Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient
We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of inco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Teaching sociology 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.336-351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 351 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 336 |
container_title | Teaching sociology |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Downey, Dennis J. Ernest, J. Brooke |
description | We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0092055X241248174 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3111680380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0092055X241248174</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3111680380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-87e16436c1217a95f8e657c921f4e1aac6a59a2b3f62aa6d725c2f7170a9a1f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geTWT3U12vZVSa6EiQoXelmmatCntbk2yhR59c1NX8CDCwMzwzf8PM4TcArsHkPKBsZKzPJ_zDHhWgMzOSA_KtEwKwefnpHfiyWngklx5v2GMZazMe-Rz2G6DPWCw9Yq-tVgHG2Jz0HRqg3aojtTWNKw1ndTBNctWhcYd6bBpndePdEBfMMJdlChPRxHHqqkj325x0biuCw2daVTrb5-xrW3k2hirrK7DNbkwuPX65if3yfvTaDZ8Tqav48lwME0UF1lICqlBZKlQwEFimZtCi1yqkoPJNCAqgXmJfJEawRHFUvJccSNBMiwRTJH2yV3nu3fNR6t9qDbxiDqurFIAEAVLY_QJdFPKNd47baq9szt0xwpYdfp09efTUXPfaTyu9K_r_4Ivc_9_pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111680380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Downey, Dennis J. ; Ernest, J. Brooke</creator><creatorcontrib>Downey, Dennis J. ; Ernest, J. Brooke</creatorcontrib><description>We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-055X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-862X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0092055X241248174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; Collaboration ; Comprehension ; Concept Formation ; Cooperative learning ; Education ; Evaluation ; Grammatical aspect ; Income inequality ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Introductory Courses ; Literacy ; Mathematics ; Mathematics education ; Misconceptions ; Numeracy ; Sociology ; Students ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Teaching sociology, 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.336-351</ispartof><rights>American Sociological Association 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-87e16436c1217a95f8e657c921f4e1aac6a59a2b3f62aa6d725c2f7170a9a1f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9842-9427</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0092055X241248174$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0092055X241248174$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Downey, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernest, J. Brooke</creatorcontrib><title>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</title><title>Teaching sociology</title><addtitle>Teach Sociol</addtitle><description>We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Grammatical aspect</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Numeracy</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>0092-055X</issn><issn>1939-862X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geTWT3U12vZVSa6EiQoXelmmatCntbk2yhR59c1NX8CDCwMzwzf8PM4TcArsHkPKBsZKzPJ_zDHhWgMzOSA_KtEwKwefnpHfiyWngklx5v2GMZazMe-Rz2G6DPWCw9Yq-tVgHG2Jz0HRqg3aojtTWNKw1ndTBNctWhcYd6bBpndePdEBfMMJdlChPRxHHqqkj325x0biuCw2daVTrb5-xrW3k2hirrK7DNbkwuPX65if3yfvTaDZ8Tqav48lwME0UF1lICqlBZKlQwEFimZtCi1yqkoPJNCAqgXmJfJEawRHFUvJccSNBMiwRTJH2yV3nu3fNR6t9qDbxiDqurFIAEAVLY_QJdFPKNd47baq9szt0xwpYdfp09efTUXPfaTyu9K_r_4Ivc_9_pQ</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Downey, Dennis J.</creator><creator>Ernest, J. Brooke</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9427</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</title><author>Downey, Dennis J. ; Ernest, J. Brooke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-87e16436c1217a95f8e657c921f4e1aac6a59a2b3f62aa6d725c2f7170a9a1f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Grammatical aspect</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Numeracy</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Downey, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernest, J. Brooke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Teaching sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Downey, Dennis J.</au><au>Ernest, J. Brooke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient</atitle><jtitle>Teaching sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Teach Sociol</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>336-351</pages><issn>0092-055X</issn><eissn>1939-862X</eissn><abstract>We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0092055X241248174</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9427</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0092-055X |
ispartof | Teaching sociology, 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.336-351 |
issn | 0092-055X 1939-862X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3111680380 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Active Learning Collaboration Comprehension Concept Formation Cooperative learning Education Evaluation Grammatical aspect Income inequality Interdisciplinary aspects Introductory Courses Literacy Mathematics Mathematics education Misconceptions Numeracy Sociology Students Teaching |
title | Cultivating Quantitative Literacy in the Introductory Course: A Mathematics Education Collaboration to Teach the Gini Coefficient |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultivating%20Quantitative%20Literacy%20in%20the%20Introductory%20Course:%20A%20Mathematics%20Education%20Collaboration%20to%20Teach%20the%20Gini%20Coefficient&rft.jtitle=Teaching%20sociology&rft.au=Downey,%20Dennis%20J.&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=336-351&rft.issn=0092-055X&rft.eissn=1939-862X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0092055X241248174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111680380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111680380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0092055X241248174&rfr_iscdi=true |