Is a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 too low? Evidence from population density analogues
This research considers the current New Zealand conventional wisdom of a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 circa‐1770 using a variety of population density analogues. The first set of analogues examines estimated population densities of six districts in early‐contact period New Zealand for whi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia-Pacific economic history review 2024-03, Vol.64 (1), p.94-112 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 112 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | Asia-Pacific economic history review |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Chapple, Simon |
description | This research considers the current New Zealand conventional wisdom of a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 circa‐1770 using a variety of population density analogues. The first set of analogues examines estimated population densities of six districts in early‐contact period New Zealand for which reasonable population estimates can be constructed using methods of historical demography. The second set examines estimated population densities of pre‐industrial societies on large, relatively isolated temperate islands outside of New Zealand. The density research indicates that a contact‐era Māori population in excess of 200,000 is a distinct possibility. Based on this density analysis the current conventional wisdom's figure of 100,000 appears to be—considerably—on the low side, and suggesting considerable catastrophic early post‐contact population decline. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aehr.12281 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3109048969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3109048969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-57e0ed805c268fead956988acbbfc4d748574920bb361ef3d423c19842fcd9f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MoWGovPkHAm7g1H_uRnKSUagsVQRS8hWw20S3bzZpsW3rTN_ChfBKfxNQV7Mm5zDDzm_8MfwBOMRriEJdSv7ghJoThA9AjjJIIJ9nT4V59DAbeLxBChDPOEO0BNfNQwtvPd-tKqGzdStV-vX1oJ2Fjm1Ul29LW0BqIEboIi7C1FlZ2cwUn67LQtdLQOLvch0PXl-0WylpW9nml_Qk4MrLyevCb--DxevIwnkbzu5vZeDSPFOUYR0mmkS4YShRJmdGy4EnKGZMqz42KiyxmSRZzgvKcplgbWsSEKsxZTIwquElpH5x1uo2zr-FuKxZ25cIXXlCMOIoZT3mgzjtKOeu900Y0rlxKtxUYiZ2PYuej-PExwLCDdfCm9H8o4zjME04DgjtkU1Z6-4-YGE2m953sN2EIgCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109048969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 too low? Evidence from population density analogues</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chapple, Simon</creator><creatorcontrib>Chapple, Simon</creatorcontrib><description>This research considers the current New Zealand conventional wisdom of a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 circa‐1770 using a variety of population density analogues. The first set of analogues examines estimated population densities of six districts in early‐contact period New Zealand for which reasonable population estimates can be constructed using methods of historical demography. The second set examines estimated population densities of pre‐industrial societies on large, relatively isolated temperate islands outside of New Zealand. The density research indicates that a contact‐era Māori population in excess of 200,000 is a distinct possibility. Based on this density analysis the current conventional wisdom's figure of 100,000 appears to be—considerably—on the low side, and suggesting considerable catastrophic early post‐contact population decline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2832-157X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2832-157X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aehr.12281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>contact‐era ; Demography ; depopulation ; Historical demography ; Industrialized nations ; Islands ; Maoris ; Māori ; Population decline ; Population density ; population size ; pre‐industrial population density ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific economic history review, 2024-03, Vol.64 (1), p.94-112</ispartof><rights>2024 Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-57e0ed805c268fead956988acbbfc4d748574920bb361ef3d423c19842fcd9f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-57e0ed805c268fead956988acbbfc4d748574920bb361ef3d423c19842fcd9f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5039-6715</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faehr.12281$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faehr.12281$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chapple, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>Is a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 too low? Evidence from population density analogues</title><title>Asia-Pacific economic history review</title><description>This research considers the current New Zealand conventional wisdom of a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 circa‐1770 using a variety of population density analogues. The first set of analogues examines estimated population densities of six districts in early‐contact period New Zealand for which reasonable population estimates can be constructed using methods of historical demography. The second set examines estimated population densities of pre‐industrial societies on large, relatively isolated temperate islands outside of New Zealand. The density research indicates that a contact‐era Māori population in excess of 200,000 is a distinct possibility. Based on this density analysis the current conventional wisdom's figure of 100,000 appears to be—considerably—on the low side, and suggesting considerable catastrophic early post‐contact population decline.</description><subject>contact‐era</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>depopulation</subject><subject>Historical demography</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Maoris</subject><subject>Māori</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>pre‐industrial population density</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>2832-157X</issn><issn>2832-157X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MoWGovPkHAm7g1H_uRnKSUagsVQRS8hWw20S3bzZpsW3rTN_ChfBKfxNQV7Mm5zDDzm_8MfwBOMRriEJdSv7ghJoThA9AjjJIIJ9nT4V59DAbeLxBChDPOEO0BNfNQwtvPd-tKqGzdStV-vX1oJ2Fjm1Ul29LW0BqIEboIi7C1FlZ2cwUn67LQtdLQOLvch0PXl-0WylpW9nml_Qk4MrLyevCb--DxevIwnkbzu5vZeDSPFOUYR0mmkS4YShRJmdGy4EnKGZMqz42KiyxmSRZzgvKcplgbWsSEKsxZTIwquElpH5x1uo2zr-FuKxZ25cIXXlCMOIoZT3mgzjtKOeu900Y0rlxKtxUYiZ2PYuej-PExwLCDdfCm9H8o4zjME04DgjtkU1Z6-4-YGE2m953sN2EIgCY</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Chapple, Simon</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-6715</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Is a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 too low? Evidence from population density analogues</title><author>Chapple, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-57e0ed805c268fead956988acbbfc4d748574920bb361ef3d423c19842fcd9f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>contact‐era</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>depopulation</topic><topic>Historical demography</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Maoris</topic><topic>Māori</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>pre‐industrial population density</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chapple, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific economic history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chapple, Simon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 too low? Evidence from population density analogues</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific economic history review</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>94-112</pages><issn>2832-157X</issn><eissn>2832-157X</eissn><abstract>This research considers the current New Zealand conventional wisdom of a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 circa‐1770 using a variety of population density analogues. The first set of analogues examines estimated population densities of six districts in early‐contact period New Zealand for which reasonable population estimates can be constructed using methods of historical demography. The second set examines estimated population densities of pre‐industrial societies on large, relatively isolated temperate islands outside of New Zealand. The density research indicates that a contact‐era Māori population in excess of 200,000 is a distinct possibility. Based on this density analysis the current conventional wisdom's figure of 100,000 appears to be—considerably—on the low side, and suggesting considerable catastrophic early post‐contact population decline.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aehr.12281</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-6715</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2832-157X |
ispartof | Asia-Pacific economic history review, 2024-03, Vol.64 (1), p.94-112 |
issn | 2832-157X 2832-157X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3109048969 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | contact‐era Demography depopulation Historical demography Industrialized nations Islands Maoris Māori Population decline Population density population size pre‐industrial population density Wisdom |
title | Is a Māori contact‐era population of 100,000 too low? Evidence from population density analogues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A13%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20a%20M%C4%81ori%20contact%E2%80%90era%20population%20of%20100,000%20too%20low?%20Evidence%20from%20population%20density%20analogues&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20economic%20history%20review&rft.au=Chapple,%20Simon&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=94-112&rft.issn=2832-157X&rft.eissn=2832-157X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aehr.12281&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3109048969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109048969&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |