Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana

Surface geometry inversion of geophysical data has recently been introduced as an effective approach for generating surface‐based geological models. The models obtained through surface geometry inversion clearly delineate the contacts between distinct rock units, making them easily interpretable by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical Prospecting 2024-11, Vol.72 (9), p.3524-3546
Hauptverfasser: Vatankhah, Saeed, Lelièvre, Peter G., Matende, Kitso, Mickus, Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3546
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3524
container_title Geophysical Prospecting
container_volume 72
creator Vatankhah, Saeed
Lelièvre, Peter G.
Matende, Kitso
Mickus, Kevin
description Surface geometry inversion of geophysical data has recently been introduced as an effective approach for generating surface‐based geological models. The models obtained through surface geometry inversion clearly delineate the contacts between distinct rock units, making them easily interpretable by geologists. Surface geometry inversion has shown promising preliminary results in other works, but the practical application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical data has not been thoroughly investigated. To move towards a better understanding of the practicalities involved, we applied surface geometry inversion to a real magnetic dataset acquired over two kimberlite pipes located in north‐central Botswana. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the surface geometry inversion approach in accurately characterizing the subsurface geometry and identifying the boundaries of the kimberlite pipes. We first perform an anomaly separation approach to isolate the magnetic anomalies associated with the kimberlite pipes. A surface geometry inversion algorithm was applied to the original and separated datasets using various initial models and other control parameters. Several tests were performed to investigate the effects that data processing, initial models, and other parameter choices have on the surface geometry inversion results. We successfully recover the geometry, extension and dip of the two kimberlite pipes. We discuss the results of our various tests and provide advice for practitioners interested in applying surface geometry inversion methods to their data. Our work indicates that surface geometry inversion can be used as a complementary approach to voxel inversion, and we propose an iterative surface geometry inversion algorithm as a possible alternative approach to voxel inversion for simple geological scenarios. This work provides valuable insights into the appropriate application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical datasets.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2478.13588
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3115400190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3115400190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1998-a69b31319f531bdca4eaa86a477316293b68b2116ca2f3f89230eda8b2f879763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtnrwuet81sNtnkImjRKlYU0XPIbiclpd3UZGvpvzd1xatzGXjz3gzzEXIJdASpxsAEz4uykiNgXMojMvhTjsmAUhC5pAU_JWcxLilllPNyQK6fzaLFzjVZ3AZrGswW6NfYhX3m2i8M0fk28zZ7cusaw8p1GNMgu_Vd3JnWnJMTa1YRL377kHzc371PHvLZy_RxcjPLG1BK5kaomgEDZTmDet6YEo2RwpRVxUAUitVC1gWAaExhmZWqYBTnJmlWVqoSbEiu-r2b4D-3GDu99NvQppOaAfAyvadoco17VxN8jAGt3gS3NmGvgeoDJH1Aog9I9A-klOB9YudWuP_Prqevb33uG_A9Z8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115400190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vatankhah, Saeed ; Lelièvre, Peter G. ; Matende, Kitso ; Mickus, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Vatankhah, Saeed ; Lelièvre, Peter G. ; Matende, Kitso ; Mickus, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>Surface geometry inversion of geophysical data has recently been introduced as an effective approach for generating surface‐based geological models. The models obtained through surface geometry inversion clearly delineate the contacts between distinct rock units, making them easily interpretable by geologists. Surface geometry inversion has shown promising preliminary results in other works, but the practical application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical data has not been thoroughly investigated. To move towards a better understanding of the practicalities involved, we applied surface geometry inversion to a real magnetic dataset acquired over two kimberlite pipes located in north‐central Botswana. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the surface geometry inversion approach in accurately characterizing the subsurface geometry and identifying the boundaries of the kimberlite pipes. We first perform an anomaly separation approach to isolate the magnetic anomalies associated with the kimberlite pipes. A surface geometry inversion algorithm was applied to the original and separated datasets using various initial models and other control parameters. Several tests were performed to investigate the effects that data processing, initial models, and other parameter choices have on the surface geometry inversion results. We successfully recover the geometry, extension and dip of the two kimberlite pipes. We discuss the results of our various tests and provide advice for practitioners interested in applying surface geometry inversion methods to their data. Our work indicates that surface geometry inversion can be used as a complementary approach to voxel inversion, and we propose an iterative surface geometry inversion algorithm as a possible alternative approach to voxel inversion for simple geological scenarios. This work provides valuable insights into the appropriate application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical datasets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.13588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Houten: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biotite ; Data acquisition ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Effectiveness ; Geologists ; Geology ; Geometry ; Geophysical data ; Geophysical methods ; Geophysics ; inverse problem ; inversion ; Kimberlites ; Magnetic anomalies ; magnetics ; Parameter identification ; Peridotite ; Pipes ; Surface geometry</subject><ispartof>Geophysical Prospecting, 2024-11, Vol.72 (9), p.3524-3546</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1998-a69b31319f531bdca4eaa86a477316293b68b2116ca2f3f89230eda8b2f879763</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2865-7453 ; 0000-0001-7403-6848 ; 0000-0002-3401-0376</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2478.13588$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2478.13588$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vatankhah, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelièvre, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matende, Kitso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mickus, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana</title><title>Geophysical Prospecting</title><description>Surface geometry inversion of geophysical data has recently been introduced as an effective approach for generating surface‐based geological models. The models obtained through surface geometry inversion clearly delineate the contacts between distinct rock units, making them easily interpretable by geologists. Surface geometry inversion has shown promising preliminary results in other works, but the practical application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical data has not been thoroughly investigated. To move towards a better understanding of the practicalities involved, we applied surface geometry inversion to a real magnetic dataset acquired over two kimberlite pipes located in north‐central Botswana. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the surface geometry inversion approach in accurately characterizing the subsurface geometry and identifying the boundaries of the kimberlite pipes. We first perform an anomaly separation approach to isolate the magnetic anomalies associated with the kimberlite pipes. A surface geometry inversion algorithm was applied to the original and separated datasets using various initial models and other control parameters. Several tests were performed to investigate the effects that data processing, initial models, and other parameter choices have on the surface geometry inversion results. We successfully recover the geometry, extension and dip of the two kimberlite pipes. We discuss the results of our various tests and provide advice for practitioners interested in applying surface geometry inversion methods to their data. Our work indicates that surface geometry inversion can be used as a complementary approach to voxel inversion, and we propose an iterative surface geometry inversion algorithm as a possible alternative approach to voxel inversion for simple geological scenarios. This work provides valuable insights into the appropriate application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical datasets.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biotite</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Geologists</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Geophysical data</subject><subject>Geophysical methods</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>inverse problem</subject><subject>inversion</subject><subject>Kimberlites</subject><subject>Magnetic anomalies</subject><subject>magnetics</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Peridotite</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Surface geometry</subject><issn>0016-8025</issn><issn>1365-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtnrwuet81sNtnkImjRKlYU0XPIbiclpd3UZGvpvzd1xatzGXjz3gzzEXIJdASpxsAEz4uykiNgXMojMvhTjsmAUhC5pAU_JWcxLilllPNyQK6fzaLFzjVZ3AZrGswW6NfYhX3m2i8M0fk28zZ7cusaw8p1GNMgu_Vd3JnWnJMTa1YRL377kHzc371PHvLZy_RxcjPLG1BK5kaomgEDZTmDet6YEo2RwpRVxUAUitVC1gWAaExhmZWqYBTnJmlWVqoSbEiu-r2b4D-3GDu99NvQppOaAfAyvadoco17VxN8jAGt3gS3NmGvgeoDJH1Aog9I9A-klOB9YudWuP_Prqevb33uG_A9Z8U</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Vatankhah, Saeed</creator><creator>Lelièvre, Peter G.</creator><creator>Matende, Kitso</creator><creator>Mickus, Kevin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2865-7453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-6848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3401-0376</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana</title><author>Vatankhah, Saeed ; Lelièvre, Peter G. ; Matende, Kitso ; Mickus, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1998-a69b31319f531bdca4eaa86a477316293b68b2116ca2f3f89230eda8b2f879763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biotite</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Geologists</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Geophysical data</topic><topic>Geophysical methods</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>inverse problem</topic><topic>inversion</topic><topic>Kimberlites</topic><topic>Magnetic anomalies</topic><topic>magnetics</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Peridotite</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Surface geometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vatankhah, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelièvre, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matende, Kitso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mickus, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vatankhah, Saeed</au><au>Lelièvre, Peter G.</au><au>Matende, Kitso</au><au>Mickus, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3524</spage><epage>3546</epage><pages>3524-3546</pages><issn>0016-8025</issn><eissn>1365-2478</eissn><abstract>Surface geometry inversion of geophysical data has recently been introduced as an effective approach for generating surface‐based geological models. The models obtained through surface geometry inversion clearly delineate the contacts between distinct rock units, making them easily interpretable by geologists. Surface geometry inversion has shown promising preliminary results in other works, but the practical application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical data has not been thoroughly investigated. To move towards a better understanding of the practicalities involved, we applied surface geometry inversion to a real magnetic dataset acquired over two kimberlite pipes located in north‐central Botswana. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the surface geometry inversion approach in accurately characterizing the subsurface geometry and identifying the boundaries of the kimberlite pipes. We first perform an anomaly separation approach to isolate the magnetic anomalies associated with the kimberlite pipes. A surface geometry inversion algorithm was applied to the original and separated datasets using various initial models and other control parameters. Several tests were performed to investigate the effects that data processing, initial models, and other parameter choices have on the surface geometry inversion results. We successfully recover the geometry, extension and dip of the two kimberlite pipes. We discuss the results of our various tests and provide advice for practitioners interested in applying surface geometry inversion methods to their data. Our work indicates that surface geometry inversion can be used as a complementary approach to voxel inversion, and we propose an iterative surface geometry inversion algorithm as a possible alternative approach to voxel inversion for simple geological scenarios. This work provides valuable insights into the appropriate application of surface geometry inversion on real geophysical datasets.</abstract><cop>Houten</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2478.13588</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2865-7453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-6848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3401-0376</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8025
ispartof Geophysical Prospecting, 2024-11, Vol.72 (9), p.3524-3546
issn 0016-8025
1365-2478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3115400190
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Algorithms
Biotite
Data acquisition
Data analysis
Data processing
Datasets
Effectiveness
Geologists
Geology
Geometry
Geophysical data
Geophysical methods
Geophysics
inverse problem
inversion
Kimberlites
Magnetic anomalies
magnetics
Parameter identification
Peridotite
Pipes
Surface geometry
title Magnetic surface geometry inversion of Kimberlites in Botswana
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A05%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20surface%20geometry%20inversion%20of%20Kimberlites%20in%20Botswana&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20Prospecting&rft.au=Vatankhah,%20Saeed&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3524&rft.epage=3546&rft.pages=3524-3546&rft.issn=0016-8025&rft.eissn=1365-2478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115400190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115400190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true