Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy
: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polish journal of medical physics and engineering 2024-09, Vol.30 (3), p.169-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Polish journal of medical physics and engineering |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Półtorak, Michał Banatkiewicz, Paweł Półtorak, Łukasz Sobolewski, Piotr Zimoń, Damian Szwast, Maciej Walecka, Irena |
description | : This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans.
: This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V
, V
, V
, D
, CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament.
: The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V
, V
, and V
showed high compliance, with V
having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V
exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D
values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%.
: The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3112544642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112544642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-96f0968c30d8517a700f4404c0be7a34d4fcbf35dc4d40adc4bf4504dc8097623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxEAQhIMouD7OXgc8x-1kZvM4eJDFFyyIoOfQmXTcWfMYZya75F_4k524gl68dNWh6oOuILiI4CoWaTbXm1ZTGEMsQoAYDoJZlOVZCBzywz_-ODixdgOQJDzKZ8Hn84CdUw6d2hKreqtackZJhh02o1WW7ZRbM9VVpMmfzjHb126HhrxpBqf6zvpwxWTfakNr6uxEcobQtVNcN9gxjQY9mAyjLTYDTjUPZfbdn9KgXI9uTQb1eBYc1dhYOv_R0-D17vZl-RCunu4flzerUMYic2Ge1JAnmeRQZYsoxRSgFgKEhJJS5KIStSxrvqikt4BeylosQFQygzxNYn4aXO652vQfA1lXbPrB-KdtwaMoXgiRiCk136ek6a01VBfaqBbNWERQTLMX37MX0-zFNLtvXO8bO2z8vxW9mWH05hf_XxN4lOT8CyG3kBY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112544642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Półtorak, Michał ; Banatkiewicz, Paweł ; Półtorak, Łukasz ; Sobolewski, Piotr ; Zimoń, Damian ; Szwast, Maciej ; Walecka, Irena</creator><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Michał ; Banatkiewicz, Paweł ; Półtorak, Łukasz ; Sobolewski, Piotr ; Zimoń, Damian ; Szwast, Maciej ; Walecka, Irena</creatorcontrib><description>: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans.
: This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V
, V
, V
, D
, CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament.
: The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V
, V
, and V
showed high compliance, with V
having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V
exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D
values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%.
: The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1898-0309</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1425-4689</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1898-0309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warsaw: Sciendo</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Compliance ; independent check ; individual applicator ; Mathematical analysis ; Mean ; Parameters ; plan parameters ; Quality assurance ; Radiation therapy ; skin cancer ; Software ; Standard deviation</subject><ispartof>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering, 2024-09, Vol.30 (3), p.169-176</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-96f0968c30d8517a700f4404c0be7a34d4fcbf35dc4d40adc4bf4504dc8097623</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-3577-5067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76036,76037</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Łukasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobolewski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimoń, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwast, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walecka, Irena</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</title><title>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering</title><description>: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans.
: This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V
, V
, V
, D
, CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament.
: The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V
, V
, and V
showed high compliance, with V
having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V
exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D
values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%.
