Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race
For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often li...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Latino studies 2024-08, Vol.22 (2), p.317-331 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 331 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 317 |
container_title | Latino studies |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Howard, Natasha |
description | For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3112266915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112266915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-70d8533c962aecb4091ce62ef77c04be99f2759e51c7ddb83c892ca8e58db89b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOeBX4pgLggooEogL3JAsx9kUt8EJdgrq3-MSBDdO-5qZ3R2Ejik5pSSXZ1FQJouMMJERIgqRiR00oSK1uBB89zfn-T46iHFJCGOU0Al6eeg-nF_gCjadr_HwCrhy3oTNxTmed5_Y-MFlV62xKxyMdabFg2lX2PQ9mBCx89gGNzibBrWLtluHCBF3fouGQ7TXmDbC0U-coueb66fZPLt_vL2bXd5nlhEyZJLUZc65VQUzYCtBFLVQMGiktERUoFTDZK4gp1bWdVVyWypmTQl5mSpV8Sk6GXX70L2vIQ56mQ7xaaXmlDJWFIrmCcVGlA1djAEa3Qf3ll7VlOiti3p0UScX9beLWiQSH0kxgf0Cwp_0P6wvvn51BA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112266915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Howard, Natasha</creator><creatorcontrib>Howard, Natasha</creatorcontrib><description>For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-3435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-3443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Black people ; Critical theory ; Cultural and Media Studies ; Cultural Studies ; Discourses ; Ethnicity Studies ; Latin American cultural groups ; Literature ; Migration ; Minority groups ; Original Article ; Postcolonial/World Literature ; Race ; Racial identity ; Racial justice ; Regional and Cultural Studies ; Social justice ; Theorists ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Latino studies, 2024-08, Vol.22 (2), p.317-331</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-70d8533c962aecb4091ce62ef77c04be99f2759e51c7ddb83c892ca8e58db89b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2859-1888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,33765,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howard, Natasha</creatorcontrib><title>Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race</title><title>Latino studies</title><addtitle>Lat Stud</addtitle><description>For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad.</description><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Cultural and Media Studies</subject><subject>Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Ethnicity Studies</subject><subject>Latin American cultural groups</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Postcolonial/World Literature</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial identity</subject><subject>Racial justice</subject><subject>Regional and Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Theorists</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1476-3435</issn><issn>1476-3443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOeBX4pgLggooEogL3JAsx9kUt8EJdgrq3-MSBDdO-5qZ3R2Ejik5pSSXZ1FQJouMMJERIgqRiR00oSK1uBB89zfn-T46iHFJCGOU0Al6eeg-nF_gCjadr_HwCrhy3oTNxTmed5_Y-MFlV62xKxyMdabFg2lX2PQ9mBCx89gGNzibBrWLtluHCBF3fouGQ7TXmDbC0U-coueb66fZPLt_vL2bXd5nlhEyZJLUZc65VQUzYCtBFLVQMGiktERUoFTDZK4gp1bWdVVyWypmTQl5mSpV8Sk6GXX70L2vIQ56mQ7xaaXmlDJWFIrmCcVGlA1djAEa3Qf3ll7VlOiti3p0UScX9beLWiQSH0kxgf0Cwp_0P6wvvn51BA</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Howard, Natasha</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-1888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race</title><author>Howard, Natasha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-70d8533c962aecb4091ce62ef77c04be99f2759e51c7ddb83c892ca8e58db89b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Cultural and Media Studies</topic><topic>Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Ethnicity Studies</topic><topic>Latin American cultural groups</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Postcolonial/World Literature</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial identity</topic><topic>Racial justice</topic><topic>Regional and Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Theorists</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howard, Natasha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Latino studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howard, Natasha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race</atitle><jtitle>Latino studies</jtitle><stitle>Lat Stud</stitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>317-331</pages><issn>1476-3435</issn><eissn>1476-3443</eissn><abstract>For more than two decades, Latina/o critical theory (LatCrit) scholars have called for moving beyond the Black/White binary in conversations on race. By emphasizing Black people, proponents have argued, we ignore Latinx and other racialized minorities who are neither Black nor White and who often live in transnational contexts with transnational identities. This article engages with those scholars who call for moving beyond the Black/White binary by asking how their arguments stimulate anti-Black discourse. Ultimately, LatCrit writers fail to engage with Black Latinx critical race theorists in both the United States and Latin America and, as a result, reproduce anti-Blackness. The call to move beyond a Black/White binary is really a call to make Latinx Blackness invisible. As such, it is not a step toward racial justice but another articulation of anti-Blackness presented as progressive racial thinking. Here I engage with Black Latinx and Black Latin American critical race scholars who challenge US LatCrit scholars to think about how anti-Blackness is part of Latinidad.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-1888</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1476-3435 |
ispartof | Latino studies, 2024-08, Vol.22 (2), p.317-331 |
issn | 1476-3435 1476-3443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3112266915 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Black people Critical theory Cultural and Media Studies Cultural Studies Discourses Ethnicity Studies Latin American cultural groups Literature Migration Minority groups Original Article Postcolonial/World Literature Race Racial identity Racial justice Regional and Cultural Studies Social justice Theorists Transnationalism |
title | Moving beyond the binary?: How anti-Black racial talk appears in critical discourses on race |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A24%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moving%20beyond%20the%20binary?:%20How%20anti-Black%20racial%20talk%20appears%20in%20critical%20discourses%20on%20race&rft.jtitle=Latino%20studies&rft.au=Howard,%20Natasha&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=317-331&rft.issn=1476-3435&rft.eissn=1476-3443&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41276-024-00464-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3112266915%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112266915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |