Density and Differentiation: Cities in Global Social History

The present article examines the particular role that cities have played, and should play, in global social history. It notes that many of the historiographical discussions that in the past years have addressed the reach and limits of the bourgeoisie and the middle class as a globalized social forma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Historical journal 2024-09, Vol.67 (4), p.670-691
1. Verfasser: Goebel, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 691
container_issue 4
container_start_page 670
container_title The Historical journal
container_volume 67
creator Goebel, Michael
description The present article examines the particular role that cities have played, and should play, in global social history. It notes that many of the historiographical discussions that in the past years have addressed the reach and limits of the bourgeoisie and the middle class as a globalized social formation have implicitly focused on cities. It also notes that these discussions have often not been very forthcoming in explicitly acknowledging this urban focus. From this starting point, the present article ponders the implications and ramifications of making this focus more explicit. What do we conclude from the observation that the ‘global bourgeoisie’ or the ‘global middle class’, inasmuch as they existed at all, were quintessentially urban formations? And what do these conclusions, conversely, entail for the field of urban history? Highlighting density and differentiation as key traits of the urban form, the article ultimately argues for greater attention to the spatiality and to the built environment of class formation in global history.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0018246X24000256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3118955402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0018246X24000256</cupid><sourcerecordid>3118955402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-21cfd8e045355c5417021c70cbb9e3a4528922bb3fc78f4bc46f7e6470887f473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwNuC59X38meTFS_S1lYoeKiCtyVJE0lpd2uSHvrt3dKCB_E08OY382AIuUW4R0D5sABARXn1STkAUFGdkQHyqi4FAjsng4NdHvxLcpXSqmcqDjggT2PXppD3hW6XxTh476Jrc9A5dO1jMQo5uFSEtpiuO6PXxaKzoZdZSLmL-2ty4fU6uZuTDsnHy-R9NCvnb9PX0fO8tFjXuaRo_VI54IIJYQVHCf1JgjWmdkxzQVVNqTHMW6k8N5ZXXrqKS1BKei7ZkNwde7ex-965lJtVt4tt_7JhiKoWggPtKTxSNnYpReebbQwbHfcNQnMYqfkzUp9hp4zemBiWX-63-v_UDzmIZyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118955402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Density and Differentiation: Cities in Global Social History</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Goebel, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The present article examines the particular role that cities have played, and should play, in global social history. It notes that many of the historiographical discussions that in the past years have addressed the reach and limits of the bourgeoisie and the middle class as a globalized social formation have implicitly focused on cities. It also notes that these discussions have often not been very forthcoming in explicitly acknowledging this urban focus. From this starting point, the present article ponders the implications and ramifications of making this focus more explicit. What do we conclude from the observation that the ‘global bourgeoisie’ or the ‘global middle class’, inasmuch as they existed at all, were quintessentially urban formations? And what do these conclusions, conversely, entail for the field of urban history? Highlighting density and differentiation as key traits of the urban form, the article ultimately argues for greater attention to the spatiality and to the built environment of class formation in global history.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-246X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X24000256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>20th century ; Archives &amp; records ; Bourgeoisie ; Built environment ; Cities ; Class formation ; Classroom observation ; Density ; Differentiation ; Global economy ; Globalization ; Historians ; Inequality ; Labor history ; Middle class ; Rural areas ; Social classes ; Social history ; Sociology ; Urban areas ; Urban history ; Urbanization ; Working class</subject><ispartof>The Historical journal, 2024-09, Vol.67 (4), p.670-691</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1556-8227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0018246X24000256/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27915,27916,33765,55619</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Density and Differentiation: Cities in Global Social History</title><title>The Historical journal</title><addtitle>Hist. J</addtitle><description>The present article examines the particular role that cities have played, and should play, in global social history. It notes that many of the historiographical discussions that in the past years have addressed the reach and limits of the bourgeoisie and the middle class as a globalized social formation have implicitly focused on cities. It also notes that these discussions have often not been very forthcoming in explicitly acknowledging this urban focus. From this starting point, the present article ponders the implications and ramifications of making this focus more explicit. What do we conclude from the observation that the ‘global bourgeoisie’ or the ‘global middle class’, inasmuch as they existed at all, were quintessentially urban formations? And what do these conclusions, conversely, entail for the field of urban history? Highlighting density and differentiation as key traits of the urban form, the article ultimately argues for greater attention to the spatiality and to the built environment of class formation in global history.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Bourgeoisie</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Class formation</subject><subject>Classroom observation</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor history</subject><subject>Middle class</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban history</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Working class</subject><issn>0018-246X</issn><issn>1469-5103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwNuC59X38meTFS_S1lYoeKiCtyVJE0lpd2uSHvrt3dKCB_E08OY382AIuUW4R0D5sABARXn1STkAUFGdkQHyqi4FAjsng4NdHvxLcpXSqmcqDjggT2PXppD3hW6XxTh476Jrc9A5dO1jMQo5uFSEtpiuO6PXxaKzoZdZSLmL-2ty4fU6uZuTDsnHy-R9NCvnb9PX0fO8tFjXuaRo_VI54IIJYQVHCf1JgjWmdkxzQVVNqTHMW6k8N5ZXXrqKS1BKei7ZkNwde7ex-965lJtVt4tt_7JhiKoWggPtKTxSNnYpReebbQwbHfcNQnMYqfkzUp9hp4zemBiWX-63-v_UDzmIZyY</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Goebel, Michael</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1556-8227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Density and Differentiation: Cities in Global Social History</title><author>Goebel, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-21cfd8e045355c5417021c70cbb9e3a4528922bb3fc78f4bc46f7e6470887f473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Bourgeoisie</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Class formation</topic><topic>Classroom observation</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor history</topic><topic>Middle class</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban history</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Working class</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Historical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goebel, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Density and Differentiation: Cities in Global Social History</atitle><jtitle>The Historical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Hist. J</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>691</epage><pages>670-691</pages><issn>0018-246X</issn><eissn>1469-5103</eissn><abstract>The present article examines the particular role that cities have played, and should play, in global social history. It notes that many of the historiographical discussions that in the past years have addressed the reach and limits of the bourgeoisie and the middle class as a globalized social formation have implicitly focused on cities. It also notes that these discussions have often not been very forthcoming in explicitly acknowledging this urban focus. From this starting point, the present article ponders the implications and ramifications of making this focus more explicit. What do we conclude from the observation that the ‘global bourgeoisie’ or the ‘global middle class’, inasmuch as they existed at all, were quintessentially urban formations? And what do these conclusions, conversely, entail for the field of urban history? Highlighting density and differentiation as key traits of the urban form, the article ultimately argues for greater attention to the spatiality and to the built environment of class formation in global history.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0018246X24000256</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1556-8227</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-246X
ispartof The Historical journal, 2024-09, Vol.67 (4), p.670-691
issn 0018-246X
1469-5103
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3118955402
source Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 20th century
Archives & records
Bourgeoisie
Built environment
Cities
Class formation
Classroom observation
Density
Differentiation
Global economy
Globalization
Historians
Inequality
Labor history
Middle class
Rural areas
Social classes
Social history
Sociology
Urban areas
Urban history
Urbanization
Working class
title Density and Differentiation: Cities in Global Social History
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A49%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Density%20and%20Differentiation:%20Cities%20in%20Global%20Social%20History&rft.jtitle=The%20Historical%20journal&rft.au=Goebel,%20Michael&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=691&rft.pages=670-691&rft.issn=0018-246X&rft.eissn=1469-5103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0018246X24000256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3118955402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118955402&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0018246X24000256&rfr_iscdi=true