Collection Point Matters in Time-Energy Tradeoff for UAV-Enabled Data Collection of IoT Devices

In this work, we study the problem of dispatching an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for data collection of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, where a UAV departs from a data center, then visits some IoT devices for data collection and finally returns to the data center. Different from most existing wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE internet of things journal 2024-10, Vol.11 (19), p.31492-31506
Hauptverfasser: Fu, Qiyong, Jia, Riheng, Lyu, Feng, Lin, Feilong, Zheng, Zhonglong, Li, Minglu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31506
container_issue 19
container_start_page 31492
container_title IEEE internet of things journal
container_volume 11
creator Fu, Qiyong
Jia, Riheng
Lyu, Feng
Lin, Feilong
Zheng, Zhonglong
Li, Minglu
description In this work, we study the problem of dispatching an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for data collection of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, where a UAV departs from a data center, then visits some IoT devices for data collection and finally returns to the data center. Different from most existing works on UAV-enabled data collection, we assume that the UAV's collection point, i.e., the location where the UAV stays during the data collection process, can be deployed anywhere within the communication range of each IoT device, rather than being assumed to be in a fixed position. This new assumption is motivated by the fact that the collection point has a great impact on both time and energy consumption of the UAV during its data collection tour. Thus, in this work, we focus on minimizing the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption during a data collection tour, by jointly optimizing the UAV's collection point for each IoT device, flight trajectory and flight speed. We formulate this problem as a multiobjective optimization problem, which is solved by executing the following three successive steps: 1) we first employ the ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm to decide the UAV's visiting order of all IoT devices; 2) we then reduce the searching space of the collection point for each visited IoT device by using geometric theory and reformulate the original problem; and 3) we finally develop an enhanced multiobjective particle swarm optimization (EMOPSO) algorithm by incorporating a novel gbest selection strategy to identify the optimal collection point for each visited IoT device, based on which the corresponding flight trajectory as well as the flight speed is calculated. We refer to the above three-step hybrid algorithm as ACO-EMOPSO-G. Extensive evaluations validate the superiority of ACO-EMOPSO-G in terms of the tradeoff between the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption, compared with some other data collection approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3418081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3109489472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10568916</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3109489472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c912-4b5eb6dd56b90eca898f3d1cf33c4c1b428ee4d0936070f0b8c86a32928f76003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWLQ_QPAQ8Lw1X5tNjqWtWqnUw-o1ZLMT2bLd1GQr9N-7pT30NMPwvO_Ag9ADJRNKiX5-X67LCSNMTLigiih6hUaMsyITUrLri_0WjVPaEEKGWE61HCEzC20Lrm9Chz9D0_X4w_Y9xISbDpfNFrJFB_HngMtoawjeYx8i_pp-D3dbtVDjue0tvmgJHi9Diefw1zhI9-jG2zbB-DzvUPmyKGdv2Wr9upxNV5nTlGWiyqGSdZ3LShNwVmnleU2d59wJRyvBFICoieaSFMSTSjklLWeaKV9IQvgdejrV7mL43UPqzSbsYzd8NHwwJJQWBRsoeqJcDClF8GYXm62NB0OJOZo0R5PmaNKcTQ6Zx1OmAYALPpdKU8n_AfrBbdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109489472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collection Point Matters in Time-Energy Tradeoff for UAV-Enabled Data Collection of IoT Devices</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Fu, Qiyong ; Jia, Riheng ; Lyu, Feng ; Lin, Feilong ; Zheng, Zhonglong ; Li, Minglu</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, Qiyong ; Jia, Riheng ; Lyu, Feng ; Lin, Feilong ; Zheng, Zhonglong ; Li, Minglu</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, we study the problem of dispatching an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for data collection of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, where a UAV departs from a data center, then visits some IoT devices for data collection and finally returns to the data center. Different from most existing works on UAV-enabled data collection, we assume that the UAV's collection point, i.e., the location where the UAV stays during the data collection process, can be deployed anywhere within the communication range of each IoT device, rather than being assumed to be in a fixed position. This new assumption is motivated by the fact that the collection point has a great impact on both time and energy consumption of the UAV during its data collection tour. Thus, in this work, we focus on minimizing the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption during a data collection tour, by jointly optimizing the UAV's collection point for each IoT device, flight trajectory and flight speed. We formulate this problem as a multiobjective optimization problem, which is solved by executing the following three successive steps: 1) we first employ the ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm to decide the UAV's visiting order of all IoT devices; 2) we then reduce the searching space of the collection point for each visited IoT device by using geometric theory and reformulate the original problem; and 3) we finally develop an enhanced multiobjective particle swarm optimization (EMOPSO) algorithm by incorporating a novel gbest selection strategy to identify the optimal collection point for each visited IoT device, based on which the corresponding flight trajectory as well as the flight speed is calculated. We refer to the above three-step hybrid algorithm as ACO-EMOPSO-G. Extensive evaluations validate the superiority of ACO-EMOPSO-G in terms of the tradeoff between the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption, compared with some other data collection approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2327-4662</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-4662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3418081</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IITJAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Airspeed ; Algorithms ; Ant colony optimization ; Autonomous aerial vehicles ; Completion time ; Computer centers ; Data centers ; Data collection ; Devices ; Energy consumption ; Flight ; Internet of Things ; Multiobjective optimization ; Multiple objective analysis ; Optimization ; Particle swarm optimization ; Position (location) ; Task analysis ; Tradeoffs ; Trajectory ; Trajectory optimization ; trajectory planning ; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled data collection network ; Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><ispartof>IEEE internet of things journal, 2024-10, Vol.11 (19), p.31492-31506</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c912-4b5eb6dd56b90eca898f3d1cf33c4c1b428ee4d0936070f0b8c86a32928f76003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8125-5819 ; 0000-0002-5741-5560 ; 0000-0002-2990-5415 ; 0000-0001-6547-3472 ; 0000-0003-0981-3721 ; 0000-0002-5271-9215</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10568916$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,793,27905,27906,54739</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10568916$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, Qiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Riheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Feilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhonglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Minglu</creatorcontrib><title>Collection Point Matters in Time-Energy Tradeoff for UAV-Enabled Data Collection of IoT Devices</title><title>IEEE internet of things journal</title><addtitle>JIoT</addtitle><description>In this work, we study the problem of dispatching an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for data collection of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, where a UAV departs from a data center, then visits some IoT devices for data collection and finally returns to the data center. Different from most existing works on UAV-enabled data collection, we assume that the UAV's collection point, i.e., the location where the UAV stays during the data collection process, can be deployed anywhere within the communication range of each IoT device, rather than being assumed to be in a fixed position. This new assumption is motivated by the fact that the collection point has a great impact on both time and energy consumption of the UAV during its data collection tour. Thus, in this work, we focus on minimizing the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption during a data collection tour, by jointly optimizing the UAV's collection point for each IoT device, flight trajectory and flight speed. We formulate this problem as a multiobjective optimization problem, which is solved by executing the following three successive steps: 1) we first employ the ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm to decide the UAV's visiting order of all IoT devices; 2) we then reduce the searching space of the collection point for each visited IoT device by using geometric theory and reformulate the original problem; and 3) we finally develop an enhanced multiobjective particle swarm optimization (EMOPSO) algorithm by incorporating a novel gbest selection strategy to identify the optimal collection point for each visited IoT device, based on which the corresponding flight trajectory as well as the flight speed is calculated. We refer to the above three-step hybrid algorithm as ACO-EMOPSO-G. Extensive evaluations validate the superiority of ACO-EMOPSO-G in terms of the tradeoff between the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption, compared with some other data collection approaches.</description><subject>Airspeed</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Ant colony optimization</subject><subject>Autonomous aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Completion time</subject><subject>Computer centers</subject><subject>Data centers</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Multiobjective optimization</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Position (location)</subject><subject>Task analysis</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Trajectory</subject><subject>Trajectory optimization</subject><subject>trajectory planning</subject><subject>unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled data collection network</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><issn>2327-4662</issn><issn>2327-4662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWLQ_QPAQ8Lw1X5tNjqWtWqnUw-o1ZLMT2bLd1GQr9N-7pT30NMPwvO_Ag9ADJRNKiX5-X67LCSNMTLigiih6hUaMsyITUrLri_0WjVPaEEKGWE61HCEzC20Lrm9Chz9D0_X4w_Y9xISbDpfNFrJFB_HngMtoawjeYx8i_pp-D3dbtVDjue0tvmgJHi9Diefw1zhI9-jG2zbB-DzvUPmyKGdv2Wr9upxNV5nTlGWiyqGSdZ3LShNwVmnleU2d59wJRyvBFICoieaSFMSTSjklLWeaKV9IQvgdejrV7mL43UPqzSbsYzd8NHwwJJQWBRsoeqJcDClF8GYXm62NB0OJOZo0R5PmaNKcTQ6Zx1OmAYALPpdKU8n_AfrBbdA</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Fu, Qiyong</creator><creator>Jia, Riheng</creator><creator>Lyu, Feng</creator><creator>Lin, Feilong</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhonglong</creator><creator>Li, Minglu</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-5819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-5560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-5415</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-3472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-3721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5271-9215</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Collection Point Matters in Time-Energy Tradeoff for UAV-Enabled Data Collection of IoT Devices</title><author>Fu, Qiyong ; Jia, Riheng ; Lyu, Feng ; Lin, Feilong ; Zheng, Zhonglong ; Li, Minglu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c912-4b5eb6dd56b90eca898f3d1cf33c4c1b428ee4d0936070f0b8c86a32928f76003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Airspeed</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Ant colony optimization</topic><topic>Autonomous aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Completion time</topic><topic>Computer centers</topic><topic>Data centers</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Multiobjective optimization</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Position (location)</topic><topic>Task analysis</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Trajectory</topic><topic>Trajectory optimization</topic><topic>trajectory planning</topic><topic>unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled data collection network</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, Qiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Riheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Feilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhonglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Minglu</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE internet of things journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, Qiyong</au><au>Jia, Riheng</au><au>Lyu, Feng</au><au>Lin, Feilong</au><au>Zheng, Zhonglong</au><au>Li, Minglu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collection Point Matters in Time-Energy Tradeoff for UAV-Enabled Data Collection of IoT Devices</atitle><jtitle>IEEE internet of things journal</jtitle><stitle>JIoT</stitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>31492</spage><epage>31506</epage><pages>31492-31506</pages><issn>2327-4662</issn><eissn>2327-4662</eissn><coden>IITJAU</coden><abstract>In this work, we study the problem of dispatching an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for data collection of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, where a UAV departs from a data center, then visits some IoT devices for data collection and finally returns to the data center. Different from most existing works on UAV-enabled data collection, we assume that the UAV's collection point, i.e., the location where the UAV stays during the data collection process, can be deployed anywhere within the communication range of each IoT device, rather than being assumed to be in a fixed position. This new assumption is motivated by the fact that the collection point has a great impact on both time and energy consumption of the UAV during its data collection tour. Thus, in this work, we focus on minimizing the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption during a data collection tour, by jointly optimizing the UAV's collection point for each IoT device, flight trajectory and flight speed. We formulate this problem as a multiobjective optimization problem, which is solved by executing the following three successive steps: 1) we first employ the ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm to decide the UAV's visiting order of all IoT devices; 2) we then reduce the searching space of the collection point for each visited IoT device by using geometric theory and reformulate the original problem; and 3) we finally develop an enhanced multiobjective particle swarm optimization (EMOPSO) algorithm by incorporating a novel gbest selection strategy to identify the optimal collection point for each visited IoT device, based on which the corresponding flight trajectory as well as the flight speed is calculated. We refer to the above three-step hybrid algorithm as ACO-EMOPSO-G. Extensive evaluations validate the superiority of ACO-EMOPSO-G in terms of the tradeoff between the UAV's task completion time and energy consumption, compared with some other data collection approaches.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JIOT.2024.3418081</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-5819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-5560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-5415</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-3472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-3721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5271-9215</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2327-4662
ispartof IEEE internet of things journal, 2024-10, Vol.11 (19), p.31492-31506
issn 2327-4662
2327-4662
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3109489472
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Airspeed
Algorithms
Ant colony optimization
Autonomous aerial vehicles
Completion time
Computer centers
Data centers
Data collection
Devices
Energy consumption
Flight
Internet of Things
Multiobjective optimization
Multiple objective analysis
Optimization
Particle swarm optimization
Position (location)
Task analysis
Tradeoffs
Trajectory
Trajectory optimization
trajectory planning
unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled data collection network
Unmanned aerial vehicles
title Collection Point Matters in Time-Energy Tradeoff for UAV-Enabled Data Collection of IoT Devices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A30%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collection%20Point%20Matters%20in%20Time-Energy%20Tradeoff%20for%20UAV-Enabled%20Data%20Collection%20of%20IoT%20Devices&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20internet%20of%20things%20journal&rft.au=Fu,%20Qiyong&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=31492&rft.epage=31506&rft.pages=31492-31506&rft.issn=2327-4662&rft.eissn=2327-4662&rft.coden=IITJAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3418081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E3109489472%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109489472&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10568916&rfr_iscdi=true