Drinking Water Quality in Delta and Non-Delta Counties along the Mississippi River

The Mississippi Delta region has worse population health outcomes, including higher overall cardiovascular and infant mortality rates. Water quality has yet to be considered as a factor in these health disparities. The objective of this paper is to determine overall differences in basic water qualit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.2622
Hauptverfasser: Pickering, Emily V, Jia, Chunrong, Naser, Abu Mohd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2622
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 16
creator Pickering, Emily V
Jia, Chunrong
Naser, Abu Mohd
description The Mississippi Delta region has worse population health outcomes, including higher overall cardiovascular and infant mortality rates. Water quality has yet to be considered as a factor in these health disparities. The objective of this paper is to determine overall differences in basic water quality indicators, electrolytes of cardiovascular importance, trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions of groundwater in delta and non-delta counties in states along the Mississippi River. Data were sourced from the major-ions dataset of the U.S. Geological Survey. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine the difference in water quality parameters. Overall, delta counties had lower total dissolved solids (TDS) (47 and 384 mg/L, p -value < 0.001), calcium (7 and 58 mg/L; p -value < 0.001), magnesium (2 and 22 mg/L; p -value < 0.001), and potassium (1.57 and 1.80 mg/L; p -value < 0.001) and higher sodium (38 mg/L and 22 mg/L; p -value < 0.001) compared to non-delta counties. Overall, there were no statistical differences in trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions across delta versus non-delta counties. These results underscore the need for further epidemiological studies to understand if worse health outcomes in delta counties could be partially explained by these parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w16182622
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3110711409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A811857109</galeid><sourcerecordid>A811857109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g215t-190b73e79119f46f8e5ba3c3e40e00427004ca9120939ba77142332f24a503443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptTk1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKet2aSbLM5ltYvqIpF8bik29mauk3qJqv4741WpAdnhvl4vDczhJwCGwqh2fkHjKDgI84PSI8zJTIpJRzu9cdkEMKaJZO6KHLWI_Npa92rdSv6bCK29KEzjY2f1Do6xSYaatyS3nmX7aaJ71y0GKhpfNLEF6S3NoTv2G4tndt3bE_IUW2agIPf2idPlxePk-tsdn91MxnPshWHPGag2UIJVBpA13JUF5gvjKgESobpP65SqowGzrTQC6MUSC4Er7k0ORNSij452-3dtv6twxDLte9al06WAoApAJmkf6yVabC0rvaxNdXGhqocFwBFruCHNfyHlXyJG1t5h7VN-J7gCw9FagU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3110711409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drinking Water Quality in Delta and Non-Delta Counties along the Mississippi River</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pickering, Emily V ; Jia, Chunrong ; Naser, Abu Mohd</creator><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Emily V ; Jia, Chunrong ; Naser, Abu Mohd</creatorcontrib><description>The Mississippi Delta region has worse population health outcomes, including higher overall cardiovascular and infant mortality rates. Water quality has yet to be considered as a factor in these health disparities. The objective of this paper is to determine overall differences in basic water quality indicators, electrolytes of cardiovascular importance, trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions of groundwater in delta and non-delta counties in states along the Mississippi River. Data were sourced from the major-ions dataset of the U.S. Geological Survey. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine the difference in water quality parameters. Overall, delta counties had lower total dissolved solids (TDS) (47 and 384 mg/L, p -value &lt; 0.001), calcium (7 and 58 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001), magnesium (2 and 22 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001), and potassium (1.57 and 1.80 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001) and higher sodium (38 mg/L and 22 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001) compared to non-delta counties. Overall, there were no statistical differences in trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions across delta versus non-delta counties. These results underscore the need for further epidemiological studies to understand if worse health outcomes in delta counties could be partially explained by these parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w16182622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alkalinity ; Arsenic ; Cadmium ; Chemicals ; Cobalt ; Comparative analysis ; Composition ; Copper ; County government ; Drinking water ; Electrolytes ; Environmental aspects ; Groundwater ; Health aspects ; Health disparities ; Heavy metals ; Life expectancy ; Magnesium ; Measurement ; Molybdenum ; Mortality ; Nitrogen ; Potassium ; Selenium ; Sodium ; Testing ; Trace elements ; Water quality ; Water supply ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.2622</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Emily V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Chunrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naser, Abu Mohd</creatorcontrib><title>Drinking Water Quality in Delta and Non-Delta Counties along the Mississippi River</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>The Mississippi Delta region has worse population health outcomes, including higher overall cardiovascular and infant mortality rates. Water quality has yet to be considered as a factor in these health disparities. The objective of this paper is to determine overall differences in basic water quality indicators, electrolytes of cardiovascular importance, trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions of groundwater in delta and non-delta counties in states along the Mississippi River. Data were sourced from the major-ions dataset of the U.S. Geological Survey. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine the difference in water quality parameters. Overall, delta counties had lower total dissolved solids (TDS) (47 and 384 mg/L, p -value &lt; 0.001), calcium (7 and 58 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001), magnesium (2 and 22 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001), and potassium (1.57 and 1.80 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001) and higher sodium (38 mg/L and 22 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001) compared to non-delta counties. Overall, there were no statistical differences in trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions across delta versus non-delta counties. These results underscore the need for further epidemiological studies to understand if worse health outcomes in delta counties could be partially explained by these parameters.</description><subject>Alkalinity</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>County government</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Molybdenum</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptTk1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKet2aSbLM5ltYvqIpF8bik29mauk3qJqv4741WpAdnhvl4vDczhJwCGwqh2fkHjKDgI84PSI8zJTIpJRzu9cdkEMKaJZO6KHLWI_Npa92rdSv6bCK29KEzjY2f1Do6xSYaatyS3nmX7aaJ71y0GKhpfNLEF6S3NoTv2G4tndt3bE_IUW2agIPf2idPlxePk-tsdn91MxnPshWHPGag2UIJVBpA13JUF5gvjKgESobpP65SqowGzrTQC6MUSC4Er7k0ORNSij452-3dtv6twxDLte9al06WAoApAJmkf6yVabC0rvaxNdXGhqocFwBFruCHNfyHlXyJG1t5h7VN-J7gCw9FagU</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Pickering, Emily V</creator><creator>Jia, Chunrong</creator><creator>Naser, Abu Mohd</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Drinking Water Quality in Delta and Non-Delta Counties along the Mississippi River</title><author>Pickering, Emily V ; Jia, Chunrong ; Naser, Abu Mohd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g215t-190b73e79119f46f8e5ba3c3e40e00427004ca9120939ba77142332f24a503443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alkalinity</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>County government</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Molybdenum</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Emily V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Chunrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naser, Abu Mohd</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pickering, Emily V</au><au>Jia, Chunrong</au><au>Naser, Abu Mohd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drinking Water Quality in Delta and Non-Delta Counties along the Mississippi River</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2622</spage><pages>2622-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>The Mississippi Delta region has worse population health outcomes, including higher overall cardiovascular and infant mortality rates. Water quality has yet to be considered as a factor in these health disparities. The objective of this paper is to determine overall differences in basic water quality indicators, electrolytes of cardiovascular importance, trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions of groundwater in delta and non-delta counties in states along the Mississippi River. Data were sourced from the major-ions dataset of the U.S. Geological Survey. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine the difference in water quality parameters. Overall, delta counties had lower total dissolved solids (TDS) (47 and 384 mg/L, p -value &lt; 0.001), calcium (7 and 58 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001), magnesium (2 and 22 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001), and potassium (1.57 and 1.80 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001) and higher sodium (38 mg/L and 22 mg/L; p -value &lt; 0.001) compared to non-delta counties. Overall, there were no statistical differences in trace elements, heavy metals, and radioactive ions across delta versus non-delta counties. These results underscore the need for further epidemiological studies to understand if worse health outcomes in delta counties could be partially explained by these parameters.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w16182622</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.2622
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3110711409
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Alkalinity
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chemicals
Cobalt
Comparative analysis
Composition
Copper
County government
Drinking water
Electrolytes
Environmental aspects
Groundwater
Health aspects
Health disparities
Heavy metals
Life expectancy
Magnesium
Measurement
Molybdenum
Mortality
Nitrogen
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Testing
Trace elements
Water quality
Water supply
Zinc
title Drinking Water Quality in Delta and Non-Delta Counties along the Mississippi River
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A36%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drinking%20Water%20Quality%20in%20Delta%20and%20Non-Delta%20Counties%20along%20the%20Mississippi%20River&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Pickering,%20Emily%20V&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2622&rft.pages=2622-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w16182622&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA811857109%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3110711409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A811857109&rfr_iscdi=true