1090-P: RCT Design Risks Excluding Key Groups in Pediatric–Adult Transition Studies

Introduction: Importance of the patient-provider relationship in pediatric to adult clinic transitions is well recognized. Yet, there is a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We tested a new approach to moving endocrinology patients to adult care in an RCT. However, consent re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2024-06, Vol.73 (Supplement_1), p.1
Hauptverfasser: LIU, YING-TING, MORGAN, MARCI, SHAH, SEJAL, HSU, LIANA, DESAI, DIMPI, SUH, BAILEY, CHEN, JULIE, LAL, RAYHAN, HUGHES, MICHAEL S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 1
container_title Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 73
creator LIU, YING-TING
MORGAN, MARCI
SHAH, SEJAL
HSU, LIANA
DESAI, DIMPI
SUH, BAILEY
CHEN, JULIE
LAL, RAYHAN
HUGHES, MICHAEL S.
description Introduction: Importance of the patient-provider relationship in pediatric to adult clinic transitions is well recognized. Yet, there is a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We tested a new approach to moving endocrinology patients to adult care in an RCT. However, consent requirements of the RCT posed challenges. We therefore examined whether this skewed enrollment, inadvertently precluding the very patients we sought to assist. Methods: Participants age ≥16 with a chronic endocrine condition transferring from Stanford's pediatric to adult endocrinology clinics were randomized 2:1 to "Guided Transfer" (starting care with an adult physician in the pediatric clinic before moving) or "Direct Referral" (beginning adult care in adult clinic). To identify potential biases after enrollment ceased in Nov 2023, we reviewed enrollment efforts, compared participants' demographics to the age-matched population of patients in the 4 most commonly referring clinics, and surveyed referring providers. Data collection on the primary outcome, attendance in two adult clinic visits, is ongoing. Results: Of 119 candidates, 34% were unreachable despite 256 cumulative contact attempts. 45 enrollees were randomized to GT and 21 to DR; 82% had diabetes. Compared to the age-matched clinic population (n=2169), enrollees were significantly more white (59% vs 38%, p
doi_str_mv 10.2337/db24-1090-P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3111275942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3111275942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642-524b9ce4004d273e60a1b8b610a8866dec55c02086e4994e6844720163ffb9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsrXyDgUkZvfiaZuCu1rWLBUkdwF2aSTEmtMzWZAbvzHXxDn8Qplbs4m--cCx9ClwRuKGPy1paUJwQUJIsjNCCKqYRR-XaMBgCEJkQqeYrOYlwDgOhvgF4P9B1ejnN876Jf1Xjp43vEky-z6ayvV_jJ7fAsNN02Yl_jhbO-aIM3v98_I9ttWpyHoo6-9U2NX9q-4uI5OqmKTXQX_zlE-XSSjx-S-fPscTyaJ0ZwmqSUl8o4DsAtlcwJKEiZlYJAkWVCWGfS1ACFTDiuFHci41xSIIJVVakssCG6OsxuQ_PZudjqddOFuv-oGSGEylRx2lPXB8qEJsbgKr0N_qMIO01A77XpvTa9F6EX7A-9214G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111275942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1090-P: RCT Design Risks Excluding Key Groups in Pediatric–Adult Transition Studies</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>LIU, YING-TING ; MORGAN, MARCI ; SHAH, SEJAL ; HSU, LIANA ; DESAI, DIMPI ; SUH, BAILEY ; CHEN, JULIE ; LAL, RAYHAN ; HUGHES, MICHAEL S.</creator><creatorcontrib>LIU, YING-TING ; MORGAN, MARCI ; SHAH, SEJAL ; HSU, LIANA ; DESAI, DIMPI ; SUH, BAILEY ; CHEN, JULIE ; LAL, RAYHAN ; HUGHES, MICHAEL S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Importance of the patient-provider relationship in pediatric to adult clinic transitions is well recognized. Yet, there is a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We tested a new approach to moving endocrinology patients to adult care in an RCT. However, consent requirements of the RCT posed challenges. We therefore examined whether this skewed enrollment, inadvertently precluding the very patients we sought to assist. Methods: Participants age ≥16 with a chronic endocrine condition transferring from Stanford's pediatric to adult endocrinology clinics were randomized 2:1 to "Guided Transfer" (starting care with an adult physician in the pediatric clinic before moving) or "Direct Referral" (beginning adult care in adult clinic). To identify potential biases after enrollment ceased in Nov 2023, we reviewed enrollment efforts, compared participants' demographics to the age-matched population of patients in the 4 most commonly referring clinics, and surveyed referring providers. Data collection on the primary outcome, attendance in two adult clinic visits, is ongoing. Results: Of 119 candidates, 34% were unreachable despite 256 cumulative contact attempts. 