: The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>independent check</subject><subject>individual applicator</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>plan parameters</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>skin cancer</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><issn>1898-0309</issn><issn>1425-4689</issn><issn>1898-0309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxEAQhIMouD7OXgc8x-1kZvM4eJDFFyyIoOfQmXTcWfMYZya75F_4k524gl68dNWh6oOuILiI4CoWaTbXm1ZTGEMsQoAYDoJZlOVZCBzywz_-ODixdgOQJDzKZ8Hn84CdUw6d2hKreqtackZJhh02o1WW7ZRbM9VVpMmfzjHb126HhrxpBqf6zvpwxWTfakNr6uxEcobQtVNcN9gxjQY9mAyjLTYDTjUPZfbdn9KgXI9uTQb1eBYc1dhYOv_R0-D17vZl-RCunu4flzerUMYic2Ge1JAnmeRQZYsoxRSgFgKEhJJS5KIStSxrvqikt4BeylosQFQygzxNYn4aXO652vQfA1lXbPrB-KdtwaMoXgiRiCk136ek6a01VBfaqBbNWERQTLMX37MX0-zFNLtvXO8bO2z8vxW9mWH05hf_XxN4lOT8CyG3kBY</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Półtorak, Michał</creator><creator>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</creator><creator>Półtorak, Łukasz</creator><creator>Sobolewski, Piotr</creator><creator>Zimoń, Damian</creator><creator>Szwast, Maciej</creator><creator>Walecka, Irena</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3577-5067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</title><author>Półtorak, Michał ; Banatkiewicz, Paweł ; Półtorak, Łukasz ; Sobolewski, Piotr ; Zimoń, Damian ; Szwast, Maciej ; Walecka, Irena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-96f0968c30d8517a700f4404c0be7a34d4fcbf35dc4d40adc4bf4504dc8097623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>independent check</topic><topic>individual applicator</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>plan parameters</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>skin cancer</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Półtorak, Łukasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobolewski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimoń, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szwast, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walecka, Irena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Półtorak, Michał</au><au>Banatkiewicz, Paweł</au><au>Półtorak, Łukasz</au><au>Sobolewski, Piotr</au><au>Zimoń, Damian</au><au>Szwast, Maciej</au><au>Walecka, Irena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy</atitle><jtitle>Polish journal of medical physics and engineering</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>169-176</pages><issn>1898-0309</issn><issn>1425-4689</issn><eissn>1898-0309</eissn><abstract>: This study aimed to investigate quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation for the treatment of skin cancer. Specifically, we aimed to conduct a dosimetric analysis of the treatment plan and we presented the clinical parameters used in our institution of clinically used treatment plans.
: This study compares dose calculations between BrachyVision v16.1 and RadCalc v7.2 for brachytherapy applications. It evaluates key treatment plan parameters, including V
, V
, V
, D
, CI, DNR, mean treatment depth, treatment time, and various Gamma values. Dose calculations utilized the 192-Ir GammaMed HDR Plus source. RadCalc employed a referenced model. Applicators were 3D printed using PLA as the printing filament.
: The study assessed compliance for 20 patient plans, finding a mean dose difference of 0.05% with a standard deviation of 0.26%. V
, V
, and V
showed high compliance, with V
having a minimal mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation of 0.02% and V
exhibiting the lowest compliance 0.52%, a standard deviation of 1.72%. D
values displayed high compliance with a mean difference of 0.35%, and a standard deviation of 1.85%. The coverage index parameter was strongly supported (R²: 0.984). DNR values indicated close agreement with a mean difference of 0.01%, a standard deviation: of 0.10%. The average Gamma value was 99.91% with a standard deviation of 0.11%.
: The agreement between treatment planning system and independent software solutions results validates treatment planning accuracy. This supports the method’s suitability for patient care and encourages wider adoption, ensuring quality assurance in clinical settings.</abstract><cop>Warsaw</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3577-5067</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1898-0309 |
ispartof | Polish journal of medical physics and engineering, 2024-09, Vol.30 (3), p.169-176 |
issn | 1898-0309 1425-4689 1898-0309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3112544642 |
source | De Gruyter Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | 3D printing Compliance independent check individual applicator Mathematical analysis Mean Parameters plan parameters Quality assurance Radiation therapy skin cancer Software Standard deviation |
title | Quantitative dosimetric analysis with independent software solutions and comprehensive treatment plan parameter evaluation in skin brachytherapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A44%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20dosimetric%20analysis%20with%20independent%20software%20solutions%20and%20comprehensive%20treatment%20plan%20parameter%20evaluation%20in%20skin%20brachytherapy&rft.jtitle=Polish%20journal%20of%20medical%20physics%20and%20engineering&rft.au=P%C3%B3%C5%82torak,%20Micha%C5%82&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=169-176&rft.issn=1898-0309&rft.eissn=1898-0309&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3112544642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112544642&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |