Spatial Differentiation in the Use of Rural Development Programme Funds for the Environment in Poland for the Periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020

The purpose of this paper is to assess the changes in agricultural producers’ use of funds allocated for environmental measures under the 2007–2013 RDP (Rural Development Program) and 2014–2020 RDP in Poland. The extent to which environmental CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) funds are used was exami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.7881
Hauptverfasser: Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka, Sadowski, Arkadiusz, Wigier, Marek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 18
container_start_page 7881
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 16
creator Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka
Sadowski, Arkadiusz
Wigier, Marek
description The purpose of this paper is to assess the changes in agricultural producers’ use of funds allocated for environmental measures under the 2007–2013 RDP (Rural Development Program) and 2014–2020 RDP in Poland. The extent to which environmental CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) funds are used was examined on a geographic basis, so as to take account of socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of districts. Correlation analysis and a cartographic method were used. The study found growing differences in how the funds are used between territorial units. The analysis of correlation provided grounds for concluding that a relationship exists between the share of environmental funds used in total RDP payments and environmental conditions, mostly including the share of permanent pasture in the structure of agricultural land (0.515 in 2014–2020). Conversely, no relationship was discovered between the level of wealth and the local agrarian structure (0.249 and 0.327 in 2014–2020). The analysis of differences between territorial units revealed that in some geographic areas that had the potential for being granted environmental funds, the farmers decided not to apply for them. Based on the above, it was concluded that the potential beneficiaries’ activity in that respect is largely impacted not only by their environmental awareness and attitude but also by historical events.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su16187881
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3110714572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810786756</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810786756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-d2a861bdcc99c15977381921d13505fef54da71e3a8a59fffe9627fc15fa7cc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1KAzEQxxdRUNSLTxDwpFDNJM1m9yhqVRAs1p6XmJ3UyG5Sk13Rm68gvqFPYtqKH5lDZjK__wyTybI9oEecl_Q49pBDIYsC1rItRiUMgAq6_sffzHZjfKTpcA4l5FvZ-2SuOqsacmaNwYAuBZ31jlhHugck04jEG3LbhwWDz9j4eZsoMg5-FlTbIhn1ro7E-LAUnLtnG7xbMqnG2DfK1T_ZMQbrE80olZ9vH4wCJ4t8cobLmNGdbMOoJuLu972dTUfnd6eXg-ubi6vTk-uBZkJ2g5qpIof7Wuuy1CBKKXkBJYMauKDCoBHDWklArgolSpOGK3MmTUKNklpzvp3tr-rOg3_qMXbVo--DSy0rDpB-bCgkS9TRipqpBivrjO-C0slqbK32Do1N7ydFEhS5FHkSHPwTJKbDl26m-hirq8ntf_ZwxergYwxoqnmwrQqvFdBqsdLqd6X8C5EikmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3110714572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Differentiation in the Use of Rural Development Programme Funds for the Environment in Poland for the Periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka ; Sadowski, Arkadiusz ; Wigier, Marek</creator><creatorcontrib>Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka ; Sadowski, Arkadiusz ; Wigier, Marek</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper is to assess the changes in agricultural producers’ use of funds allocated for environmental measures under the 2007–2013 RDP (Rural Development Program) and 2014–2020 RDP in Poland. The extent to which environmental CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) funds are used was examined on a geographic basis, so as to take account of socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of districts. Correlation analysis and a cartographic method were used. The study found growing differences in how the funds are used between territorial units. The analysis of correlation provided grounds for concluding that a relationship exists between the share of environmental funds used in total RDP payments and environmental conditions, mostly including the share of permanent pasture in the structure of agricultural land (0.515 in 2014–2020). Conversely, no relationship was discovered between the level of wealth and the local agrarian structure (0.249 and 0.327 in 2014–2020). The analysis of differences between territorial units revealed that in some geographic areas that had the potential for being granted environmental funds, the farmers decided not to apply for them. Based on the above, it was concluded that the potential beneficiaries’ activity in that respect is largely impacted not only by their environmental awareness and attitude but also by historical events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16187881</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Beneficiaries ; Common Agricultural Policy ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental economics ; Environmental protection ; Environmental sustainability ; Externality ; Farmers ; Farms ; Food security ; Government aid ; Government finance ; Participation ; Rural areas ; Rural development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.7881</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-d2a861bdcc99c15977381921d13505fef54da71e3a8a59fffe9627fc15fa7cc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8236-1007 ; 0000-0001-5134-2295 ; 0000-0002-5724-1505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadowski, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigier, Marek</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Differentiation in the Use of Rural Development Programme Funds for the Environment in Poland for the Periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The purpose of this paper is to assess the changes in agricultural producers’ use of funds allocated for environmental measures under the 2007–2013 RDP (Rural Development Program) and 2014–2020 RDP in Poland. The extent to which environmental CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) funds are used was examined on a geographic basis, so as to take account of socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of districts. Correlation analysis and a cartographic method were used. The study found growing differences in how the funds are used between territorial units. The analysis of correlation provided grounds for concluding that a relationship exists between the share of environmental funds used in total RDP payments and environmental conditions, mostly including the share of permanent pasture in the structure of agricultural land (0.515 in 2014–2020). Conversely, no relationship was discovered between the level of wealth and the local agrarian structure (0.249 and 0.327 in 2014–2020). The analysis of differences between territorial units revealed that in some geographic areas that had the potential for being granted environmental funds, the farmers decided not to apply for them. Based on the above, it was concluded that the potential beneficiaries’ activity in that respect is largely impacted not only by their environmental awareness and attitude but also by historical events.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Common Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Government aid</subject><subject>Government finance</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1KAzEQxxdRUNSLTxDwpFDNJM1m9yhqVRAs1p6XmJ3UyG5Sk13Rm68gvqFPYtqKH5lDZjK__wyTybI9oEecl_Q49pBDIYsC1rItRiUMgAq6_sffzHZjfKTpcA4l5FvZ-2SuOqsacmaNwYAuBZ31jlhHugck04jEG3LbhwWDz9j4eZsoMg5-FlTbIhn1ro7E-LAUnLtnG7xbMqnG2DfK1T_ZMQbrE80olZ9vH4wCJ4t8cobLmNGdbMOoJuLu972dTUfnd6eXg-ubi6vTk-uBZkJ2g5qpIof7Wuuy1CBKKXkBJYMauKDCoBHDWklArgolSpOGK3MmTUKNklpzvp3tr-rOg3_qMXbVo--DSy0rDpB-bCgkS9TRipqpBivrjO-C0slqbK32Do1N7ydFEhS5FHkSHPwTJKbDl26m-hirq8ntf_ZwxergYwxoqnmwrQqvFdBqsdLqd6X8C5EikmQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Sadowski, Arkadiusz</creator><creator>Wigier, Marek</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-1007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-2295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-1505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Spatial Differentiation in the Use of Rural Development Programme Funds for the Environment in Poland for the Periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020</title><author>Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka ; Sadowski, Arkadiusz ; Wigier, Marek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-d2a861bdcc99c15977381921d13505fef54da71e3a8a59fffe9627fc15fa7cc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Common Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Government aid</topic><topic>Government finance</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadowski, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigier, Marek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka</au><au>Sadowski, Arkadiusz</au><au>Wigier, Marek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Differentiation in the Use of Rural Development Programme Funds for the Environment in Poland for the Periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>7881</spage><pages>7881-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this paper is to assess the changes in agricultural producers’ use of funds allocated for environmental measures under the 2007–2013 RDP (Rural Development Program) and 2014–2020 RDP in Poland. The extent to which environmental CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) funds are used was examined on a geographic basis, so as to take account of socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of districts. Correlation analysis and a cartographic method were used. The study found growing differences in how the funds are used between territorial units. The analysis of correlation provided grounds for concluding that a relationship exists between the share of environmental funds used in total RDP payments and environmental conditions, mostly including the share of permanent pasture in the structure of agricultural land (0.515 in 2014–2020). Conversely, no relationship was discovered between the level of wealth and the local agrarian structure (0.249 and 0.327 in 2014–2020). The analysis of differences between territorial units revealed that in some geographic areas that had the potential for being granted environmental funds, the farmers decided not to apply for them. Based on the above, it was concluded that the potential beneficiaries’ activity in that respect is largely impacted not only by their environmental awareness and attitude but also by historical events.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16187881</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-1007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-2295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-1505</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.7881
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3110714572
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Beneficiaries
Common Agricultural Policy
Environmental aspects
Environmental economics
Environmental protection
Environmental sustainability
Externality
Farmers
Farms
Food security
Government aid
Government finance
Participation
Rural areas
Rural development
title Spatial Differentiation in the Use of Rural Development Programme Funds for the Environment in Poland for the Periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Differentiation%20in%20the%20Use%20of%20Rural%20Development%20Programme%20Funds%20for%20the%20Environment%20in%20Poland%20for%20the%20Periods%202007%E2%80%932013%20and%202014%E2%80%932020&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Baer-Nawrocka,%20Agnieszka&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=7881&rft.pages=7881-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16187881&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA810786756%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3110714572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A810786756&rfr_iscdi=true