Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization

During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Greenhouse gases: science and technology 2024-10, Vol.14 (5), p.760-775
Hauptverfasser: Baur, Friedemann, Hiebert, Sam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 775
container_issue 5
container_start_page 760
container_title Greenhouse gases: science and technology
container_volume 14
creator Baur, Friedemann
Hiebert, Sam
description During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ghg.2303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3115018329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3115018329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-e55ab46b7b0d61b0f8c3058fcd6e75d40f7c26cc7fdbcd13a5feae3fc68529063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBnxAQxM3Um6SZTJcyaFsoCD7WIZNHO2Wa1GSq1F_vTOvCjXdzD4fv3AsHoWsCYwJA71fr1ZgyYGdoQAmnGStEcf5HX6JRShvoZgJUgBigl4X_VKkOHu9s1KFRba9vcdWZHm-DsU1T-xV2IeKyfMWpbi1OOlrre1t5g_VaRaVbG-vvY_oKXTjVJDv63UP0_vT4Vs6z5fNsUT4sM00KzjLLuaomeSUqMDmpwBWaAS-cNrkV3EzACU1zrYUzlTaEKe6ssszpvOB0CjkbopvT3V0MH3ubWrkJ--i7l5IRwoEUjE476u5E6RhSitbJXay3Kh4kAdmXJrvSZF9ah45P6Ffd2MO_nJzNZ-wY-AFbZG2t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115018329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasion percolation &amp; basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Baur, Friedemann ; Hiebert, Sam</creator><creatorcontrib>Baur, Friedemann ; Hiebert, Sam</creatorcontrib><description>During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-3878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-3878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>basin modelling ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; CO2 density ; CO2 plume ; fluid flow ; Injection ; injection window ; invasion percolation ; Modelling ; Percolation ; Plumes ; Reservoirs ; Screening ; Stratigraphy ; Temperature requirements</subject><ispartof>Greenhouse gases: science and technology, 2024-10, Vol.14 (5), p.760-775</ispartof><rights>2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-e55ab46b7b0d61b0f8c3058fcd6e75d40f7c26cc7fdbcd13a5feae3fc68529063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fghg.2303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fghg.2303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baur, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiebert, Sam</creatorcontrib><title>Invasion percolation &amp; basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</title><title>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</title><description>During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>basin modelling</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>CO2 density</subject><subject>CO2 plume</subject><subject>fluid flow</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>injection window</subject><subject>invasion percolation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Percolation</subject><subject>Plumes</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>Temperature requirements</subject><issn>2152-3878</issn><issn>2152-3878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBnxAQxM3Um6SZTJcyaFsoCD7WIZNHO2Wa1GSq1F_vTOvCjXdzD4fv3AsHoWsCYwJA71fr1ZgyYGdoQAmnGStEcf5HX6JRShvoZgJUgBigl4X_VKkOHu9s1KFRba9vcdWZHm-DsU1T-xV2IeKyfMWpbi1OOlrre1t5g_VaRaVbG-vvY_oKXTjVJDv63UP0_vT4Vs6z5fNsUT4sM00KzjLLuaomeSUqMDmpwBWaAS-cNrkV3EzACU1zrYUzlTaEKe6ssszpvOB0CjkbopvT3V0MH3ubWrkJ--i7l5IRwoEUjE476u5E6RhSitbJXay3Kh4kAdmXJrvSZF9ah45P6Ffd2MO_nJzNZ-wY-AFbZG2t</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Baur, Friedemann</creator><creator>Hiebert, Sam</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Invasion percolation &amp; basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</title><author>Baur, Friedemann ; Hiebert, Sam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-e55ab46b7b0d61b0f8c3058fcd6e75d40f7c26cc7fdbcd13a5feae3fc68529063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>basin modelling</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>CO2 density</topic><topic>CO2 plume</topic><topic>fluid flow</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>injection window</topic><topic>invasion percolation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Percolation</topic><topic>Plumes</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>Temperature requirements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baur, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiebert, Sam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baur, Friedemann</au><au>Hiebert, Sam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasion percolation &amp; basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</atitle><jtitle>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>760-775</pages><issn>2152-3878</issn><eissn>2152-3878</eissn><abstract>During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ghg.2303</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2152-3878
ispartof Greenhouse gases: science and technology, 2024-10, Vol.14 (5), p.760-775
issn 2152-3878
2152-3878
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3115018329
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects basin modelling
Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
CO2 density
CO2 plume
fluid flow
Injection
injection window
invasion percolation
Modelling
Percolation
Plumes
Reservoirs
Screening
Stratigraphy
Temperature requirements
title Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasion%20percolation%20&%20basin%20modelling%20for%20CCS%20site%20screening%20and%20characterization&rft.jtitle=Greenhouse%20gases:%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Baur,%20Friedemann&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=760-775&rft.issn=2152-3878&rft.eissn=2152-3878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ghg.2303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115018329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115018329&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true