Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient

We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of inco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Teaching sociology 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.336-351
Hauptverfasser: Downey, Dennis J., Ernest, J. Brooke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 351
container_issue 4
container_start_page 336
container_title Teaching sociology
container_volume 52
creator Downey, Dennis J.
Ernest, J. Brooke
description We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0092055X241248174
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3111680380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0092055X241248174</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3111680380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-87e16436c1217a95f8e657c921f4e1aac6a59a2b3f62aa6d725c2f7170a9a1f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geTWT3U12vZVSa6EiQoXelmmatCntbk2yhR59c1NX8CDCwMzwzf8PM4TcArsHkPKBsZKzPJ_zDHhWgMzOSA_KtEwKwefnpHfiyWngklx5v2GMZazMe-Rz2G6DPWCw9Yq-tVgHG2Jz0HRqg3aojtTWNKw1ndTBNctWhcYd6bBpndePdEBfMMJdlChPRxHHqqkj325x0biuCw2daVTrb5-xrW3k2hirrK7DNbkwuPX65if3yfvTaDZ8Tqav48lwME0UF1lICqlBZKlQwEFimZtCi1yqkoPJNCAqgXmJfJEawRHFUvJccSNBMiwRTJH2yV3nu3fNR6t9qDbxiDqurFIAEAVLY_QJdFPKNd47baq9szt0xwpYdfp09efTUXPfaTyu9K_r_4Ivc_9_pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111680380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Downey, Dennis J. ; Ernest, J. Brooke</creator><creatorcontrib>Downey, Dennis J. ; Ernest, J. Brooke</creatorcontrib><description>We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-055X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-862X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0092055X241248174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; Collaboration ; Comprehension ; Concept Formation ; Cooperative learning ; Education ; Evaluation ; Grammatical aspect ; Income inequality ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Introductory Courses ; Literacy ; Mathematics ; Mathematics education ; Misconceptions ; Numeracy ; Sociology ; Students ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Teaching sociology, 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.336-351</ispartof><rights>American Sociological Association 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-87e16436c1217a95f8e657c921f4e1aac6a59a2b3f62aa6d725c2f7170a9a1f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9842-9427</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0092055X241248174$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0092055X241248174$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Downey, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernest, J. Brooke</creatorcontrib><title>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</title><title>Teaching sociology</title><addtitle>Teach Sociol</addtitle><description>We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Grammatical aspect</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Numeracy</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>0092-055X</issn><issn>1939-862X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geTWT3U12vZVSa6EiQoXelmmatCntbk2yhR59c1NX8CDCwMzwzf8PM4TcArsHkPKBsZKzPJ_zDHhWgMzOSA_KtEwKwefnpHfiyWngklx5v2GMZazMe-Rz2G6DPWCw9Yq-tVgHG2Jz0HRqg3aojtTWNKw1ndTBNctWhcYd6bBpndePdEBfMMJdlChPRxHHqqkj325x0biuCw2daVTrb5-xrW3k2hirrK7DNbkwuPX65if3yfvTaDZ8Tqav48lwME0UF1lICqlBZKlQwEFimZtCi1yqkoPJNCAqgXmJfJEawRHFUvJccSNBMiwRTJH2yV3nu3fNR6t9qDbxiDqurFIAEAVLY_QJdFPKNd47baq9szt0xwpYdfp09efTUXPfaTyu9K_r_4Ivc_9_pQ</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Downey, Dennis J.</creator><creator>Ernest, J. Brooke</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9427</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</title><author>Downey, Dennis J. ; Ernest, J. Brooke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-87e16436c1217a95f8e657c921f4e1aac6a59a2b3f62aa6d725c2f7170a9a1f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Grammatical aspect</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Numeracy</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Downey, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernest, J. Brooke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Teaching sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Downey, Dennis J.</au><au>Ernest, J. Brooke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</atitle><jtitle>Teaching sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Teach Sociol</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>336-351</pages><issn>0092-055X</issn><eissn>1939-862X</eissn><abstract>We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0092055X241248174</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9427</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-055X
ispartof Teaching sociology, 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.336-351
issn 0092-055X
1939-862X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3111680380
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Active Learning
Collaboration
Comprehension
Concept Formation
Cooperative learning
Education
Evaluation
Grammatical aspect
Income inequality
Interdisciplinary aspects
Introductory Courses
Literacy
Mathematics
Mathematics education
Misconceptions
Numeracy
Sociology
Students
Teaching
title Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultivating%20Quantitative%20Literacy%20in%20the%20Introductory%20Course:%20A%20Mathematics%20Education%20Collaboration%20to%20Teach%20the%20Gini%20Coefficient&rft.jtitle=Teaching%20sociology&rft.au=Downey,%20Dennis%20J.&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=336-351&rft.issn=0092-055X&rft.eissn=1939-862X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0092055X241248174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111680380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111680380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0092055X241248174&rfr_iscdi=true