Responsible AI in the Global Context: Maturity Model and Survey
Responsible AI (RAI) has emerged as a major focus across industry, policymaking, and academia, aiming to mitigate the risks and maximize the benefits of AI, both on an organizational and societal level. This study explores the global state of RAI through one of the most extensive surveys to date on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2024-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Anka Reuel Connolly, Patrick Kiana Jafari Meimandi Tewari, Shekhar Wiatrak, Jakub Dikshita Venkatesh Kochenderfer, Mykel |
description | Responsible AI (RAI) has emerged as a major focus across industry, policymaking, and academia, aiming to mitigate the risks and maximize the benefits of AI, both on an organizational and societal level. This study explores the global state of RAI through one of the most extensive surveys to date on the topic, surveying 1000 organizations across 20 industries and 19 geographical regions. We define a conceptual RAI maturity model for organizations to map how well they implement organizational and operational RAI measures. Based on this model, the survey assesses the adoption of system-level measures to mitigate identified risks related to, for example, discrimination, reliability, or privacy, and also covers key organizational processes pertaining to governance, risk management, and monitoring and control. The study highlights the expanding AI risk landscape, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk mitigation strategies. The findings also reveal significant strides towards RAI maturity, but we also identify gaps in RAI implementation that could lead to increased (public) risks from AI systems. This research offers a structured approach to assess and improve RAI practices globally and underscores the critical need for bridging the gap between RAI planning and execution to ensure AI advancement aligns with human welfare and societal benefits. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3116748328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3116748328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_31167483283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsKwjAUgOEgCBbtOxxwLrRJL8FFpHgbuqh7SekRU0JScxH79jr4AE7_8P0zElHGsoTnlC5I7NyQpiktK1oULCLbC7rRaCc7hbA7g9TgHwhHZTqhoDba49tvoBE-WOknaEyPCoTu4RrsC6cVmd-Fchj_uiTrw_5Wn5LRmmdA59vBBKu_1LIsK6ucM8rZf9cHkHo34w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116748328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responsible AI in the Global Context: Maturity Model and Survey</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Anka Reuel ; Connolly, Patrick ; Kiana Jafari Meimandi ; Tewari, Shekhar ; Wiatrak, Jakub ; Dikshita Venkatesh ; Kochenderfer, Mykel</creator><creatorcontrib>Anka Reuel ; Connolly, Patrick ; Kiana Jafari Meimandi ; Tewari, Shekhar ; Wiatrak, Jakub ; Dikshita Venkatesh ; Kochenderfer, Mykel</creatorcontrib><description>Responsible AI (RAI) has emerged as a major focus across industry, policymaking, and academia, aiming to mitigate the risks and maximize the benefits of AI, both on an organizational and societal level. This study explores the global state of RAI through one of the most extensive surveys to date on the topic, surveying 1000 organizations across 20 industries and 19 geographical regions. We define a conceptual RAI maturity model for organizations to map how well they implement organizational and operational RAI measures. Based on this model, the survey assesses the adoption of system-level measures to mitigate identified risks related to, for example, discrimination, reliability, or privacy, and also covers key organizational processes pertaining to governance, risk management, and monitoring and control. The study highlights the expanding AI risk landscape, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk mitigation strategies. The findings also reveal significant strides towards RAI maturity, but we also identify gaps in RAI implementation that could lead to increased (public) risks from AI systems. This research offers a structured approach to assess and improve RAI practices globally and underscores the critical need for bridging the gap between RAI planning and execution to ensure AI advancement aligns with human welfare and societal benefits.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Organizations ; Risk management</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-10</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anka Reuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiana Jafari Meimandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Shekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiatrak, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dikshita Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochenderfer, Mykel</creatorcontrib><title>Responsible AI in the Global Context: Maturity Model and Survey</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Responsible AI (RAI) has emerged as a major focus across industry, policymaking, and academia, aiming to mitigate the risks and maximize the benefits of AI, both on an organizational and societal level. This study explores the global state of RAI through one of the most extensive surveys to date on the topic, surveying 1000 organizations across 20 industries and 19 geographical regions. We define a conceptual RAI maturity model for organizations to map how well they implement organizational and operational RAI measures. Based on this model, the survey assesses the adoption of system-level measures to mitigate identified risks related to, for example, discrimination, reliability, or privacy, and also covers key organizational processes pertaining to governance, risk management, and monitoring and control. The study highlights the expanding AI risk landscape, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk mitigation strategies. The findings also reveal significant strides towards RAI maturity, but we also identify gaps in RAI implementation that could lead to increased (public) risks from AI systems. This research offers a structured approach to assess and improve RAI practices globally and underscores the critical need for bridging the gap between RAI planning and execution to ensure AI advancement aligns with human welfare and societal benefits.</description><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyrsKwjAUgOEgCBbtOxxwLrRJL8FFpHgbuqh7SekRU0JScxH79jr4AE7_8P0zElHGsoTnlC5I7NyQpiktK1oULCLbC7rRaCc7hbA7g9TgHwhHZTqhoDba49tvoBE-WOknaEyPCoTu4RrsC6cVmd-Fchj_uiTrw_5Wn5LRmmdA59vBBKu_1LIsK6ucM8rZf9cHkHo34w</recordid><startdate>20241013</startdate><enddate>20241013</enddate><creator>Anka Reuel</creator><creator>Connolly, Patrick</creator><creator>Kiana Jafari Meimandi</creator><creator>Tewari, Shekhar</creator><creator>Wiatrak, Jakub</creator><creator>Dikshita Venkatesh</creator><creator>Kochenderfer, Mykel</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241013</creationdate><title>Responsible AI in the Global Context: Maturity Model and Survey</title><author>Anka Reuel ; Connolly, Patrick ; Kiana Jafari Meimandi ; Tewari, Shekhar ; Wiatrak, Jakub ; Dikshita Venkatesh ; Kochenderfer, Mykel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31167483283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anka Reuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiana Jafari Meimandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Shekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiatrak, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dikshita Venkatesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochenderfer, Mykel</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anka Reuel</au><au>Connolly, Patrick</au><au>Kiana Jafari Meimandi</au><au>Tewari, Shekhar</au><au>Wiatrak, Jakub</au><au>Dikshita Venkatesh</au><au>Kochenderfer, Mykel</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Responsible AI in the Global Context: Maturity Model and Survey</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-10-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Responsible AI (RAI) has emerged as a major focus across industry, policymaking, and academia, aiming to mitigate the risks and maximize the benefits of AI, both on an organizational and societal level. This study explores the global state of RAI through one of the most extensive surveys to date on the topic, surveying 1000 organizations across 20 industries and 19 geographical regions. We define a conceptual RAI maturity model for organizations to map how well they implement organizational and operational RAI measures. Based on this model, the survey assesses the adoption of system-level measures to mitigate identified risks related to, for example, discrimination, reliability, or privacy, and also covers key organizational processes pertaining to governance, risk management, and monitoring and control. The study highlights the expanding AI risk landscape, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk mitigation strategies. The findings also reveal significant strides towards RAI maturity, but we also identify gaps in RAI implementation that could lead to increased (public) risks from AI systems. This research offers a structured approach to assess and improve RAI practices globally and underscores the critical need for bridging the gap between RAI planning and execution to ensure AI advancement aligns with human welfare and societal benefits.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-10 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3116748328 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Organizations Risk management |
title | Responsible AI in the Global Context: Maturity Model and Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A01%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Responsible%20AI%20in%20the%20Global%20Context:%20Maturity%20Model%20and%20Survey&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Anka%20Reuel&rft.date=2024-10-13&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3116748328%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116748328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |