Effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface

The paper describes a study on the effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO 2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface. The study involved several broadleaved tree species (oak, birch, alder, plum, and apple tree) and one coniferous species (pine). Sa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of wood and wood products 2024-10, Vol.82 (5), p.1369-1379
Hauptverfasser: Maciak, Adam, Aniszewska, Monika, Zychowicz, Witold, Zowczak, Włodzimierz, Danielewski, Hubert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1379
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1369
container_title European journal of wood and wood products
container_volume 82
creator Maciak, Adam
Aniszewska, Monika
Zychowicz, Witold
Zowczak, Włodzimierz
Danielewski, Hubert
description The paper describes a study on the effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO 2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface. The study involved several broadleaved tree species (oak, birch, alder, plum, and apple tree) and one coniferous species (pine). Samples were cut with a Trumpf TLC1005 laser equipped with a TruFlow 6000 CO 2 resonator at a wavelength of 10.6 μm at three power output settings (1 kW, 2 kW, and 3 kW) and one feed rate (0.4 m∙min − 1 ). Contact angle was measured by pipetting a drop of distilled water on the wood surface and recording the process with a camera. Subsequently, images of the drop were analyzed over one minute at 10 s intervals to determine changes in contact angle for each of the cases examined. It was not possible to measure the contact angle on saw-cut samples as the water was immediately absorbed, while water drops placed on laser-cut samples remained on the surface for over 60 s, with the contact angle decreasing over time for the examined species from an average of 90° to 40°. The higher beam power settings (2 or 3 kW) were found to be preferable for the hardwood species (oak, birch, alder, and apple tree). In turn, in the case of the softwood species (pine), the laser power output did not matter, as both at the low (1 kW) and high (3 kW) settings the drop did not spread over the surface quickly. Finally, the optimum beam power for plum tree wood was found to be 1 kW.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00107-024-02095-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3118937198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3118937198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7a5672b6831390a70157cc873f009a5d530a91907e55181b03487e68c187a69a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFqGzEQhkVpoSbJC_Q00Esvm452dlfaYzBpEgjkkkJvQpZH9ob1ypG0ODnnxSvHhUIPFQiB9P0fI34hvki8lIjqe0KUqCqsm7Kxb6uXD2IhG-oqRd2vj2JR3nVFqtOfxUVKT1gWyaYmWoi3a-_Z5QTBw4rtDvbhwBHstAbPvIZoM8MwQd4y7GNwnN5RN-c8TBvwkdMWDiGs4TDkLVhYPtQw2lQcYYJDSUdwYcrW5SLdjHy8PsqKAdIcvXV8Lj55Oya--HOeiZ8_rh-Xt9X9w83d8uq-ctSoXCnbdqpedZok9WgVylY5pxV5xN6265bQ9rJHxW0rtVwhNVpxp53Uyna9pTPx7eQtH3meOWWzG5LjcbQThzkZki1p0gqbgn79B30Kc5zKdIWSuicle12o-kS5GFKK7M0-DjsbX41Ec6zGnKoxpRrzXo15KSE6hVKBpw3Hv-r_pH4Dfx2PhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118937198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface</title><source>Springer Journals</source><creator>Maciak, Adam ; Aniszewska, Monika ; Zychowicz, Witold ; Zowczak, Włodzimierz ; Danielewski, Hubert</creator><creatorcontrib>Maciak, Adam ; Aniszewska, Monika ; Zychowicz, Witold ; Zowczak, Włodzimierz ; Danielewski, Hubert</creatorcontrib><description>The paper describes a study on the effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO 2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface. The study involved several broadleaved tree species (oak, birch, alder, plum, and apple tree) and one coniferous species (pine). Samples were cut with a Trumpf TLC1005 laser equipped with a TruFlow 6000 CO 2 resonator at a wavelength of 10.6 μm at three power output settings (1 kW, 2 kW, and 3 kW) and one feed rate (0.4 m∙min − 1 ). Contact angle was measured by pipetting a drop of distilled water on the wood surface and recording the process with a camera. Subsequently, images of the drop were analyzed over one minute at 10 s intervals to determine changes in contact angle for each of the cases examined. It was not possible to measure the contact angle on saw-cut samples as the water was immediately absorbed, while water drops placed on laser-cut samples remained on the surface for over 60 s, with the contact angle decreasing over time for the examined species from an average of 90° to 40°. The higher beam power settings (2 or 3 kW) were found to be preferable for the hardwood species (oak, birch, alder, and apple tree). In turn, in the case of the softwood species (pine), the laser power output did not matter, as both at the low (1 kW) and high (3 kW) settings the drop did not spread over the surface quickly. Finally, the optimum beam power for plum tree wood was found to be 1 kW.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-736X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00107-024-02095-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>apples ; Betula ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birch trees ; broadleaved trees ; cameras ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide lasers ; Ceramics ; Composites ; Contact angle ; Cuttings ; Distilled water ; Feed rate ; Fruit trees ; Glass ; hardwood ; Hardwoods ; Laser beam cutting ; Lasers ; Life Sciences ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Natural Materials ; Oak ; Original Article ; Pine ; Plant species ; plums ; Processes ; softwood ; Softwoods ; Species ; Water drops ; wavelengths ; Wood ; Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>European journal of wood and wood products, 2024-10, Vol.82 (5), p.1369-1379</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7a5672b6831390a70157cc873f009a5d530a91907e55181b03487e68c187a69a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4049-9489 ; 0000-0002-1281-9887 ; 0000-0001-7877-7096 ; 0000-0002-3685-4919 ; 0000-0003-4675-6236</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00107-024-02095-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00107-024-02095-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maciak, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aniszewska, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zychowicz, Witold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zowczak, Włodzimierz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielewski, Hubert</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface</title><title>European journal of wood and wood products</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Wood Prod</addtitle><description>The paper describes a study on the effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO 2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface. The study involved several broadleaved tree species (oak, birch, alder, plum, and apple tree) and one coniferous species (pine). Samples were cut with a Trumpf TLC1005 laser equipped with a TruFlow 6000 CO 2 resonator at a wavelength of 10.6 μm at three power output settings (1 kW, 2 kW, and 3 kW) and one feed rate (0.4 m∙min − 1 ). Contact angle was measured by pipetting a drop of distilled water on the wood surface and recording the process with a camera. Subsequently, images of the drop were analyzed over one minute at 10 s intervals to determine changes in contact angle for each of the cases examined. It was not possible to measure the contact angle on saw-cut samples as the water was immediately absorbed, while water drops placed on laser-cut samples remained on the surface for over 60 s, with the contact angle decreasing over time for the examined species from an average of 90° to 40°. The higher beam power settings (2 or 3 kW) were found to be preferable for the hardwood species (oak, birch, alder, and apple tree). In turn, in the case of the softwood species (pine), the laser power output did not matter, as both at the low (1 kW) and high (3 kW) settings the drop did not spread over the surface quickly. Finally, the optimum beam power for plum tree wood was found to be 1 kW.</description><subject>apples</subject><subject>Betula</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birch trees</subject><subject>broadleaved trees</subject><subject>cameras</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide lasers</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Composites</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Cuttings</subject><subject>Distilled water</subject><subject>Feed rate</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>hardwood</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Laser beam cutting</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Natural Materials</subject><subject>Oak</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>plums</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>softwood</subject><subject>Softwoods</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Water drops</subject><subject>wavelengths</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>0018-3768</issn><issn>1436-736X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFqGzEQhkVpoSbJC_Q00Esvm452dlfaYzBpEgjkkkJvQpZH9ob1ypG0ODnnxSvHhUIPFQiB9P0fI34hvki8lIjqe0KUqCqsm7Kxb6uXD2IhG-oqRd2vj2JR3nVFqtOfxUVKT1gWyaYmWoi3a-_Z5QTBw4rtDvbhwBHstAbPvIZoM8MwQd4y7GNwnN5RN-c8TBvwkdMWDiGs4TDkLVhYPtQw2lQcYYJDSUdwYcrW5SLdjHy8PsqKAdIcvXV8Lj55Oya--HOeiZ8_rh-Xt9X9w83d8uq-ctSoXCnbdqpedZok9WgVylY5pxV5xN6265bQ9rJHxW0rtVwhNVpxp53Uyna9pTPx7eQtH3meOWWzG5LjcbQThzkZki1p0gqbgn79B30Kc5zKdIWSuicle12o-kS5GFKK7M0-DjsbX41Ec6zGnKoxpRrzXo15KSE6hVKBpw3Hv-r_pH4Dfx2PhQ</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Maciak, Adam</creator><creator>Aniszewska, Monika</creator><creator>Zychowicz, Witold</creator><creator>Zowczak, Włodzimierz</creator><creator>Danielewski, Hubert</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-9489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-9887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-7096</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-4919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-6236</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface</title><author>Maciak, Adam ; Aniszewska, Monika ; Zychowicz, Witold ; Zowczak, Włodzimierz ; Danielewski, Hubert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7a5672b6831390a70157cc873f009a5d530a91907e55181b03487e68c187a69a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>apples</topic><topic>Betula</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birch trees</topic><topic>broadleaved trees</topic><topic>cameras</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide lasers</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Composites</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Cuttings</topic><topic>Distilled water</topic><topic>Feed rate</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>hardwood</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Laser beam cutting</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Natural Materials</topic><topic>Oak</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>plums</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>softwood</topic><topic>Softwoods</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Water drops</topic><topic>wavelengths</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maciak, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aniszewska, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zychowicz, Witold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zowczak, Włodzimierz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielewski, Hubert</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of wood and wood products</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maciak, Adam</au><au>Aniszewska, Monika</au><au>Zychowicz, Witold</au><au>Zowczak, Włodzimierz</au><au>Danielewski, Hubert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface</atitle><jtitle>European journal of wood and wood products</jtitle><stitle>Eur. J. Wood Prod</stitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1369</spage><epage>1379</epage><pages>1369-1379</pages><issn>0018-3768</issn><eissn>1436-736X</eissn><abstract>The paper describes a study on the effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO 2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface. The study involved several broadleaved tree species (oak, birch, alder, plum, and apple tree) and one coniferous species (pine). Samples were cut with a Trumpf TLC1005 laser equipped with a TruFlow 6000 CO 2 resonator at a wavelength of 10.6 μm at three power output settings (1 kW, 2 kW, and 3 kW) and one feed rate (0.4 m∙min − 1 ). Contact angle was measured by pipetting a drop of distilled water on the wood surface and recording the process with a camera. Subsequently, images of the drop were analyzed over one minute at 10 s intervals to determine changes in contact angle for each of the cases examined. It was not possible to measure the contact angle on saw-cut samples as the water was immediately absorbed, while water drops placed on laser-cut samples remained on the surface for over 60 s, with the contact angle decreasing over time for the examined species from an average of 90° to 40°. The higher beam power settings (2 or 3 kW) were found to be preferable for the hardwood species (oak, birch, alder, and apple tree). In turn, in the case of the softwood species (pine), the laser power output did not matter, as both at the low (1 kW) and high (3 kW) settings the drop did not spread over the surface quickly. Finally, the optimum beam power for plum tree wood was found to be 1 kW.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00107-024-02095-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-9489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-9887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7877-7096</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-4919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-6236</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-3768
ispartof European journal of wood and wood products, 2024-10, Vol.82 (5), p.1369-1379
issn 0018-3768
1436-736X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3118937198
source Springer Journals
subjects apples
Betula
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birch trees
broadleaved trees
cameras
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide lasers
Ceramics
Composites
Contact angle
Cuttings
Distilled water
Feed rate
Fruit trees
Glass
hardwood
Hardwoods
Laser beam cutting
Lasers
Life Sciences
Machines
Manufacturing
Natural Materials
Oak
Original Article
Pine
Plant species
plums
Processes
softwood
Softwoods
Species
Water drops
wavelengths
Wood
Wood Science & Technology
title Effects of beam power and feed rate in the process of cutting fresh wood with a CO2 laser on water contact angle on the cut surface
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20beam%20power%20and%20feed%20rate%20in%20the%20process%20of%20cutting%20fresh%20wood%20with%20a%20CO2%20laser%20on%20water%20contact%20angle%20on%20the%20cut%20surface&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20wood%20and%20wood%20products&rft.au=Maciak,%20Adam&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1369&rft.epage=1379&rft.pages=1369-1379&rft.issn=0018-3768&rft.eissn=1436-736X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00107-024-02095-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3118937198%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118937198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true