Education Reform in Post-Coup Myanmar: Federalizing or Federating?
Since Myanmar transitioned from direct military rule in 2011, successive governments have attempted to decentralize the primary and higher education systems through top-down "federalizing" initiatives. However, these efforts have largely failed. However, following the February 2021 militar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary Southeast Asia 2024-08, Vol.46 (2), p.318-341 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 341 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 318 |
container_title | Contemporary Southeast Asia |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | South, Ashley Stenning, Emily Schroeder, Tim |
description | Since Myanmar transitioned from direct military rule in 2011, successive governments have attempted to decentralize the primary and higher education systems through top-down "federalizing" initiatives. However, these efforts have largely failed. However, following the February 2021 military coup, the absence of a credible central education authority has led ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and non-state actors, including local communities, to provide education to up to one million of the most vulnerable and conflict-affected children. This represents a new "federating" moment for education in Myanmar, where capacity and alliances are built from the bottom up and which could potentially endure after the ongoing conflict ends. This article explores Myanmar's complex and contested education system since the coup, analysing the difference between "federalizing" and "federating" approaches. It compares the preand post-coup approaches to illustrate the importance of an adaptive, bottom-up approach based on local ownership and resilience. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1355/cs46-2f |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_proje</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3107251953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3107251953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p158t-b99f56dd41cbda351f5727d5dd6895ba91c0a467a0c6c5437a996e6b2f0f6b153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4FwZcR_O6yVw3oqVVoaL4gO5KJg-Z0k7qZGahv94piq4OBz7OgY-QU87OuQS4cFlpKuIeGXGDkopSLfbJiHGB1KBZHJKjnFeMMV0yNiI3U98729WpKZ5DTO2mqJviKeWOTlK_LR4-bbOx7WUxCz60dl1_1c17kdrf3g3t6pgcRLvO4eQ3x-RtNn2d3NH54-395HpOtxzKjlaIEbT3irvKWwk8ghHGg_e6RKgscses0sYypx0oaSyiDroSkUVdcZBjcvazu23TRx9yt1ylvm2Gy6XkzAjgCHKg1B-1Cq7b9Dn8gyi1QVy-7NTszAglBhVQym8O61q_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3107251953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Education Reform in Post-Coup Myanmar: Federalizing or Federating?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>South, Ashley ; Stenning, Emily ; Schroeder, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>South, Ashley ; Stenning, Emily ; Schroeder, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Since Myanmar transitioned from direct military rule in 2011, successive governments have attempted to decentralize the primary and higher education systems through top-down "federalizing" initiatives. However, these efforts have largely failed. However, following the February 2021 military coup, the absence of a credible central education authority has led ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and non-state actors, including local communities, to provide education to up to one million of the most vulnerable and conflict-affected children. This represents a new "federating" moment for education in Myanmar, where capacity and alliances are built from the bottom up and which could potentially endure after the ongoing conflict ends. This article explores Myanmar's complex and contested education system since the coup, analysing the difference between "federalizing" and "federating" approaches. It compares the preand post-coup approaches to illustrate the importance of an adaptive, bottom-up approach based on local ownership and resilience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0129-797X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1793-284X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1355/cs46-2f</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute</publisher><subject>Community ; Conflict ; Coups d'etat ; Decentralization ; Education reform ; Educational systems ; Higher education ; Military regimes ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Non-state actors ; Ownership ; Resilience ; Students</subject><ispartof>Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2024-08, Vol.46 (2), p.318-341</ispartof><rights>Copyright © ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute</rights><rights>Copyright ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute Aug 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>South, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenning, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Education Reform in Post-Coup Myanmar: Federalizing or Federating?</title><title>Contemporary Southeast Asia</title><description>Since Myanmar transitioned from direct military rule in 2011, successive governments have attempted to decentralize the primary and higher education systems through top-down "federalizing" initiatives. However, these efforts have largely failed. However, following the February 2021 military coup, the absence of a credible central education authority has led ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and non-state actors, including local communities, to provide education to up to one million of the most vulnerable and conflict-affected children. This represents a new "federating" moment for education in Myanmar, where capacity and alliances are built from the bottom up and which could potentially endure after the ongoing conflict ends. This article explores Myanmar's complex and contested education system since the coup, analysing the difference between "federalizing" and "federating" approaches. It compares the preand post-coup approaches to illustrate the importance of an adaptive, bottom-up approach based on local ownership and resilience.</description><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Coups d'etat</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational systems</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Military regimes</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Non-state actors</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0129-797X</issn><issn>1793-284X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4FwZcR_O6yVw3oqVVoaL4gO5KJg-Z0k7qZGahv94piq4OBz7OgY-QU87OuQS4cFlpKuIeGXGDkopSLfbJiHGB1KBZHJKjnFeMMV0yNiI3U98729WpKZ5DTO2mqJviKeWOTlK_LR4-bbOx7WUxCz60dl1_1c17kdrf3g3t6pgcRLvO4eQ3x-RtNn2d3NH54-395HpOtxzKjlaIEbT3irvKWwk8ghHGg_e6RKgscses0sYypx0oaSyiDroSkUVdcZBjcvazu23TRx9yt1ylvm2Gy6XkzAjgCHKg1B-1Cq7b9Dn8gyi1QVy-7NTszAglBhVQym8O61q_</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>South, Ashley</creator><creator>Stenning, Emily</creator><creator>Schroeder, Tim</creator><general>ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute</general><general>ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Education Reform in Post-Coup Myanmar: Federalizing or Federating?</title><author>South, Ashley ; Stenning, Emily ; Schroeder, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p158t-b99f56dd41cbda351f5727d5dd6895ba91c0a467a0c6c5437a996e6b2f0f6b153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Coups d'etat</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational systems</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Military regimes</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Non-state actors</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>South, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenning, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Contemporary Southeast Asia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>South, Ashley</au><au>Stenning, Emily</au><au>Schroeder, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Education Reform in Post-Coup Myanmar: Federalizing or Federating?</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary Southeast Asia</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>318</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>318-341</pages><issn>0129-797X</issn><eissn>1793-284X</eissn><abstract>Since Myanmar transitioned from direct military rule in 2011, successive governments have attempted to decentralize the primary and higher education systems through top-down "federalizing" initiatives. However, these efforts have largely failed. However, following the February 2021 military coup, the absence of a credible central education authority has led ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and non-state actors, including local communities, to provide education to up to one million of the most vulnerable and conflict-affected children. This represents a new "federating" moment for education in Myanmar, where capacity and alliances are built from the bottom up and which could potentially endure after the ongoing conflict ends. This article explores Myanmar's complex and contested education system since the coup, analysing the difference between "federalizing" and "federating" approaches. It compares the preand post-coup approaches to illustrate the importance of an adaptive, bottom-up approach based on local ownership and resilience.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute</pub><doi>10.1355/cs46-2f</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0129-797X |
ispartof | Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2024-08, Vol.46 (2), p.318-341 |
issn | 0129-797X 1793-284X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3107251953 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Community Conflict Coups d'etat Decentralization Education reform Educational systems Higher education Military regimes Minority & ethnic groups Non-state actors Ownership Resilience Students |
title | Education Reform in Post-Coup Myanmar: Federalizing or Federating? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_proje&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Education%20Reform%20in%20Post-Coup%20Myanmar:%20Federalizing%20or%20Federating?&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20Southeast%20Asia&rft.au=South,%20Ashley&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=318-341&rft.issn=0129-797X&rft.eissn=1793-284X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1355/cs46-2f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_proje%3E3107251953%3C/proquest_proje%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3107251953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |