Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE
This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economics and finance 2024-09, Vol.48 (3), p.614-643 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 643 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 614 |
container_title | Journal of economics and finance |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Kim, Jang-Chul Su, Qing |
description | This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3116713136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3116713136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5a52fb0db608530d64da30289153419d6c09b711b32d84032f44eb195f0db6f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEEs8_wMkS16bs-pWYG0K8pAqQgAMnK4mdktLarZ0i-u9xCRI3TrurmW9Hmiw7RRgjQHEekaIqcqA8ByWlzL92sgNUrMxVwflu2kGIJFGxnx3GOANAyhQ9yBZPft71XVPNSaj6zk3jiEz9pw1uYV1PVusqyZsRqZwh82617kw6L4j97Ix1jSVt8Avy4F3-On4eE-tsmG5I7H3zEZM_9tYQ70j_bsnD2_P1cbbXVvNoT37nUfZ6c_1ydZdPHm_vry4necMk9LmoBG1rMLWEUjAwkpuKAS0VCsZRGdmAqgvEmlFTcmC05dzWqES7ZVrOjrKz4e8y-NXaxl7P_Dq4FKkZoiyQIZPJRQdXE3yMwbZ6GbpFFTYaQW9r1UOtOtWqf2rVXwkiA2Qb77r4hygoWSGQbtPZYIlJdFMb_tL_efwNZOCE_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116713136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kim, Jang-Chul ; Su, Qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jang-Chul ; Su, Qing</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-0925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-9744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Climate change ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Energy industry ; Finance ; Geopolitics ; International finance ; International relations-US ; Investments ; Liquidity ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Political risk ; Politics ; Ratings & rankings ; Securities markets ; Stock exchanges ; Stock market delistings ; Tariffs</subject><ispartof>Journal of economics and finance, 2024-09, Vol.48 (3), p.614-643</ispartof><rights>Academy of Economics and Finance 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Sep 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5a52fb0db608530d64da30289153419d6c09b711b32d84032f44eb195f0db6f43</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-1459-9810</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jang-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Qing</creatorcontrib><title>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</title><title>Journal of economics and finance</title><addtitle>J Econ Finan</addtitle><description>This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Political risk</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stock market delistings</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><issn>1055-0925</issn><issn>1938-9744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEEs8_wMkS16bs-pWYG0K8pAqQgAMnK4mdktLarZ0i-u9xCRI3TrurmW9Hmiw7RRgjQHEekaIqcqA8ByWlzL92sgNUrMxVwflu2kGIJFGxnx3GOANAyhQ9yBZPft71XVPNSaj6zk3jiEz9pw1uYV1PVusqyZsRqZwh82617kw6L4j97Ix1jSVt8Avy4F3-On4eE-tsmG5I7H3zEZM_9tYQ70j_bsnD2_P1cbbXVvNoT37nUfZ6c_1ydZdPHm_vry4necMk9LmoBG1rMLWEUjAwkpuKAS0VCsZRGdmAqgvEmlFTcmC05dzWqES7ZVrOjrKz4e8y-NXaxl7P_Dq4FKkZoiyQIZPJRQdXE3yMwbZ6GbpFFTYaQW9r1UOtOtWqf2rVXwkiA2Qb77r4hygoWSGQbtPZYIlJdFMb_tL_efwNZOCE_g</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Kim, Jang-Chul</creator><creator>Su, Qing</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1459-9810</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</title><author>Kim, Jang-Chul ; Su, Qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-5a52fb0db608530d64da30289153419d6c09b711b32d84032f44eb195f0db6f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Political risk</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stock market delistings</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jang-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Qing</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of economics and finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jang-Chul</au><au>Su, Qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economics and finance</jtitle><stitle>J Econ Finan</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>614</spage><epage>643</epage><pages>614-643</pages><issn>1055-0925</issn><eissn>1938-9744</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the relationship between liquidity, information asymmetry, political risk rating, government and regulatory quality rating for non-U.S. stocks in the energy industries listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our findings indicate that stocks from countries with higher government and regulatory quality and lower political risk tend to have narrower spreads, a smaller price impact of trades, and a higher market quality index. To explore the impact of political risk on liquidity and information asymmetry, we analyze political shocks resulting from the U.S.-China trade conflict on Chinese energy stocks. Our findings reveal that whenever the U.S.-China political tension escalates over trade policy, the market liquidity and information asymmetry for Chinese energy stocks worsen. This suggests that negative shocks have a detrimental impact on the liquidity of stocks from countries where political tension is escalated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1459-9810</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-0925 |
ispartof | Journal of economics and finance, 2024-09, Vol.48 (3), p.614-643 |
issn | 1055-0925 1938-9744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3116713136 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Asymmetry Climate change Economics Economics and Finance Energy industry Finance Geopolitics International finance International relations-US Investments Liquidity Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics Political risk Politics Ratings & rankings Securities markets Stock exchanges Stock market delistings Tariffs |
title | Political ratings, government quality, and liquidity: evidence from Non-U.S. energy stocks listed on the NYSE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20ratings,%20government%20quality,%20and%20liquidity:%20evidence%20from%20Non-U.S.%20energy%20stocks%20listed%20on%20the%20NYSE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economics%20and%20finance&rft.au=Kim,%20Jang-Chul&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=614&rft.epage=643&rft.pages=614-643&rft.issn=1055-0925&rft.eissn=1938-9744&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12197-024-09666-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3116713136%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116713136&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |