Antibody engagement with amyloid‐beta does not inhibit [11C]PiB binding for PET imaging

The elimination of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques in Alzheimer's disease patients after treatment with anti‐Aβ antibodies such as lecanemab and aducanumab is supported by a substantially decreased signal in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, this decreased PET signal has no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurochemistry 2024-09, Vol.168 (9), p.2601-2610
Hauptverfasser: Xiong, Mengfei, Dahlén, Amelia, Roshanbin, Sahar, Wik, Elin, Aguilar, Ximena, Eriksson, Jonas, Sehlin, Dag, Syvänen, Stina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2610
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2601
container_title Journal of neurochemistry
container_volume 168
creator Xiong, Mengfei
Dahlén, Amelia
Roshanbin, Sahar
Wik, Elin
Aguilar, Ximena
Eriksson, Jonas
Sehlin, Dag
Syvänen, Stina
description The elimination of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques in Alzheimer's disease patients after treatment with anti‐Aβ antibodies such as lecanemab and aducanumab is supported by a substantially decreased signal in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, this decreased PET signal has not been matched by a similar substantial effect on cognitive function. There may be several reasons for this, including short treatment duration and advanced disease stages among the patients. However, one aspect that has not been investigated, and the subject of this study, is whether antibody engagement with amyloid plaques inhibits the binding of amyloid‐PET ligands, leading to a false impression of Aβ removal from the brain. In the present study, tg‐ArcSwe mice received three injections of RmAb158, the murine version of lecanemab or phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) before the administration of the amyloid‐PET radioligand [11C]PiB, followed by isolation of brain tissue. Autoradiography showed that RmAb158‐ and PBS‐treated mice displayed similar [11C]PiB binding. Moreover, the total Aβ1–40 levels, representing the major Aβ species of plaques in the tg‐ArcSwe model, as well as soluble triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels, were similar in both groups. Interestingly, the concentration of soluble Aβ aggregates was decreased in the RmAb158‐treated group, along with a small but significant decrease in the total Aβ1–42 levels. In conclusion, this study indicates that the binding of [11C]PiB to Aβ accurately mirrors the load of Aβ plaques in the brain, aligning with how amyloid‐PET is interpreted in clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies. However, early treatment effects on soluble Aβ aggregates and Aβ1–42 levels were not detected. We investigated whether the anti‐amyloid‐beta (Aβ) antibody lecanemab affects amyloid‐positron emission tomography (PET) ligand binding, potentially giving a false impression of plaque removal in Alzheimer's disease. Mice with Aβ pathology received three injections of a murine version of lecanemab during two weeks to maximize Aβ plaque binding without plaque removal. Treatment did not decrease amyloid‐PET ligand [11C]PiB binding or plaque load, but decreased soluble Aβ aggregates. This suggests that amyloid‐PET accurately reflects plaque load but may not capture early treatment effects on soluble Aβ. Understanding this is crucial for interpreting clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jnc.16127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3112454253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112454253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3157-d37da36e7142c3f7c14da5b4639c50d38b644d63ebad83d5a4af99db085e082f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUQC0EoqUw8APIEhNDWl_biZOxROWlCjqUASEU2bGTumodSFJV2fgEvpEvIZDChpcrS0fnXh2EToEMoX2jpUuHEAAVe6gPXIDHwY_2UZ8QSj1GOO2ho6paEgIBD-AQ9VgoKARU9NHT2NVWFbrBxuUyN2vjary19QLLdbMqrP58_1CmllgXpsKuqLF1C6tsjZ8B4peZvcTKOm1djrOixLPJHNu1zNv_MTrI5KoyJ7s5QI9Xk3l8400frm_j8dRLGfjC00xoyQIjgNOUZSIFrqWveMCi1CeahSrgXAfMKKlDpn3JZRZFWpHQNySkGRug8877WhZvG1PVybLYlK5dmTAAyn1OfdZSFx2VlkVVlSZLXsv20LJJgCTfEZM2YvITsWXPdsaNWhv9R_5Wa4FRB2ztyjT_m5K7-7hTfgHJDHsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112454253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibody engagement with amyloid‐beta does not inhibit [11C]PiB binding for PET imaging</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Xiong, Mengfei ; Dahlén, Amelia ; Roshanbin, Sahar ; Wik, Elin ; Aguilar, Ximena ; Eriksson, Jonas ; Sehlin, Dag ; Syvänen, Stina</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Mengfei ; Dahlén, Amelia ; Roshanbin, Sahar ; Wik, Elin ; Aguilar, Ximena ; Eriksson, Jonas ; Sehlin, Dag ; Syvänen, Stina</creatorcontrib><description>The elimination of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques in Alzheimer's disease patients after treatment with anti‐Aβ antibodies such as lecanemab and aducanumab is supported by a substantially decreased signal in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, this decreased PET signal has not been matched by a similar substantial effect on cognitive function. There may be several reasons for this, including short treatment duration and advanced disease stages among the patients. However, one aspect that has not been investigated, and the subject of this study, is whether antibody engagement with amyloid plaques inhibits the binding of amyloid‐PET ligands, leading to a false impression of Aβ removal from the brain. In the present study, tg‐ArcSwe mice received three injections of RmAb158, the murine version of lecanemab or phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) before the administration of the amyloid‐PET radioligand [11C]PiB, followed by isolation of brain tissue. Autoradiography showed that RmAb158‐ and PBS‐treated mice displayed similar [11C]PiB binding. Moreover, the total Aβ1–40 levels, representing the major Aβ species of plaques in the tg‐ArcSwe model, as well as soluble triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels, were similar in both groups. Interestingly, the concentration of soluble Aβ aggregates was decreased in the RmAb158‐treated group, along with a small but significant decrease in the total Aβ1–42 levels. In conclusion, this study indicates that the binding of [11C]PiB to Aβ accurately mirrors the load of Aβ plaques in the brain, aligning with how amyloid‐PET is interpreted in clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies. However, early treatment effects on soluble Aβ aggregates and Aβ1–42 levels were not detected. We investigated whether the anti‐amyloid‐beta (Aβ) antibody lecanemab affects amyloid‐positron emission tomography (PET) ligand binding, potentially giving a false impression of plaque removal in Alzheimer's disease. Mice with Aβ pathology received three injections of a murine version of lecanemab during two weeks to maximize Aβ plaque binding without plaque removal. Treatment did not decrease amyloid‐PET ligand [11C]PiB binding or plaque load, but decreased soluble Aβ aggregates. This suggests that amyloid‐PET accurately reflects plaque load but may not capture early treatment effects on soluble Aβ. Understanding this is crucial for interpreting clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-4159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jnc.16127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38721627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>[11C]PiB ; Aggregates ; Alzheimer's disease ; Alzheimer's disease (AD) ; amyloid PET ; amyloid‐beta ; Antibodies ; antibody treatment ; Autoradiography ; Binding ; Brain ; Cognitive ability ; Health services ; immunotherapy ; Medical imaging ; Myeloid cells ; Neurodegenerative diseases ; Neuroimaging ; Patients ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Senile plaques ; β-Amyloid</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurochemistry, 2024-09, Vol.168 (9), p.2601-2610</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society for Neurochemistry.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Journal of Neurochemistry published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society for Neurochemistry.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3157-d37da36e7142c3f7c14da5b4639c50d38b644d63ebad83d5a4af99db085e082f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8196-4041</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjnc.16127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjnc.16127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38721627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Mengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlén, Amelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roshanbin, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wik, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, Ximena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehlin, Dag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvänen, Stina</creatorcontrib><title>Antibody engagement with amyloid‐beta does not inhibit [11C]PiB binding for PET imaging</title><title>Journal of neurochemistry</title><addtitle>J Neurochem</addtitle><description>The elimination of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques in Alzheimer's disease patients after treatment with anti‐Aβ antibodies such as lecanemab and aducanumab is supported by a substantially decreased signal in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, this decreased PET signal has not been matched by a similar substantial effect on cognitive function. There may be several reasons for this, including short treatment duration and advanced disease stages among the patients. However, one aspect that has not been investigated, and the subject of this study, is whether antibody engagement with amyloid plaques inhibits the binding of amyloid‐PET ligands, leading to a false impression of Aβ removal from the brain. In the present study, tg‐ArcSwe mice received three injections of RmAb158, the murine version of lecanemab or phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) before the administration of the amyloid‐PET radioligand [11C]PiB, followed by isolation of brain tissue. Autoradiography showed that RmAb158‐ and PBS‐treated mice displayed similar [11C]PiB binding. Moreover, the total Aβ1–40 levels, representing the major Aβ species of plaques in the tg‐ArcSwe model, as well as soluble triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels, were similar in both groups. Interestingly, the concentration of soluble Aβ aggregates was decreased in the RmAb158‐treated group, along with a small but significant decrease in the total Aβ1–42 levels. In conclusion, this study indicates that the binding of [11C]PiB to Aβ accurately mirrors the load of Aβ plaques in the brain, aligning with how amyloid‐PET is interpreted in clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies. However, early treatment effects on soluble Aβ aggregates and Aβ1–42 levels were not detected. We investigated whether the anti‐amyloid‐beta (Aβ) antibody lecanemab affects amyloid‐positron emission tomography (PET) ligand binding, potentially giving a false impression of plaque removal in Alzheimer's disease. Mice with Aβ pathology received three injections of a murine version of lecanemab during two weeks to maximize Aβ plaque binding without plaque removal. Treatment did not decrease amyloid‐PET ligand [11C]PiB binding or plaque load, but decreased soluble Aβ aggregates. This suggests that amyloid‐PET accurately reflects plaque load but may not capture early treatment effects on soluble Aβ. Understanding this is crucial for interpreting clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.</description><subject>[11C]PiB</subject><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease (AD)</subject><subject>amyloid PET</subject><subject>amyloid‐beta</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>antibody treatment</subject><subject>Autoradiography</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>immunotherapy</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Myeloid cells</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative diseases</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Senile plaques</subject><subject>β-Amyloid</subject><issn>0022-3042</issn><issn>1471-4159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUQC0EoqUw8APIEhNDWl_biZOxROWlCjqUASEU2bGTumodSFJV2fgEvpEvIZDChpcrS0fnXh2EToEMoX2jpUuHEAAVe6gPXIDHwY_2UZ8QSj1GOO2ho6paEgIBD-AQ9VgoKARU9NHT2NVWFbrBxuUyN2vjary19QLLdbMqrP58_1CmllgXpsKuqLF1C6tsjZ8B4peZvcTKOm1djrOixLPJHNu1zNv_MTrI5KoyJ7s5QI9Xk3l8400frm_j8dRLGfjC00xoyQIjgNOUZSIFrqWveMCi1CeahSrgXAfMKKlDpn3JZRZFWpHQNySkGRug8877WhZvG1PVybLYlK5dmTAAyn1OfdZSFx2VlkVVlSZLXsv20LJJgCTfEZM2YvITsWXPdsaNWhv9R_5Wa4FRB2ztyjT_m5K7-7hTfgHJDHsg</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Xiong, Mengfei</creator><creator>Dahlén, Amelia</creator><creator>Roshanbin, Sahar</creator><creator>Wik, Elin</creator><creator>Aguilar, Ximena</creator><creator>Eriksson, Jonas</creator><creator>Sehlin, Dag</creator><creator>Syvänen, Stina</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8196-4041</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Antibody engagement with amyloid‐beta does not inhibit [11C]PiB binding for PET imaging</title><author>Xiong, Mengfei ; Dahlén, Amelia ; Roshanbin, Sahar ; Wik, Elin ; Aguilar, Ximena ; Eriksson, Jonas ; Sehlin, Dag ; Syvänen, Stina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3157-d37da36e7142c3f7c14da5b4639c50d38b644d63ebad83d5a4af99db085e082f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>[11C]PiB</topic><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease (AD)</topic><topic>amyloid PET</topic><topic>amyloid‐beta</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>antibody treatment</topic><topic>Autoradiography</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>immunotherapy</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Myeloid cells</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative diseases</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Senile plaques</topic><topic>β-Amyloid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Mengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlén, Amelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roshanbin, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wik, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, Ximena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehlin, Dag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvänen, Stina</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiong, Mengfei</au><au>Dahlén, Amelia</au><au>Roshanbin, Sahar</au><au>Wik, Elin</au><au>Aguilar, Ximena</au><au>Eriksson, Jonas</au><au>Sehlin, Dag</au><au>Syvänen, Stina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibody engagement with amyloid‐beta does not inhibit [11C]PiB binding for PET imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurochemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurochem</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2601</spage><epage>2610</epage><pages>2601-2610</pages><issn>0022-3042</issn><eissn>1471-4159</eissn><abstract>The elimination of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) plaques in Alzheimer's disease patients after treatment with anti‐Aβ antibodies such as lecanemab and aducanumab is supported by a substantially decreased signal in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, this decreased PET signal has not been matched by a similar substantial effect on cognitive function. There may be several reasons for this, including short treatment duration and advanced disease stages among the patients. However, one aspect that has not been investigated, and the subject of this study, is whether antibody engagement with amyloid plaques inhibits the binding of amyloid‐PET ligands, leading to a false impression of Aβ removal from the brain. In the present study, tg‐ArcSwe mice received three injections of RmAb158, the murine version of lecanemab or phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) before the administration of the amyloid‐PET radioligand [11C]PiB, followed by isolation of brain tissue. Autoradiography showed that RmAb158‐ and PBS‐treated mice displayed similar [11C]PiB binding. Moreover, the total Aβ1–40 levels, representing the major Aβ species of plaques in the tg‐ArcSwe model, as well as soluble triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels, were similar in both groups. Interestingly, the concentration of soluble Aβ aggregates was decreased in the RmAb158‐treated group, along with a small but significant decrease in the total Aβ1–42 levels. In conclusion, this study indicates that the binding of [11C]PiB to Aβ accurately mirrors the load of Aβ plaques in the brain, aligning with how amyloid‐PET is interpreted in clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies. However, early treatment effects on soluble Aβ aggregates and Aβ1–42 levels were not detected. We investigated whether the anti‐amyloid‐beta (Aβ) antibody lecanemab affects amyloid‐positron emission tomography (PET) ligand binding, potentially giving a false impression of plaque removal in Alzheimer's disease. Mice with Aβ pathology received three injections of a murine version of lecanemab during two weeks to maximize Aβ plaque binding without plaque removal. Treatment did not decrease amyloid‐PET ligand [11C]PiB binding or plaque load, but decreased soluble Aβ aggregates. This suggests that amyloid‐PET accurately reflects plaque load but may not capture early treatment effects on soluble Aβ. Understanding this is crucial for interpreting clinical studies of anti‐Aβ antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38721627</pmid><doi>10.1111/jnc.16127</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8196-4041</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3042
ispartof Journal of neurochemistry, 2024-09, Vol.168 (9), p.2601-2610
issn 0022-3042
1471-4159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3112454253
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects [11C]PiB
Aggregates
Alzheimer's disease
Alzheimer's disease (AD)
amyloid PET
amyloid‐beta
Antibodies
antibody treatment
Autoradiography
Binding
Brain
Cognitive ability
Health services
immunotherapy
Medical imaging
Myeloid cells
Neurodegenerative diseases
Neuroimaging
Patients
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Senile plaques
β-Amyloid
title Antibody engagement with amyloid‐beta does not inhibit [11C]PiB binding for PET imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A35%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibody%20engagement%20with%20amyloid%E2%80%90beta%20does%20not%20inhibit%20%5B11C%5DPiB%20binding%20for%20PET%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurochemistry&rft.au=Xiong,%20Mengfei&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2601&rft.epage=2610&rft.pages=2601-2610&rft.issn=0022-3042&rft.eissn=1471-4159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jnc.16127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3112454253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112454253&rft_id=info:pmid/38721627&rfr_iscdi=true