‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist
This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thesis eleven 2024-06, Vol.182 (1), p.94-114 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | Thesis eleven |
container_volume | 182 |
creator | Minkkinen, Panu |
description | This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/07255136241256979 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3111276595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_07255136241256979</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3111276595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-ae8c63f3824337b294c4f208622379d8d88b3977a731c74e73ee63bc179dd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEURYMoWGo_wF3A9dS8JJNM3EmxKhRd2IW7IZPJ2Mi0qUm60JWfob_XLzG1ggtx9Xjccy_vXYROgYwBpDwnkpYlMEE50FIoqQ7QALiAQvKyPESDnV7sgGM0itE1hFBGuCBkgB637x_zhcXG962NCfsO677_XvHSr2KyIW7fPy_wNDjbBmcW-M7Z9BZNNumIdUYz5dImOb_SPU4L64OL6QQddbqPdvQzh-hhejWf3BSz--vbyeWsMJTJVGhbGcE6VlHOmGyo4oZ3lFSCZlm1VVtVDVNSasnASG4ls1awxkAWW8WG6Gyfug7-ZZMfqJ_9JuQ7Ys0AgEpRqjJTsKdM8DEG29Xr4JY6vNZA6l2D9Z8Gs2e890T9ZH9T_zd8AbVlcV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111276595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Minkkinen, Panu</creator><creatorcontrib>Minkkinen, Panu</creatorcontrib><description>This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0725-5136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/07255136241256979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Constitutions ; Philosophy ; Social theories ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Thesis eleven, 2024-06, Vol.182 (1), p.94-114</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-ae8c63f3824337b294c4f208622379d8d88b3977a731c74e73ee63bc179dd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/07255136241256979$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07255136241256979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minkkinen, Panu</creatorcontrib><title>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</title><title>Thesis eleven</title><description>This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power.</description><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0725-5136</issn><issn>1461-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEURYMoWGo_wF3A9dS8JJNM3EmxKhRd2IW7IZPJ2Mi0qUm60JWfob_XLzG1ggtx9Xjccy_vXYROgYwBpDwnkpYlMEE50FIoqQ7QALiAQvKyPESDnV7sgGM0itE1hFBGuCBkgB637x_zhcXG962NCfsO677_XvHSr2KyIW7fPy_wNDjbBmcW-M7Z9BZNNumIdUYz5dImOb_SPU4L64OL6QQddbqPdvQzh-hhejWf3BSz--vbyeWsMJTJVGhbGcE6VlHOmGyo4oZ3lFSCZlm1VVtVDVNSasnASG4ls1awxkAWW8WG6Gyfug7-ZZMfqJ_9JuQ7Ys0AgEpRqjJTsKdM8DEG29Xr4JY6vNZA6l2D9Z8Gs2e890T9ZH9T_zd8AbVlcV8</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Minkkinen, Panu</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</title><author>Minkkinen, Panu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-ae8c63f3824337b294c4f208622379d8d88b3977a731c74e73ee63bc179dd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minkkinen, Panu</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Thesis eleven</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minkkinen, Panu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist</atitle><jtitle>Thesis eleven</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>94-114</pages><issn>0725-5136</issn><eissn>1461-7455</eissn><abstract>This article asks whether we can identify a vitalistic undertow in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy that would make sense for contemporary political and constitutional theory as well. The arguments are presented by contrasting Nietzsche’s philosophy with the social theory of Herbert Spencer. After an introduction, the first main part discusses Spencer and his so-called ‘organic analogy’ in which he draws parallels between natural organisms and the body politic. Spencer’s social theory is a paradigmatic example of vitalism and organic state theory and, as a counterpoint, can help tease out Nietzsche’s vitalism as well. The article then examines Nietzsche’s admittedly fragmentary encounters with Spencer and his flirtations with vitalism and organic state theory. In the conclusions, the reconstructed narrative about Nietzsche’s vitalism is linked with Nietzsche’s main philosophical works in the hope of provisionally extracting a Nietzschean ‘constitutional theory’ from his notion of will to power.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/07255136241256979</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0725-5136 |
ispartof | Thesis eleven, 2024-06, Vol.182 (1), p.94-114 |
issn | 0725-5136 1461-7455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3111276595 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Constitutions Philosophy Social theories Theory |
title | ‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A47%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98The%20coldest%20of%20all%20cold%20monsters%E2%80%99:%20Friedrich%20Nietzsche%20as%20a%20constitutional%20theorist&rft.jtitle=Thesis%20eleven&rft.au=Minkkinen,%20Panu&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=94-114&rft.issn=0725-5136&rft.eissn=1461-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/07255136241256979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111276595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111276595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_07255136241256979&rfr_iscdi=true |