Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization
During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Greenhouse gases: science and technology 2024-10, Vol.14 (5), p.760-775 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 775 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 760 |
container_title | Greenhouse gases: science and technology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Baur, Friedemann Hiebert, Sam |
description | During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ghg.2303 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3115018329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3115018329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-e55ab46b7b0d61b0f8c3058fcd6e75d40f7c26cc7fdbcd13a5feae3fc68529063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBnxAQxM3Um6SZTJcyaFsoCD7WIZNHO2Wa1GSq1F_vTOvCjXdzD4fv3AsHoWsCYwJA71fr1ZgyYGdoQAmnGStEcf5HX6JRShvoZgJUgBigl4X_VKkOHu9s1KFRba9vcdWZHm-DsU1T-xV2IeKyfMWpbi1OOlrre1t5g_VaRaVbG-vvY_oKXTjVJDv63UP0_vT4Vs6z5fNsUT4sM00KzjLLuaomeSUqMDmpwBWaAS-cNrkV3EzACU1zrYUzlTaEKe6ssszpvOB0CjkbopvT3V0MH3ubWrkJ--i7l5IRwoEUjE476u5E6RhSitbJXay3Kh4kAdmXJrvSZF9ah45P6Ffd2MO_nJzNZ-wY-AFbZG2t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115018329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Baur, Friedemann ; Hiebert, Sam</creator><creatorcontrib>Baur, Friedemann ; Hiebert, Sam</creatorcontrib><description>During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-3878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-3878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>basin modelling ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; CO2 density ; CO2 plume ; fluid flow ; Injection ; injection window ; invasion percolation ; Modelling ; Percolation ; Plumes ; Reservoirs ; Screening ; Stratigraphy ; Temperature requirements</subject><ispartof>Greenhouse gases: science and technology, 2024-10, Vol.14 (5), p.760-775</ispartof><rights>2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-e55ab46b7b0d61b0f8c3058fcd6e75d40f7c26cc7fdbcd13a5feae3fc68529063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fghg.2303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fghg.2303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baur, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiebert, Sam</creatorcontrib><title>Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</title><title>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</title><description>During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>basin modelling</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>CO2 density</subject><subject>CO2 plume</subject><subject>fluid flow</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>injection window</subject><subject>invasion percolation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Percolation</subject><subject>Plumes</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>Temperature requirements</subject><issn>2152-3878</issn><issn>2152-3878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBnxAQxM3Um6SZTJcyaFsoCD7WIZNHO2Wa1GSq1F_vTOvCjXdzD4fv3AsHoWsCYwJA71fr1ZgyYGdoQAmnGStEcf5HX6JRShvoZgJUgBigl4X_VKkOHu9s1KFRba9vcdWZHm-DsU1T-xV2IeKyfMWpbi1OOlrre1t5g_VaRaVbG-vvY_oKXTjVJDv63UP0_vT4Vs6z5fNsUT4sM00KzjLLuaomeSUqMDmpwBWaAS-cNrkV3EzACU1zrYUzlTaEKe6ssszpvOB0CjkbopvT3V0MH3ubWrkJ--i7l5IRwoEUjE476u5E6RhSitbJXay3Kh4kAdmXJrvSZF9ah45P6Ffd2MO_nJzNZ-wY-AFbZG2t</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Baur, Friedemann</creator><creator>Hiebert, Sam</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</title><author>Baur, Friedemann ; Hiebert, Sam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-e55ab46b7b0d61b0f8c3058fcd6e75d40f7c26cc7fdbcd13a5feae3fc68529063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>basin modelling</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>CO2 density</topic><topic>CO2 plume</topic><topic>fluid flow</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>injection window</topic><topic>invasion percolation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Percolation</topic><topic>Plumes</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>Temperature requirements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baur, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiebert, Sam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baur, Friedemann</au><au>Hiebert, Sam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization</atitle><jtitle>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>760-775</pages><issn>2152-3878</issn><eissn>2152-3878</eissn><abstract>During the early screening phase of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) site evaluations limited time and data are available and hence CO2 plume evaluations using time and data intensive reservoir simulations are almost never performed. However, there is still a need for early plume evaluations to risk and rank injection sites relative to each other. Therefore, an alternative fluid migration method called invasion percolation is adopted for the CCS screening phase to predict the extent and location of CO2 plumes in the subsurface. Invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a rapid method, which requires limited data and is ideal for the early screening phase. Invasion percolation results are compared to uncalibrated reservoir models, typical for the screening phase, revealing that plume location shape and size are very reasonable especially when compared to seismic observed plume outlines. It can be concluded that invasion percolation as part of basin modeling is a fit for purpose method, which can assess multiple opportunities rapidly during the early intake screening phase to risk and rank opportunities relative to each other and to build a CCS injection site portfolio. In addition to the plume evaluation, basin models can provide useful basin‐scale or injection site specific pressure and temperature predictions as well as CO2 density estimates for static volume calculations before detailed reservoir and stratigraphic models are available. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ghg.2303</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2152-3878 |
ispartof | Greenhouse gases: science and technology, 2024-10, Vol.14 (5), p.760-775 |
issn | 2152-3878 2152-3878 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3115018329 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | basin modelling Carbon dioxide Carbon sequestration CO2 density CO2 plume fluid flow Injection injection window invasion percolation Modelling Percolation Plumes Reservoirs Screening Stratigraphy Temperature requirements |
title | Invasion percolation & basin modelling for CCS site screening and characterization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasion%20percolation%20&%20basin%20modelling%20for%20CCS%20site%20screening%20and%20characterization&rft.jtitle=Greenhouse%20gases:%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Baur,%20Friedemann&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=760-775&rft.issn=2152-3878&rft.eissn=2152-3878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ghg.2303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115018329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115018329&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |