Linear bone gain and healing complication rate comparative outcomes following ridge augmentation with custom 3D printed titanium mesh vs Ti-reinforced dPTFE. A randomized clinical trial

Aim : The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the qualitative (linear alveolar ridge changes) and quantitative (healing complications) outcomes after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh versus titanium reinforced dense PTFE membrane for vertic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Folia Medica 2024-08, Vol.66 (4), p.505-514
Hauptverfasser: Giragosyan, Krikor, Chenchev, Ivan, Ivanova, Vasilena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 514
container_issue 4
container_start_page 505
container_title Folia Medica
container_volume 66
creator Giragosyan, Krikor
Chenchev, Ivan
Ivanova, Vasilena
description Aim : The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the qualitative (linear alveolar ridge changes) and quantitative (healing complications) outcomes after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh versus titanium reinforced dense PTFE membrane for vertical and horizontal augmentation of deficient alveolar ridges. Materials and methods : Forty patients (40 defect sites) were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups – a test group that received custom made Ti mesh and a control group which received a titanium reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. This case series documented consecutive patients treated with vertical bone augmentation to facilitate the future placement of dental implants. The procedure was performed using xenograft and autograft in a ratio of 1:1. Baseline vertical and horizontal deficiencies, acquired bone height and width as well as absolute bone gain (height and width) were recorded radiographically; postoperative complication rate was recorded clinically. Results : The absolute bone height acquired for the test group was 3.65±1.73 mm, and for the control group - 4.24±2.19 mm; the absolute bone width acquired for the test group was 2.48±1.03 mm and for the control group - 2.60±0.82 mm. Postop complication rate was 33.3% for the test group and 38.9% for the control group. Conclusion : The use of a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh for needs of vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration showed results comparable to those of – Ti d-PTFE both in terms of height and width gain and complication rate.
doi_str_mv 10.3897/folmed.66.e123766
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3110755531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a15cf31f29c441a9acc1fc516501bc7d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3110755531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2126-b0ad8282d4b063427c5eedf8584273e36135d5f578f8ffbb5a2b2d96b8d68e1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1v1DAQjRBILIUfwM0S5yz-iJ3ssSotVFqJHpazNbHHWa8Se3GcVvDP-u_wNhWnmXmeee_Jr6o-M7oV3a796uI4od0qtUXGRavUm2rDBGtqzhrxttpQTpu6o414X32Y5xOlSlIqN9Xz3geERPoYkAzgA4FgyRFh9GEgJk7n0RvIPgaSIOMLAqXzj0jiksuIMyniY3y6HCRvBySwDBOGvJ49-XwkZplznIj4Rs7Jh4yWZJ8h-GUiheBIHmdy8HVCH1xMpjzbh8Pd7ZZcF9Vg4-T_FswUT8XMSHLyMH6s3jkYZ_z0Wq-qX3e3h5sf9f7n9_ub631tOOOq7inYjnfcNj1VouGtkYjWdbIrvUChmJBWOtl2rnOu7yXwntud6jurOmRWXFX3K6-NcNLF_gTpj47g9QsQ06AhZW9G1MCkcYI5vjNNw2AHxjBnJCt_zXrTXri-rFznFH8vOGd9iksKxb4WjNFWSilY2WLrlklxnhO6_6qM6kvaek1bK6Vf0xb_ANtRoxk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3110755531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linear bone gain and healing complication rate comparative outcomes following ridge augmentation with custom 3D printed titanium mesh vs Ti-reinforced dPTFE. A randomized clinical trial</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Giragosyan, Krikor ; Chenchev, Ivan ; Ivanova, Vasilena</creator><creatorcontrib>Giragosyan, Krikor ; Chenchev, Ivan ; Ivanova, Vasilena</creatorcontrib><description>Aim : The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the qualitative (linear alveolar ridge changes) and quantitative (healing complications) outcomes after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh versus titanium reinforced dense PTFE membrane for vertical and horizontal augmentation of deficient alveolar ridges. Materials and methods : Forty patients (40 defect sites) were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups – a test group that received custom made Ti mesh and a control group which received a titanium reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. This case series documented consecutive patients treated with vertical bone augmentation to facilitate the future placement of dental implants. The procedure was performed using xenograft and autograft in a ratio of 1:1. Baseline vertical and horizontal deficiencies, acquired bone height and width as well as absolute bone gain (height and width) were recorded radiographically; postoperative complication rate was recorded clinically. Results : The absolute bone height acquired for the test group was 3.65±1.73 mm, and for the control group - 4.24±2.19 mm; the absolute bone width acquired for the test group was 2.48±1.03 mm and for the control group - 2.60±0.82 mm. Postop complication rate was 33.3% for the test group and 38.9% for the control group. Conclusion : The use of a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh for needs of vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration showed results comparable to those of – Ti d-PTFE both in terms of height and width gain and complication rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0204-8043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1314-2143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3897/folmed.66.e123766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Plovdiv: MEDICAL UNIVERSITY- PLOVDIV</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Edentulous ; Medical device industry ; Medical equipment ; Patients ; Pore size ; Teeth ; Titanium ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Folia Medica, 2024-08, Vol.66 (4), p.505-514</ispartof><rights>Copyright MEDICAL UNIVERSITY- PLOVDIV 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2126-b0ad8282d4b063427c5eedf8584273e36135d5f578f8ffbb5a2b2d96b8d68e1d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3454-2919 ; 0000-0002-8914-2931 ; 0000-0002-8499-1619</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giragosyan, Krikor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenchev, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Vasilena</creatorcontrib><title>Linear bone gain and healing complication rate comparative outcomes following ridge augmentation with custom 3D printed titanium mesh vs Ti-reinforced dPTFE. A randomized clinical trial</title><title>Folia Medica</title><description>Aim : The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the qualitative (linear alveolar ridge changes) and quantitative (healing complications) outcomes after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh versus titanium reinforced dense PTFE membrane for vertical and horizontal augmentation of deficient alveolar ridges. Materials and methods : Forty patients (40 defect sites) were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups – a test group that received custom made Ti mesh and a control group which received a titanium reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. This case series documented consecutive patients treated with vertical bone augmentation to facilitate the future placement of dental implants. The procedure was performed using xenograft and autograft in a ratio of 1:1. Baseline vertical and horizontal deficiencies, acquired bone height and width as well as absolute bone gain (height and width) were recorded radiographically; postoperative complication rate was recorded clinically. Results : The absolute bone height acquired for the test group was 3.65±1.73 mm, and for the control group - 4.24±2.19 mm; the absolute bone width acquired for the test group was 2.48±1.03 mm and for the control group - 2.60±0.82 mm. Postop complication rate was 33.3% for the test group and 38.9% for the control group. Conclusion : The use of a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh for needs of vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration showed results comparable to those of – Ti d-PTFE both in terms of height and width gain and complication rate.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>Medical device industry</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0204-8043</issn><issn>1314-2143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UU1v1DAQjRBILIUfwM0S5yz-iJ3ssSotVFqJHpazNbHHWa8Se3GcVvDP-u_wNhWnmXmeee_Jr6o-M7oV3a796uI4od0qtUXGRavUm2rDBGtqzhrxttpQTpu6o414X32Y5xOlSlIqN9Xz3geERPoYkAzgA4FgyRFh9GEgJk7n0RvIPgaSIOMLAqXzj0jiksuIMyniY3y6HCRvBySwDBOGvJ49-XwkZplznIj4Rs7Jh4yWZJ8h-GUiheBIHmdy8HVCH1xMpjzbh8Pd7ZZcF9Vg4-T_FswUT8XMSHLyMH6s3jkYZ_z0Wq-qX3e3h5sf9f7n9_ub631tOOOq7inYjnfcNj1VouGtkYjWdbIrvUChmJBWOtl2rnOu7yXwntud6jurOmRWXFX3K6-NcNLF_gTpj47g9QsQ06AhZW9G1MCkcYI5vjNNw2AHxjBnJCt_zXrTXri-rFznFH8vOGd9iksKxb4WjNFWSilY2WLrlklxnhO6_6qM6kvaek1bK6Vf0xb_ANtRoxk</recordid><startdate>20240831</startdate><enddate>20240831</enddate><creator>Giragosyan, Krikor</creator><creator>Chenchev, Ivan</creator><creator>Ivanova, Vasilena</creator><general>MEDICAL UNIVERSITY- PLOVDIV</general><general>Pensoft Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-2919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-1619</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240831</creationdate><title>Linear bone gain and healing complication rate comparative outcomes following ridge augmentation with custom 3D printed titanium mesh vs Ti-reinforced dPTFE. A randomized clinical trial</title><author>Giragosyan, Krikor ; Chenchev, Ivan ; Ivanova, Vasilena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2126-b0ad8282d4b063427c5eedf8584273e36135d5f578f8ffbb5a2b2d96b8d68e1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>Medical device industry</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giragosyan, Krikor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenchev, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Vasilena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Folia Medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giragosyan, Krikor</au><au>Chenchev, Ivan</au><au>Ivanova, Vasilena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linear bone gain and healing complication rate comparative outcomes following ridge augmentation with custom 3D printed titanium mesh vs Ti-reinforced dPTFE. A randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Folia Medica</jtitle><date>2024-08-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>505-514</pages><issn>0204-8043</issn><eissn>1314-2143</eissn><abstract>Aim : The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the qualitative (linear alveolar ridge changes) and quantitative (healing complications) outcomes after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh versus titanium reinforced dense PTFE membrane for vertical and horizontal augmentation of deficient alveolar ridges. Materials and methods : Forty patients (40 defect sites) were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups – a test group that received custom made Ti mesh and a control group which received a titanium reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. This case series documented consecutive patients treated with vertical bone augmentation to facilitate the future placement of dental implants. The procedure was performed using xenograft and autograft in a ratio of 1:1. Baseline vertical and horizontal deficiencies, acquired bone height and width as well as absolute bone gain (height and width) were recorded radiographically; postoperative complication rate was recorded clinically. Results : The absolute bone height acquired for the test group was 3.65±1.73 mm, and for the control group - 4.24±2.19 mm; the absolute bone width acquired for the test group was 2.48±1.03 mm and for the control group - 2.60±0.82 mm. Postop complication rate was 33.3% for the test group and 38.9% for the control group. Conclusion : The use of a custom-made 3D printed titanium mesh for needs of vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration showed results comparable to those of – Ti d-PTFE both in terms of height and width gain and complication rate.</abstract><cop>Plovdiv</cop><pub>MEDICAL UNIVERSITY- PLOVDIV</pub><doi>10.3897/folmed.66.e123766</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-2919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-1619</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0204-8043
ispartof Folia Medica, 2024-08, Vol.66 (4), p.505-514
issn 0204-8043
1314-2143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3110755531
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Clinical trials
Edentulous
Medical device industry
Medical equipment
Patients
Pore size
Teeth
Titanium
Transplants & implants
title Linear bone gain and healing complication rate comparative outcomes following ridge augmentation with custom 3D printed titanium mesh vs Ti-reinforced dPTFE. A randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A30%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linear%20bone%20gain%20and%20healing%20complication%20rate%20comparative%20outcomes%20following%20ridge%20augmentation%20with%20custom%203D%20printed%20titanium%20mesh%20vs%20Ti-reinforced%20dPTFE.%20A%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Folia%20Medica&rft.au=Giragosyan,%20Krikor&rft.date=2024-08-31&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=505-514&rft.issn=0204-8043&rft.eissn=1314-2143&rft_id=info:doi/10.3897/folmed.66.e123766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3110755531%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3110755531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a15cf31f29c441a9acc1fc516501bc7d&rfr_iscdi=true