Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy

: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polish journal of medical physics and engineering 2024-09, Vol.30 (3), p.169-176
Hauptverfasser: Półtorak, Michał, Banatkiewicz, Paweł, Półtorak, Łukasz, Sobolewski, Piotr, Zimoń, Damian, Szwast, Maciej, Walecka, Irena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 3
container_start_page 169
container_title Polish journal of medical physics and engineering
container_volume 30
creator Półtorak, Michał
Banatkiewicz, Paweł
Półtorak, Łukasz
Sobolewski, Piotr
Zimoń, Damian
Szwast, Maciej
Walecka, Irena
description : This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans. : This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V , V , V , D , CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament. : The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V , V , and V showed high compliance, with V having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%. : The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3112544642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112544642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-96f0968c30d8517a700f4404c0be7a34d4fcbf35dc4d40adc4bf4504dc8097623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxEAQhIMouD7OXgc8x-1kZvM4eJDFFyyIoOfQmXTcWfMYZya75F_4k524gl68dNWh6oOuILiI4CoWaTbXm1ZTGEMsQoAYDoJZlOVZCBzywz_-ODixdgOQJDzKZ8Hn84CdUw6d2hKreqtackZJhh02o1WW7ZRbM9VVpMmfzjHb126HhrxpBqf6zvpwxWTfakNr6uxEcobQtVNcN9gxjQY9mAyjLTYDTjUPZfbdn9KgXI9uTQb1eBYc1dhYOv_R0-D17vZl-RCunu4flzerUMYic2Ge1JAnmeRQZYsoxRSgFgKEhJJS5KIStSxrvqikt4BeylosQFQygzxNYn4aXO652vQfA1lXbPrB-KdtwaMoXgiRiCk136ek6a01VBfaqBbNWERQTLMX37MX0-zFNLtvXO8bO2z8vxW9mWH05hf_XxN4lOT8CyG3kBY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112544642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Półtorak, Michał ; Banatkiewicz, Paweł ; Półtorak, Łukasz ; Sobolewski, Piotr ; Zimoń, Damian ; Szwast, Maciej ; Walecka, Irena</creator><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Michał ; Banatkiewicz, Paweł ; Półtorak, Łukasz ; Sobolewski, Piotr ; Zimoń, Damian ; Szwast, Maciej ; Walecka, Irena</creatorcontrib><description>: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans. : This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V , V , V , D , CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament. : The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V , V , and V showed high compliance, with V having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%. : The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1898-0309</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1425-4689</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1898-0309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warsaw: Sciendo</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Compliance ; independent check ; individual applicator ; Mathematical analysis ; Mean ; Parameters ; plan parameters ; Quality assurance ; Radiation therapy ; skin cancer ; Software ; Standard deviation</subject><ispartof>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering, 2024-09, Vol.30 (3), p.169-176</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-96f0968c30d8517a700f4404c0be7a34d4fcbf35dc4d40adc4bf4504dc8097623</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-3577-5067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76036,76037</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Łukasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobolewski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimoń, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwast, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walecka, Irena</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</title><title>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering</title><description>: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans. : This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V , V , V , D , CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament. : The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V , V , and V showed high compliance, with V having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%. : The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>independent check</subject><subject>individual applicator</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>plan parameters</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>skin cancer</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><issn>1898-0309</issn><issn>1425-4689</issn><issn>1898-0309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxEAQhIMouD7OXgc8x-1kZvM4eJDFFyyIoOfQmXTcWfMYZya75F_4k524gl68dNWh6oOuILiI4CoWaTbXm1ZTGEMsQoAYDoJZlOVZCBzywz_-ODixdgOQJDzKZ8Hn84CdUw6d2hKreqtackZJhh02o1WW7ZRbM9VVpMmfzjHb126HhrxpBqf6zvpwxWTfakNr6uxEcobQtVNcN9gxjQY9mAyjLTYDTjUPZfbdn9KgXI9uTQb1eBYc1dhYOv_R0-D17vZl-RCunu4flzerUMYic2Ge1JAnmeRQZYsoxRSgFgKEhJJS5KIStSxrvqikt4BeylosQFQygzxNYn4aXO652vQfA1lXbPrB-KdtwaMoXgiRiCk136ek6a01VBfaqBbNWERQTLMX37MX0-zFNLtvXO8bO2z8vxW9mWH05hf_XxN4lOT8CyG3kBY</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Półtorak, Michał</creator><creator>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</creator><creator>Półtorak, Łukasz</creator><creator>Sobolewski, Piotr</creator><creator>Zimoń, Damian</creator><creator>Szwast, Maciej</creator><creator>Walecka, Irena</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3577-5067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</title><author>Półtorak, Michał ; Banatkiewicz, Paweł ; Półtorak, Łukasz ; Sobolewski, Piotr ; Zimoń, Damian ; Szwast, Maciej ; Walecka, Irena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-96f0968c30d8517a700f4404c0be7a34d4fcbf35dc4d40adc4bf4504dc8097623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>independent check</topic><topic>individual applicator</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>plan parameters</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>skin cancer</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Łukasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobolewski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimoń, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwast, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walecka, Irena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Półtorak, Michał</au><au>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</au><au>Półtorak, Łukasz</au><au>Sobolewski, Piotr</au><au>Zimoń, Damian</au><au>Szwast, Maciej</au><au>Walecka, Irena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</atitle><jtitle>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>169-176</pages><issn>1898-0309</issn><issn>1425-4689</issn><eissn>1898-0309</eissn><abstract>: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans. : This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V , V , V , D , CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament. : The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V , V , and V showed high compliance, with V having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%. : The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings.</abstract><cop>Warsaw</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3577-5067</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1898-0309
ispartof Polish journal of medical physics and engineering, 2024-09, Vol.30 (3), p.169-176
issn 1898-0309
1425-4689
1898-0309
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3112544642
source De Gruyter Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects 3D printing
Compliance
independent check
individual applicator
Mathematical analysis
Mean
Parameters
plan parameters
Quality assurance
Radiation therapy
skin cancer
Software
Standard deviation
title Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A44%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20dosimetric%20analysis%20with%20independent%20software%20solutions%20and%20comprehensive%20treatment%20plan%20parameter%20evaluation%20in%20skin%20brachytherapy&rft.jtitle=Polish%20journal%20of%20medical%20physics%20and%20engineering&rft.au=P%C3%B3%C5%82torak,%20Micha%C5%82&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=169-176&rft.issn=1898-0309&rft.eissn=1898-0309&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3112544642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112544642&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true