Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE

This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economics and finance 2024-09, Vol.48 (3), p.614-643
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jang-Chul, Su, Qing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 643
container_issue 3
container_start_page 614
container_title Journal of economics and finance
container_volume 48
creator Kim, Jang-Chul
Su, Qing
description This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3116713136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3116713136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5a52fb0db608530d64da30289153419d6c09b711b32d84032f44eb195f0db6f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEEs8_wMkS16bs-pWYG0K8pAqQgAMnK4mdktLarZ0i-u9xCRI3TrurmW9Hmiw7RRgjQHEekaIqcqA8ByWlzL92sgNUrMxVwflu2kGIJFGxnx3GOANAyhQ9yBZPft71XVPNSaj6zk3jiEz9pw1uYV1PVusqyZsRqZwh82617kw6L4j97Ix1jSVt8Avy4F3-On4eE-tsmG5I7H3zEZM_9tYQ70j_bsnD2_P1cbbXVvNoT37nUfZ6c_1ydZdPHm_vry4necMk9LmoBG1rMLWEUjAwkpuKAS0VCsZRGdmAqgvEmlFTcmC05dzWqES7ZVrOjrKz4e8y-NXaxl7P_Dq4FKkZoiyQIZPJRQdXE3yMwbZ6GbpFFTYaQW9r1UOtOtWqf2rVXwkiA2Qb77r4hygoWSGQbtPZYIlJdFMb_tL_efwNZOCE_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116713136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kim, Jang-Chul ; Su, Qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jang-Chul ; Su, Qing</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-0925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-9744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Climate change ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Energy industry ; Finance ; Geopolitics ; International finance ; International relations-US ; Investments ; Liquidity ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Political risk ; Politics ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Securities markets ; Stock exchanges ; Stock market delistings ; Tariffs</subject><ispartof>Journal of economics and finance, 2024-09, Vol.48 (3), p.614-643</ispartof><rights>Academy of Economics and Finance 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Sep 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5a52fb0db608530d64da30289153419d6c09b711b32d84032f44eb195f0db6f43</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-1459-9810</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jang-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Qing</creatorcontrib><title>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</title><title>Journal of economics and finance</title><addtitle>J Econ Finan</addtitle><description>This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Political risk</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stock market delistings</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><issn>1055-0925</issn><issn>1938-9744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEEs8_wMkS16bs-pWYG0K8pAqQgAMnK4mdktLarZ0i-u9xCRI3TrurmW9Hmiw7RRgjQHEekaIqcqA8ByWlzL92sgNUrMxVwflu2kGIJFGxnx3GOANAyhQ9yBZPft71XVPNSaj6zk3jiEz9pw1uYV1PVusqyZsRqZwh82617kw6L4j97Ix1jSVt8Avy4F3-On4eE-tsmG5I7H3zEZM_9tYQ70j_bsnD2_P1cbbXVvNoT37nUfZ6c_1ydZdPHm_vry4necMk9LmoBG1rMLWEUjAwkpuKAS0VCsZRGdmAqgvEmlFTcmC05dzWqES7ZVrOjrKz4e8y-NXaxl7P_Dq4FKkZoiyQIZPJRQdXE3yMwbZ6GbpFFTYaQW9r1UOtOtWqf2rVXwkiA2Qb77r4hygoWSGQbtPZYIlJdFMb_tL_efwNZOCE_g</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Kim, Jang-Chul</creator><creator>Su, Qing</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1459-9810</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</title><author>Kim, Jang-Chul ; Su, Qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5a52fb0db608530d64da30289153419d6c09b711b32d84032f44eb195f0db6f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Political risk</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stock market delistings</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jang-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Qing</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of economics and finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jang-Chul</au><au>Su, Qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economics and finance</jtitle><stitle>J Econ Finan</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>614</spage><epage>643</epage><pages>614-643</pages><issn>1055-0925</issn><eissn>1938-9744</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1459-9810</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-0925
ispartof Journal of economics and finance, 2024-09, Vol.48 (3), p.614-643
issn 1055-0925
1938-9744
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3116713136
source SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Asymmetry
Climate change
Economics
Economics and Finance
Energy industry
Finance
Geopolitics
International finance
International relations-US
Investments
Liquidity
Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics
Political risk
Politics
Ratings & rankings
Securities markets
Stock exchanges
Stock market delistings
Tariffs
title Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20ratings,%20government%20quality,%20and%20liquidity:%20evidence%20from%20Non-U.S.%20energy%20stocks%20listed%20on%20the%20NYSE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economics%20and%20finance&rft.au=Kim,%20Jang-Chul&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=614&rft.epage=643&rft.pages=614-643&rft.issn=1055-0925&rft.eissn=1938-9744&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3116713136%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116713136&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true