Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories

In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical education 2024-10, Vol.101 (10), p.4102-4113
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Shuangshuang, Xue, Song, Yang, Dan, Zhu, Liying, Ye, Mingzhan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4113
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4102
container_title Journal of chemical education
container_volume 101
creator Chen, Shuangshuang
Xue, Song
Yang, Dan
Zhu, Liying
Ye, Mingzhan
description In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing students’ knowledge and inquiry skills, is rare. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of VL and HL on junior high school students’ learning within the specific context of the Law of Conservation of Mass. By analyzing students’ performance through quantitative and qualitative assessments in knowledge tests and inquiry tasks, significant findings emerged. It was observed that the VL group demonstrated superior knowledge performance compared with the HL group. In terms of inquiry skills, while the overall performance was better in the HL group, particularly in planning and evidence collection, the VL group excelled in explanation and evaluation skills. These results suggest the potential benefit of implementing a blended approach, integrating both VL and HL, across various domains in chemistry education. Such an approach could leverage the unique advantages of each laboratory type to maximize student learning and engagement.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3118844092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3118844092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a197t-c4d9a77eb4b3ead26c6d6ebe189e6f5fa65ddadbbfc081d166b9090a88ef051a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwBWwssU5r52kvoTxaKVIXBbaWY9-AS-qkdiLo3-M-2LK6izkzczUI3VIyoSSmU6n8ZK0-YQN6kipCsqw4QyPKExbRJGbnaEQCFvGMpZfoyvs1ITTOOBuh7umna1pn7Ad-NHUNDqwCj43Fq37QYHtcgnR2r0ur8cJuB-N2ePVlmsbjB-i_ASyeB81HS3tg3o3rB9ngWfjH-D7QpaxaJ_tQA_4aXdSy8XBzumP09vz0OptH5fJlMbsvI0l50Ucq1VwWBVRplYDUca5ynUMFlHHI66yWeaa11FVVK8KopnleccKJZAxqklGZjNHdMbdz7XYA34t1OzgbKkVCKWNpSngcqORIKdd676AWnTMb6XaCErGfVoRpxWlacZo2uKZH10H8i_3P8QsVC4Ii</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118844092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Chen, Shuangshuang ; Xue, Song ; Yang, Dan ; Zhu, Liying ; Ye, Mingzhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuangshuang ; Xue, Song ; Yang, Dan ; Zhu, Liying ; Ye, Mingzhan</creatorcontrib><description>In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing students’ knowledge and inquiry skills, is rare. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of VL and HL on junior high school students’ learning within the specific context of the Law of Conservation of Mass. By analyzing students’ performance through quantitative and qualitative assessments in knowledge tests and inquiry tasks, significant findings emerged. It was observed that the VL group demonstrated superior knowledge performance compared with the HL group. In terms of inquiry skills, while the overall performance was better in the HL group, particularly in planning and evidence collection, the VL group excelled in explanation and evaluation skills. These results suggest the potential benefit of implementing a blended approach, integrating both VL and HL, across various domains in chemistry education. Such an approach could leverage the unique advantages of each laboratory type to maximize student learning and engagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; College students ; Digital Age ; Education ; Educational Practices ; Group dynamics ; Hands on Science ; High School Students ; Impact analysis ; Junior High School Students ; Knowledge ; Laboratories ; Learning ; Middle school students ; Organic Chemistry ; Performance evaluation ; Qualitative analysis ; Science Education ; Science Laboratories ; Secondary school students ; Skills ; Students ; Teaching methods ; Technology Integration ; Virtual environments ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2024-10, Vol.101 (10), p.4102-4113</ispartof><rights>2024 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Oct 8, 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a197t-c4d9a77eb4b3ead26c6d6ebe189e6f5fa65ddadbbfc081d166b9090a88ef051a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2866-7387</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27075,27923,27924,56737,56787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuangshuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Liying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Mingzhan</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing students’ knowledge and inquiry skills, is rare. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of VL and HL on junior high school students’ learning within the specific context of the Law of Conservation of Mass. By analyzing students’ performance through quantitative and qualitative assessments in knowledge tests and inquiry tasks, significant findings emerged. It was observed that the VL group demonstrated superior knowledge performance compared with the HL group. In terms of inquiry skills, while the overall performance was better in the HL group, particularly in planning and evidence collection, the VL group excelled in explanation and evaluation skills. These results suggest the potential benefit of implementing a blended approach, integrating both VL and HL, across various domains in chemistry education. Such an approach could leverage the unique advantages of each laboratory type to maximize student learning and engagement.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Digital Age</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Hands on Science</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Junior High School Students</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Middle school students</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Laboratories</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Technology Integration</subject><subject>Virtual environments</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwBWwssU5r52kvoTxaKVIXBbaWY9-AS-qkdiLo3-M-2LK6izkzczUI3VIyoSSmU6n8ZK0-YQN6kipCsqw4QyPKExbRJGbnaEQCFvGMpZfoyvs1ITTOOBuh7umna1pn7Ad-NHUNDqwCj43Fq37QYHtcgnR2r0ur8cJuB-N2ePVlmsbjB-i_ASyeB81HS3tg3o3rB9ngWfjH-D7QpaxaJ_tQA_4aXdSy8XBzumP09vz0OptH5fJlMbsvI0l50Ucq1VwWBVRplYDUca5ynUMFlHHI66yWeaa11FVVK8KopnleccKJZAxqklGZjNHdMbdz7XYA34t1OzgbKkVCKWNpSngcqORIKdd676AWnTMb6XaCErGfVoRpxWlacZo2uKZH10H8i_3P8QsVC4Ii</recordid><startdate>20241008</startdate><enddate>20241008</enddate><creator>Chen, Shuangshuang</creator><creator>Xue, Song</creator><creator>Yang, Dan</creator><creator>Zhu, Liying</creator><creator>Ye, Mingzhan</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-7387</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241008</creationdate><title>Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories</title><author>Chen, Shuangshuang ; Xue, Song ; Yang, Dan ; Zhu, Liying ; Ye, Mingzhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a197t-c4d9a77eb4b3ead26c6d6ebe189e6f5fa65ddadbbfc081d166b9090a88ef051a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Digital Age</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Hands on Science</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Junior High School Students</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Middle school students</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Laboratories</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Technology Integration</topic><topic>Virtual environments</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuangshuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Liying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Mingzhan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Shuangshuang</au><au>Xue, Song</au><au>Yang, Dan</au><au>Zhu, Liying</au><au>Ye, Mingzhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2024-10-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4102</spage><epage>4113</epage><pages>4102-4113</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><abstract>In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing students’ knowledge and inquiry skills, is rare. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of VL and HL on junior high school students’ learning within the specific context of the Law of Conservation of Mass. By analyzing students’ performance through quantitative and qualitative assessments in knowledge tests and inquiry tasks, significant findings emerged. It was observed that the VL group demonstrated superior knowledge performance compared with the HL group. In terms of inquiry skills, while the overall performance was better in the HL group, particularly in planning and evidence collection, the VL group excelled in explanation and evaluation skills. These results suggest the potential benefit of implementing a blended approach, integrating both VL and HL, across various domains in chemistry education. Such an approach could leverage the unique advantages of each laboratory type to maximize student learning and engagement.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-7387</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9584
ispartof Journal of chemical education, 2024-10, Vol.101 (10), p.4102-4113
issn 0021-9584
1938-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3118844092
source ACS Publications
subjects Chemistry
College students
Digital Age
Education
Educational Practices
Group dynamics
Hands on Science
High School Students
Impact analysis
Junior High School Students
Knowledge
Laboratories
Learning
Middle school students
Organic Chemistry
Performance evaluation
Qualitative analysis
Science Education
Science Laboratories
Secondary school students
Skills
Students
Teaching methods
Technology Integration
Virtual environments
Virtual reality
title Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A37%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20Differences%20in%20Student%20Learning%20and%20Inquiry%20Skills%20Between%20Hands-On%20and%20Virtual%20Chemistry%20Laboratories&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Chen,%20Shuangshuang&rft.date=2024-10-08&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4102&rft.epage=4113&rft.pages=4102-4113&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3118844092%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118844092&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true