Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)

Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as brique...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2024-09, Vol.1388 (1), p.12029
Hauptverfasser: Chusniyah, D A, Pratiwi, R, Benyamin, Hartono, K F, Djumantara, M, Wijayanto, Y P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12029
container_title IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science
container_volume 1388
creator Chusniyah, D A
Pratiwi, R
Benyamin
Hartono, K F
Djumantara, M
Wijayanto, Y P
description Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3109954919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3109954919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-feafe9fe242d9da88c559deba6fbd4a2e132bcba9439788160a732c90a925ec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWKu_wQUvLRi7m-89SqwfUFCknpfJ7myb0mTjblLw6i83MaJHT_P1vjPM43mXjN4wmmULlsaxz0IWL1g4lAvKAhrwI2_yOzn-zWl66p05t6M0SaOQT7zP5QH2HbRlvSHtFkmDVhtbQS2RoNYo2_KANTpHjCaFLd87bFt0pAKFRFtTEWmkqbuWKIsbIrdgpYE9meV3-fyatAjEoitVh2S2fu07UKtvC5DGqF72Mj_3TjTsHV78xKn3dr9c54_-6vnhKb9d-ZIlnPsaQSPXGESB4gqyTMYxV1hAogsVQYAsDApZAO__SrOMJRTSMJCcAg9ilCycelfj3saa_g3Xip3pbN2fFCGjnMcRZ7xXpaNKWuOcRS0aW1ZgPwSjYgAuBpRiwCoG4IKJEXjvDEdnaZq_1f-5vgAf8oJR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109954919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><creator>Chusniyah, D A ; Pratiwi, R ; Benyamin ; Hartono, K F ; Djumantara, M ; Wijayanto, Y P</creator><creatorcontrib>Chusniyah, D A ; Pratiwi, R ; Benyamin ; Hartono, K F ; Djumantara, M ; Wijayanto, Y P</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Ash ; Ashes ; Briquets ; Briquettes ; Calorific value ; Carbon ; Charcoal ; Cocoa ; Effectiveness ; Emissions ; Energy ; Energy efficiency ; Energy sources ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse gases ; Human populations ; Moisture content ; Renewable energy ; Residues ; Sulfur ; Sulfur content ; Sustainable energy ; Water content</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-09, Vol.1388 (1), p.12029</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-feafe9fe242d9da88c559deba6fbd4a2e132bcba9439788160a732c90a925ec13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chusniyah, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartono, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djumantara, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijayanto, Y P</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><description>Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Ash</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Briquets</subject><subject>Briquettes</subject><subject>Calorific value</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Cocoa</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulfur content</subject><subject>Sustainable energy</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWKu_wQUvLRi7m-89SqwfUFCknpfJ7myb0mTjblLw6i83MaJHT_P1vjPM43mXjN4wmmULlsaxz0IWL1g4lAvKAhrwI2_yOzn-zWl66p05t6M0SaOQT7zP5QH2HbRlvSHtFkmDVhtbQS2RoNYo2_KANTpHjCaFLd87bFt0pAKFRFtTEWmkqbuWKIsbIrdgpYE9meV3-fyatAjEoitVh2S2fu07UKtvC5DGqF72Mj_3TjTsHV78xKn3dr9c54_-6vnhKb9d-ZIlnPsaQSPXGESB4gqyTMYxV1hAogsVQYAsDApZAO__SrOMJRTSMJCcAg9ilCycelfj3saa_g3Xip3pbN2fFCGjnMcRZ7xXpaNKWuOcRS0aW1ZgPwSjYgAuBpRiwCoG4IKJEXjvDEdnaZq_1f-5vgAf8oJR</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Chusniyah, D A</creator><creator>Pratiwi, R</creator><creator>Benyamin</creator><creator>Hartono, K F</creator><creator>Djumantara, M</creator><creator>Wijayanto, Y P</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</title><author>Chusniyah, D A ; Pratiwi, R ; Benyamin ; Hartono, K F ; Djumantara, M ; Wijayanto, Y P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-feafe9fe242d9da88c559deba6fbd4a2e132bcba9439788160a732c90a925ec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Ash</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Briquets</topic><topic>Briquettes</topic><topic>Calorific value</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Cocoa</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulfur content</topic><topic>Sustainable energy</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chusniyah, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benyamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartono, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djumantara, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijayanto, Y P</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chusniyah, D A</au><au>Pratiwi, R</au><au>Benyamin</au><au>Hartono, K F</au><au>Djumantara, M</au><au>Wijayanto, Y P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>1388</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12029</spage><pages>12029-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>Environmental pollution, depletion of fossil fuels, and a significant rise in the human population are contributing to an increase in the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Addressing these challenges necessitates the production of clean, low-carbon emission, and sustainable bioenergy, such as briquettes, which can significantly contribute to knowledge and innovation. To assess the effectiveness of briquettes, their characteristics need to be tested using proximate analysis. In examining the characteristics of briquettes, the average moisture content of coconut dreg charcoal and tea residue (CDC+TR) measured 4.835%, contrasting with the 5.9% found in the cocoa pod (CP). The average ash content in CDC+TR was 2.351%, while CP recorded 3.2%. The average volatile matter in CDC+TR was 24.993%, while in CP, it was 31.5%. CDC+TR had an average fixed carbon of 67.815%, compared to CP of 59.5%. Furthermore, the average gross calorific value in CDC+TR was 4562.16 cal/g, whereas in CP, it was 4205.2 cal/g. In conclusion, CP briquettes could serve as an alternative energy source due to ease of production, low sulfur content, and favorable calorific value. CDC+TR, on the other hand, enhanced energy efficiency because of their lower moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter. Additionally, CDC+TR briquettes had higher fixed carbon and gross calorific values compared to CP, making them a suitable energy source.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-1307
ispartof IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2024-09, Vol.1388 (1), p.12029
issn 1755-1307
1755-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3109954919
source Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra
subjects Alternative energy sources
Ash
Ashes
Briquets
Briquettes
Calorific value
Carbon
Charcoal
Cocoa
Effectiveness
Emissions
Energy
Energy efficiency
Energy sources
Fossil fuels
Greenhouse gases
Human populations
Moisture content
Renewable energy
Residues
Sulfur
Sulfur content
Sustainable energy
Water content
title Evaluating the performance effectiveness of briquettes made from coconut dreg charcoal (CDC), tea residue (TR), and cocoa pod (CP)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A50%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20performance%20effectiveness%20of%20briquettes%20made%20from%20coconut%20dreg%20charcoal%20(CDC),%20tea%20residue%20(TR),%20and%20cocoa%20pod%20(CP)&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Chusniyah,%20D%20A&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=1388&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12029&rft.pages=12029-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E3109954919%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109954919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true