‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist

This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thesis eleven 2024-06, Vol.182 (1), p.94-114
1. Verfasser: Minkkinen, Panu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue 1
container_start_page 94
container_title Thesis eleven
container_volume 182
creator Minkkinen, Panu
description This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/07255136241256979
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3111276595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_07255136241256979</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3111276595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-ae8c63f3824337b294c4f208622379d8d88b3977a731c74e73ee63bc179dd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEURYMoWGo_wF3A9dS8JJNM3EmxKhRd2IW7IZPJ2Mi0qUm60JWfob_XLzG1ggtx9Xjccy_vXYROgYwBpDwnkpYlMEE50FIoqQ7QALiAQvKyPESDnV7sgGM0itE1hFBGuCBkgB637x_zhcXG962NCfsO677_XvHSr2KyIW7fPy_wNDjbBmcW-M7Z9BZNNumIdUYz5dImOb_SPU4L64OL6QQddbqPdvQzh-hhejWf3BSz--vbyeWsMJTJVGhbGcE6VlHOmGyo4oZ3lFSCZlm1VVtVDVNSasnASG4ls1awxkAWW8WG6Gyfug7-ZZMfqJ_9JuQ7Ys0AgEpRqjJTsKdM8DEG29Xr4JY6vNZA6l2D9Z8Gs2e890T9ZH9T_zd8AbVlcV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111276595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Minkkinen, Panu</creator><creatorcontrib>Minkkinen, Panu</creatorcontrib><description>This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0725-5136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/07255136241256979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Constitutions ; Philosophy ; Social theories ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Thesis eleven, 2024-06, Vol.182 (1), p.94-114</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-ae8c63f3824337b294c4f208622379d8d88b3977a731c74e73ee63bc179dd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/07255136241256979$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07255136241256979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minkkinen, Panu</creatorcontrib><title>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</title><title>Thesis eleven</title><description>This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power.</description><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0725-5136</issn><issn>1461-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEURYMoWGo_wF3A9dS8JJNM3EmxKhRd2IW7IZPJ2Mi0qUm60JWfob_XLzG1ggtx9Xjccy_vXYROgYwBpDwnkpYlMEE50FIoqQ7QALiAQvKyPESDnV7sgGM0itE1hFBGuCBkgB637x_zhcXG962NCfsO677_XvHSr2KyIW7fPy_wNDjbBmcW-M7Z9BZNNumIdUYz5dImOb_SPU4L64OL6QQddbqPdvQzh-hhejWf3BSz--vbyeWsMJTJVGhbGcE6VlHOmGyo4oZ3lFSCZlm1VVtVDVNSasnASG4ls1awxkAWW8WG6Gyfug7-ZZMfqJ_9JuQ7Ys0AgEpRqjJTsKdM8DEG29Xr4JY6vNZA6l2D9Z8Gs2e890T9ZH9T_zd8AbVlcV8</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Minkkinen, Panu</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</title><author>Minkkinen, Panu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-ae8c63f3824337b294c4f208622379d8d88b3977a731c74e73ee63bc179dd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minkkinen, Panu</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Thesis eleven</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minkkinen, Panu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</atitle><jtitle>Thesis eleven</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>94-114</pages><issn>0725-5136</issn><eissn>1461-7455</eissn><abstract>This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/07255136241256979</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0725-5136
ispartof Thesis eleven, 2024-06, Vol.182 (1), p.94-114
issn 0725-5136
1461-7455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3111276595
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Constitutions
Philosophy
Social theories
Theory
title ‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A47%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98The%20coldest%20of%20all%20cold%20monsters%E2%80%99:%20Friedrich%20Nietzsche%20as%20a%20constitutional%20theorist&rft.jtitle=Thesis%20eleven&rft.au=Minkkinen,%20Panu&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=94-114&rft.issn=0725-5136&rft.eissn=1461-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/07255136241256979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111276595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111276595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_07255136241256979&rfr_iscdi=true