Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data

Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2024-09, Vol.129 (18), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo, Han, Ying, Xu, Zhongfeng, Guo, Weidong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 18
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 129
creator Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo
Han, Ying
Xu, Zhongfeng
Guo, Weidong
description Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process. Plain Language Summary High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature ex
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2024JD041253
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3109687043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3109687043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-fc0fa01af3d4f4dedde83ba7c0b4e43e8afa0625593e65a354bed047e91d69c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0xwdYYkvAjh0nXpaklFblIR4Su8hJJshVEhc7bcmOT-Ab-RJSFSFWzGaudI9mpIPQCSXnlPjywic-nyWEUz9ge2jgUyG9SEqx_5vDl0M0dG5B-okI4wEfoHrkHDinm1ccV7pWLeDxe2uhBod1g5OuUbXOVYUTs2lcH7bko65XlWq1aRxOrF5Dg7MOK3xr1lDhS63c18dnbKyFvIUCxzfTe4ET1apjdFCqysHwZx-h56vxU3ztze8m03g093IqufDKnJSKUFWygpe8gKKAiGUqzEnGgTOIVF8LPwgkAxEoFvAMCsJDkLQQMhfsCJ3u7i6teVuBa9OFWdmmf5kySqSIQsJZT53tqNwa5yyU6dL2CmyXUpJunaZ_nfY42-EbXUH3L5vOJg9JIMNQsG-stHkj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109687043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo ; Han, Ying ; Xu, Zhongfeng ; Guo, Weidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo ; Han, Ying ; Xu, Zhongfeng ; Guo, Weidong</creatorcontrib><description>Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process. Plain Language Summary High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature extremes, reducing the overall bias by 1%–82%. Bias‐corrected GCM data contributes to better simulation of the large‐scale circulation in the RCM and further improves the simulation of climate extremes by various physical processes. Our results highlight the effectiveness of the bias‐corrected GCM data by the MVT method in RCM simulation of climate extremes. Key Points Global climate model (GCM) bias should be constrained in the future projections of regional climate extremes by dynamical downscaling Multivariate bias correction method for GCM can greatly improve the downscaled simulation of climate extremes GCM bias corrections promote better simulations of the large‐scale circulation, resulting in improvements in downscaled climate extremes</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2024JD041253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advection ; Annual precipitation ; Annual variations ; Bias ; boundary conditions ; Climate ; Climate and weather ; climate extremes ; Climate models ; Climatic extremes ; Climatic indexes ; Climatological means ; Climatology ; Datasets ; dynamical downscaling ; Effectiveness ; Energy exchange ; Energy transfer ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental risk ; Evaporation ; Extreme values ; Extreme weather ; GCM bias correction ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; Precipitation ; projections ; Regional analysis ; Regional climate models ; Regional climates ; Regional planning ; Reliability ; Risk assessment ; Simulation ; Surface energy ; Surface properties ; Temperature extremes ; Weather ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2024-09, Vol.129 (18), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-fc0fa01af3d4f4dedde83ba7c0b4e43e8afa0625593e65a354bed047e91d69c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1274-6438 ; 0000-0003-0299-6393 ; 0000-0002-4647-6317</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2024JD041253$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2024JD041253$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhongfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Weidong</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process. Plain Language Summary High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature extremes, reducing the overall bias by 1%–82%. Bias‐corrected GCM data contributes to better simulation of the large‐scale circulation in the RCM and further improves the simulation of climate extremes by various physical processes. Our results highlight the effectiveness of the bias‐corrected GCM data by the MVT method in RCM simulation of climate extremes. Key Points Global climate model (GCM) bias should be constrained in the future projections of regional climate extremes by dynamical downscaling Multivariate bias correction method for GCM can greatly improve the downscaled simulation of climate extremes GCM bias corrections promote better simulations of the large‐scale circulation, resulting in improvements in downscaled climate extremes</description><subject>Advection</subject><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Annual variations</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>boundary conditions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate and weather</subject><subject>climate extremes</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatic extremes</subject><subject>Climatic indexes</subject><subject>Climatological means</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>dynamical downscaling</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Energy exchange</subject><subject>Energy transfer</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>GCM bias correction</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>projections</subject><subject>Regional analysis</subject><subject>Regional climate models</subject><subject>Regional climates</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Surface energy</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Temperature extremes</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0xwdYYkvAjh0nXpaklFblIR4Su8hJJshVEhc7bcmOT-Ab-RJSFSFWzGaudI9mpIPQCSXnlPjywic-nyWEUz9ge2jgUyG9SEqx_5vDl0M0dG5B-okI4wEfoHrkHDinm1ccV7pWLeDxe2uhBod1g5OuUbXOVYUTs2lcH7bko65XlWq1aRxOrF5Dg7MOK3xr1lDhS63c18dnbKyFvIUCxzfTe4ET1apjdFCqysHwZx-h56vxU3ztze8m03g093IqufDKnJSKUFWygpe8gKKAiGUqzEnGgTOIVF8LPwgkAxEoFvAMCsJDkLQQMhfsCJ3u7i6teVuBa9OFWdmmf5kySqSIQsJZT53tqNwa5yyU6dL2CmyXUpJunaZ_nfY42-EbXUH3L5vOJg9JIMNQsG-stHkj</recordid><startdate>20240928</startdate><enddate>20240928</enddate><creator>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</creator><creator>Han, Ying</creator><creator>Xu, Zhongfeng</creator><creator>Guo, Weidong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-6438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-6393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4647-6317</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240928</creationdate><title>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</title><author>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo ; Han, Ying ; Xu, Zhongfeng ; Guo, Weidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1946-fc0fa01af3d4f4dedde83ba7c0b4e43e8afa0625593e65a354bed047e91d69c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Advection</topic><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Annual variations</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>boundary conditions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate and weather</topic><topic>climate extremes</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatic extremes</topic><topic>Climatic indexes</topic><topic>Climatological means</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>dynamical downscaling</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Energy exchange</topic><topic>Energy transfer</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>GCM bias correction</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>projections</topic><topic>Regional analysis</topic><topic>Regional climate models</topic><topic>Regional climates</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Surface energy</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Temperature extremes</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhongfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Weidong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Meng‐Zhuo</au><au>Han, Ying</au><au>Xu, Zhongfeng</au><au>Guo, Weidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2024-09-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>18</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Dynamical downscaling is a widely‐used approach for generating regional projections of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, the systematic bias of the global climate model (GCM) generally degrades the reliability of projections. Recently, novel bias‐corrected CMIP6 data was generated using a mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method for dynamical downscaling simulation. To validate the effectiveness of this data in the dynamical downscaling simulation of climate extremes, we carry out three Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations over Asia‐western North Pacific with a 25 km grid spacing from 1980 to 2014. The dynamical downscaling simulations driven by the raw GCM data set (hereafter WRF_GCM) and the bias‐corrected GCM (hereafter WRF_GCMbc) were assessed against the simulation driven by the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 data set. The results indicate that the MVT bias correction significantly improves the climatological mean and inter‐annual variability of downscaled climate extreme indices. In terms of the climatological mean, the WRF_GCMbc shows a 25%–82% decrease in root mean square errors (RMSEs) against the WRF_GCM. As for the inter‐annual variability, the MVT bias correction can improve the downscaling simulation of almost all precipitation extreme indices and 70% of the temperature extreme indices, characterized by the RMSEs' reduction of 1%–58%. The improvements of the climate extremes in terms of the climatological mean in the WRF_GCMbc primarily stem from the improved large‐scale circulation and ocean evaporation in the WRF, which in turn improves the downscaled precipitation and 2 m temperature through the advection, radiation, and surface energy exchange process. Plain Language Summary High‐resolution projection of climate extremes is critical for climate risk assessment and regional adaptation planning. Regional climate model (RCM) is widely used to project future changes of climate extremes at a finer scale. However, as the input data for RCM, the global climate model (GCM) suffers from systematic biases, which greatly reduces the reliability of climate extremes' projections. Using the raw GCM data and the bias‐corrected GCM data by the mean‐variance‐trend (MVT) bias correction method, we conduct RCM simulations over the Asian‐western North Pacific region. We found that the MVT method can significantly improve the RCM simulations of various indices for precipitation and temperature extremes, reducing the overall bias by 1%–82%. Bias‐corrected GCM data contributes to better simulation of the large‐scale circulation in the RCM and further improves the simulation of climate extremes by various physical processes. Our results highlight the effectiveness of the bias‐corrected GCM data by the MVT method in RCM simulation of climate extremes. Key Points Global climate model (GCM) bias should be constrained in the future projections of regional climate extremes by dynamical downscaling Multivariate bias correction method for GCM can greatly improve the downscaled simulation of climate extremes GCM bias corrections promote better simulations of the large‐scale circulation, resulting in improvements in downscaled climate extremes</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2024JD041253</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-6438</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-6393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4647-6317</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2024-09, Vol.129 (18), p.n/a
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3109687043
source Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Advection
Annual precipitation
Annual variations
Bias
boundary conditions
Climate
Climate and weather
climate extremes
Climate models
Climatic extremes
Climatic indexes
Climatological means
Climatology
Datasets
dynamical downscaling
Effectiveness
Energy exchange
Energy transfer
Environmental assessment
Environmental risk
Evaporation
Extreme values
Extreme weather
GCM bias correction
Global climate
Global climate models
Precipitation
projections
Regional analysis
Regional climate models
Regional climates
Regional planning
Reliability
Risk assessment
Simulation
Surface energy
Surface properties
Temperature extremes
Weather
Weather forecasting
title Assessing Climate Extremes in Dynamical Downscaling Simulations Driven by a Novel Bias‐Corrected CMIP6 Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T05%3A39%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Climate%20Extremes%20in%20Dynamical%20Downscaling%20Simulations%20Driven%20by%20a%20Novel%20Bias%E2%80%90Corrected%20CMIP6%20Data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Zhang,%20Meng%E2%80%90Zhuo&rft.date=2024-09-28&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=18&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2024JD041253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3109687043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109687043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true