The Twitter Blackout: Do congressional rules influence the cyberworld?

Intro Communication is understood to be a pillar of democracy. Therefore, governments around the world enact laws which make it easier for politicians to communicate with their constituents. However, some governments also restrict this ability during campaign seasons as a way of unclogging the media...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science quarterly 2024-09, Vol.105 (5), p.1835-1847
Hauptverfasser: Gutierrez‐Mannix, Carlos, Gray, Thomas R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intro Communication is understood to be a pillar of democracy. Therefore, governments around the world enact laws which make it easier for politicians to communicate with their constituents. However, some governments also restrict this ability during campaign seasons as a way of unclogging the media. In the United States, congressional election blackout dates are periods in which politicians are not allowed to engage in mass unsolicited mailing of political advertising. Because the prohibition only applies to unsolicited media, we theorize that we should see the transition from one type of communication to another. Methods To test this effect, we created a database containing all tweets by all Members of Congress from the last three Congresses. Results We find that immediately during the blackout periods, members of Congress substantially increase the number of tweets they post. Discussion We conclude that Members of Congress are strategic in their ability to exchange communication outlets.
ISSN:0038-4941
1540-6237
DOI:10.1111/ssqu.13432