45 enrollees were randomized to GT and 21 to DR; 82% had diabetes. Compared to the age-matched clinic population (n=2169), enrollees were significantly more white (59% vs 38%, p&lt;0.001) and privately insured (73% vs 43%, p&lt;0.001). Among providers (n=13), 85% felt GT provided a benefit to patients. Key themes regarding improvement areas included eliminating consent needs, including all participants in GT, and enhancing monitoring and communication methods. Conclusion: RCTs are prone to recruitment and enrollment bias in this population, missing those who might benefit most from the intervention, such as harder to contact or underserved individuals. Providers recognized RCT challenges but still favored the GT approach. A single-arm QI-based study may reduce barriers and improve demographic representation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-327X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/db24-1090-P</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Clinics ; Demography ; Diabetes mellitus ; Endocrinology ; Pediatrics</subject><ispartof>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2024-06, Vol.73 (Supplement_1), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Diabetes Association Jun 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LIU, YING-TING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, MARCI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAH, SEJAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HSU, LIANA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DESAI, DIMPI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUH, BAILEY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, JULIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAL, RAYHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUGHES, MICHAEL S.</creatorcontrib><title>1090-P: RCT Design Risks Excluding Key Groups in Pediatric–Adult Transition Studies</title><title>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Introduction: Importance of the patient-provider relationship in pediatric to adult clinic transitions is well recognized. Yet, there is a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We tested a new approach to moving endocrinology patients to adult care in an RCT. However, consent requirements of the RCT posed challenges. We therefore examined whether this skewed enrollment, inadvertently precluding the very patients we sought to assist. Methods: Participants age ≥16 with a chronic endocrine condition transferring from Stanford's pediatric to adult endocrinology clinics were randomized 2:1 to "Guided Transfer" (starting care with an adult physician in the pediatric clinic before moving) or "Direct Referral" (beginning adult care in adult clinic). To identify potential biases after enrollment ceased in Nov 2023, we reviewed enrollment efforts, compared participants' demographics to the age-matched population of patients in the 4 most commonly referring clinics, and surveyed referring providers. Data collection on the primary outcome, attendance in two adult clinic visits, is ongoing. Results: Of 119 candidates, 34% were unreachable despite 256 cumulative contact attempts. 45 enrollees were randomized to GT and 21 to DR; 82% had diabetes. Compared to the age-matched clinic population (n=2169), enrollees were significantly more white (59% vs 38%, p&lt;0.001) and privately insured (73% vs 43%, p&lt;0.001). Among providers (n=13), 85% felt GT provided a benefit to patients. Key themes regarding improvement areas included eliminating consent needs, including all participants in GT, and enhancing monitoring and communication methods. Conclusion: RCTs are prone to recruitment and enrollment bias in this population, missing those who might benefit most from the intervention, such as harder to contact or underserved individuals. Providers recognized RCT challenges but still favored the GT approach. A single-arm QI-based study may reduce barriers and improve demographic representation.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><issn>0012-1797</issn><issn>1939-327X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsrXyDgUkZvfiaZuCu1rWLBUkdwF2aSTEmtMzWZAbvzHXxDn8Qplbs4m--cCx9ClwRuKGPy1paUJwQUJIsjNCCKqYRR-XaMBgCEJkQqeYrOYlwDgOhvgF4P9B1ejnN876Jf1Xjp43vEky-z6ayvV_jJ7fAsNN02Yl_jhbO-aIM3v98_I9ttWpyHoo6-9U2NX9q-4uI5OqmKTXQX_zlE-XSSjx-S-fPscTyaJ0ZwmqSUl8o4DsAtlcwJKEiZlYJAkWVCWGfS1ACFTDiuFHci41xSIIJVVakssCG6OsxuQ_PZudjqddOFuv-oGSGEylRx2lPXB8qEJsbgKr0N_qMIO01A77XpvTa9F6EX7A-9214G</recordid><startdate>20240614</startdate><enddate>20240614</enddate><creator>LIU, YING-TING</creator><creator>MORGAN, MARCI</creator><creator>SHAH, SEJAL</creator><creator>HSU, LIANA</creator><creator>DESAI, DIMPI</creator><creator>SUH, BAILEY</creator><creator>CHEN, JULIE</creator><creator>LAL, RAYHAN</creator><creator>HUGHES, MICHAEL S.</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240614</creationdate><title>1090-P: RCT Design Risks Excluding Key Groups in Pediatric–Adult Transition Studies</title><author>LIU, YING-TING ; MORGAN, MARCI ; SHAH, SEJAL ; HSU, LIANA ; DESAI, DIMPI ; SUH, BAILEY ; CHEN, JULIE ; LAL, RAYHAN ; HUGHES, MICHAEL S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642-524b9ce4004d273e60a1b8b610a8866dec55c02086e4994e6844720163ffb9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LIU, YING-TING</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, MARCI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAH, SEJAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HSU, LIANA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DESAI, DIMPI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUH, BAILEY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, JULIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAL, RAYHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUGHES, MICHAEL S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LIU, YING-TING</au><au>MORGAN, MARCI</au><au>SHAH, SEJAL</au><au>HSU, LIANA</au><au>DESAI, DIMPI</au><au>SUH, BAILEY</au><au>CHEN, JULIE</au><au>LAL, RAYHAN</au><au>HUGHES, MICHAEL S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1090-P: RCT Design Risks Excluding Key Groups in Pediatric–Adult Transition Studies</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2024-06-14</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0012-1797</issn><eissn>1939-327X</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Importance of the patient-provider relationship in pediatric to adult clinic transitions is well recognized. Yet, there is a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We tested a new approach to moving endocrinology patients to adult care in an RCT. However, consent requirements of the RCT posed challenges. We therefore examined whether this skewed enrollment, inadvertently precluding the very patients we sought to assist. Methods: Participants age ≥16 with a chronic endocrine condition transferring from Stanford's pediatric to adult endocrinology clinics were randomized 2:1 to "Guided Transfer" (starting care with an adult physician in the pediatric clinic before moving) or "Direct Referral" (beginning adult care in adult clinic). To identify potential biases after enrollment ceased in Nov 2023, we reviewed enrollment efforts, compared participants' demographics to the age-matched population of patients in the 4 most commonly referring clinics, and surveyed referring providers. Data collection on the primary outcome, attendance in two adult clinic visits, is ongoing. Results: Of 119 candidates, 34% were unreachable despite 256 cumulative contact attempts. 45 enrollees were randomized to GT and 21 to DR; 82% had diabetes. Compared to the age-matched clinic population (n=2169), enrollees were significantly more white (59% vs 38%, p&lt;0.001) and privately insured (73% vs 43%, p&lt;0.001). Among providers (n=13), 85% felt GT provided a benefit to patients. Key themes regarding improvement areas included eliminating consent needs, including all participants in GT, and enhancing monitoring and communication methods. Conclusion: RCTs are prone to recruitment and enrollment bias in this population, missing those who might benefit most from the intervention, such as harder to contact or underserved individuals. Providers recognized RCT challenges but still favored the GT approach. A single-arm QI-based study may reduce barriers and improve demographic representation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><doi>10.2337/db24-1090-P</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1797
ispartof Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2024-06, Vol.73 (Supplement_1), p.1
issn 0012-1797
1939-327X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3111275942
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Clinical trials
Clinics
Demography
Diabetes mellitus
Endocrinology
Pediatrics
title 1090-P: RCT Design Risks Excluding Key Groups in Pediatric–Adult Transition Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A08%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1090-P:%20RCT%20Design%20Risks%20Excluding%20Key%20Groups%20in%20Pediatric%E2%80%93Adult%20Transition%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=LIU,%20YING-TING&rft.date=2024-06-14&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0012-1797&rft.eissn=1939-327X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/db24-1090-P&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111275942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111275942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true