Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data
Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2024-09, Vol.129 (18), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo Han, Ying Xu, Zhongfeng Guo, Weidong |
description | Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process.
Plain Language Summary
High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature ex |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2024JD041253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3109687043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3109687043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-fc0fa01af3d4f4dedde83ba7c0b4e43e8afa0625593e65a354bed047e91d69c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0xwdYYkvAjh0nXpaklFblIR4Su8hJJshVEhc7bcmOT-Ab-RJSFSFWzGaudI9mpIPQCSXnlPjywic-nyWEUz9ge2jgUyG9SEqx_5vDl0M0dG5B-okI4wEfoHrkHDinm1ccV7pWLeDxe2uhBod1g5OuUbXOVYUTs2lcH7bko65XlWq1aRxOrF5Dg7MOK3xr1lDhS63c18dnbKyFvIUCxzfTe4ET1apjdFCqysHwZx-h56vxU3ztze8m03g093IqufDKnJSKUFWygpe8gKKAiGUqzEnGgTOIVF8LPwgkAxEoFvAMCsJDkLQQMhfsCJ3u7i6teVuBa9OFWdmmf5kySqSIQsJZT53tqNwa5yyU6dL2CmyXUpJunaZ_nfY42-EbXUH3L5vOJg9JIMNQsG-stHkj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109687043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo ; Han, Ying ; Xu, Zhongfeng ; Guo, Weidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo ; Han, Ying ; Xu, Zhongfeng ; Guo, Weidong</creatorcontrib><description>Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process.
Plain Language Summary
High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature extremes, reducing the overall bias by 1%–82%. Bias‐corrected GCM data contributes to better simulation of the large‐scale circulation in the RCM and further improves the simulation of climate extremes by various physical processes. Our results highlight the effectiveness of the bias‐corrected GCM data by the MVT method in RCM simulation of climate extremes.
Key Points
Global climate model (GCM) bias should be constrained in the future projections of regional climate extremes by dynamical downscaling
Multivariate bias correction method for GCM can greatly improve the downscaled simulation of climate extremes
GCM bias corrections promote better simulations of the large‐scale circulation, resulting in improvements in downscaled climate extremes</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2024JD041253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advection ; Annual precipitation ; Annual variations ; Bias ; boundary conditions ; Climate ; Climate and weather ; climate extremes ; Climate models ; Climatic extremes ; Climatic indexes ; Climatological means ; Climatology ; Datasets ; dynamical downscaling ; Effectiveness ; Energy exchange ; Energy transfer ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental risk ; Evaporation ; Extreme values ; Extreme weather ; GCM bias correction ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; Precipitation ; projections ; Regional analysis ; Regional climate models ; Regional climates ; Regional planning ; Reliability ; Risk assessment ; Simulation ; Surface energy ; Surface properties ; Temperature extremes ; Weather ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2024-09, Vol.129 (18), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-fc0fa01af3d4f4dedde83ba7c0b4e43e8afa0625593e65a354bed047e91d69c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1274-6438 ; 0000-0003-0299-6393 ; 0000-0002-4647-6317</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2024JD041253$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2024JD041253$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhongfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Weidong</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process.
Plain Language Summary
High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature extremes, reducing the overall bias by 1%–82%. Bias‐corrected GCM data contributes to better simulation of the large‐scale circulation in the RCM and further improves the simulation of climate extremes by various physical processes. Our results highlight the effectiveness of the bias‐corrected GCM data by the MVT method in RCM simulation of climate extremes.
Key Points
Global climate model (GCM) bias should be constrained in the future projections of regional climate extremes by dynamical downscaling
Multivariate bias correction method for GCM can greatly improve the downscaled simulation of climate extremes
GCM bias corrections promote better simulations of the large‐scale circulation, resulting in improvements in downscaled climate extremes</description><subject>Advection</subject><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Annual variations</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>boundary conditions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate and weather</subject><subject>climate extremes</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatic extremes</subject><subject>Climatic indexes</subject><subject>Climatological means</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>dynamical downscaling</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Energy exchange</subject><subject>Energy transfer</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>GCM bias correction</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>projections</subject><subject>Regional analysis</subject><subject>Regional climate models</subject><subject>Regional climates</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Surface energy</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Temperature extremes</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0xwdYYkvAjh0nXpaklFblIR4Su8hJJshVEhc7bcmOT-Ab-RJSFSFWzGaudI9mpIPQCSXnlPjywic-nyWEUz9ge2jgUyG9SEqx_5vDl0M0dG5B-okI4wEfoHrkHDinm1ccV7pWLeDxe2uhBod1g5OuUbXOVYUTs2lcH7bko65XlWq1aRxOrF5Dg7MOK3xr1lDhS63c18dnbKyFvIUCxzfTe4ET1apjdFCqysHwZx-h56vxU3ztze8m03g093IqufDKnJSKUFWygpe8gKKAiGUqzEnGgTOIVF8LPwgkAxEoFvAMCsJDkLQQMhfsCJ3u7i6teVuBa9OFWdmmf5kySqSIQsJZT53tqNwa5yyU6dL2CmyXUpJunaZ_nfY42-EbXUH3L5vOJg9JIMNQsG-stHkj</recordid><startdate>20240928</startdate><enddate>20240928</enddate><creator>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</creator><creator>Han, Ying</creator><creator>Xu, Zhongfeng</creator><creator>Guo, Weidong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-6438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-6393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4647-6317</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240928</creationdate><title>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</title><author>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo ; Han, Ying ; Xu, Zhongfeng ; Guo, Weidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-fc0fa01af3d4f4dedde83ba7c0b4e43e8afa0625593e65a354bed047e91d69c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Advection</topic><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Annual variations</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>boundary conditions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate and weather</topic><topic>climate extremes</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatic extremes</topic><topic>Climatic indexes</topic><topic>Climatological means</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>dynamical downscaling</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Energy exchange</topic><topic>Energy transfer</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>GCM bias correction</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>projections</topic><topic>Regional analysis</topic><topic>Regional climate models</topic><topic>Regional climates</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Surface energy</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Temperature extremes</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhongfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Weidong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</au><au>Han, Ying</au><au>Xu, Zhongfeng</au><au>Guo, Weidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2024-09-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>18</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process.
Plain Language Summary
High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature extremes, reducing the overall bias by 1%–82%. Bias‐corrected GCM data contributes to better simulation of the large‐scale circulation in the RCM and further improves the simulation of climate extremes by various physical processes. Our results highlight the effectiveness of the bias‐corrected GCM data by the MVT method in RCM simulation of climate extremes.
Key Points
Global climate model (GCM) bias should be constrained in the future projections of regional climate extremes by dynamical downscaling
Multivariate bias correction method for GCM can greatly improve the downscaled simulation of climate extremes
GCM bias corrections promote better simulations of the large‐scale circulation, resulting in improvements in downscaled climate extremes</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2024JD041253</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-6438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-6393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4647-6317</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2024-09, Vol.129 (18), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3109687043 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Advection Annual precipitation Annual variations Bias boundary conditions Climate Climate and weather climate extremes Climate models Climatic extremes Climatic indexes Climatological means Climatology Datasets dynamical downscaling Effectiveness Energy exchange Energy transfer Environmental assessment Environmental risk Evaporation Extreme values Extreme weather GCM bias correction Global climate Global climate models Precipitation projections Regional analysis Regional climate models Regional climates Regional planning Reliability Risk assessment Simulation Surface energy Surface properties Temperature extremes Weather Weather forecasting |
title | Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T05%3A39%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Climate%20Extremes%20in%20Dynamical%20Downscaling%20Simulations%20Driven%20by%20a%20Novel%20Bias%E2%80%90Corrected%20CMIP6%20Data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Zhang,%20Meng%E2%80%90Zhuo&rft.date=2024-09-28&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=18&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2024JD041253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3109687043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109687043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |