Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)
Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as brique...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2024-09, Vol.1388 (1), p.12029 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12029 |
container_title | IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science |
container_volume | 1388 |
creator | Chusniyah, D A Pratiwi, R Benyamin Hartono, K F Djumantara, M Wijayanto, Y P |
description | Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3109954919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3109954919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-feafe9fe242d9da88c559deba6fbd4a2e132bcba9439788160a732c90a925ec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWKu_wQUvLRi7m-89SqwfUFCknpfJ7myb0mTjblLw6i83MaJHT_P1vjPM43mXjN4wmmULlsaxz0IWL1g4lAvKAhrwI2_yOzn-zWl66p05t6M0SaOQT7zP5QH2HbRlvSHtFkmDVhtbQS2RoNYo2_KANTpHjCaFLd87bFt0pAKFRFtTEWmkqbuWKIsbIrdgpYE9meV3-fyatAjEoitVh2S2fu07UKtvC5DGqF72Mj_3TjTsHV78xKn3dr9c54_-6vnhKb9d-ZIlnPsaQSPXGESB4gqyTMYxV1hAogsVQYAsDApZAO__SrOMJRTSMJCcAg9ilCycelfj3saa_g3Xip3pbN2fFCGjnMcRZ7xXpaNKWuOcRS0aW1ZgPwSjYgAuBpRiwCoG4IKJEXjvDEdnaZq_1f-5vgAf8oJR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109954919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><creator>Chusniyah, D A ; Pratiwi, R ; Benyamin ; Hartono, K F ; Djumantara, M ; Wijayanto, Y P</creator><creatorcontrib>Chusniyah, D A ; Pratiwi, R ; Benyamin ; Hartono, K F ; Djumantara, M ; Wijayanto, Y P</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Ash ; Ashes ; Briquets ; Briquettes ; Calorific value ; Carbon ; Charcoal ; Cocoa ; Effectiveness ; Emissions ; Energy ; Energy efficiency ; Energy sources ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse gases ; Human populations ; Moisture content ; Renewable energy ; Residues ; Sulfur ; Sulfur content ; Sustainable energy ; Water content</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-09, Vol.1388 (1), p.12029</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-feafe9fe242d9da88c559deba6fbd4a2e132bcba9439788160a732c90a925ec13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chusniyah, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartono, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djumantara, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijayanto, Y P</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><description>Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Ash</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Briquets</subject><subject>Briquettes</subject><subject>Calorific value</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Cocoa</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulfur content</subject><subject>Sustainable energy</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWKu_wQUvLRi7m-89SqwfUFCknpfJ7myb0mTjblLw6i83MaJHT_P1vjPM43mXjN4wmmULlsaxz0IWL1g4lAvKAhrwI2_yOzn-zWl66p05t6M0SaOQT7zP5QH2HbRlvSHtFkmDVhtbQS2RoNYo2_KANTpHjCaFLd87bFt0pAKFRFtTEWmkqbuWKIsbIrdgpYE9meV3-fyatAjEoitVh2S2fu07UKtvC5DGqF72Mj_3TjTsHV78xKn3dr9c54_-6vnhKb9d-ZIlnPsaQSPXGESB4gqyTMYxV1hAogsVQYAsDApZAO__SrOMJRTSMJCcAg9ilCycelfj3saa_g3Xip3pbN2fFCGjnMcRZ7xXpaNKWuOcRS0aW1ZgPwSjYgAuBpRiwCoG4IKJEXjvDEdnaZq_1f-5vgAf8oJR</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Chusniyah, D A</creator><creator>Pratiwi, R</creator><creator>Benyamin</creator><creator>Hartono, K F</creator><creator>Djumantara, M</creator><creator>Wijayanto, Y P</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</title><author>Chusniyah, D A ; Pratiwi, R ; Benyamin ; Hartono, K F ; Djumantara, M ; Wijayanto, Y P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-feafe9fe242d9da88c559deba6fbd4a2e132bcba9439788160a732c90a925ec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Ash</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Briquets</topic><topic>Briquettes</topic><topic>Calorific value</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Cocoa</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulfur content</topic><topic>Sustainable energy</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chusniyah, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartono, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djumantara, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijayanto, Y P</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chusniyah, D A</au><au>Pratiwi, R</au><au>Benyamin</au><au>Hartono, K F</au><au>Djumantara, M</au><au>Wijayanto, Y P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>1388</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12029</spage><pages>12029-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-1307 |
ispartof | IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-09, Vol.1388 (1), p.12029 |
issn | 1755-1307 1755-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3109954919 |
source | Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Ash Ashes Briquets Briquettes Calorific value Carbon Charcoal Cocoa Effectiveness Emissions Energy Energy efficiency Energy sources Fossil fuels Greenhouse gases Human populations Moisture content Renewable energy Residues Sulfur Sulfur content Sustainable energy Water content |
title | Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A50%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20performance%20effectiveness%20of%20briquettes%20made%20from%20coconut%20dreg%20charcoal%20(CDC),%20tea%20residue%20(TR),%20and%20cocoa%20pod%20(CP)&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Chusniyah,%20D%20A&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=1388&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12029&rft.pages=12029-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E3109954919%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109954919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |