), a new link-specific, risk-based performance measure that uses flood-risk vulnerability scores and a Monte Carlo simulation process for simulating disruptive impacts and measuring link criticality. The paper includes an application of the NCI for flood risk planning to the Deerfield River basin in Vermont. Highly critical segments can be identified as those with the highest NCI values, and mitigation projects can be designed to mitigate the risk. The application finds that relatively high traffic flows can make highly vulnerable links critical due to a lack of redundant routes with adequate capacity to handle flows when they are disrupted by floods. Reducing risk to the highway system from flooding means either (1) improving the segment or crossing and thereby reducing its vulnerability score, or (2) influencing regional traffic flows to prevent disruptive effects on travelers when a disruption occurs. Addressing the vulnerability of the segment or crossing can be done with an engineering design that is sensitive to the project context and the need to improve its ability to withstand higher stream flows in the future.</description><subject>Application</subject><subject>Criticality aspects</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Economic Geography</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Emergency response</subject><subject>Engineering Economics</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Innovation/Technology Management</subject><subject>Links</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Traffic</subject><subject>Traffic capacity</subject><subject>Traffic flow</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Transportation networks</subject><subject>Transportation systems</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0049-4488</issn><issn>1572-9435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxA6wssTaM38myKk-pEhtYW64flds0KXYqlL8nNEjsmM1s7rkzOgjdULijAPq-0HEUAcYJBV4rMpygGZWakVpweYpmAKImQlTVObooZQMAkko6Qw9z3IYvnFPZkpUtweNdsOWQA-4iblK7xS6nPjnbpH7Ascs4Nl3njwDeN7ZtU7u-QmfRNiVc_-5L9PH0-L54Icu359fFfEkc09ATpqvoQHnqgxcrV1XAnNdBjv9GH1RtY1Q6iMi8Ain4KlRCSmFpZIJpwSm_RLdT7z53n4dQerPpDrkdTxpOac0VFVyPKTalXO5KySGafU47mwdDwfzYMpMtM9oyR1tmGCE-QWUMt-uQ_6r_ob4B3rps2g</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Sullivan, James L.</creator><creator>Sentoff, Karen</creator><creator>Segale, Joseph</creator><creator>Marshall, Norman L.</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Evan</creator><creator>Schiff, Roy</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>A new risk-based measure of link criticality for flood risk planning</title><author>Sullivan, James L. ; Sentoff, Karen ; Segale, Joseph ; Marshall, Norman L. ; Fitzgerald, Evan ; Schiff, Roy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-278fc06d1ded4bc8802cd7e5396fde69aff67e4f2d60543be84554a1f24274313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Application</topic><topic>Criticality aspects</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Economic Geography</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Emergency response</topic><topic>Engineering Economics</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Innovation/Technology Management</topic><topic>Links</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Traffic</topic><topic>Traffic capacity</topic><topic>Traffic flow</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Transportation networks</topic><topic>Transportation systems</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sentoff, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segale, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Norman L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiff, Roy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sullivan, James L.</au><au>Sentoff, Karen</au><au>Segale, Joseph</au><au>Marshall, Norman L.</au><au>Fitzgerald, Evan</au><au>Schiff, Roy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new risk-based measure of link criticality for flood risk planning</atitle><jtitle>Transportation (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Transportation</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2051</spage><epage>2071</epage><pages>2051-2071</pages><issn>0049-4488</issn><eissn>1572-9435</eissn><abstract>The importance of a reliable transportation system is often taken for granted but its value becomes undeniable when the system is severely disrupted with little warning, the area of impact is extensive, and the amount of time required to restore system connectivity is prolonged. For many states, the largest single cost of flood damage comes from damage to transportation infrastructure and the ensuing disruption of personal, commercial, and emergency-response travel. The goal of transportation risk planning at the state or provincial level is to consider the risks imposed by the vulnerability of network elements to strengthen the system’s ability to withstand a disruptive impact. Although separate measures of vulnerability and criticality are useful, a true risk-based measure would use the vulnerability of links in the network to calculate criticality, so links that are unlikely to be disrupted by a given hazard are left intact in the calculations. This paper details the development and application of the Network Criticality Index (NCI), a new link-specific, risk-based performance measure that uses flood-risk vulnerability scores and a Monte Carlo simulation process for simulating disruptive impacts and measuring link criticality. The paper includes an application of the NCI for flood risk planning to the Deerfield River basin in Vermont. Highly critical segments can be identified as those with the highest NCI values, and mitigation projects can be designed to mitigate the risk. The application finds that relatively high traffic flows can make highly vulnerable links critical due to a lack of redundant routes with adequate capacity to handle flows when they are disrupted by floods. Reducing risk to the highway system from flooding means either (1) improving the segment or crossing and thereby reducing its vulnerability score, or (2) influencing regional traffic flows to prevent disruptive effects on travelers when a disruption occurs. Addressing the vulnerability of the segment or crossing can be done with an engineering design that is sensitive to the project context and the need to improve its ability to withstand higher stream flows in the future.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11116-023-10396-y</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-4488 |
ispartof | Transportation (Dordrecht), 2024-12, Vol.51 (6), p.2051-2071 |
issn | 0049-4488 1572-9435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3119361437 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Application Criticality aspects Design engineering Disruption Economic Geography Economics Economics and Finance Emergency response Engineering Economics Environmental risk Flood damage Floods Infrastructure Innovation/Technology Management Links Logistics Marketing Mitigation Monte Carlo simulation Organization Regional planning Regional/Spatial Science Risk management Risk reduction River basins Rivers Segments Simulation Stream discharge Stream flow Traffic Traffic capacity Traffic flow Transportation Transportation networks Transportation systems Vulnerability |
title | A new risk-based measure of link criticality for flood risk planning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20risk-based%20measure%20of%20link%20criticality%20for%20flood%20risk%20planning&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Sullivan,%20James%20L.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2051&rft.epage=2071&rft.pages=2051-2071&rft.issn=0049-4488&rft.eissn=1572-9435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11116-023-10396-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3119361437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3119361437&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |